Kinetochore function is controlled by a phosphodependent coexpansion of inner and outer components

Journal of Cell Biology

Volumn 210, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 899-916

  Wynne, David J ^a   Funabiki, Hironori ^a  

^a ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AURORA B KINASE; CENTROMERE PROTEIN E; PHOSPHOPROTEIN PHOSPHATASE 1; PROTEIN MAD1; AURKB PROTEIN, XENOPUS; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; CENTROMERE PROTEIN C; CHROMATIN; MPS1 PROTEIN, XENOPUS; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEX; NONHISTONE PROTEIN; PLK1 PROTEIN, XENOPUS; PROTEIN SERINE THREONINE KINASE; XENOPUS PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CELL COMPONENT; CELL EXPANSION; CELL FUNCTION; CENTROMERE; CHROMATIN; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROMETAPHASE; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; XENOPUS LAEVIS; ANIMAL; CELL LINE; HUMAN; KINETICS; METABOLISM; MICROSCOPY; MICROTUBULE; MITOSIS; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROCEDURES; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ANIMALS; AURORA KINASE B; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CELL LINE; CHROMATIN; CHROMOSOMAL PROTEINS, NON-HISTONE; HUMANS; KINETICS; KINETOCHORES; MICROSCOPY; MICROTUBULES; MITOSIS; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEXES; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN PHOSPHATASE 1; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; XENOPUS LAEVIS; XENOPUS PROTEINS;

EID: 84975883441     PISSN: 00219525     EISSN: 15408140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201506020     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Abrieu, A., L. Magnaghi-Jaulin, J.A. Kahana, M. Peter, A. Castro, S. Vigneron, T. Lorca, D.W. Cleveland, and J.C. Labbé. 2001. Mps1 is a kinetochore- associated kinase essential for the vertebrate mitotic checkpoint. Cell. 106:83-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00410-X
2. Akiyoshi, B., C.R. Nelson, and S. Biggins. 2013. The aurora B kinase promotes inner and outer kinetochore interactions in budding yeast. Genetics. 194:785-789. http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.113.150839
3. Basilico, F., S. Maffini, J.R. Weir, D. Prumbaum, A.M. Rojas, T. Zimniak, A. De Antoni, S. Jeganathan, B. Voss, S. van Gerwen, et al. 2014. The pseudo GTPase CENP-M drives human kinetochore assembly. eLife. 3:e02978. http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02978
4. Boyarchuk, Y., A. Salic, M. Dasso, and A. Arnaoutov. 2007. Bub1 is essential for assembly of the functional inner centromere. J. Cell Biol. 176:919-928. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200609044
5. Cheerambathur, D.K., R. Gassmann, B. Cook, K. Oegema, and A. Desai. 2013. Crosstalk between microtubule attachment complexes ensures accurate chromosome segregation. Science. 342:1239-1242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1246232
6. Cheeseman, I.M., J.S. Chappie, E.M. Wilson-Kubalek, and A. Desai. 2006. The conserved KMN network constitutes the core microtubule-binding site of the kinetochore. Cell. 127:983-997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.039
7. Cheeseman, I.M., T. Hori, T. Fukagawa, and A. Desai. 2008. KNL1 and the CENP-H/I/K complex coordinately direct kinetochore assembly in vertebrates. Mol. Biol. Cell. 19:587-594. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc. E07-10-1051
8. Chen, R.-H. 2002. BubR1 is essential for kinetochore localization of other spindle checkpoint proteins and its phosphorylation requires Mad1. J. Cell Biol. 158:487-496. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200204048
9. Chen, R.H. 2004. Phosphorylation and activation of Bub1 on unattached chromosomes facilitate the spindle checkpoint. EMBO J. 23:3113-3121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600308
