Classroom testing and assessment for all students: Beyond standardization

Classroom Testing and Assessment for All Students: Beyond Standardization

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-167

  Salend, Spencer J ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84949764891     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781483350554     Document Type: Book

References (173)

1. Abell, M., Bauder, D., & Simmons, T. (2004). Universally designed online assessment: Implications for the future. Information Technology and Disabilities, 10(1). Retrieved June 1, 2007, from http://www.rit.edu/~easi/itd/itdv10n1/abell.htm
2. Acrey, C., Johnstone, C., & Milligan, C. (2005). Using universal design to unlock the potential for academic achievement of at-risk learners. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38(2), 22-31.
3. Albus, D., Thurlow, M., Liu, K., & Bielinski, J. (2005). Reading test performance of English language learners using an English dictionary. The Journal of Educational Research, 98, 245-253. doi:10.3200/JOER.98.4.245-256 http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JOER.98.4.245-256
4. Andrade, H. (2008). Self-assessments through rubrics. Educational Leadership, 65(4), 60-63.
5. Badke, W. (2009). Stepping beyond Wikipedia. Educational Leadership, 66(6), 54-55.
6. Barber, M., & Njus, D. (2007). Clicker evolution: Seeking intelligent design. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 6(1), 1-8. doi:10.1187/cbe.06-12-0206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.06-12-0206
7. Barlow, C. L., & Wetherill, K. S. (2005). Technology + imagination = results. T.H.E. Journal, 33, 20-22, 24, 26. Retrieved May 30, 2007, from http://www.thejournal.com/articles/17431_1
8. Beatty, I., Gerace, W., Leonard, W., & Dufresne, R. (2006). Designing effective questions for classroom response system teaching. American Journal of Physics, 74(1), 31-39. doi:10.1119/1.2121753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.2121753
9. Beddow, P. A., Kettler, R. J., & Elliott, S. N. (2008). TAMI: Test accessibility and modification inventory. Retrieved September 22, 2008, from http://peabody.vanderbilt.edu/TAMI.xml
10. Bender, W. N., & Shores, C. (2007). Response to intervention: A practical guide for teachers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
11. Bennett, D. E., Zentall, S. S., French, B. F., & Giorgetti-Borucki, K. (2006). The effects of computer administered choice on students with and without characteristics of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Behavioral Disorders, 31, 189-203.
12. Boone, R., & Higgins, K. (2007). The software-list: Evaluating educational software for use by students with disabilities. Technology in Action, 3(1), 1-15.
13. Bouck, E. C. (2006). Online assessments in the content areas: What are they good for? Journal of Special Education Technology, 21(2), 67-73.
14. Bouck, E. C., & Bouck, M. K. (2008). Does it add up? Calculators as accommodations for sixth grade students with disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 23(2), 17-32.
15. Brigham Young University Counseling and Career Center. (2008). Test-taking strategies. Retrieved July 8, 2008 from http://ccc.byu.edu/learning/strategy.php#6
16. Brinckerhoff, L. C., & Banerjee, M. (2007). Misconceptions regarding accommodations on high-stakes tests: Recommendations for preparing disability documentation for test takers with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 22, 246-255. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00253.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00253.x
17. Brody, J. E. (2006, March 7). Latest in technology gives life a clearer focus. New York Times, p. F7.
18. Brookhart, S. M., & Nitko, A. J. (2008). Assessment and grading in classrooms. Columbus, OH: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
19. Byrnes, M. A. (2008). Educators' interpretations of ambiguous accommodations. Remedial and Special Education, 29(3), 306-315. doi:10.1177/0741932507313017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0741932507313017
20. Capizzi, A. M., & Fuchs, L. S. (2005). Effects of curriculum-based measurement with and without diagnostic feedback on teacher planning. Remedial and Special Education, 26, 159-174. doi:10.1177/07419325050260030401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/07419325050260030401
21. Carr, S. C. (2002). Assessing learning processes: Useful information for teachers and students. Intervention in School and Clinic, 37, 156-162. doi:10.1177/105345120203700304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/105345120203700304
22. Chappuis, S., & Chappuis, J. (2008). The best value in formative assessment. Educational Leadership, 65(4), 14-18.
23. Childre, A., Sands, J. R., & Tanner Pope, S. (2009). Backward design: Targeting depth of understanding for all learners. Teaching Exceptional Children, 41(5), 6-14.
