Dynamics of centromere and kinetochore proteins: Implications for checkpoint signaling and silencing

Current Biology

Volumn 14, Issue 11, 2004, Pages 942-952

  Shah, Jagesh V ^a   Botvinick, Elliot ^b,c   Bonday, Zahid ^a   Furnari, Frank ^a   Berns, Michael ^b,c   Cleveland, Don W ^a  

^a LUDWIG INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUB1 SPINDLE CHECKPOINT PROTEIN; CALCIUM BINDING PROTEIN; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; COMPLEMENTARY DNA; MAD1L1 PROTEIN, HUMAN; MAD2L1 PROTEIN, HUMAN; NUCLEAR PROTEIN; PHOSPHOPROTEIN; PROTEIN KINASE; REPRESSOR PROTEIN;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CELL CULTURE; CENTROMERE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FLUORESCENCE RECOVERY AFTER PHOTOBLEACHING; FLUORESCENT ANTIBODY TECHNIQUE; GENE; GENE VECTOR; HELA CELL; HUMAN; MALE; MARSUPIAL; METABOLISM; MITOSIS SPINDLE; PHYSIOLOGY; RETROVIRUS; SERODIAGNOSIS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ANIMALS; CALCIUM-BINDING PROTEINS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CELLS, CULTURED; DNA, COMPLEMENTARY; FLUORESCENCE RECOVERY AFTER PHOTOBLEACHING; FLUORESCENT ANTIBODY TECHNIQUE; GENES, CDC; GENETIC VECTORS; HELA CELLS; HUMANS; KINETOCHORES; MALE; MARSUPIALIA; MITOTIC SPINDLE APPARATUS; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; PHOSPHOPROTEINS; PRECIPITIN TESTS; PROTEIN KINASES; REPRESSOR PROTEINS; RETROVIRIDAE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ANIMALIA; METATHERIA; UNIDENTIFIED RETROVIRUS;

