Data-analysis strategies for image-based cell profiling

Nature Methods

Volumn 14, Issue 9, 2017, Pages 849-863

  Caicedo, Juan C ^a   Cooper, Sam ^b   Heigwer, Florian ^c   Warchal, Scott ^d   Qiu, Peng ^e   Molnar, Csaba ^f   Vasilevich, Aliaksei S ^g   Barry, Joseph D ^h   Bansal, Harmanjit Singh ⁱ   Kraus, Oren ^j   Wawer, Mathias ^a   Paavolainen, Lassi ^k   Herrmann, Markus D ^l   Rohban, Mohammad ^a   Hung, Jane ^a,m   Hennig, Holger ⁿ   Concannon, John ^o   Smith, Ian ^a   Clemons, Paul A ^a   Singh, Shantanu ^a   Rees, Paul ^a,p   Horvath, Peter ^f,k   Linington, Roger G ^q   Carpenter, Anne E ^a   more..

^a BROAD INSTITUTE OF MIT AND HARVARD   (United States)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER DKFZ   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^e Emory University   (United States)

^f INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

^g MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^h DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

ⁱ TATA INSTITUTE OF FUNDAMENTAL RESEARCH   (India)

^j UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^k UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^l UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^m Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge   (United States)

ⁿ UNIVERSITY OF ROSTOCK   (Germany)

^o NOVARTIS INSTITUTES FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH   (United States)

^p SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^q SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CELL ASSAY; CELL LEVEL; CELL STRUCTURE; DATA ANALYSIS; HUMAN; ILLUMINATION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE BASED CELL PROFILING; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; MACHINE LEARNING; MOLECULAR IMAGING; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCEDURES CONCERNING CELLS; QUALITY CONTROL; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; ANIMAL; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; CELL TRACKING; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; MICROSCOPY; PROCEDURES; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TISSUE MICROARRAY;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; CELL TRACKING; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HIGH-THROUGHPUT SCREENING ASSAYS; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MACHINE LEARNING; MICROSCOPY; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; TISSUE ARRAY ANALYSIS;

EID: 85028727120     PISSN: 15487091     EISSN: 15487105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.4397     Document Type: Article

References (150)