24. Clapper, A. T., Morse, A. B., Thurlow, M. L., & Thompson, S. J. (2006). How to develop state guidelines for access assistants: Scribes, readers, and sign language interpreters. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
25. Cohen, A. S., Gregg, N., & Deng, M. (2005). The role of extended time and item content on a high-stakes mathematics test. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 20, 225-233. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2005.00138.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2005.00138.x
26. Cohen, L. G., & Spenciner, L. J. (2007). Assessment of children and youth with special needs (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
27. Conderman, G., & Koroghlanian, C. (2002). Writing test questions like a pro. Intervention in School and Clinic, 42, 34-39. doi:10.1177/10534512060420010601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10534512060420010601
28. Cote, D. (2007). Problem-based learning software for students with disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 43, 29-37. doi:10.1177/10534512070430010401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10534512070430010401
29. Countryman, L. L., & Schroeder, M. (1996). When students lead parent-teacher conferences. Educational Leadership, 63(2), 42-47.
30. Cox, M. L., Herner, J. G., Demczyk, M. J., & Nieberding, J. J. (2006). Provision of testing accommodations for students with disabilities on statewide assessments: Statistical links with participation and discipline rates. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 346-354. doi:10.1177/07419325060270060401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/07419325060270060401
31. Cullen, J., Richards, S. B., & Frank, C. L. (2008). Using software to enhance the writing skills of students with special needs. Journal of Special Education Technology, 23(2), 33-43.
32. Cummings, T. M. (2007). Virtual reality as assistive technology. Journal of Special Education Technology, 22(2), 55-58.
33. Curry, C. (2003). Universal design accessibility for all learners. Educational Leadership, 61(2), 55-60.
34. Davis, A. P., & McGrail, E. (2009). The joy of blogging. Educational Leadership, 66(6), 74-77.
35. Dell, A. G., Newton, D., & Petroff, J. (2008). Assistive technology in the classroom: Enhancing the school experiences of students with disabilities. Columbus, OH: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
36. Dolan, R. P., Hall, T. E., Banerjee, M., Chun, S., & Strangman, N. (2005). Applying principles of universal design to test delivery: The effect of computer-based read-aloud on test performance of high school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 3(7). Available from http://www.jtla.org
37. Doyle, M. B., & Giangreco, M. F. (2009). Making presentation software accessible to high school students with intellectual disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 41(3), 24-31.
38. Edgemon, E. A., Jablonski, B. R., & Lloyd, J. W. (2006). Large-scale assessments: A teacher's guide to making decisions about accommodations. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38(3), 6-11.
39. Educational Testing Service (2005). Reducing test anxiety. Princeton, NJ: Author.
40. Edyburn, D. L. (2003). Technology in special education. In M. D.Roblyer (Ed.), Integrating educational technology into teaching (3rd ed., pp. 315-333). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
41. Edyburn, D., & Basham, J. (2008). Collecting and coding observational data. Journal of Special Education Technology, 23(2), 56-60.
42. Elbaum, B. (2007). Effects of an oral testing accommodation on the mathematics performance of secondary students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 40, 218-229. doi:10.1177/00224669070400040301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00224669070400040301
43. Elliott, J. L., & Thurlow, M. L. (2006). Improving test performance of students with disabilities … on district and state assessments (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
44. Elliott, S. N., Kratochwill, T. R., & Schulte, T. R. (1998). The assessment accommodation checklist. Teaching Exceptional Children, 31(2), 10-14.
45. Elliott, S. N., & Marquart, A. (2004). Extended time as a testing accommodation: Its effects and perceived consequences. Exceptional Children, 70, 349-367.
46. Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2008). Releasing responsibility. Educational Leadership, 66(3), 32-37.