EID: 2642549143     PISSN: 09609822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.05.046     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Amon A. The spindle checkpoint. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 9:1999;69-75
2. Cleveland D.W., Mao Y., Sullivan K.F. Centromeres and kinetochores. from epigenetics to mitotic checkpoint signaling Cell. 112:2003;407-421
3. Millband D.N., Campbell L., Hardwick K.G. The awesome power of multiple model systems. interpreting the complex nature of spindle checkpoint signaling Trends Cell Biol. 12:2002;205-209
4. Hoyt M.A. A new view of the spindle checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 154:2001;909-911
5. Peters J.M. The anaphase-promoting complex. proteolysis in mitosis and beyond Mol. Cell. 9:2002;931-943
6. Rieder C.L., Cole R.W., Khodjakov A., Sluder G. The checkpoint delaying anaphase in response to chromosome monoorientation is mediated by an inhibitory signal produced by unattached kinetochores. J. Cell Biol. 130:1995;941-948
7. Nicklas R.B., Ward S.C., Gorbsky G.J. Kinetochore chemistry is sensitive to tension and may link mitotic forces to a cell cycle checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 130:1995;929-939
8. Mao Y., Abrieu A., Cleveland D.W. Activating and silencing the mitotic checkpoint through CENP-E-dependent activation/inactivation of BubR1. Cell. 114:2003;87-98
9. Weaver B.A.A., Bonday Z.Q., Putkey F.R., Kops G.J.P.L., Silk A.D., Cleveland D.W. CENP-E is essential for the mammalian mitotic checkpoint to prevent aneuploidy due to single chromosome loss. J. Cell Biol. 162:2003;551-563
10. Dobles M., Liberal V., Scott M.L., Benezra R., Sorger P.K. Chromosome missegregation and apoptosis in mice lacking the mitotic checkpoint protein Mad2. Cell. 101:2000;635-645
11. Howell B.J., Hoffman D.B., Fang G., Murray A.W., Salmon E.D. Visualization of Mad2 dynamics at kinetochores, along spindle fibers, and at spindle poles in living cells. J. Cell Biol. 150:2000;1233-1250
12. Fang G., Yu H., Kirschner M.W. The checkpoint protein MAD2 and the mitotic regulator CDC20 form a ternary complex with the anaphase-promoting complex to control anaphase initiation. Genes Dev. 12:1998;1871-1883
13. Shah J.V., Cleveland D.W. Waiting for anaphase. Mad2 and the spindle assembly checkpoint Cell. 103:2000;997-1000
14. Kallio M.J., Beardmore V.A., Weinstein J., Gorbsky G.J. Rapid microtubule-independent dynamics of Cdc20 at kinetochores and centrosomes in mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol. 158:2002;841-847
15. Hori T., Haraguchi T., Hiraoka Y., Kimura H., Fukagawa T. Dynamic behavior of Nuf2-Hec1 complex that localizes to the centrosome and centromere and is essential for mitotic progression in vertebrate cells. J. Cell Sci. 116:2003;3347-3362
16. McCleland M.L., Gardner R.D., Kallio M.J., Daum J.R., Gorbsky G.J., Burke D.J., Stukenberg P.T. The highly conserved Ndc80 complex is required for kinetochore assembly, chromosome congression, and spindle checkpoint activity. Genes Dev. 17:2003;101-114
17. Musacchio A., Hardwick K.G. The spindle checkpoint. structural insights into dynamic signalling Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3:2002;731-741
18. Yu H. Regulation of APC-Cdc20 by the spindle checkpoint. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 14:2002;706-714
19. Sironi L., Melixetian M., Faretta M., Prosperini E., Helin K., Musacchio A. Mad2 binding to Mad1 and Cdc20, rather than oligomerization, is required for the spindle checkpoint. EMBO J. 20:2001;6371-6382
20. Campbell M.S., Chan G.K., Yen T.J. Mitotic checkpoint proteins HsMAD1 and HsMAD2 are associated with nuclear pore complexes in interphase. J. Cell Sci. 114:2001;953-963
21. Chen R.H., Shevchenko A., Mann M., Murray A.W. Spindle checkpoint protein Xmad1 recruits Xmad2 to unattached kinetochores. J. Cell Biol. 143:1998;283-295
22. Sironi L., Mapelli M., Knapp S., Antoni A.D., Jeang K.T., Musacchio A. Crystal structure of the tetrameric Mad1-Mad2 core complex. implications of a 'safety belt' binding mechanism for the spindle checkpoint EMBO J. 21:2002;2496-2506
23. Meeks-Wagner D., Wood J.S., Garvik B., Hartwell L.H. Isolation of two genes that affect mitotic chromosome transmission in S. cerevisiae. Cell. 44:1986;53-63
24. Pangilinan F., Spencer F. Abnormal kinetochore structure activates the spindle assembly checkpoint in budding yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell. 7:1996;1195-1208
25. Hoyt M.A., Totis L., Roberts B.T. S. cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule function. Cell. 66:1991;507-517
26. Fukagawa T., Pendon C., Morris J., Brown W. CENP-C is necessary but not sufficient to induce formation of a functional centromere. EMBO J. 18:1999;4196-4209
27. Basu J., Bousbaa H., Logarinho E., Li Z., Williams B.C., Lopes C., Sunkel C.E., Goldberg M.L. Mutations in the essential spindle checkpoint gene bub1 cause chromosome missegregation and fail to block apoptosis in Drosophila. J. Cell Biol. 146:1999;13-28
28. Sharp-Baker H., Chen R.H. Spindle checkpoint protein Bub1 is required for kinetochore localization of Mad1, Mad2, Bub3, and CENP-E, independently of its kinase activity. J. Cell Biol. 153:2001;1239-1250
29. Taylor S.S., McKeon F. Kinetochore localization of murine Bub1 is required for normal mitotic timing and checkpoint response to spindle damage. Cell. 89:1997;727-735
30. Daigle N., Beaudouin J., Hartnell L., Imreh G., Hallberg E., Lippincott-Schwartz J., Ellenberg J. Nuclear pore complexes form immobile networks and have a very low turnover in live mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol. 154:2001;71-84
31. Iouk T., Kerscher O., Scott R.J., Basrai M.A., Wozniak R.W. The yeast nuclear pore complex functionally interacts with components of the spindle assembly checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 159:2002;807-819
32. Babu J.R., Jeganathan K.B., Baker D.J., Wu X., Kang-Decker N., van Deursen J.M. Rae1 is an essential mitotic checkpoint regulator that cooperates with Bub3 to prevent chromosome missegregation. J. Cell Biol. 160:2003;341-353
33. Belgareh N., Rabut G., Bai S.W., van Overbeek M., Beaudouin J., Daigle N., Zatsepina O.V., Pasteau F., Labas V., Fromont-Racine M., et al. An evolutionarily conserved NPC subcomplex, which redistributes in part to kinetochores in mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol. 154:2001;1147-1160
34. Luo X., Tang Z., Rizo J., Yu H. The Mad2 spindle checkpoint protein undergoes similar major conformational changes upon binding to either Mad1 or Cdc20. Mol. Cell. 9:2002;59-71
35. Martin-Lluesma S., Stucke V.M., Nigg E.A. Role of Hec1 in spindle checkpoint signaling and kinetochore recruitment of Mad1/Mad2. Science. 297:2002;2267-2270
36. Howell B.J., McEwen B.F., Canman J.C., Hoffman D.B., Farrar E.M., Rieder C.L., Salmon E.D. Cytoplasmic dynein/dynactin drives kinetochore protein transport to the spindle poles and has a role in mitotic spindle checkpoint inactivation. J. Cell Biol. 155:2001;1159-1172
37. Morgenstern J., Land H. Advanced mammalian gene transfer. high titre retroviral vectors with multiple drug selection markers and a complementary helper-free packaging cell line Nucleic Acids Res. 18:1990;3587-3596
38. Laemmli U.K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 227:1970;680-685
39. Towbin H., Staehelin T., Gordon J. Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets. procedure and some applications Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 76:1979;4350-4354
40. Kasai T., Iwanaga Y., Iha H., Jeang K.T. Prevalent loss of mitotic spindle checkpoint in adult T-cell leukemia confers resistance to microtubule inhibitors. J. Biol. Chem. 277:2002;5187-5193
41. Maddox P.S., Bloom K.S., Salmon E.D. The polarity and dynamics of microtubule assembly in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat. Cell Biol. 2:2000;36-41