10. Chen, R.-H., J.C. Waters, E.D. Salmon, and A.W. Murray. 1996. Association of spindle assembly checkpoint component XMAD2 with unattached kinetochores. Science. 274:242-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/ science.274.5285.242
11. Chen, R.-H., A. Shevchenko, M. Mann, and A.W. Murray. 1998. Spindle checkpoint protein Xmad1 recruits Xmad2 to unattached kinetochores. J. Cell Biol. 143:283-295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.143.2.283
12. Cleveland, D.W., Y. Mao, and K.F. Sullivan. 2003. Centromeres and kinetochores: from epigenetics to mitotic checkpoint signaling. Cell. 112:407- 421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00115-6
13. Collin, P., O. Nashchekina, R. Walker, and J. Pines. 2013. The spindle assembly checkpoint works like a rheostat rather than a toggle switch. Nat. Cell Biol. 15:1378-1385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2855
14. De La Fuente, R., C. Baumann, and M.M. Viveiros. 2015. ATRX contributes to epigenetic asymmetry and silencing of major satellite transcripts in the maternal genome of the mouse embryo. Development. 142:1806-1817. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.118927
15. DeLuca, J.G., Y. Dong, P. Hergert, J. Strauss, J.M. Hickey, E.D. Salmon, and B.F. McEwen. 2005. Hec1 and nuf2 are core components of the kinetochore outer plate essential for organizing microtubule attachment sites. Mol. Biol. Cell. 16:519-531. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E04-09-0852
16. DeLuca, J.G., W.E. Gall, C. Ciferri, D. Cimini, A. Musacchio, and E.D. Salmon. 2006. Kinetochore microtubule dynamics and attachment stability are regulated by Hec1. Cell. 127:969-982. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.047
17. Desai, A., A. Murray, T.J. Mitchison, and C.E. Walczak. 1999. The use of Xenopus egg extracts to study mitotic spindle assembly and function in vitro. Methods Cell Biol. 61:385-412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0091-679X(08)61991-3
18. Elowe, S., S. Hümmer, A. Uldschmid, X. Li, and E.A. Nigg. 2007. Tensionsensitive Plk1 phosphorylation on BubR1 regulates the stability of kinetochore microtubule interactions. Genes Dev. 21:2205-2219. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.436007
19. Emanuele, M.J., M.L. McCleland, D.L. Satinover, and P.T. Stukenberg. 2005. Measuring the stoichiometry and physical interactions between components elucidates the architecture of the vertebrate kinetochore. Mol. Biol. Cell. 16:4882-4892. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E05-03-0239
20. Emanuele, M.J., W. Lan, M. Jwa, S.A. Miller, C.S.M. Chan, and P.T. Stukenberg. 2008. Aurora B kinase and protein phosphatase 1 have opposing roles in modulating kinetochore assembly. J. Cell Biol. 181:241-254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200710019
21. Espeut, J., A. Gaussen, P. Bieling, V. Morin, S. Prieto, D. Fesquet, T. Surrey, and A. Abrieu. 2008. Phosphorylation relieves autoinhibition of the kinetochore motor Cenp-E. Mol. Cell. 29:637-643. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2008.01.004
22. Foley, E.A., and T.M. Kapoor. 2013. Microtubule attachment and spindle assembly checkpoint signalling at the kinetochore. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 14:25-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm3494
23. Funabiki, H., and A.W. Murray. 2000. The Xenopus chromokinesin Xkid is essential for metaphase chromosome alignment and must be degraded to allow anaphase chromosome movement. Cell. 102:411-424. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00047-7
24. Funabiki, H., and D.J. Wynne. 2013. Making an effective switch at the kinetochore by phosphorylation and dephosphorylation. Chromosoma. 122:135-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00412-013-0401-5
25. Gassmann, R., A. Essex, J.S. Hu, P.S. Maddox, F. Motegi, A. Sugimoto, S.M. O'Rourke, B. Bowerman, I. McLeod, J.R. Yates III, et al. 2008. A new mechanism controlling kinetochore-microtubule interactions revealed by comparison of two dynein-targeting components: SPDL-1 and the Rod/Zwilch/Zw10 complex. Genes Dev. 22:2385-2399. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1687508