1. Boutros, M., Heigwer, F. & Laufer, C. Microscopy-based high-content screening. Cell 163, 1314-1325 (2015).
2. Mattiazzi Usaj, M. et al. High-content screening for quantitative cell biology. Trends Cell Biol. 26, 598-611 (2016).
3. Fetz, V., Prochnow, H., Brönstrup, M. & Sasse, F. Target identification by image analysis. Nat. Prod. Rep. 33, 655-667 (2016).
4. Pennisi, E. 'Cell painting' highlights responses to drugs and toxins. Science 352, 877-878 (2016).
5. Grys, B.T. et al. Machine learning and computer vision approaches for phenotypic profiling. J. Cell Biol. 216, 65-71 (2017).
6. Feng, Y., Mitchison, T.J., Bender, A., Young, D.W. & Tallarico, J.A. Multi-parameter phenotypic profiling: using cellular effects to characterize small-molecule compounds. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 8, 567-578 (2009).
7. Mader, C.C., Subramanian, A. & Bittker, J. Multidimensional profile based screening: understanding biology through cellular response signatures. in High Throughput Screening Methods: Evolution and Refinement (eds. Bittker, J.A. & Ross, N.T.) 214-238 (RSC Publishing, 2016).
8. Caicedo, J.C., Singh, S. & Carpenter, A.E. Applications in image-based profiling of perturbations. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 39, 134-142 (2016).
9. Bougen-Zhukov, N., Loh, S.Y., Lee, H.K. & Loo, L.-H. Large-scale image-based screening and profiling of cellular phenotypes. Cytometry A 91, 115-125 (2017).
10. Gustafsdottir, S.M. et al. Multiplex cytological profiling assay to measure diverse cellular states. PLoS One 8, e80999 (2013).
11. Bray, M.-A. et al. Cell Painting, a high-content image-based assay for morphological profiling using multiplexed fluorescent dyes. Nat. Protoc. 11, 1757-1774 (2016).
12. Kang, J. et al. Improving drug discovery with high-content phenotypic screens by systematic selection of reporter cell lines. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 70-77 (2016).
13. Neumann, B. et al. Phenotypic profiling of the human genome by time-lapse microscopy reveals cell division genes. Nature 464, 721-727 (2010).
14. Hasson, S.A. & Inglese, J. Innovation in academic chemical screening: filling the gaps in chemical biology. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 17, 329-338 (2013).
15. Smith, K. et al. CIDRE: an illumination-correction method for optical microscopy. Nat. Methods 12, 404-406 (2015).
16. Singh, S., Bray, M.-A., Jones, T.R. & Carpenter, A.E. Pipeline for illumination correction of images for high-throughput microscopy. J. Microsc. 256, 231-236 (2014).
17. Likar, B., Maintz, J.B., Viergever, M.A. & Pernus, F. Retrospective shading correction based on entropy minimization. J. Microsc. 197, 285-295 (2000).
18. Lévesque, M.P. & Lelièvre, , M. Evaluation of the iterative method for image background removal in astronomical images. (TN 2007-344) (DRDC Valcartier, 2008).
19. Babaloukas, G., Tentolouris, N., Liatis, S., Sklavounou, A. & Perrea, D. Evaluation of three methods for retrospective correction of vignetting on medical microscopy images utilizing two open source software tools. J. Microsc. 244, 320-324 (2011).
20. Can, A. et al. Multi-modal imaging of histological tissue sections. in 2008 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro 288-291 (2008).
21. Molnar, C. et al. Accurate morphology preserving segmentation of overlapping cells based on active contours. Sci. Rep. 6, 32412 (2016).
22. Stoeger, T., Battich, N., Herrmann, M.D., Yakimovich, Y. & Pelkmans, L. Computer vision for image-based transcriptomics. Methods 85, 44-53 (2015).
23. Sommer, C., Straehle, C., Köthe, U. & Hamprecht, F.A. Ilastik: interactive learning and segmentation toolkit. in 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro 230-233 (2011).
24. Carpenter, A.E. et al. CellProfiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes. Genome Biol. 7, R100 (2006).
25. Rodenacker, K. & Bengtsson, E. A feature set for cytometry on digitized microscopic images. Anal. Cell. Pathol. 25, 1-36 (2003).