47. Fitzgerald, M. (2008, January 27). The coming wave of gadgets that listen and obey. New York Times, p. BU4.
48. Foegen, A. (2008). Progress monitoring in middle school mathematics: Options and issues. Remedial and Special Education, 29(4), 195-207. doi:10.1177/0741932507309716 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0741932507309716
49. Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2005). Responsiveness-to-intervention: A blueprint for practitioners, policymakers, and parents. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38(1), 57-59.
50. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2001). Helping teachers formulate sound test accommodation decisions for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 174-181. doi:10.1111/0938-8982.00018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0938-8982.00018
51. Gajria, M., Giek, K., Hemrick, M., & Salend, S. J. (1992, April). Teacher acceptability of testing modifications for mainstreamed students. Paper presented at the meeting of the Council for Exceptional Children, Baltimore, MD.
52. Garcia, S. B., & Ortiz, A. A. (2006). Preventing disproportionate representation: Culturally and linguistically responsive prereferral interventions. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38(4), 64-67.
53. Gee, J. P., & Levine, M. H. (2009). Welcome to our virtual worlds. Educational Leadership, 66(6), 48-52.
54. Geller, L. K. (2005, April). Universal design for assessments: Including all students in general education assessments. Presentation at the international meeting of the Council for Exceptional Children, Baltimore, MD.
55. Glenn, R. E. (2004). Teach kids test-taking tactics. Teaching for Excellence, 24, 1-2.
56. Glor-Sheib, S., & Telthorster, H. (2006). Activate your student IEP team member using technology: How electronic portfolios can bring the student voice to life! Teaching Exceptional Children Plus, 2(3) Article 1. Retrieved December 10, 2007, from http://escholarship.bc.edu/education/tecplus/vol2/iss3/art1
57. Hansen, E. G., & Mislevy, R. J. (2006). Accessibility of computer-based testing for individuals with disabilities and English language learners within a validity framework. In M.Hricko & S. L.Howell (Eds.), Online assessment and measurement: Foundations and challenges (pp. 214-261). Hershey, PA: Information Sciences.
58. Hasselbring, T. S., & Bausch, M. E. (2006). Assistive technologies for reading. Educational Leadership, 63(4), 72-75.
59. Herrera, S. G., Murry, K. G., & Cabral, R. M. (2007). Assessment accommodations for classroom teachers of culturally and linguistically diverse students. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
60. Hessler, T., & Konrad, M. (2008). Using curriculum-based measurement to drive IEPs and instruction in written expression. Teaching Exceptional Children, 41(2), 28-37.
61. Hetzroni, O. E., & Shrieber, B. (2004). Word processing as an assistive technology tool for enhancing the academic outcomes of students with writing disabilities in the general classroom. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 144-154. doi:10.1177/00222194040370020501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00222194040370020501
62. Higgins, E. L., & Raskind, M. H. (2005). The compensatory effectiveness of the Quicktionary Reading Pen II on the reading comprehension of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 20(1), 31-37.
63. Hoffman, B., Hartley, K., & Boone, R. (2005). Reaching accessibility: Guidelines for creating and refining digital learning materials. Intervention in School and Clinic, 40, 171-176. doi:10.1177/10534512050400030601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10534512050400030601
64. Hogan, T. P. (2007). Educational assessment: A practical introduction. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
65. Holzer, M. F., Madaus, J. W., Bray, M. A., & Kehle, T. J. (2009). The test-taking strategy intervention for college students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 24, 44-56. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2008.01276.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2008.01276.x
66. Hoover, J. (2009). RTI assessment essentials for struggling learners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
67. Hopkins, J. (2006). All students being equal. Technology and Learning, 26(10), 26-28.
68. Horn, C., Schuster, J. W., & Collins, B. C. (2006). Use of response cards to teach telling time to students with moderate and severe disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 41(4), 382-391.
69. Hughes, C. A., Schumaker, J. B., & Deshler, D. D. (2005). The essay test-taking strategy. Lawrence, KS: Edge Enterprises.
70. Hughes, C. A., Schumaker, J. B., Deshler, D. D., & Mercer, C. D. (2002). Learning strategies curriculum: The test-taking strategy (6th ed.). Lawrence, KS: Edge Enterprise.
