A conceptual framework for scaffolding III-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions

Educational Technology Research and Development

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 5-22

  Ge, Xun ^a   Land, Susan M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3943057484     PISSN: 10421629     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/bf02504836     Document Type: Review

References (70)

1. Bell, P., & Linn, M. C. (2000). Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: Designing for learning for the Web with KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 797-817.
2. Brabeck, M. M., & Wood, P. K. (1990). Cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence for differences between well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving abilities. In M. L. Commons, C. Armon, L. Kohlberg, F. A., Richards, T. A., Grotzer, & J. D. Sinnott (Eds.), Adult development: Vol. 2. Models and methods in the study of adolescent and adult thought (pp. 133-146). New York: Praeger.
3. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
4. Bransford, J. D., & Stein, B. S. (1993). The IDEAL problem solver: A guide for improving thinking, learning, and creativity (2nd ed.). New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
5. Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F.E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65-115). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229-270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Brown, A. L., & Palincsar, A. S. (1989). Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 393-451). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Cerbin, B. (1988). The nature and development of informal reasoning skills in college students. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 298805)
9. Chi, M., Bassok, M., Lewis, M., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145-182.
10. Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognition Science, 5, 121-152.
11. Chi, M. T. H., & Glaser, R. (1985). Problem solving ability. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Human abilities: An information processing approach (pp. 227-250). New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
12. Chi, M. T. H., Leeuw, N. D., Chiu, M., & Lavancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 15, 439-477.
13. Cooper, M. A. (1999). Classroom choices from a cognitive perspective on peer learning. In A.M. O'Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 215-233). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Davis, E. A., & Linn, M. (2000). Scaffolding students' knowledge integration: Prompts for reflection in KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 819-837.
15. Feltovich, P. J., Spiro, R. J., Coulson, R. L., & Feltovich, J. (1996). Collaboration within and among minds: Mastering complexity, individuality and in groups. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 25-44). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Garner, R., & Alexander, P. A. (1989). Metacognition: Answered and unanswered questions. Educational Psychologist, 24, 143-158.
17. Ge, X., & Land, S. M. (2003). Scaffolding students' problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(1), 21-38.
18. Gick, M. L. (1986). Problem solving strategies. Educational Psychologist, 21(1&2), 99-120.
19. Glaser, R., & Chi, M. T. H. (1988). Overview. In M. T. H. Chi, R. Glaser & M. J. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. xv-xxviii). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Greene, B. A., & Land, S. M. (2000). A qualitative analysis of scaffolding use in a resource-based learning environment involving the World Wide Web. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(2), 151-179.
21. Greeno, J. (1978). Nature of problem-solving abilities. In W. Estes (Ed.), Handbook of learning and cognitive processes: Vol. 5. Human information processing (pp. 239-270). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Hannafin, M., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1999). Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: Vol. 2. A new paradigm of instruc-tional theory (pp. 115-140). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Jacobs, J.E., & Paris, S. G. (1987). Children's metacognition about reading: Issues in definition, measurement, and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 22, 255-278.
24. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1979). Conflict in the classroom: Controversy and learning. Review of Educational Research, 49, 51-70.
25. Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (4th ed.). Boston, Allyn & Bacon.
26. Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65-94.
27. Jonassen, D. H., Beissner, K., & Yacci, M. (1993). Structural knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28. King, A. (1989). Verbal interaction and problem solving within computer-assisted cooperative learning group. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 5(1), 1-15.
29. King, A. (1991). Effects of training in strategic questioning on children's problem-solving performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 307-317.
30. King, A. (1992). Facilitating elaborative learning through guided student-generated questioning. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 111-126.
31. King, A. (1994). Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: Effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain. American Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 338-368.
32. King, A. (1999). Discourse patterns for mediating peer learning. In A. M. O'Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspective on peer learning (pp. 87-115). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33. King, A., & Rosenshine, B. (1993). Effect of guided cooperative questioning on children's knowledge construction. Journal of Experimental Education, 61(2), 127-148.
34. Kitchener, K. S. (1983). Cognition, metacognition, and epistemistic cognition: A three-level model of cognitive processing. Human Development, 26, 222-232.