26. Wählby, C. Algorithms for applied digital image cytometry PhD thesis. Uppsala University (2003).
27. Haralick, R.M., Shanmugam, K. & Dinstein, I. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. SMC-3, 610-621 (1973).
28. Turner, M.R. Texture discrimination by Gabor functions. Biol. Cybern. 55, 71-82 (1986).
29. Boland, M.V., Markey, M.K. & Murphy, R.F. Automated recognition of patterns characteristic of subcellular structures in fluorescence microscopy images. Cytometry 33, 366-375 (1998).
30. Coelho, L.P. et al. Determining the subcellular location of new proteins from microscope images using local features. Bioinformatics 29, 2343-2349 (2013).
31. Snijder, B. et al. Population context determines cell-to-cell variability in endocytosis and virus infection. Nature 461, 520-523 (2009).
32. Snijder, B. et al. Single-cell analysis of population context advances RNAi screening at multiple levels. Mol. Syst. Biol. 8, 579 (2012).
33. Sero, J.E. et al. Cell shape and the microenvironment regulate nuclear translocation of NF-κB in breast epithelial and tumor cells. Mol. Syst. Biol. 11, 790 (2015).
34. Singh, S., Carpenter, A.E. & Genovesio, A. Increasing the content of high-content screening: an overview. J. Biomol. Screen. 19, 640-650 (2014).
35. Pau, G., Fuchs, F., Sklyar, O., Boutros, M. & Huber, W. EBImage: an R package for image processing with applications to cellular phenotypes. Bioinformatics 26, 979-981 (2010).
36. Schneider, C.A., Rasband, W.S. & Eliceiri, K.W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671-675 (2012).
37. Groen, F.C., Young, I.T. & Ligthart, G. A comparison of different focus functions for use in autofocus algorithms. Cytometry 6, 81-91 (1985).
38. Haralick, R.M. Statistical and structural approaches to texture. Proc. IEEE 67, 786-804 (1979).
39. Field, D.J. & Brady, N. Visual sensitivity, blur and the sources of variability in the amplitude spectra of natural scenes. Vision Res. 37, 3367-3383 (1997).
40. Bray, M.-A., Fraser, A.N., Hasaka, T.P. & Carpenter, A.E. Workflow and metrics for image quality control in large-scale high-content screens. J. Biomol. Screen. 17, 266-274 (2012).
41. Goode, A. et al. Distributed online anomaly detection in high-content screening. in 2008 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro 249-252 (2008).
42. Lou, X., Fiaschi, L., Koethe, U. & Hamprecht, F.A. Quality classification of microscopic imagery with weakly supervised learning. in Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (eds. Wang, F., Shen, D., Yan, P. & Suzuki, K.) 176-183 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012).
43. Bamnett, V. & Lewis, T. Outliers in statistical data (Wiley, 1994).
44. Malo, N., Hanley, J.A., Cerquozzi, S., Pelletier, J. & Nadon, R. Statistical practice in high-throughput screening data analysis. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 167-175 (2006).
45. Liberali, P., Snijder, B. & Pelkmans, L. Single-cell and multivariate approaches in genetic perturbation screens. Nat. Rev. Genet. 16, 18-32 (2015).
46. Prastawa, M., Bullitt, E., Ho, S. & Gerig, G. A brain tumor segmentation framework based on outlier detection. Med. Image Anal. 8, 275-283 (2004).
47. Hulsman, M. et al. Analysis of high-throughput screening reveals the effect of surface topographies on cellular morphology. Acta Biomater. 15, 29-38 (2015).
48. Rousseeuw, P.J. & Leroy, A.M. Robust Regression and Outlier Detection (Wiley, 2005).
49. Rämö, P., Sacher, R., Snijder, B., Begemann, B. & Pelkmans, L. CellClassifier: supervised learning of cellular phenotypes. Bioinformatics 25, 3028-3030 (2009).
50. Horvath, P., Wild, T., Kutay, U. & Csucs, G. Machine learning improves the precision and robustness of high-content screens: using nonlinear multiparametric methods to analyze screening results. J. Biomol. Screen. 16, 1059-1067 (2011).
