High-Content Screening for Quantitative Cell Biology

Trends in Cell Biology

Volumn 26, Issue 8, 2016, Pages 598-611

  Mattiazzi Usaj, Mojca ^a   Styles, Erin B ^a   Verster, Adrian J ^a   Friesen, Helena ^a   Boone, Charles ^a   Andrews, Brenda J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

automated image analysis; high content screening; high throughput microscopy

Indexed keywords

PROTEOME;

ASSAY; AUTOMATION; BIOASSAY; BIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA AND FUNCTIONS CONCERNING THE ENTIRE ORGANISM; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL POPULATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SCREENING; DATA ANALYSIS; DISEASE MODEL; EXTRACTION; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENE INTERACTION; HIGH CONTENT SCREENING; HIGH THROUGHPUT MICROSCOPY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; MACHINE LEARNING; MICROSCOPY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; ANIMAL; CYTOLOGY; GENETICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; METABOLISM; PROCEDURES;

ANIMALS; CELL BIOLOGY; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; HIGH-THROUGHPUT SCREENING ASSAYS; HUMANS; PROTEOME;

EID: 84964647459     PISSN: 09628924     EISSN: 18793088     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2016.03.008     Document Type: Review

References (91)

1. 1 Giaever, G., et al. Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 418 (2002), 387–391.
2. 2 Kim, D.U., et al. Analysis of a genome-wide set of gene deletions in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nat. Biotechnol. 28 (2010), 617–623.
3. 3 Li, Z., et al. Systematic exploration of essential yeast gene function with temperature-sensitive mutants. Nat. Biotechnol. 29 (2011), 361–367.
4. 4 Winzeler, E.A., et al. Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. Science 285 (1999), 901–906.
5. 5 Falschlehner, C., et al. High-throughput RNAi screening to dissect cellular pathways: a how-to guide. Biotechnol. J. 5 (2010), 368–376.
6. 6 Gilbert, L.A., et al. Genome-scale CRISPR-mediated control of gene repression and activation. Cell 159 (2014), 647–661.
7. 7 Zanella, F., et al. High content screening: seeing is believing. Trends Biotechnol. 28 (2010), 237–245.
8. 8 Graml, V., et al. A genomic multiprocess survey of machineries that control and link cell shape, microtubule organization, and cell-cycle progression. Dev. Cell 31 (2014), 227–239.
9. 9 Vizeacoumar, F.J., et al. Integrating high-throughput genetic interaction mapping and high-content screening to explore yeast spindle morphogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 188 (2010), 69–81.
10. 10 Neumann, B., et al. Phenotypic profiling of the human genome by time-lapse microscopy reveals cell division genes. Nature 464 (2010), 721–727.
11. 11 Liberali, P., et al. A hierarchical map of regulatory genetic interactions in membrane trafficking. Cell 157 (2014), 1473–1487.
12. 12 Simpson, J.C., et al. Genome-wide RNAi screening identifies human proteins with a regulatory function in the early secretory pathway. Nat. Cell Biol. 14 (2012), 764–774.
13. 13 Lindquist, R.A., et al. Genome-scale RNAi on living-cell microarrays identifies novel regulators of Drosophila melanogaster TORC1-S6K pathway signaling. Genome Res. 21 (2011), 433–446.
14. 14 Eulalio, A., et al. Functional screening identifies miRNAs inducing cardiac regeneration. Nature 492 (2012), 376–381.
15. 15 Chia, N.Y., et al. A genome-wide RNAi screen reveals determinants of human embryonic stem cell identity. Nature 468 (2010), 316–320.
16. 16 Huang, H., et al. High-throughput screening for bioactive molecules using primary cell culture of transgenic zebrafish embryos. Cell Rep. 2 (2012), 695–704.
17. 17 Schulte, J., et al. High-content chemical and RNAi screens for suppressors of neurotoxicity in a Huntington's disease model. PLoS ONE, 6, 2011, e23841.
18. 18 Honarnejad, K., et al. Development and implementation of a high-throughput compound screening assay for targeting disrupted ER calcium homeostasis in Alzheimer's disease. PLoS ONE, 8, 2013, e80645.
19. 19 Almaca, J., et al. High-content siRNA screen reveals global ENaC regulators and potential cystic fibrosis therapy targets. Cell 154 (2013), 1390–1400.
20. 20 Huh, W.K., et al. Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast. Nature 425 (2003), 686–691.
21. 21 Chong, Y.T., et al. Yeast proteome dynamics from single cell imaging and automated analysis. Cell 161 (2015), 1413–1424.
22. 22 Sternberg, S.H., Doudna, J.A., Expanding the biologist's toolkit with CRISPR-Cas9. Mol. Cell 58 (2015), 568–574.
23. 23 Futamura, Y., et al. Morphobase, an encyclopedic cell morphology database, and its use for drug target identification. Chem. Biol. 19 (2012), 1620–1630.
24. 24 Okada, H., et al. Distinct roles of cell wall biogenesis in yeast morphogenesis as revealed by multivariate analysis of high-dimensional morphometric data. Mol. Biol. Cell 25 (2014), 222–233.