26. Gassmann, R., A.J. Holland, D. Varma, X. Wan, F. Civril, D.W. Cleveland, K. Oegema, E.D. Salmon, and A. Desai. 2010. Removal of Spindly from microtubule-attached kinetochores controls spindle checkpoint silencing in human cells. Genes Dev. 24:957-971. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1886810
27. Ghenoiu, C., M.S. Wheelock, and H. Funabiki. 2013. Autoinhibition and Polo-dependent multisite phosphorylation restrict activity of the histone H3 kinase Haspin to mitosis. Mol. Cell. 52:734-745. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2013.10.002
28. Gudimchuk, N., B. Vitre, Y. Kim, A. Kiyatkin, D.W. Cleveland, F.I. Ataullakhanov, and E.L. Grishchuk. 2013. Kinetochore kinesin CENP-E is a processive bi-directional tracker of dynamic microtubule tips. Nat. Cell Biol. 15:1079-1088. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2831
29. Gustafsson, M.G., L. Shao, P.M. Carlton, C.J. Wang, I.N. Golubovskaya, W.Z. Cande, D.A. Agard, and J.W. Sedat. 2008. Three-dimensional resolution doubling in wide-field fluorescence microscopy by structured illumination. Biophys. J. 94:4957-4970. http://dx.doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.107.120345
30. Hannak, E., and R. Heald. 2006. Investigating mitotic spindle assembly and function in vitro using Xenopus laevis egg extracts. Nat. Protoc. 1:2305- 2314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.396
31. Hara, K., P. Tydeman, and M. Kirschner. 1980. A cytoplasmic clock with the same period as the division cycle in Xenopus eggs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 77:462-466. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.77.1.462
32. Hoffman, D.B., C.G. Pearson, T.J. Yen, B.J. Howell, and E.D. Salmon. 2001. Microtubule-dependent changes in assembly of microtubule motor proteins and mitotic spindle checkpoint proteins at PtK1 kinetochores. Mol. Biol. Cell. 12:1995-2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.12.7.1995
33. Hori, T., M. Okada, K. Maenaka, and T. Fukagawa. 2008. CENP-O class proteins form a stable complex and are required for proper kinetochore function. Mol. Biol. Cell. 19:843-854. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E07-06-0556
34. Hori, T., W.H. Shang, K. Takeuchi, and T. Fukagawa. 2013. The CCAN recruits CENP-A to the centromere and forms the structural core for kinetochore assembly. J. Cell Biol. 200:45-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201210106
35. Howell, B.J., B.F. McEwen, J.C. Canman, D.B. Hoffman, E.M. Farrar, C.L. Rieder, and E.D. Salmon. 2001. Cytoplasmic dynein/dynactin drives kinetochore protein transport to the spindle poles and has a role in mitotic spindle checkpoint inactivation. J. Cell Biol. 155:1159-1172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200105093
36. Howell, B.J., B. Moree, E.M. Farrar, S. Stewart, G. Fang, and E.D. Salmon. 2004. Spindle checkpoint protein dynamics at kinetochores in living cells. Curr. Biol. 14:953-964. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2004.05.053
37. Kallio, M.J., M.L. McCleland, P.T. Stukenberg, and G.J. Gorbsky. 2002. Inhibition of aurora B kinase blocks chromosome segregation, overrides the spindle checkpoint, and perturbs microtubule dynamics in mitosis. Curr. Biol. 12:900-905. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00887-4
38. Kang, Y.H., J.E. Park, L.R. Yu, N.K. Soung, S.M. Yun, J.K. Bang, Y.S. Seong, H. Yu, S. Garfield, T.D. Veenstra, and K.S. Lee. 2006. Self-regulated Plk1 recruitment to kinetochores by the Plk1-PBIP1 interaction is critical for proper chromosome segregation. Mol. Cell. 24:409-422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2006.10.016
39. Kapoor, T.M., M.A. Lampson, P. Hergert, L. Cameron, D. Cimini, E.D. Salmon, B.F. McEwen, and A. Khodjakov. 2006. Chromosomes can congress to the metaphase plate before biorientation. Science. 311:388-391. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1122142