51. Dao, D. et al. CellProfiler Analyst: interactive data exploration, analysis and classification of large biological image sets. Bioinformatics 32, 3210-3212 (2016).
52. Liberali, P., Snijder, B. & Pelkmans, L. A hierarchical map of regulatory genetic interactions in membrane trafficking. Cell 157, 1473-1487 (2014).
53. Zhu, Y., Hernandez, L.M., Mueller, P., Dong, Y. & Forman, M.R. Data acquisition and preprocessing in studies on humans: what is not taught in statistics classes? Am. Stat. 67, 235-241 (2013).
54. Mpindi, J.-P. et al. Impact of normalization methods on high-throughput screening data with high hit rates and drug testing with dose-response data. Bioinformatics 31, 3815-3821 (2015).
55. Kluger, Y., Yu, H., Qian, J. & Gerstein, M. Relationship between gene co-expression and probe localization on microarray slides. BMC Genomics 4, 49 (2003).
56. Yu, H. et al. Positional artifacts in microarrays: experimental verification and construction of COP, an automated detection tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, e8 (2007).
57. Makarenkov, V. et al. An efficient method for the detection and elimination of systematic error in high-throughput screening. Bioinformatics 23, 1648-1657 (2007).
58. Homouz, D., Chen, G. & Kudlicki, A.S. Correcting positional correlations in Affymetrix genome chips. Sci. Rep. 5, 9078 (2015).
59. Lundholt, B.K., Scudder, K.M. & Pagliaro, L. A simple technique for reducing edge effect in cell-based assays. J. Biomol. Screen. 8, 566-570 (2003).
60. Brideau, C., Gunter, B., Pikounis, B. & Liaw, A. Improved statistical methods for hit selection in high-throughput screening. J. Biomol. Screen. 8, 634-647 (2003).
61. Reisen, F. et al. Linking phenotypes and modes of action through high-content screen fingerprints. Assay Drug Dev. Technol. 13, 415-427 (2015).
62. Leek, J.T. et al. Tackling the widespread and critical impact of batch effects in high-throughput data. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 733-739 (2010).
63. Bolstad, B.M., Irizarry, R.A., Astrand, M. & Speed, T.P. A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias. Bioinformatics 19, 185-193 (2003).
64. Vaisipour, S. Detecting, correcting, and preventing the batch effects in multi-site data, with a focus on gene expression microarrays. PhD thesis University of Alberta (2014).
65. Stein, C.K. et al. Removing batch effects from purified plasma cell gene expression microarrays with modified ComBat. BMC Bioinformatics 16, 63 (2015).
66. Haney, S.A. Rapid assessment and visualization of normality in high-content and other cell-level data and its impact on the interpretation of experimental results. J. Biomol. Screen. 19, 672-684 (2014).
67. Durbin, B.P., Hardin, J.S., Hawkins, D.M. & Rocke, D.M. A variance-stabilizing transformation for gene-expression microarray data. Bioinformatics 18 (Suppl. 1), S105-S110 (2002).
68. Huber, W., von Heydebreck, A., Sültmann, H., Poustka, A. & Vingron, M. Variance stabilization applied to microarray data calibration and to the quantification of differential expression. Bioinformatics 18 (Suppl. 1), S96-S104 (2002).
69. Laufer, C., Fischer, B., Billmann, M., Huber, W. & Boutros, M. Mapping genetic interactions in human cancer cells with RNAi and multiparametric phenotyping. Nat. Methods 10, 427-431 (2013).
70. Fischer, B. et al. A map of directional genetic interactions in a metazoan cell. eLife 4, e05464 (2015).
71. Birmingham, A. et al. Statistical methods for analysis of high-throughput RNA interference screens. Nat. Methods 6, 569-575 (2009).
72. Woehrmann, M.H. et al. Large-scale cytological profiling for functional analysis of bioactive compounds. Mol. Biosyst. 9, 2604-2617 (2013).
73. Ding, C. & Peng, H. Minimum redundancy feature selection from microarray gene expression data. J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol. 3, 185-205 (2005).
74. Ng, A.Y.J. et al. A cell profiling framework for modeling drug responses from HCS imaging. J. Biomol. Screen. 15, 858-868 (2010).