71. Jones, E. (2008). They can hear you know. Technology and Learning, 28(11), 43-46.
72. Kalyanpur, M., & Kirmani, M. H. (2005). Diversity and technology: Classroom implications for the digital divide. Journal of Special Education Technology, 20(4), 9-18.
73. Kaylor, M. (2008). Use digital storytelling to improve your students' writing skills. CEC Today, Retrieved December 16, 2008, from http://www.cec.sped.org/AM/PrinterTemplate.cfm?Section=CEC_Today1&TEMPLATE
74. Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., Alonzo, J., Braun-Monegan, J., & Tindal, G. (2007). Recommendations for accommodations: Implications of (in)consistency. Remedial and Special Education, 28, 194-206. doi:10.1177/07419325070280040101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/07419325070280040101
75. Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., Yovanoff, P., & Tindal, G. (2007). Developing a new paradigm for conducting research on accommodations in mathematics testing. Exceptional Children, 73, 331-347.
76. King-Sears, K. E., & Evmenova, A. S. (2007). Premises, principles, and processes for integrating TECHnology into instruction. Teaching Exceptional Children, 40(1), 6-14.
77. Kirby, J. R., Silvestri, R., Allingham, B. H., Parrila, R., & La Fave, C. B. (2008). Learning strategies and study approaches of postsecondary students with dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(1), 85-96. doi:10.1177/0022219407311040 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022219407311040
78. Knobel, M. & Wilber, D. (2009). Let's talk 2.0. Educational Leadership, 66(6), 20-24.
79. Kozen, A. A., Murray, R. K., & Windell, I. (2006). Increasing all students' chance to achieve: Using and adapting anticipation guides with middle school learners. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41, 195-200. doi:10.1177/10534512060410040101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10534512060410040101
80. Kretlow, A. G., Lo, Y., White, R. B., & Jordan, L. (2008). Teaching test-taking strategies to improve the academic achievement of students with mild mental disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 43(3), 397-408.
81. Kurtts, S. A., Matthews, C. E., & Smallwood, T. (2009). (Dis)solving the differences: A physical science lesson using universal design. Intervention in School and Clinic, 44(3), 151-159. doi:10.1177/1053451208326051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1053451208326051
82. Lacava, P. G., Golan, O., Baron-Cohen, S., & Myles, B. S. (2007). Using assistive technology to teach emotion recognition to students with Asperger syndrome: A pilot study. Remedial and Special Education, 28, 174-181. doi:10.1177/07419325070280030601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/07419325070280030601
83. Lambert, M. A., & Nowacek, J. (2006). Help high school students improve their study skills. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41, 241-243. doi:10.1177/10534512060410040701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10534512060410040701
84. Lancaster, P. E., Lancaster, S. C., Schumaker, J. B., & Deshler, D. D. (2006). The efficacy of an interactive hypermedial program for teaching a test-taking strategy to students with high-incidence disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 21(2), 17-30.
85. Layton, C. A., & Lock, R. H. (2008). Assessing students with special needs to produce quality outcomes. Columbus, OH: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
86. Lenz, B. K. (2006). Creating school-wide conditions for high-quality learning strategy classroom instruction. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41, 261-266. doi:10.1177/10534512060410050201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10534512060410050201
87. Lenz, K., Graner, P., & Adams, G. (2003). Learning expressways: Building academic relationships to improve learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(3), 70-73.
88. Levine, M. (2003). Celebrating diverse minds. Educational Leadership, 61(2), 12-18.
89. Lindstrom, J. H. (2007). Determining appropriate accommodations for postsecondary students with reading and written expression disorders. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 22(4), 229-236. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00251.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00251.x
90. MacArthur, C. A. (2009). Reflections on research on writing and technology for struggling writers. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice 24, 81-92. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2009.00283.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2009.00283.x
91. MacArthur, C. A., & Cavalier, A. R. (2004). Dictation and speech recognition technology as test accommodations. Exceptional Children, 71, 43-58.
