Visualizing quantitative microscopy data: History and challenges

Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

Volumn 51, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 96-101

  Sailem, Heba Z ^a   Cooper, Sam ^b,c   Bakal, Chris ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c INSTITUTE OF CANCER RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cell phenotypes; data visualization; high content analysis; microscopy

Indexed keywords

BAR CHART; BOX PLOT; CELL SIZE; CELL STRUCTURE; CELL TRANSFORMATION; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; CONTENT ANALYSIS; CYTOLOGY; HEAT MAP; HIGH CONTENT ANALYSIS; MICROSCOPY; NETWORK GRAPH; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SCATTER PLOT; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TRANSCRIPTOMICS; HUMAN; TUMOR CELL LINE;

CELL LINE, TUMOR; HUMANS; MICROSCOPY;

EID: 84959063772     PISSN: 10409238     EISSN: 15497798     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/10409238.2016.1146222     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. Altschuler SJ, Wu LF. (2010). Cellular heterogeneity: do differences make a difference? Cell 141: 559-63
2. Bakal C, Aach J, Church G, Perrimon N. (2007). Quantitative morphological signatures define local signaling networks regulating cell morphology. Science 316: 1753-6
3. Boland MV, Murphy RF. (2001). A neural network classifier capable of recognizing the patterns of all major subcellular structures in fluorescence microscope images of HeLa cells. Bioinformatics 17: 1213-23
4. Boutros M, Heigwer F, Laufer C. (2015). Microscopy-based high-content screening. Cell 163: 1314-25
5. Chernoff H. (1973). The use of faces to represent points in k-dimensional space graphically. J Am Stat Assoc 68: 361-18
6. Ciresan DC, Giusti A, Gambardella LM, Schmidhuber J. (2013). Mitosis detection in breast cancer histology images with deep neural networks. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 16: 411-18
7. Collinet C, Stoter M, Bradshaw CR, et al. (2010). Systems survey of endocytosis by multiparametric image analysis. Nature 464: 243-9
8. Cooper S, Sadok A, Bousgouni V, Bakal C. (2015). Apolar and polar transitions drive the conversion between amoeboid and mesenchymal shapes in melanoma cells. Mol Biol Cell 26: 4163-70
9. Costanzo M, Baryshnikova A, Bellay J, et al. (2010). The genetic landscape of a cell. Science 327: 425-31
10. Crane E. 1999. The world history of beekeeping and honey hunting. New York (NY): Routledge
11. Fisher RA. (1936). The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic profiles. Ann Eugenics 7: 179-88
12. Gehlenborg N, Wong B. (2012a). Points of view: heat maps. Nat Methods 9: 213
13. Gehlenborg N, Wong B. (2012b). Points of view: mapping quantitative data to color. Nat Methods 9: 769
14. Gehlenborg N, Wong B. (2012c). Power of the plane. Nat Methods 9: 935
15. Giuliano KA, Debiaso RL, Dunlay T, et al. (1997). High-content screening: a new approach to easing key bottlenecks in the drug discovery process. J Biomol Screen 2: 249-59
16. Glory E, Murphy RF. (2007). Automated subcellular location determination and high-throughput microscopy. Dev Cell 12: 7-16
17. Graml V, Studera X, Lawson JL, et al. (2014). A genomic Multiprocess survey of machineries that control and link cell shape, microtubule organization, and cell-cycle progression. Dev Cell 31: 227-39
18. Hewes FW, Gannett H. (1883). Scribner's statistical atlas of the United States showing by graphic methods their present condition and their political, social and industrial development. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons
19. Johnson GR, Buck TE, Sullivan DP, et al. (2015a). Joint modeling of cell and nuclear shape variation. Mol Biol Cell 26: 4046-56
20. Johnson GR, Li J, Shariff A, et al. (2015b). Automated learning of subcellular variation among punctate protein patterns and a generative model of their relation to microtubules. PLoS Comput Biol 11: e1004614
21. Kauffman SA. (1993). The origins of order. Self-organization and selection in evolution. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press
22. Keren K, Pincus Z, Allen GM, et al. (2008). Mechanism of shape determination in motile cells. Nature 453: 475-80
23. Leha A, Moens N, Meleckyte R, et al. (2015). A high-content platform to characterise human induced pluripotent stem cell lines. Methods. pii: S1046-2023(15)30153-5