75. Guyon, I., Weston, J., Barnhill, S. & Vapnik, V. Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines. Mach. Learn. 46, 389-422 (2002).
76. Loo, L.-H., Wu, L.F. & Altschuler, S.J. Image-based multivariate profiling of drug responses from single cells. Nat. Methods 4, 445-453 (2007).
77. Ljosa, V. et al. Comparison of methods for image-based profiling of cellular morphological responses to small-molecule treatment. J. Biomol. Screen. 18, 1321-1329 (2013).
78. Reisen, F., Zhang, X., Gabriel, D. & Selzer, P. Benchmarking of multivariate similarity measures for high-content screening fingerprints in phenotypic drug discovery. J. Biomol. Screen. 18, 1284-1297 (2013).
79. Pincus, Z. & Theriot, J.A. Comparison of quantitative methods for cell-shape analysis. J. Microsc. 227, 140-156 (2007).
80. Young, D.W. et al. Integrating high-content screening and ligand-target prediction to identify mechanism of action. Nat. Chem. Biol. 4, 59-68 (2008).
81. Kümmel, A. et al. Integration of multiple readouts into the Z′ factor for assay quality assessment. J. Biomol. Screen. 15, 95-101 (2010).
82. Adams, C.L. et al. Compound classification using image-based cellular phenotypes. Methods Enzymol. 414, 440-468 (2006).
83. Perlman, Z.E. et al. Multidimensional drug profiling by automated microscopy. Science 306, 1194-1198 (2004).
84. Candia, J. et al. From cellular characteristics to disease diagnosis: uncovering phenotypes with supercells. PLoS Comput. Biol. 9, e1003215 (2013).
85. Altschuler, S.J. & Wu, L.F. Cellular heterogeneity: do differences make a difference? Cell 141, 559-563 (2010).
86. Snijder, B. & Pelkmans, L. Origins of regulated cell-to-cell variability. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12, 119-125 (2011).
87. Bakal, C., Aach, J., Church, G. & Perrimon, N. Quantitative morphological signatures define local signaling networks regulating cell morphology. Science 316, 1753-1756 (2007).
88. Jones, T.R. et al. CellProfiler Analyst: data exploration and analysis software for complex image-based screens. BMC Bioinformatics 9, 482 (2008).
89. Fuchs, F. et al. Clustering phenotype populations by genome-wide RNAi and multiparametric imaging. Mol. Syst. Biol. 6, 370 (2010).
90. Sailem, H., Bousgouni, V., Cooper, S. & Bakal, C. Cross-talk between Rho and Rac GTPases drives deterministic exploration of cellular shape space and morphological heterogeneity. Open Biol. 4, 130132 (2014).
91. Mukherji, M. et al. Genome-wide functional analysis of human cell-cycle regulators. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 14819-14824 (2006).
92. Singh, D.K. et al. Patterns of basal signaling heterogeneity can distinguish cellular populations with different drug sensitivities. Mol. Syst. Biol. 6, 369 (2010).
93. Sailem, H.Z., Cooper, S. & Bakal, C. Visualizing quantitative microscopy data: History and challenges. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 51, 96-101 (2016).
94. Kiger, A.A. et al. A functional genomic analysis of cell morphology using RNA interference. J. Biol. 2, 27 (2003).
95. Yin, Z. et al. Online phenotype discovery in high-content RNAi screens using gap statistics. in Proc. Int. Symposium on Computational Models of Life Sciences Vol. 952 (eds. Pham, T.D. & Zhou, X.), 86-95 (AIP Publishing, 2007).
96. Jones, T.R. et al. Scoring diverse cellular morphologies in image-based screens with iterative feedback and machine learning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 1826-1831 (2009).
97. Volz, H.C. et al. Single-cell phenotyping of human induced pluripotent stem cells by high-throughput imaging. Preprint at http://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2015/09/16/026955/ (2015).
98. Cooper, S., Sadok, A., Bousgouni, V. & Bakal, C. Apolar and polar transitions drive the conversion between amoeboid and mesenchymal shapes in melanoma cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 26, 4163-4170 (2015).
99. Rohban, M.H. et al. Systematic morphological profiling of human gene and allele function via Cell Painting. eLife 6, e24060 (2017).