35. Kitchener, K. S., & King, P. M. (1981). Reflective judgment: Concepts of justification and their relationship to age and education. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2, 89-116.
36. Kluwe, R. H., & Friedrichsen, G. (1985). Mechanism of control and regulation in problem solving. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 183-218). New York: Springer-Verlag.
37. Lajoie, S. P. (Ed.). (2000). Computers as cognitive tools: No more walls (Vol. 2). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
38. Lajoie, S. P., & Deny, S. J. (Eds.). (1993). Computers as cognitive tools. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
39. Land, S. M. (2000). Cognitive requirements for learn-ing with open-ended learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48 (3), 61-78.
40. Land, S. M., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2003). Scaffolding reflection and articulation of scientific explanations in a data-rich, project-based learning environment: An investigation of Progress Portfolio. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51 (4), 65-84.
41. Lin, X. (2001). Designing metacognitive activities. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(2), 25-40.
42. Lin, X., & Lehman, J. D. (1999). Supporting learning of variable control in a computer-based biology environment: Effects of prompting college students to reflect on their own thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(7), 837-858.
43. Lin, X., Hmelo, C., Kinzer, C. K., & Secules, T. J. (1999). Designing technology to support reflection. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(3), 43-62.
44. Mayer, R. E. (1991). Thinking, problem solving, cognition. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
45. Noddings, N. (1985). Small groups as a setting for research on mathematical problem solving. In E. A. Silver (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematkal problem solving (pp. 345-359). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
46. O'Donnell, A. M. (1999). Structuring dyadic interaction through scripted cooperation. In A. M. O'Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspective on peer learning (pp. 179-196). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
47. Palincsar, A. S. (1986). The role of dialogue in providing scaffolded instruction. Educational Psychologist, 21(1 & 2), 73-98.
48. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 117-175.
49. Pressley, M., & McCormick, C. B. (1987). Advanced educational psychology for educators, researchers, and policy makers. New York: HarperCollins.
50. Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1992). The use of scaffolds for teaching higher-level cognitive strategies. Educational Leadership, 4, 26-33.
51. Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 181-221.
52. Salomon, G., & Globerson, T. (1989). When teams do not function the way they ought to. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 89-99.
53. Salomon, G., Globerson, T., & Guterman, E. (1989). The computer as a zone of proximal development: Internalizing reading-related metacognitions from a reading partner. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81 (4), 620-627.
54. Saye, J. W., & Brush, T. (2002). Scaffolding critical reasoning about history and social issues in multimedia-supported learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 77-96.
55. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1985). Fostering the development of self-regulation in children's knowledge processing. In S. F. Chipman, J. W. Segal, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills: Research and open questions (Vol. 2), pp. 563-577). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
56. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., & Steinbach, R. (1984). Teachability of reflective processes in written composition. Cognitive Science, 8(2), 173-190.
57. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., McLean, R. S., Swallow, J., & Woodruff, E. (1989). Computer-supported intentional learning environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5(1), 51-68.
58. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem-solving. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
59. Simon, H. A. (1978). Information-processing theory of human problem solving. In W. Estes (Ed.), Handbook of learning and cognitive processes: Vol. 5. Human information processing (pp. 271-295). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
60. Sinnott, J. D. (1989). A model for solution of ill-structured problems: Implications for everyday and abstract problem solving. In J. D. Sinnott (Ed.), Everyday problem solving: Theory and application (pp. 72-99). New York: Praeger.
61. Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
62. Voss, J. F. (1988). Problem solving and reasoning in illstructured domains. In C. Antaki (Ed.), Analyzing everyday explanation: A casebook of methods (pp. 74-93). London: Sage.
63. Voss, J. F., & Post, T. A. (1988). On the solving of ill-structured problems. In M. H. Chi, R. Glaser, & M. J. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. 261-285). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
64. Voss, J. F., Wolfe, C. R., Lawrence, J. A., & Engle, R. A. (1991). From representation to decision: An analysis of problem solving in international relations. In R. J. Sternberg & P. A. Frensch (Eds.), Complex problem solving: Principles and mechanisms. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
65. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
66. Webb, N. M. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 21-39.
67. Webb, N. M. (1991). Task related verbal interactions and mathematics learning in small groups. Journal for Research in Mathematic Education, 22, 366-389.
68. Webb, N. M., & Palincsar, A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 841-873). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
69. Webb, N. M., Troper, J. D., & Fall, R. (1995), Constructive activity and learning in small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(3), 406-423.
70. Wineburg, S. S. (1998). Reading Abraham Lincoln: An expert-expert study in the interpretation of historical texts. Cognitive Science, 22, 319-346.