40. Kelly, A.E., C. Ghenoiu, J.Z. Xue, C. Zierhut, H. Kimura, and H. Funabiki. 2010. Survivin reads phosphorylated histone H3 threonine 3 to activate the mitotic kinase Aurora B. Science. 330:235-239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1189505
41. Kern, D.M., T. Kim, M. Rigney, N. Hattersley, A. Desai, and I.M. Cheeseman. 2015. The outer kinetochore protein KNL-1 contains a defined oligomerization domain in nematodes. Mol. Biol. Cell. 26:229-237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E14-06-1125
42. Kim, S., and H. Yu. 2015. Multiple assembly mechanisms anchor the KMN spindle checkpoint platform at human mitotic kinetochores. J. Cell Biol. 208:181-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201407074
43. Kim, Y., J.E. Heuser, C.M. Waterman, and D.W. Cleveland. 2008. CENP-E combines a slow, processive motor and a flexible coiled coil to produce an essential motile kinetochore tether. J. Cell Biol. 181:411-419. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200802189
44. Kim, S., H. Sun, D.R. Tomchick, H. Yu, and X. Luo. 2012. Structure of human Mad1 C-terminal domain reveals its involvement in kinetochore targeting. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 109:6549-6554. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1118210109
45. Kimelman, D., M. Kirschner, and T. Scherson. 1987. The events of the midblastula transition in Xenopus are regulated by changes in the cell cycle. Cell. 48:399-407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(87)90191-7
46. Kiyomitsu, T., H. Murakami, and M. Yanagida. 2011. Protein interaction domain mapping of human kinetochore protein Blinkin reveals a consensus motif for binding of spindle assembly checkpoint proteins Bub1 and BubR1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 31:998-1011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00815-10
47. Kwiatkowski, N., N. Jelluma, P. Filippakopoulos, M. Soundararajan, M.S. Manak, M. Kwon, H.G. Choi, T. Sim, Q.L. Deveraux, S. Rottmann, et al. 2010. Small-molecule kinase inhibitors provide insight into Mps1 cell cycle function. Nat. Chem. Biol. 6:359-368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.345
48. London, N., S. Ceto, J.A. Ranish, and S. Biggins. 2012. Phosphoregulation of Spc105 by Mps1 and PP1 regulates Bub1 localization to kinetochores. Curr. Biol. 22:900-906. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.052
49. Maddox, P., A. Straight, P. Coughlin, T.J. Mitchison, and E.D. Salmon. 2003. Direct observation of microtubule dynamics at kinetochores in Xenopus extract spindles: implications for spindle mechanics. J. Cell Biol. 162:377-382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200301088
50. Magidson, V., C.B. O'Connell, J. Loncarek, R. Paul, A. Mogilner, and A. Khodjakov. 2011. The spatial arrangement of chromosomes during prometaphase facilitates spindle assembly. Cell. 146:555-567. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.07.012
51. Mao, Y., A. Abrieu, and D.W. Cleveland. 2003. Activating and silencing the mitotic checkpoint through CENP-E-dependent activation/inactivation of BubR1. Cell. 114:87-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00475-6
52. Mao, Y., A. Desai, and D.W. Cleveland. 2005. Microtubule capture by CENP-E silences BubR1-dependent mitotic checkpoint signaling. J. Cell Biol. 170:873-880. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200505040
53. Maresca, T.J., and R. Heald. 2006. The long and the short of it: linker histone H1 is required for metaphase chromosome compaction. Cell Cycle. 5:589- 591. http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.5.6.2581
54. Martin-Lluesma, S., V.M. Stucke, and E.A. Nigg. 2002. Role of Hec1 in spindle checkpoint signaling and kinetochore recruitment of Mad1/Mad2. Science. 297:2267-2270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1075596