100. Gordonov, S. et al. Time series modeling of live-cell shape dynamics for image-based phenotypic profiling. Integr. Biol. 8, 73-90 (2016).
101. Caie, P.D. et al. High-content phenotypic profiling of drug response signatures across distinct cancer cells. Mol. Cancer Ther. 9, 1913-1926 (2010).
102. Schulze, C.J. et al. "Function-first" lead discovery: mode of action profiling of natural product libraries using image-based screening. Chem. Biol. 20, 285-295 (2013).
103. Singh, S. et al. Morphological profiles of RNAi-induced gene knockdown are highly reproducible but dominated by seed effects. PLoS One 10, e0131370 (2015).
104. Zhang, X. & Boutros, M. A novel phenotypic dissimilarity method for image-based high-throughput screens. BMC Bioinformatics 14, 336 (2013).
105. Gibbons, F.D. & Roth, F.P. Judging the quality of gene expression-based clustering methods using gene annotation. Genome Res. 12, 1574-1581 (2002).
106. Rendón, E., Abundez, I. & Arizmendi, A. Internal versus external cluster validation indexes. Int. J. Computers Communications 5, 27-34 (2011).
107. Vial, M.-L. et al. A grand challenge. 2. Phenotypic profiling of a natural product library on Parkinson's patient-derived cells. J. Nat. Prod. 79, 1982-1989 (2016).
108. Ljosa, V., Sokolnicki, K.L. & Carpenter, A.E. Annotated high-throughput microscopy image sets for validation. Nat. Methods 9, 637 (2012).
109. Hutz, J.E. et al. The multidimensional perturbation value. J. Biomol. Screen. 18, 367-377 (2013).
110. Rajwa, B. Effect-size measures as descriptors of assay quality in high-content screening: a brief review of some available methodologies. Assay Drug Dev. Technol. 15, 15-29 (2017).
111. Kitami, T. et al. A chemical screen probing the relationship between mitochondrial content and cell size. PLoS One 7, e33755 (2012).
112. Zare, H., Shooshtari, P., Gupta, A. & Brinkman, R.R. Data reduction for spectral clustering to analyze high throughput flow cytometry data. BMC Bioinformatics 11, 403 (2010).
113. Qiu, P. et al. Extracting a cellular hierarchy from high-dimensional cytometry data with SPADE. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 886-891 (2011).
114. Tenenbaum, J.B., de Silva, V. & Langford, J.C. A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Science 290, 2319-2323 (2000).
115. van der Maaten, L. & Hinton, G. Visualizing data using t-SNE. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 9, 2579-2605 (2008).
116. Amir, A.D. et al. viSNE enables visualization of high dimensional single-cell data and reveals phenotypic heterogeneity of leukemia. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 545-552 (2013).
117. Anchang, B. et al. Visualization and cellular hierarchy inference of single-cell data using SPADE. Nat. Protoc. 11, 1264-1279 (2016).
118. Qiu, P., Gentles, A.J. & Plevritis, S.K. Discovering biological progression underlying microarray samples. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7, e1001123 (2011).
119. Bendall, S.C. et al. Single-cell mass cytometry of differential immune and drug responses across a human hematopoietic continuum. Science 332, 687-696 (2011).
120. Haghverdi, L., Buettner, F. & Theis, F.J. Diffusion maps for high-dimensional single-cell analysis of differentiation data. Bioinformatics 31, 2989-2998 (2015).
121. Simm, J. et al. Repurposed high-throughput images enable biological activity prediction for drug discovery. Preprint at http://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2017/03/30/108399/ (2017).
122. Carpenter, A.E., Kamentsky, L. & Eliceiri, K.W. A call for bioimaging software usability. Nat. Methods 9, 666-670 (2012).
123. Ince, D.C., Hatton, L. & Graham-Cumming, J. The case for open computer programs. Nature 482, 485-488 (2012).
124. Collberg, C., Proebsting, T. & Warren, A.M. Repeatability and Benefaction in Computer Systems Research (Technical Report 14-04) (University of Arizona, 2015).
