Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse

Discourse Studies

Volumn 1, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 479-497

  Van Eemeren, Frans H ^a   Houtlosser, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Argumentation (theory); Dialectic; Discourse analysis; Rhetoric; Strategy

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037797168     PISSN: 14614456     EISSN: 14617080     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1461445699001004005     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Agricola, Rudolph (1479/1992) De inventione dialectica libri tres: Drei Buecher über die Inventio dialectica, translated and edited by Lothar Mundt. Tuebingen: Niemeyer.
2. Anscombre, J.C. (1994) 'La nature des topoï', in J. C. Anscombre (ed.) La théorie des topoï, pp. 49-84. Paris: Editions Kimé.
3. Anscombre, J.C. and Ducrot, O. (1983) L'Argumentation dans la langue. Liege: Mardaga.
4. Barth, E.M. and Krabbe, E.C.W. (1982) From Axiom to Dialogue: A Philosophical Study of Logics and Argumentation. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
5. Benoit, W.L. and Lindsey, J.J. (1987) Argument Strategies: Antidote to Tylenol's Poisoned Image, Journal of the American Forensic Association23: 136-146.
6. Cicero (1949) De oratore, translated by E. W. Sutton and H. Rackham [Loeb Classical Library]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7. Gaonkar, D.P. (1990) Rhetoric and its Double: Reflections on the Rhetorical Turn in the Human Sciences, in H. W. Simons (ed.) The Rhetorical Turn: Invention and Persuasion in the Conduct of Inquiry, pp. 341-366. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
8. Hamblin, Ch.L. (1970) Fallacies. London: Methuen.
9. Kennedy, G.A. (1994) A New History of Classical Rhetoric. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10. Kienpointner, M. (1995) Rhetoric, in J. Verschueren, J.-O. Östman and J. Blommaert (eds) Handbook of Pragmatics: Manual, pp. 453-461. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
11. Mack, P. (1993) Renaissance Argument: Valla and Agricola in the Traditions of Rhetoric and Dialectic. Leiden: Brill.
12. Meerhoff, C.G. (1988) 'Agricola et Ramus: dialectique et rhétorique', in F. Akkerman and A. J. Vanderjagt (eds) Rodolphus Agricola Phrisius 1444-1485, pp. 270-280. Leiden: Brill.
13. Murphy, J.J. and Katula, R.A., eds (1994) A Synoptic History of Classical Rhetoric. Davis, CA: Hermagoras Press [Originally published 1972].
14. Natanson, M. (1955) The Limits of Rhetoric, Quarterly Journal of Speech41: 133-139.
15. Perelman, Ch. and Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969) The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation [Translation of La nouvelle rhétorique: traité de l'argumentation, 1958]. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
16. Reboul, O. (1991) Introduction à la rhétorique. Théorie et pratique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
17. Schiappa, E. (1991) Sophistic Rhetoric: Oasis or Mirage?, Rhetoric Review10: 5-18 [reprinted in E. Schiappa (ed.) Landmark Essays on Classical Greek Rhetoric, pp. 67-80. Davis, CA: Hermagoras Press].
18. Simons, H.W. (1990) The Rhetoric of Inquiry as an Intellectual Movement, in H. W. Simons (ed.) The Rhetorical Turn: Invention and Persuasion in the Conduct of Inquiry. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19. Toulmin, S. (1997) A Dissenter's Life, Thomas Jefferson Lecture, Washington, DC, 24 March.
20. Van Eemeren, F.H. and Grootendorst, R. (1984) Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions: A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion. Dordrecht: Foris/Mouton de Gruyter.
21. Van Eemeren, F.H. and Grootendorst, R. (1992) Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22. Van Eemeren, F.H. and Houtlosser, P. (1997) Rhetorical Rationales for Dialectical Moves, in J. Klumpp (ed.) Proceedings of the Tenth NCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation, pp. 51-56Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
23. Van Eemeren, F.H., Grootendorst, R., Jackson, S. and Jacobs, S. (1993) Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse. London: University of Alabama Press.
24. Van Eemeren, F.H., Grootendorst, R., Jackson, S. and Jacobs, S. (1997a) Argumentation, in: T. A. van Dijk (ed.) Discourse as Structure and Process. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, Vol. I, (pp. 208-229). London: Sage.
25. Van Eemeren, F.H., Grootendorst, R., Meuffels, B. and Verburg, M. (1997b) Hoe redelijk vindt men ad hominem-drogredenen? [The (un)reasonableness of ad hominem fallacies], in H. van den Bergh, D. Janssen, N. Bertens and M. Damen (eds) Taalgebruik ontrafeld, pp. 41-53. Dordrecht: Foris.
26. Van Eemeren, F.H., Grootendorst, R., Snoeck Henkemans, A.F., Blair, J.A., Johnson, R.H., Krabbe, E.C.W., Plantin, Ch., Walton, D.N., Willard, C.A., Woods, J. and Zarefsky, D. (1996) Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27. Ware, B.L. and Linkugel, W.A. (1973) They Spoke in Defense of Themselves: On the Generic Criticism of Apologia, Quarterly Journal of Speech59: 273-283.
28. Weaver, R. (1953) The Phaedrus and the Nature of Rhetoric, in The Ethics of Rhetoric, pp. 3-26. Chicago, IL: Henry Regnery.
29. Wenzel, J.W. (1990) Three Perspectives on Argument: Rhetoric, Dialectic, Logic, in R. Trapp and J. Schuetz (eds) Perspectives on Argumentation: Essays in the Honor of Wayne Brockriede, pp. 9-26. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
30. Woods, J. and Walton, D.N. (1989) Fallacies: Selected Papers, 1972-1982. Dordrecht: Foris/Mouton de Gruyter.