55. Matsumura, S., F. Toyoshima, and E. Nishida. 2007. Polo-like kinase 1 facilitates chromosome alignment during prometaphase through BubR1. J. Biol. Chem. 282:15217-15227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M611053200
56. McCleland, M.L., R.D. Gardner, M.J. Kallio, J.R. Daum, G.J. Gorbsky, D.J. Burke, and P.T. Stukenberg. 2003. The highly conserved Ndc80 complex is required for kinetochore assembly, chromosome congression, and spindle checkpoint activity. Genes Dev. 17:101-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1040903
57. McEwen, B.F., C.E. Hsieh, A.L. Mattheyses, and C.L. Rieder. 1998. A new look at kinetochore structure in vertebrate somatic cells using high-pressure freezing and freeze substitution. Chromosoma. 107:366-375. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004120050320
58. Milks, K.J., B. Moree, and A.F. Straight. 2009. Dissection of CENP-C-directed centromere and kinetochore assembly. Mol. Biol. Cell. 20:4246-4255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E09-05-0378
59. Minshull, J., H. Sun, N.K. Tonks, and A.W. Murray. 1994. A MAP kinase-dependent spindle assembly checkpoint in Xenopus egg extracts. Cell. 79:475- 486. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(94)90256-9
60. Monen, J., P.S. Maddox, F. Hyndman, K. Oegema, and A. Desai. 2005. Differential role of CENP-A in the segregation of holocentric C. elegans chromosomes during meiosis and mitosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 7:1248-1255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1331
61. Murray, A.W. 1991. Cell cycle extracts. Methods Cell Biol. 36:581-605. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0091-679X(08)60298-8
62. Nijenhuis, W., E. von Castelmur, D. Littler, V. De Marco, E. Tromer, M. Vleugel, M.H.J. van Osch, B. Snel, A. Perrakis, and G.J.P.L. Kops. 2013. A TPR domain-containing N-terminal module of MPS1 is required for its kinetochore localization by Aurora B. J. Cell Biol. 201:217-231.
63. Nishino, T., F. Rago, T. Hori, K. Tomii, I.M. Cheeseman, and T. Fukagawa. 2013. CENP-T provides a structural platform for outer kinetochore assembly. EMBO J. 32:424-436. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2012.348
64. Overlack, K., I. Primorac, M. Vleugel, V. Krenn, S. Maffini, I. Hoffmann, G.J. Kops, and A. Musacchio. 2015. A molecular basis for the differential roles of Bub1 and BubR1 in the spindle assembly checkpoint. eLife. 4:e05269. http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05269
65. Perpelescu, M., and T. Fukagawa. 2011. The ABCs of CENPs. Chromosoma. 120:425-446. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00412-011-0330-0
66. Petrovic, A., S. Mosalaganti, J. Keller, M. Mattiuzzo, K. Overlack, V. Krenn, A. De Antoni, S. Wohlgemuth, V. Cecatiello, S. Pasqualato, et al. 2014. Modular assembly of RWD domains on the Mis12 complex underlies outer kinetochore organization. Mol. Cell. 53:591-605. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2014.01.019
67. Pinsky, B.A., C.R. Nelson, and S. Biggins. 2009. Protein phosphatase 1 regulates exit from the spindle checkpoint in budding yeast. Curr. Biol. 19:1182- 1187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.06.043
68. Przewloka, M.R., Z. Venkei, V.M. Bolanos-Garcia, J. Debski, M. Dadlez, and D.M. Glover. 2011. CENP-C is a structural platform for kinetochore assembly. Curr. Biol. 21:399-405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.02.005
69. Rago, F., K.E. Gascoigne, and I.M. Cheeseman. 2015. Distinct organization and regulation of the outer kinetochore KMN network downstream of CENP-C and CENP-T. Curr. Biol. 25:671-677. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.01.059
70. Ribeiro, S.A., P. Vagnarelli, Y. Dong, T. Hori, B.F. McEwen, T. Fukagawa, C. Flors, and W.C. Earnshaw. 2010. A super-resolution map of the vertebrate kinetochore. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 107:10484-10489. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1002325107