125. Shen, H. Interactive notebooks: sharing the code. Nature 515, 151-152 (2014).
126. Boettiger, C. An introduction to Docker for reproducible research. Oper. Syst. Rev. 49, 71-79 (2015).
127. Beaulieu-Jones, B.K. & Greene, C.S. Reproducibility of computational workflows is automated using continuous analysis. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 342-346 (2017).
128. Williams, E. et al. Image Data Resource: a bioimage data integration and publication platform. Nat. Methods 14, 775-781 (2017).
129. Jupp, S. et al. The cellular microscopy phenotype ontology. J. Biomed. Semantics 7, 28 (2016).
130. Breinig, M., Klein, F.A., Huber, W. & Boutros, M. A chemical-genetic interaction map of small molecules using high-throughput imaging in cancer cells. Mol. Syst. Biol. 11, 846 (2015).
131. Badertscher, L. et al. Genome-wide RNAi Screening identifies protein modules required for 40S subunit synthesis in human cells. Cell Rep. 13, 2879-2891 (2015).
132. Allan, C. et al. OMERO: flexible, model-driven data management for experimental biology. Nat. Methods 9, 245-253 (2012).
133. Bauch, A. et al. openBIS: a flexible framework for managing and analyzing complex data in biology research. BMC Bioinformatics 12, 468 (2011).
134. Rajaram, S., Pavie, B., Wu, L.F. & Altschuler, S.J. PhenoRipper: software for rapidly profiling microscopy images. Nat. Methods 9, 635-637 (2012).
135. Pavie, B. et al. Rapid analysis and exploration of fluorescence microscopy images. J. Vis. Exp. e51280 (2014).
136. Shamir, L. et al. Wndchrm: an open source utility for biological image analysis. Source Code Biol. Med. 3, 13 (2008).
137. Orlov, N. et al. WND-CHARM: multi-purpose image classification using compound image transforms. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 29, 1684-1693 (2008).
138. Uhlmann, V., Singh, S. & Carpenter, A.E. CP-CHARM: segmentation-free image classification made accessible. BMC Bioinformatics 17, 51 (2016).
139. LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y. & Hinton, G. Deep learning. Nature 521, 436-444 (2015).
140. Kraus, O.Z. & Frey, B.J. Computer vision for high content screening. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 51, 102-109 (2016).
141. Van Valen, D.A. et al. Deep learning automates the quantitative analysis of individual cells in live-cell imaging experiments. PLoS Comput. Biol. 12, e1005177 (2016).
142. Eulenberg, P., Koehler, N., Blasi, T., Filby, A. & Carpenter, A.E. Deep learning for imaging flow cytometry: cell cycle analysis of Jurkat cells. Preprint at http://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/10/17/081364/ (2016).
143. Pawlowski, N., Caicedo, J.C., Singh, S., Carpenter, A.E. & Storkey, A. Automating morphological profiling with generic deep convolutional networks. Preprint at http://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/11/02/085118/ (2016).
144. Godinez, W.J., Hossain, I., Lazic, S.E., Davies, J.W. & Zhang, X. A multi-scale convolutional neural network for phenotyping high-content cellular images. Bioinformatics (2017).
145. Kraus, O.Z., Ba, J.L. & Frey, B.J. Classifying and segmenting microscopy images with deep multiple instance learning. Bioinformatics 32, i52-i59 (2016).
146. Kraus, O.Z. et al. Automated analysis of high-content microscopy data with deep learning. Mol. Syst. Biol. 13, 924 (2017).
147. Pärnamaa, T. & Parts, L. Accurate classification of protein subcellular localization from high throughput microscopy images using deep learning. G3 (Bethesda) 7, 1385-1392 (2017).
148. Zamparo, L. & Zhang, Z. Deep autoencoders for dimensionality reduction of high-content screening data. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1501.01348/ (2015).
149. Kandaswamy, C., Silva, L.M., Alexandre, L.A. & Santos, J.M. High-content analysis of breast cancer using single-cell deep transfer learning. J. Biomol. Screen. 21, 252-259 (2016).
150. Eliceiri, K.W. et al. Biological imaging software tools. Nat. Methods 9, 697-710 (2012).