92. Maheady, L., Michielli-Pendl, J., Mallette, B., & Harper, G. (2002). A collaborative research project to improve the academic performance of a diverse sixth grade science class. Teacher Education and Special Education, 25, 55-70. doi:10.1177/088840640202500107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/088840640202500107
93. March, T. (2006). The new WWW: Whatever, whenever, wherever. Educational Leadership, 63(4), 14-19.
94. McGuire, J. M., Scott, S. S., & Shaw, S. F. (2006). Universal design and its applications in educational environments. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 166-175. doi:10.1177/07419325060270030501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/07419325060270030501
95. McLoughlin, J. A., & Lewis, R. B. (2008). Assessing students with special needs (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
96. Mellard, D. F., & Johnson, E. (2007). RTI: A practitioner's guide to implementing response to intervention. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
97. Meltzer, L., Roditi, B., Stein, J., Krishnan, K., & Sales Pollica, M. A. (2008). Effective study and test-taking strategies for kids with learning difficulties. Retrieved June 19, 2008, from http://www.greatschools.net/cgi-bin/showarticle/1160
98. Michaelson, L., & Sweet, M. (2008). Team-based learning. NEA Higher Education Advocate, 25(6), 5-8.
99. Mind Tools (2008). Memory improvement techniques. Retrieved June 19, 2008, from http://www.mindtools.com/memory.html
100. Mitchem, K., Kight, J., Fitzgerald, G., Koury, K., & Boonseng, T. (2007). Electronic performance support systems: An assistive technology tool for secondary students with mild disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 22(2), 1-14.
101. Moats, L. C. (2006, Winter). How spelling supports reading and why it is more regular and predictable than you may think. American Educator, 12-22, 42-43.
102. Montague, M. (2006). Self-regulation strategies for better math performance in middle school. In M.Montague & A. K.Jitendra (Eds.), Teaching mathematics to middle school students with learning difficulties (pp. 89-107). New York: Guilford.
103. Moore Howard, R., & Davies, L. J. (2009). Plagiarism in the Internet age. Educational Leadership, 66(6), 64-67.
104. Mounce, A. B. (2008). Teaching content with interactive whiteboards. Journal of Special Education Technology, 23(1), 54-58.
105. Mustacchi, J. (2009). R U safe? Educational Leadership, 66(6), 78-82.
106. National Board of Medical Examiners (2002). Constructing written test questions for basic and clinical sciences (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: Author. Retrieved March 22, 2008, from http://www.nbme.org/PDF/ItemWriting_2003/2003IWGwhole.pdf
107. Neal, J. D., & Ehlert, D. (2006). 20 ways to … Add technology for students with disabilities to the library or media center. Intervention in School and Clinic, 42, 119-123. doi:10.1177/10534512060420020401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10534512060420020401
108. November, A. (2008). Web literacy for educators. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
109. Okolo, C. M., Englert, C. S., Bouck, E. C., & Heutsche, A. M. (2007). Web-based history learning environments: Helping all students learn and like history. Intervention in School and Clinic, 43, 1-11. doi:10.1177/10534512070430010101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10534512070430010101
110. Overton, T. (2009). Assessing learners with special needs: An applied approach (6th ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
111. Parette, H. P., Peterson-Karlan, G. R., Wojcik, B. W., & Bardi, N. (2007). Monitor that progress! Data trends for assistive technology decision making. Teaching Exceptional Children, 40(1), 22-29.
112. Parette, H. P., Wojcik, B. W., Peterson-Karlan, G., & Hourcade, J. J. (2005). Assistive technology for students with mild disabilities: What's cool and what's not. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 40, 320-331.
113. Perner, D. E. (2007). No Child Left Behind: Issues of assessing students with the most significant cognitive disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 42, 243-251.
114. Pike, K., & Salend, S. J. (1995). Authentic assessment strategies. Teaching exceptional children, 28(1), 15-20.
115. Pogue, D. (2008, August 7). Speak up, a computer is listening. New York Times, pp. BU1, BU8.
116. Pomplun, M. (1996). Cooperative groups: Alternate assessment for students with disabilities? Journal of Special Education, 30(1), 1-17. doi:10.1177/002246699603000101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002246699603000101
117. Popham, W. (2006). Those [fill-in-the-blank] tests. Educational Leadership, 62(5), 84-85.
118. Prensky, M. (2008). Turning on the lights. Educational Leadership, 65(6), 40-45.
119. Price, K. M., & Nelson, K. L. (2007). Planning effective instruction: Diversity responsive methods and management (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth.