25. 25 Laufer, C., et al. Mapping genetic interactions in human cancer cells with RNAi and multiparametric phenotyping. Nat. Methods 10 (2013), 427–431.
26. 26 Fischer, B., et al. A map of directional genetic interactions in a metazoan cell. Elife, 4, 2015, e05464.
27. 27 Wang, Y.L., Computational restoration of fluorescence images: noise reduction, deconvolution, and pattern recognition. Methods Cell Biol. 81 (2007), 435–445.
28. 28 Beucher, S., The watershed transformation applied to image segmentation. Scan. Microsc. Int. 6:Suppl. (1991), 299–314.
29. 29 Otsu, N., Threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern. SMC 9 (1979), 62–66.
30. 30 Abdi, H., Williams, L.J., Principal component analysis. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Comput. Stat. 2 (2010), 433–459.
31. 31 Guyon, I., Elisseeff, A., An introduction to variable and feature selection. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3 (2003), 1157–1182.
32. 32 Zhang, J.H., et al. A simple statistical parameter for use in evaluation and validation of high throughput screening assays. J. Biomol. Screen 4 (1999), 67–73.
33. 33 Singh, S., et al. Increasing the content of high-content screening: an overview. J. Biomol. Screen 19 (2014), 640–650.
34. 34 Cox, D.R., Hinkley, D.V., Theoretical Statistics. 1979, CRC Press.
35. 35 Perlman, Z.E., et al. Multidimensional drug profiling by automated microscopy. Science 306 (2004), 1194–1198.
36. 36 Young, D.W., et al. Integrating high-content screening and ligand-target prediction to identify mechanism of action. Nat. Chem. Biol. 4 (2008), 59–68.
37. 37 Miller, R.G., Simultaneous statistical inference. 2012, Springer.
38. 38 Dunn, O.J., Estimation of the medians for dependent variables. Ann. Math. Stat. 30 (1959), 192–197.
39. 39 Dunn, O.J., Multiple comparisons among means. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 56 (1961), 52–64.
40. 40 Perneger, T.V., What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. Br. Med. J. 316 (1998), 1236–1238.
41. 41 Tarca, A.L., et al. Machine learning and its applications to biology. PLoS Comput. Biol., 3, 2007, e116.
42. 42 Jones, T.R., et al. Scoring diverse cellular morphologies in image-based screens with iterative feedback and machine learning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106 (2009), 1826–1831.
43. 43 Loo, L.H., et al. Image-based multivariate profiling of drug responses from single cells. Nat. Methods 4 (2007), 445–453.
44. 44 Chen, X., Murphy, R.F., Objective clustering of proteins based on subcellular location patterns. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2005 (2005), 87–95.
45. 45 Bakal, C., et al. Quantitative morphological signatures define local signaling networks regulating cell morphology. Science 316 (2007), 1753–1756.
46. 46 Boland, M.V., Murphy, R.F., A neural network classifier capable of recognizing the patterns of all major subcellular structures in fluorescence microscope images of HeLa cells. Bioinformatics 17 (2001), 1213–1223.
47. 47 Slack, M.D., et al. Characterizing heterogeneous cellular responses to perturbations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105 (2008), 19306–19311.
48. 48 Snijder, B., et al. Population context determines cell-to-cell variability in endocytosis and virus infection. Nature 461 (2009), 520–523.
49. 49 Snijder, B., et al. Single-cell analysis of population context advances RNAi screening at multiple levels. Mol. Syst. Biol., 8, 2012, 579.
50. 50 Bushman, F.D., et al. Host cell factors in HIV replication: meta-analysis of genome-wide studies. PLoS Pathog., 5, 2009, e1000437.
51. 51 Lackner, D.H., et al. A generic strategy for CRISPR-Cas9-mediated gene tagging. Nat. Commun., 6, 2015, 10237.
52. 52 Pampaloni, F., et al. The third dimension bridges the gap between cell culture and live tissue. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8 (2007), 839–845.
53. 53 Linkert, M., et al. Metadata matters: access to image data in the real world. J. Cell Biol. 189 (2010), 777–782.
54. 54 Allan, C., et al. OMERO: flexible, model-driven data management for experimental biology. Nat. Methods 9 (2012), 245–253.
55. 55 Brazma, A., et al. Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)-toward standards for microarray data. Nat. Genet. 29 (2001), 365–371.
56. 56 Taylor, C.F., et al. Promoting coherent minimum reporting guidelines for biological and biomedical investigations: the MIBBI project. Nat. Biotechnol. 26 (2008), 889–896.
57. 57 Kettleborough, R.N., et al. A systematic genome-wide analysis of zebrafish protein-coding gene function. Nature 496 (2013), 494–497.
58. 58 Mohr, S.E., et al. Resources for functional genomics studies in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 197 (2014), 1–18.