24. Liberali P, Snijder B, Pelkmans L. (2014). A hierarchical map of regulatory genetic interactions in membrane trafficking. Cell 157: 1473-87
25. Liberali P, Snijder B, Pelkmans L. (2015). Single-cell and multivariate approaches in genetic perturbation screens. Nat Rev Genet 16: 18-32
26. Loo LH, Lin HJ, Singh DK, et al. (2009). Heterogeneity in the physiological states and pharmacological responses of differentiating 3T3-L1 preadipocytes. J Cell Biol 187: 375-84
27. Loua MT. (1873). Atlas statistique de la population de Paris. Paris, France: Imprimerie et Librairie de L'Ecole Centrale
28. Murphy RF. (2012). CellOrganizer: image-derived models of subcellular organization and protein distribution. Methods Cell Biol 110: 179-93
29. Olson AC, Larson NM, Heckman CA. (1980). Classification of cultured mammalian cells by shape analysis and pattern recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77: 1516-20
30. Overney N, Overney G. (2011). The history of photomicrography. Available from: http://www.microscopy-uk.org.uk/mag/artmar10/history-photomicrography-ed3.pdf
31. Pearson K. (1895). Contributions to the mathematical theory of evolution. II. Skew variation in homogeneous material. Phil Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 186: 343-414
32. Pelkmans L. (2012). Cell biology. Using cell-to-cell variability- A new era in molecular biology. Science 336: 425-6
33. Perlman ZE, Slack MD, Feng Y, et al. (2004). Multidimensional drug profiling by automated microscopy. Science 306: 1194-8
34. Pincus Z, Theriot JA. (2007). Comparison of quantitative methods for cell-shape analysis. J Microsc 227: 140-56
35. Rajaram S, Pavie B, Hac NE, et al. (2012). SimuCell: a flexible framework for creating synthetic microscopy images. Nat Methods 9: 634-5
36. Rizzardi AE, Johnson AT, Vogel RI, et al. (2012). Quantitative comparison of immunohistochemical staining measured by digital image analysis versus pathologist visual scoring. Diagn Pathol 7: 42
37. Sailem H, Bousgouni V, Cooper S, Bakal C. (2014). Cross-talk between Rho and Rac GTPases drives deterministic exploration of cellular shape space and morphological heterogeneity. Open Biol 4: 130132
38. Sailem HZ, Sero JE, Bakal C. (2015). Visualizing cellular imaging data using PhenoPlot. Nat Commun 6: 5825
39. Sero JE, Sailem HZ, Ardy RC, et al. (2015). Cell shape and the microenvironment regulate nuclear translocation of NF-kappaB in breast epithelial and tumor cells. Mol Syst Biol 11: 790
40. Shariff A, Kangas J, Coelho LP, et al. (2010). Automated image analysis for high-content screening and analysis. J Biomol Screen 15: 726-34
41. Singh DK, Ku CJ, Wichaidit C, et al. (2010). Patterns of basal signaling heterogeneity can distinguish cellular populations with different drug sensitivities. Mol Syst Biol 6: 3693RD
42. Slack MD, Martinez ED, Wu LF, Altschuler SJ. (2008). Characterizing heterogeneous cellular responses to perturbations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 19306-11
43. Snijder B, Liberali P, Frechin M, et al. (2013). Predicting functional gene interactions with the hierarchical interaction score. Nat Methods 10: 1089-92
44. Snijder B, Sacher R, Ramo P, et al. (2009). Population context determines cell-to-cell variability in endocytosis and virus infection. Nature 461: 520-3
45. Snijder B, Sacher R, Ramo P, et al. (2012). Single-cell analysis of population context advances RNAi screening at multiple levels. Mol Syst Biol 8: 579
46. Taylor DL. (2007). Past, present, and future of high content screening and the field of cellomics. Methods Mol Biol 356: 3-18
47. Waddington CH. (1957). The strategy of genes. London: Allen & Unwin
48. Weissgerber TL, Milic NM, Winham SJ, Garovic VD. (2015). Beyond bar and line graphs: time for a new data presentation paradigm. PLoS Biol 13: e1002128
49. Williams RJ. (1967). You are extraordinary. New York: Random House
50. Wong B. (2010). Points of view: color coding. Nat Methods 7: 573
51. Yin Z, Sadok A, Sailem H, et al. (2013). A screen for morphological complexity identifies regulators of switch-like transitions between discrete cell shapes. Nat Cell Biol 15: 860-71
52. Yin Z, Sailem H, Sero J, et al. (2014). How cells explore shape space: a quantitative statistical perspective of cellular morphogenesis. Bioessays 36: 1195-203