120. Rao, K., Dowrick, P. W., Yuen, J. W. L., & Boisvert, P. C. (2009). Writing in a multimedia environment: Pilot outcomes for high school students in special education. Journal of Special Education Technology, 24(1), 39-49.
121. Reetz, L. J. (1995, April). Portfolio assessment in inclusion settings: A shared responsibility. Presentation at the annual meeting of the Council for Exceptional Children, Indianapolis, IN.
122. Richardson, W. (2006). The educator's guide to the read/write web. Educational Leadership, 63(4), 24-27.
123. Rozalski, M. E. (2007). Practice, practice, practice: How to improve students' study skills. Beyond Behavior, 17(1), 17-23.
124. Saavedra, S. (2008). Reviewing for a test could be just a click away on your iPod. San Diego Union-Tribune. Retrieved March 3, 2008, from http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/education/20080304-9999-1n4ipods.html
125. Salend, S. J. (2008). Creating inclusive classrooms: Effective and reflective practices (6th ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
126. Salend, S. J. (2009). Using technology to create and administer accessible tests. Teaching Exceptional Children, 41(3), 40-51.
127. Salend, S. J., & Garrick Duhaney, L. M. (2002). Grading students in inclusive settings. Teaching Exceptional Children, 34(3), 8-15.
128. Savage, T. V., Savage, K., & Armstrong, D. G. (2006). Teaching in the secondary school (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
129. Sayeski, K. L. (2008). Virtual manipulatives as an assistive technology support for students with high-incidence disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 23(1), 47-53.
130. Schleibaum, (2007). Using community based social stories to enhance instruction for high school students with moderate disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 22(2), 59-64.
131. Schweder, W., & Wissick, C. A. (2007). Blogging in and out of the classroom. Journal of Special Education Technology, 22(4), 63-69.
132. Schweder, W., & Wissick, C. A. (2009). The power of wikis. Journal of Special Education Technology, 24(1), 57-60.
133. Sedensky, M. (May 2005). Computers grade student writing. Retrieved December 8, 2008, from http://www.livescience.com/technology/ap_050509_grading.html
134. Shaffer, D. W. (2007). Epistemic games as career preparatory experiences for students with disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 22(3), 57-68.
135. Silver-Pacuilla, H., & Fleischman, S. (2006). Technology to help struggling students. Educational Leadership, 63(5), 84-85.
136. Skouge, J. R., Kelly, M., Roberts, K. D., Leake, D. W., & Stodden, R. A. (2007). Technologies for self-determination for youth with developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 42, 475-482.
137. Skylar, A. A. (2007). Section 508: Web accessibility for people with disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 22(4), 57-62.
138. Skylar, A. A., Higgins, K., & Boone, R. (2007). Strategies for adapting WebQuests for students with learning disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 43, 20-28. doi:10.1177/10534512070430010301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10534512070430010301
139. Smedley, T. M., & Higgins, K. (2005). Virtual technology: Bringing the world into the special education classroom. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41, 114-119. doi:10.1177/10534512050410020201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10534512050410020201
140. Songlee, D., Miller, S. P., Tincani, M., Sileo, N. M., & Perkins, P. G. (2008). Effects of test-taking strategy instruction on high-functioning adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 23(4), 217-228. doi:10.1177/1088357608324714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1088357608324714
141. Sopko, K. M. (2008). Universal design for learning: Implementation in six local education agencies. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education.
142. Sperling, R. A. (2006). Assessing reading materials for students who are learning disabled. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41, 138-143. doi:10.1177/10534512060410030201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10534512060410030201
143. Spinelli, C. G. (2006). Classroom assessment for students in special and general education (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
144. Sprankle, B. (2008). Action: Caught on video. Technology and Learning, 28(9), 29-32.
145. Stanford, P., & Reeves, S. (2005). Assessment that drives instruction. Teaching Exceptional Children, 37(4), 18-22.
146. Stern, J., & Avigliano, J. (2008, November). Differentiated team teaching. Presentation at the State University of New York at New Paltz.
