Effects of the Drewlite CSCL platform on students' learning outcomes

Collaborative and Distributed E-Research: Innovations in Technologies, Strategies and Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 276-289

  Noroozi, Omid ^a   Biemans, Harm J A ^a   Maria, C ^a   Mulder, Martin ^a   Popov, Vitaliy ^a   Chizari, Mohammad ^b  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b TARBIAT MODARES UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870064711     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-0125-3.ch013     Document Type: Chapter

References (47)

1. Andriessen, J., Baker, M., & Suthers, D. (2003). Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
2. Baltes, B. B., Dickson, M.W., Sherman, M. P., Bauer, C. C., & LaGanke, J. (2002). Computer-mediated communication and group decision making: A metaanalysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87(1), 156-179. doi:10.1006/obhd.2001.2961
3. Beers, P. J., Kirschner, P. A., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2007). ICT-support for grounding in the classroom. Instructional Science, 35(4), 535-556. doi:10.1007/s11251-007-9018-5
4. Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy. New York, NY: Academic Press.
5. Busstra, M. C., Geelen, A., Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J. A., De Vries, J. H. M., & van 't Veer, P. (2010). Timing of information presentation in interactive digital learning material affects student's learning outcomes and appreciation of the material: a pilot study in the domain of nutritional research education. In Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2010, (pp. 3091-3100). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
6. Clark, D. B., D'Angelo, C. M., &Menekse, M. (2009). Initial structuring of online discussions to improve learning and argumentation: Incorporating students'own explanations as seed comments versus an augmented-preset approach to seeding discussions. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(4), 321-333. doi:10.1007/s10956-009-9159-1
7. Clark, D. B., Sampson, V., Weinberger, A., & Erkens, G. (2007). Analytic frameworks for assessing dialogic argumentation in online learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 343-374. doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9050-7
8. Coffin, C., & O'Halloran, A. K. (2009). Argument reconceived. Educational Review, 61(3), 301-313. doi:10.1080/00131910903045948
9. Corbel, A., Jaillon, P., Serpaggi, X., Baker, M., Quignard, M., Lund, K., & Séjourné, A. (2002). DREW: Un outil internet pour créer situations d'appretissage coopérant. (DREW: An internet tool for creating cooperative learning situations) In Desmoulins, C., Marquet, P., & Bouhineau, D. (Eds.), EIAH2003 Environnements Informatique pour l'Apprentissage Humains (pp. 109-113). Paris, France: INRP.
10. De Jong, F. P. C. M., Veldhuis-Diermanse, A. E., & Lutgens, G. (2002). Computer-supported learning in university and vocational education. In Koschman, T., Hall, R., & Miyake, N. (Eds.), CSCL 2: Carrying Forward the Conversation (pp. 111-128). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Doerry, E. (1996). An empirical comparison of co-present and technologically-mediated interaction based on communicative breakdown. PhD Dissertation. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon.
12. Engelmann, T., Dehler, J., Bodemer, D., & Buder, J. (2009). Knowledge awareness in CSCL: A psychological perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(4), 949-960. doi:10.1016/j. chb.2009.04.004
13. Ertl, B., Kopp, B., & Mandl, H. (2008). Supporting learning using external representations. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1599-1608. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.03.001
14. Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Knowledge convergence in computer-supported collaborative learning: The role of external representation tools. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(3), 405-441. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1403_3
15. Jacobson, M. J., & Wilensky, U. (2006). Complex systems in education: Scientific and educational importance and implications for the learning sciences. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 11-34. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1501_4
16. Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kanselaar, G., & Jaspers, J. (2007). Visualization of participation: Does it contribute to successful computersupported collaborative learning? Computers & Education, 49(4), 1037-1065. doi:10.1016/j. compedu.2006.01.004
17. Joiner, R., & Jones, S. (2003). The effects of communication medium on argumentation and the development of critical thinking. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(8), 861-971. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2004.11.008
18. Kanselaar, G., De Jong, T., Andriessen, J., & Goodyear, P. (2000). New technologies. In P. J. R. Simons., J. L. Van der Linden., & T. Duffy (Eds.), New Learning, (pp. 55-82). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
19. Kiesler, S. (1986). The hidden messages in computer networks. Harvard Business Review, 64(1), 46-60.
20. Kirschner, P. A., Beers, P. J., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2008). Coercing shared knowledge in collaborative learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(2), 403-420. doi:10.1016/j. chb.2007.01.028
21. Kirschner, P. A., Buckingham-Shum, S. J., & Carr, C. S. (Eds.). (2003). Visualizing argumentation: Software tools for collaborative and educational sense making. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
22. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(3), 335-353. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00057-2
23. Munneke, L., Andriessen, J., Kanselaar, G., & Kirschner, P. (2007). Supporting interactive argumentation: Influence of representational tools on discussing a wicked problem. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1072-1088. doi:10.1016/j. chb.2006.10.003
24. Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J. A., Busstra, M. C., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2011). Differences in learning processes between successful and less successful students in computer-supported collaborative learning in the field of human nutrition and health. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 309-318. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.08.009
25. Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J. A., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2010a). Analyzing learning processes and outcomes in computer-supported collaborative learning in the domain of nutritional research methodology education. In J. Baralt, N. Callaos, W. Lesso, A. Tremante, & F. Welsch (Eds.). Proceedings of the International Conference on Society and Information Technologies, (pp. 55-60). Orlando, FL: IEEE.
26. Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J. A., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2010b). Students'knowledge construction in computer-supported learning environments: A comparative study in the domain of nutritional research methodology education. In D. Gibson & B, Dodge (Eds.). SITE Book of Abstracts: 21st International Conference on Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, (p. 83). San Diego, CA: ACM.
27. Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J.A., Weinberger, A., Mulder, M., Popov, V., & Chizari, M. (2011). Supporting computer-supported argumentative knowledge construction in multidisciplinary groups of learners. In L. Gómez Chova, D. Martí Belenguer, & A. López Martínez (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, (pp. 1937-1945). Barcelona, Spain: ACM.
28. Noroozi, O., Busstra, M. C., Mulder, M., Biemans, H. J. A., Geelen, M. M. E. E., van't Veer, P. & Chizari, M. (in press). Online discussion compensates for suboptimal timing of supportive information presentation in a digitally supported learning environment. Educational Technology Research & Development. doi:10.1007/s11423\011-9217-2.
29. Noroozi, O., Mulder, M., Biemans, H. J. A., & Chizari, M. (2009). Factors influencing argumentative computer supported collaborative learning (ACSCL). In F. Salajan (Ed.), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on E-Learning, (pp. 394-403). Toronto, Canada: ACM.
30. Noroozi, O., Weinberger., Biemans, H. J. A., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (in press). Argumentationbased computer supported collaborative learning (ABCSCL). A systematic review and synthesis of fifteen years of research. Educational Research Review. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2011.11.006.
31. O'Conaill, B., & Whittaker, S. (1997). Characterizing, predicting, and measuring video-mediated communication: A conversational approach. In Finn, K. E., Sellen, A. J., & Wilbur, S. B. (Eds.), Video-Mediated Communication (pp. 107-132). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
32. Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (1997). Research on computer-supported cooperative work. In Helander, M., Landauer, T. K., & Prabhu, P. (Eds.), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction (2nd ed.). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
33. Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2005). Learning to collaborate: An instructional approach to promoting collaborative problem solving in computer-mediated settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 201-241. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1402_2
34. Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2006). Fostering knowledge construction in university students through asynchronous discussion groups. Computers & Education, 46(4), 349-370. doi:10.1016/j. compedu.2004.07.010
35. Slof, B., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., Jaspers, J. G. M., & Janssen, J. (2010). Guiding students' online complex learning-task behavior through representational scripting. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 927-939. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.02.007
36. Stacey, E., & Gerbic, P. (2003). Investigating the impact of computer conferencing: Content analysis as a manageable research tool. In G. Crisp., D. Thiele., I. Scholten., S. Barker., & J. Baron (Eds.), Interact, Integrate, Impact: Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. ASCLTE Press.
37. Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2007). Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(4), 421-447. doi:10.1007/s11412-007-9028-y
38. Suthers, D. D., & Hundhausen, C. D. (2003). An experimental study of the effects of representational guidance on collaborative learning processes. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 183-219. doi:10.1207/S15327809JLS1202_2
39. Van Amelsvoort, M. (2006). A space for debate: How diagrams support collaborative argumentation based learning. Dissertation. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Utrecht University.
40. Veerman, A. L. (2000). Computer supported collaborative learning through argumentation. PhD Dissertation. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Utrecht University.
41. Veldhuis-Diermanse, A. E. (2002). CSCLearning? Participation, learning activities and knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning in higher education. PhD dissertation. Wageningen, The Netherlands:Wageningen University.
42. Veldhuis-Diermanse, A. E., Biemans, H., Mulder, M., & Mahdizadeh, H. (2006). Analysing learning processes and quality of knowledge construction in networked learning. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 12(1), 41-58. doi:10.1080/13892240600740894
43. Walther, J. B. (1994). Anticipated ongoing interaction versus channel effects on relational communication in computer mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 20(4), 473-501. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1994.tb00332.x
44. Weinberger, A. (2003). Scripts for computer supported collaborative learning effects of social and epistemic cooperation scripts on collaborative knowledge construction. PhD Dissertation. München, Germany: München University.
45. Weinberger, A., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Epistemic and social scripts in computersupported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 33(1), 1-30. doi:10.1007/s11251-004-2322-4
46. Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2006). A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 46(1), 71-95. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.003
47. Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2007). Scripting argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported learning environments. In F. Fischer., H. Mandl., J. Haake., & I. Kollar (Eds.), Scripting Computer-Supported Communication of Knowledge - Cognitive, Computational and Educational Perspectives, (pp. 191-211). New York, NY: Springer.