59. 59 Thompson, O., et al. The million mutation project: a new approach to genetics in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genome Res. 23 (2013), 1749–1762.
60. 60 Durai, S., et al. Zinc finger nucleases: custom-designed molecular scissors for genome engineering of plant and mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 33 (2005), 5978–5990.
61. 61 Miller, J.C., et al. A TALE nuclease architecture for efficient genome editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 29 (2011), 143–148.
62. 62 Shalem, O., et al. High-throughput functional genomics using CRISPR-Cas9. Nat. Rev. Genet. 16 (2015), 299–311.
63. 63 Yang, H., et al. One-step generation of mice carrying reporter and conditional alleles by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering. Cell 154 (2013), 1370–1379.
64. 64 Giepmans, B.N., et al. The fluorescent toolbox for assessing protein location and function. Science 312 (2006), 217–224.
65. 65 Stepanenko, O.V., et al. Modern fluorescent proteins: from chromophore formation to novel intracellular applications. Biotechniques 51 (2011), 313–327.
66. 66 Edelstein, A., et al. Computer control of microscopes using microManager. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol., 2010 Chapter 14, Unit14 20.
67. 67 Pologruto, T.A., et al. ScanImage: flexible software for operating laser scanning microscopes. Biomed. Eng. Online, 2, 2003, 13.
68. 68 Kvilekval, K., et al. Bisque: a platform for bioimage analysis and management. Bioinformatics 26 (2010), 544–552.
69. 69 Bauch, A., et al. openBIS: a flexible framework for managing and analyzing complex data in biology research. BMC Bioinform., 12, 2011, 468.
70. 70 Kankaanpaa, P., et al. BioImageXD: an open, general-purpose and high-throughput image-processing platform. Nat. Methods 9 (2012), 683–689.
71. 71 Abramoff, M.D., et al. Image processing with image. J. Biophotonics Int. 11 (2004), 36–42.
72. 72 Schindelin, J., et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9 (2012), 676–682.
73. 73 Pau, G., et al. EBImage-an R package for image processing with applications to cellular phenotypes. Bioinformatics 26 (2010), 979–981.
74. 74 Held, M., et al. CellCognition: time-resolved phenotype annotation in high-throughput live cell imaging. Nat. Methods 7 (2010), 747–754.
75. 75 Carpenter, A.E., et al. CellProfiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes. Genome Biol., 7, 2006, R100.
76. 76 Jones, T.R., et al. CellProfiler Analyst: data exploration and analysis software for complex image-based screens. BMC Bioinform., 9, 2008, 482.
77. 77 Sommer, C., et al. Ilastik: interactive learning and segmentation toolkit. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, 2011, IEEE, 2011, 230–233.
78. 78 Berthold, M.R., et al. KNIME: The Konstanz Information Miner. Preisach, C., et al. (eds.) In Data Analysis, Machine Learning and Applications, 2008, Springer, 319–326.
79. 79 Demšar, J., et al. Orange: data mining toolbox in python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 14 (2013), 2349–2353.
80. 80 Wolstencroft, K., et al. The Taverna workflow suite: designing and executing workflows of Web Services on the desktop, web or in the cloud. Nucleic Acids Res. 41 (2013), W557–W561.
81. 81 Frank, E., et al. Data mining in bioinformatics using Weka. Bioinformatics 20 (2004), 2479–2481.
82. 82 Yamanaka, M., et al. Introduction to super-resolution microscopy. Microscopy 63 (2014), 177–192.
83. 83 Holden, S.J., et al. High throughput 3D super-resolution microscopy reveals Caulobacter crescentus in vivo Z-ring organization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111 (2014), 4566–4571.
84. 84 Liu, Z., et al. Imaging live-cell dynamics and structure at the single-molecule level. Mol. Cell 58 (2015), 644–659.
85. 85 Wachsmuth, M., et al. High-throughput fluorescence correlation spectroscopy enables analysis of proteome dynamics in living cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 33 (2015), 384–389.
86. 86 Streets, A.M., Huang, Y., Microfluidics for biological measurements with single-molecule resolution. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 25 (2014), 69–77.
87. 87 Jo, M.C., et al. High-throughput analysis of yeast replicative aging using a microfluidic system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 112 (2015), 9364–9369.
88. 88 Barteneva, N.S., et al. Imaging flow cytometry: coping with heterogeneity in biological systems. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 60 (2012), 723–733.
89. 89 Thaunat, O., et al. Asymmetric segregation of polarized antigen on B cell division shapes presentation capacity. Science 335 (2012), 475–479.
90. 90 Gessel, M.M., et al. MALDI imaging mass spectrometry: spatial molecular analysis to enable a new age of discovery. J. Proteomics 107 (2014), 71–82.
91. 91 McDonnell, L.A., et al. Automated imaging MS: toward high throughput imaging mass spectrometry. J. Proteomics 73 (2010), 1279–1282.