71. Rieder, C.L. 1982. The formation, structure, and composition of the mammalian kinetochore and kinetochore fiber. Int. Rev. Cytol. 79:1-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0074-7696(08)61672-1
72. Rieder, C.L., and S.P. Alexander. 1990. Kinetochores are transported poleward along a single astral microtubule during chromosome attachment to the spindle in newt lung cells. J. Cell Biol. 110:81-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.110.1.81
73. Rosenberg, J.S., F.R. Cross, and H. Funabiki. 2011. KNL1/Spc105 recruits PP1 to silence the spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 21:942-947. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.04.011
74. Sampath, S.C., R. Ohi, O. Leismann, A. Salic, A. Pozniakovski, and H. Funabiki. 2004. The chromosomal passenger complex is required for chromatin-induced microtubule stabilization and spindle assembly. Cell. 118:187- 202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2004.06.026
75. Schermelleh, L., P.M. Carlton, S. Haase, L. Shao, L. Winoto, P. Kner, B. Burke, M.C. Cardoso, D.A. Agard, M.G.L. Gustafsson, et al. 2008. Subdiffraction multicolor imaging of the nuclear periphery with 3D structured illumination microscopy. Science. 320:1332-1336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1156947
76. Schleiffer, A., M. Maier, G. Litos, F. Lampert, P. Hornung, K. Mechtler, and S. Westermann. 2012. CENP-T proteins are conserved centromere receptors of the Ndc80 complex. Nat. Cell Biol. 14:604-613. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2493
77. Screpanti, E., A. De Antoni, G.M. Alushin, A. Petrovic, T. Melis, E. Nogales, and A. Musacchio. 2011. Direct binding of Cenp-C to the Mis12 complex joins the inner and outer kinetochore. Curr. Biol. 21:391-398. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.12.039
78. Shah, J.V., E. Botvinick, Z. Bonday, F. Furnari, M. Berns, and D.W. Cleveland. 2004. Dynamics of centromere and kinetochore proteins; implications for checkpoint signaling and silencing. Curr. Biol. 14:942-952.
79. Sharp-Baker, H., and R.-H. Chen. 2001. Spindle checkpoint protein Bub1 is required for kinetochore localization of Mad1, Mad2, Bub3, and CENP-E, independently of its kinase activity. J. Cell Biol. 153:1239-1250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.153.6.1239
80. Shepperd, L.A., J.C. Meadows, A.M. Sochaj, T.C. Lancaster, J. Zou, G.J. Buttrick, J. Rappsilber, K.G. Hardwick, and J.B. Millar. 2012. Phosphodependent recruitment of Bub1 and Bub3 to Spc7/KNL1 by Mph1 kinase maintains the spindle checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 22:891-899. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.051
81. Skibbens, R.V., V.P. Skeen, and E.D. Salmon. 1993. Directional instability of kinetochore motility during chromosome congression and segregation in mitotic newt lung cells: a push-pull mechanism. J. Cell Biol. 122:859- 875. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.122.4.859
82. Stear, J.H., and M.B. Roth. 2004. The Caenorhabditis elegans kinetochore reorganizes at prometaphase and in response to checkpoint stimuli. Mol. Biol.Cell. 15:5187-5196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E04-06-0486
83. Sugimoto, K., K. Kuriyama, A. Shibata, and M. Himeno. 1997. Characterization of internal DNA-binding and C-terminal dimerization domains of human centromere/ kinetochore autoantigen CENP-C in vitro: role of DNA-binding and self-associating activities in kinetochore organization. Chromosome Res. 5:132-141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1018422325569
84. Suijkerbuijk, S.J.E., M. Vleugel, A. Teixeira, and G.J.P.L. Kops. 2012. Integration of kinase and phosphatase activities by BUBR1 ensures formation of stable kinetochore-microtubule attachments. Dev. Cell. 23:745-755. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2012.09.005
