CellProfiler Analyst: Interactive data exploration, analysis and classification of large biological image sets

Bioinformatics

Volumn 32, Issue 20, 2016, Pages 3210-3212

  Dao, David ^a,b   Fraser, Adam N ^a   Hung, Jane ^a,c   Ljosa, Vebjorn ^a   Singh, Shantanu ^a   Carpenter, Anne E ^a  

^a BROAD INSTITUTE OF MIT AND HARVARD   (United States)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; PHENOTYPE; SOFTWARE;

ANIMALS; DATASETS AS TOPIC; HUMANS; PHENOTYPE; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84995528830     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw390     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Berthold, M.R., et al. (2009). KNIME - the Konstanz Information Miner: Version 2.0 and Beyond. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl., 11, 26-31
2. Boutros, M., et al. (2006). Analysis of cell-based RNAi screens. Genome Biol., 7, R66
3. Bray, M., and Carpenter, A.E. (2015). CellProfiler Tracer: exploring and validating high-Throughput, time-lapse microscopy image data. BMC Bioinformatics, 16, 368
4. Bray, M.A., et al. (2012). Workflow and metrics for image quality control in large-scale high-content screens. J. Biomol. Screen., 17, 266-274
5. Bray, M.A., et al. (2016). Cell Painting, a high-content image-based assay for morphological profiling using multiplexed fluorescent dyes. bioRxiv, 049817
6. Caicedo, J.C., et al. (2016). Applications in image-based profiling of perturbations. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 39, 134-142
7. Held, M., et al. (2010). CellCognition: time-resolved phenotype annotation in high-Throughput live cell imaging. Nat. Methods, 7, 747-754
8. Horvath, P., et al. (2011). Machine learning improves the precision and robustness of high-content screens, using non-linear multi-parametric methods to analyze screening results. J. Biomol. Screen., 16, 1059-1067
9. Jones, T.R., et al. (2009). Scoring diverse cellular morphologies in image-based screens with iterative feedback and machine learning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 106, 1826-1831
10. Jones, T.R., et al. (2008). CellProfiler Analyst: data exploration and analysis software for complex image-based screens. BMC Bioinformatics, 9, 482
11. Kamentsky, L., et al. (2011). Improved structure, function and compatibility for CellProfiler: modular high-Throughput image analysis software. Bioinformatics, 27, 1179-1180
12. Orlov, N., et al. (2008). WND-CHARM: multi-purpose image classification using compound image transforms. Pattern Recogn. Lett., 29, 1684-1693
13. Pau, G., et al. (2013). imageHTS: Analysis of high-Throughput microscopybased screens. R package version 1.22.0
14. Pedregosa, F., et al. (2011). Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. JMLR, 12, 2825-2830
15. Pelz, O., et al. (2010). web cellHTS2: A web-Application for the analysis of highthroughput screening data. BMC Bioinformatics., 11, 1-6
16. Sommer, C., et al. (2011). Ilastik: interactive learning and segmentation toolkit. In: 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, pp. 230-33