Researching argumentation in educational contexts: New directions, new methods

International Journal of Research and Method in Education

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 219-227

  Coffin, Caroline ^a   O'Halloran, Kieran ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 54049090407     PISSN: 1743727X     EISSN: 17437288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17437270802416582     Document Type: Editorial

References (20)

1. Andrews, R. (2005) Models of argumentation in educational discourse. Text, 25:1, pp. 107-127.
2. Andriessen, J., Baker, M. J. and Suthers, D. (2003) Argumentation, computer support, and the educational context of confronting cognitions. Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments, pp. 1-25. Kluwer, Dordrecht
3. Billig, M. (1987) Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
4. Coffin, C., Hewings, A. and North, S. (2007) Argumentation and text-based conferencing: What can language data and corpus methods illuminate?. Invited contribution to the panel on Corpus Work on Argumentation, 10th International Pragmatics Conference University of Gothenburg, Sweden
5. (1999) Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches, Pergamon, Amsterdam
6. Felton, D. and Kuhn, D. (2001) The development of argumentative discourse skill. Discourse Processes, 32:2, pp. 135-153.
7. Fulkerson, R. (1996) The Toulmin model of argument. Argument revisited; argument refined; negotiating meaning in the composition classroom, pp. 45-72. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
8. Hewings, A., Coffin, C. and North, S. E-conferencing: Corpus and discourse insights. Academic writing: At the interface of corpus and discourse Continuum, London
9. Kelly, G. J., Druker, S. and Chen, C. (1998) Students' reasoning about electricity. Combining performance assessments with argumentation analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 20:7, pp. 849-871.
10. Kuhn, D. (1991) The skills of argument, Cambridge University Press, New York
11. Littleton, K., Faulkner, D., Miell, D., Joiner, R. and Hakkinen, P. (2000) Special issue: Learning to collaborate, collaborating to learn. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15:4, pp. 309-420.
12. McAlister, S., Ravenscroft, A. and Scanlon, E. (2004) Combining interaction and context design to support collaborative argumentation using a tool for synchronous CMC. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20:3, pp. 194-204.
13. O'Halloran, K. A. (2003) Critical discourse analysis and language cognition, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh
14. O'Halloran, K. A. (2007) Corpus linguistics and argumentation. Invited contribution to the panel on Corpus Work on Argumentation, 10th International Pragmatics Conference University of Gothenburg, Sweden
15. O'Halloran, K. A. and Coffin, C. (2004) Checking overinterpretation and underinterpretation. Applying English grammar: Functional and corpus approaches, pp. 275-297. Hodder Arnold, London
16. Terenzini, P. T., Spinger, L., Pascarella, E. T. and Nora, A. (1995) Influences affecting the development of students' critical thinking skills. Research in Higher Education, 36:1, pp. 23-39.
17. Toulmin, S. (1958) The uses of argument, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
18. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978) Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
19. (2003) Designing for change in networked learning environments, Kluwer, London
20. Weinberger, A. and Fischer, F. (2006) A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers and Education, 46:1, pp. 71-95.