85. Suzuki, A., T. Hori, T. Nishino, J. Usukura, A. Miyagi, K. Morikawa, and T. Fukagawa. 2011. Spindle microtubules generate tension-dependent changes in the distribution of inner kinetochore proteins. J. Cell Biol. 193:125-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201012050
86. Thrower, D.A., M.A. Jordan, and L. Wilson. 1996. Modulation of CENP-E organization at kinetochores by spindle microtubule attachment. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton. 35:121-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0169(1996)35:2121::AID-CM53.0.CO;2-D
87. Vanoosthuyse, V., and K.G. Hardwick. 2009. A novel protein phosphatase 1-dependent spindle checkpoint silencing mechanism. Curr. Biol. 19:1176- 1181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.05.060
88. Varma, D., and E.D. Salmon. 2012. The KMN protein network-chief conductors of the kinetochore orchestra. J. Cell Sci. 125:5927-5936. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.093724
89. Vigneron, S., S. Prieto, C. Bernis, J.C. Labbé, A. Castro, and T. Lorca. 2004. Kinetochore localization of spindle checkpoint proteins: who controls whom? Mol. Biol. Cell. 15:4584-4596. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E04-01-0051
90. Wan, X., R.P. O'Quinn, H.L. Pierce, A.P. Joglekar, W.E. Gall, J.G. DeLuca, C.W. Carroll, S.T. Liu, T.J. Yen, B.F. McEwen, et al. 2009. Protein architecture of the human kinetochore microtubule attachment site. Cell. 137:672-684. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.03.035
91. Weaver, B.A., Z.Q. Bonday, F.R. Putkey, G.J. Kops, A.D. Silk, and D.W. Cleveland. 2003. Centromere-associated protein-E is essential for the mammalian mitotic checkpoint to prevent aneuploidy due to single chromosome loss. J. Cell Biol. 162:551-563. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200303167
92. Westhorpe, F.G., and A.F. Straight. 2013. Functions of the centromere and kinetochore in chromosome segregation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 25:334-340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2013.02.001
93. Wojcik, E., R. Basto, M. Serr, F. Scaërou, R. Karess, and T. Hays. 2001. Kinetochore dynein: its dynamics and role in the transport of the Rough deal checkpoint protein. Nat. Cell Biol. 3:1001-1007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1101-1001
94. Wong, O.K., and G. Fang. 2006. Loading of the 3F3/2 antigen onto kinetochores is dependent on the ordered assembly of the spindle checkpoint proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell. 17:4390-4399. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E06-04-0346
95. Wood, K.W., R. Sakowicz, L.S. Goldstein, and D.W. Cleveland. 1997. CENP-E is a plus end-directed kinetochore motor required for metaphase chromosome alignment. Cell. 91:357-366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80419-5
96. Yamagishi, Y., T. Honda, Y. Tanno, and Y. Watanabe. 2010. Two histone marks establish the inner centromere and chromosome bi-orientation. Science. 330:239-243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1194498
97. Yamagishi, Y., C.H. Yang, Y. Tanno, and Y. Watanabe. 2012. MPS1/Mph1 phosphorylates the kinetochore protein KNL1/Spc7 to recruit SAC components. Nat. Cell Biol. 14:746-752. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2515
98. Yang, Y., F. Wu, T. Ward, F. Yan, Q. Wu, Z. Wang, T. McGlothen, W. Peng, T. You, M. Sun, et al. 2008. Phosphorylation of HsMis13 by Aurora B kinase is essential for assembly of functional kinetochore. J. Biol. Chem. 283:26726-26736. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M804207200
99. Zhou, L., X. Tian, C. Zhu, F. Wang, and J.M. Higgins. 2014. Polo-like kinase-1 triggers histone phosphorylation by Haspin in mitosis. EMBO Rep. 15:273-281.
100. Zierhut, C., C. Jenness, H. Kimura, and H. Funabiki. 2014. Nucleosomal regulation of chromatin composition and nuclear assembly revealed by histone depletion. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 21:617-625. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ nsmb.2845