Image-based multivariate profiling of drug responses from single cells

Nature Methods

Volumn 4, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 445-453

  Loo, Lit Hsin ^a   Wu, Lani F ^a   Altschuler, Steven J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

1,4 DIAMINO 1,4 BIS(2 AMINOPHENYLTHIO) 2,3 DICYANOBUTADIENE; 2 (2 AMINO 3 METHOXYPHENYL)CHROMONE; 2 MORPHOLINO 8 PHENYLCHROMONE; APHIDICOLIN; APICIDIN; CAMPTOTHECIN; CLOZAPINE; COLCHICINE; COMPACTIN; CYTOCHALASIN D; DIDEMNIN B; EMETINE; ETOPOSIDE; HYDROXYUREA; JASPAMIDE; LATRUNCULIN B; METHOTREXATE; NOCODAZOLE; OLOMOUCINE; OXAMFLATIN; PACLITAXEL; PUROMYCIN; RAPAMYCIN; ROSCOVITINE; SIMVASTATIN; TRICHOSTATIN A; TRIFLUOPERAZINE; UNINDEXED DRUG; VINBLASTINE; WORTMANNIN;

ALGORITHM; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CANCER CELL; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG DETERMINATION; DRUG EFFECT; DRUG RESPONSE; DRUG SCREENING; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SCORING SYSTEM; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE;

DRUG EVALUATION, PRECLINICAL; HELA CELLS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PHARMACOLOGY; PHENOTYPE;

EID: 34250216344     PISSN: 15487091     EISSN: 15491676     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth1032     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Boland, M.V. & Murphy, R.F. After sequencing: Quantitative analysis of protein localization. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 18, 115-119 (1999).
2. Lang, P., Yeow, K., Nichols, A. & Scheer, A. Cellular imaging in drug discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 5, 343-356 (2006).
3. Price, J.H. et al. Advances in molecular labeling, high throughput imaging and machine intelligence portend powerful functional cellular biochemistry tools. J. Cell. Biochem. Suppl. 39, 194-210 (2002).
4. Zhou, X. & Wong, S.T.C. Informatics challenges of high-throughput microscopy. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 23, 63-72 (2006).
5. Perlman, Z.E. et al. Multidimensional drug profiling by automated microscopy. Science 306, 1194-1198 (2004).
6. Tanaka, M. et al. An unbiased cell morphology-based screen for new, biologically active small molecules. PLoS Biol. 3, e128 (2005).
7. Boland, M.V. & Murphy, R.F. A neural network classifier capable of recognizing the patterns of all major subcellular structures in fluorescence microscope images of HeLa cells. Bioinformatics 17 1213-1223 (2001).
8. Conrad, C. et al. Automatic identification of subcellular phenotypes on human cell arrays. Genome Res. 14, 1130-1136 (2004).
9. Neumann, B. et al. High-throughput RNAi screening by time-lapse imaging of live human cells. Nat. Methods 3, 385-390 (2006).
10. Ohya, Y. et al. High-dimensional and large-scale phenotyping of yeast mutants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 19015-19020 (2005).
11. Gasparri, F., Mariani, M., Sola, F. & Galvani, A. Quantification of the proliferation index of human dermal fibroblast cultures with the ArrayScan high-content screening reader. J. Biomol. Screen. 9 232-243 (2004).
12. Giuliano, K.A. et al. Systems cell biology knowledge created from high content screening. Assay Drug Dev. Technol. 3, 501-514 (2005).
13. Vapnik, V.N. Statistical Learning Theory. (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1998).
14. Duda, R.O., Hart, P.E. & Stork, D.G. Pattern Classification 2nd edn. (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2001).
15. Guyon, I., Weston, J., Barnhill, S. & Vapnik, V. Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines. Mach. Learn. 46, 389-422 (2002).
16. Haralick, R.M. Statistical and structural approaches to texture. Proc. IEEE 67, 786-804 (1979).
17. Teh, C.H. & Chin, R.T. On image analysis by the methods of moments. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 10, 496-513 (1988).
18. Lundholt, B.K., Scudder, K.M. & Pagliaro, L. A simple technique for reducing edge effect in cell-based Assays. J. Biomol. Screen. 8 566-570 (2003).
19. Malo, N., Hanley, J.A., Cerquozzi, S., Pelletier, J. & Nadon, R. Statistical practice in high-throughput screening data analysis. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 167-175 (2006).
20. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R. & Friedman, J. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2001).
21. Yeung, T.K., Germond, C., Chen, X. & Wang, Z. The mode of action of taxol: Apoptosis at low concentration and necrosis at high concentration. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 263, 398-404 (1999).
22. Yoo, C.B. & Jones, P.A. Epigenetic therapy of cancer: Past, present and future. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 5, 37-50 (2006).
23. Perlman, Z.E., Mitchison, T.J. & Mayer, T.U. High-content screening and profiling of drug activity in an automated centrosome-duplication assay. ChemBioChem 6, 145-151 (2005).
24. Bollag, D.M. et al. Epothilones, a new class of microtubule-stabilizing agents with a taxol-like mechanism of action. Cancer Res. 55, 2325-2333 (1995).
25. Panda, D., Rathinasamy, K., Santra, M.K. & Wilson, L. Kinetic suppression of microtubule dynamic instability by griseofulvin: implications for its possible use in the treatment of cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 9878-9883 (2005).
26. Clemons, P.A. Complex phenotypic assays in high-throughput screening. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 8, 334-338 (2004).
27. Dove, A. Drug screening-beyond the bottleneck. Nat. Biotechnol. 17, 859-863 (1999).
28. Maciag, K. et al. Systems-level analyses identify extensive coupling among gene expression machines. Mol. Syst. Biol. [online] 2, 0003 (2006) (doi:10.1038/msb4100045).
29. Hanley, J.A. & McNeil, B.J. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143 29-36 (1982).