147. Stock, S. E., Davies, D. K., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2004). Internet-based multimedia tests and surveys for individuals with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 19(4), 43-47.
148. Strichart, S. S., & Mangrum, C. T. (2010). Study skills for learning disabled and struggling students (4th ed.). Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Pearson Education.
149. Strobel, W., Arthanat, S., Fossa, J., Mistrett, S., & Brace, J. (2006). The industry profile on education technology: Learning disabilities technologies and markets. Retrieved September 5, 2007, from http://cosmos.buffalo.edu/t2rerc/pubs/ip/ET/index.htm
150. Stromer, R., Kimball, W., Kinney, E. M., & Taylor, B. A. (2006). Activity schedules, computer technology, and teaching children with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 21, 14-24. doi:10.1177/10883576060210010301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10883576060210010301
151. Tam, K. Y., & Heng, M. A. (2005). A case involving culturally and linguistically diverse parents in prereferral intervention. Intervention in School and Clinic, 40, 222-230. doi:10.1177/10534512050400040301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10534512050400040301
152. Tennessee Department of Education. (2008). "Test-time" strategies for students, parents, and teachers. Retrieved December 14, 2008, from http://www.tennessee.gov/education/assessment/doc/tsteststrategies.pdf
153. Terrill, M. C., Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (2004). SAT vocabulary instruction for high school students with learning disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 39, 288-294. doi:10.1177/10534512040390050501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10534512040390050501
154. Test-taking tips for parents. (2008). Retrieved July 8, 2008, from http://www.testtakingtips.com/parents/index.htm
155. Therrien, W. J., Hughes, C., Kapelski, C., & Mokhtari, K. (2009). Effectiveness of a test-taking strategy on achievement in essay tests for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(1), 14-23. doi:10.1177/0022219408326218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022219408326218
156. Thompson, J. R., Bakken, J. P., Fulk, B. M., & Peterson-Karlan, G. (2005). Using technology to improve the literacy skills of students with disabilities. Naperville, IL: Learning Point Associates.
157. Thompson, J. R., Meadan, H., Fansler, K. W., Alber, S. B., & Balogh, P. A. (2007). Family assessment portfolios: A new way to jumpstart family/school collaboration. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39(6), 19-25.
158. Thompson, S. J., Johnstone, C. J., & Thurlow, M. L. (2002). Universal design applied to large scale assessments (Synthesis Report 44). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
159. Thompson, S. J., Quenemoen, R. F., & Thurlow, M. L. (2006). Factors to consider in the design of inclusive online assessments. In M.Hricko & S. L.Howell (Eds.), Online assessment and measurement: Foundations and challenges (pp. 102-117). Hershey, PA: Information Sciences Publishing.
160. Tomlinson, C. A. (2008). Learning to love assessment. Educational Leadership, 65(4), 8-13.
161. Towles-Reeves, E., Kleinert, A., & Muhomba, M. (2009). Alternate assessment: Have we learned anything new? Exceptional Children, 75(2), 233-252.
162. Villano, M. (2006). Classroom management software. Technology and Learning, 26(10), 8-12.
163. Walker, C., & Schmidt, E. (2004). Smart tests: Teacher-made tests that help students learn. Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.
164. Wang, L. (2005). The advantages of using technology in second language education. THE: Technological Horizons in Education, 32(10), 38-42.
165. Weinstein, C. E., Palmer, D. R., & Schulte, A. C. (2002). LASSI user's manual (2nd ed.). Clearwater, FL: H & H Publishing.
166. Whittaker, C. R., Salend, S. J., & Duhaney, D. (2001). Creating instructional rubrics for inclusive classrooms. Teaching Exceptional Children, 34(2), 8-13.
167. Williams, B. (2007). Educator's podcast guide. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
168. Willingham, D. T. (2009). What will improve a student's memory? American Educator, 32(4), 17-25.
169. Wissick, C. A. (2005). Written language: When to consider technology. Technology in Action, 1(6), 1-12.
170. Yell, M. L., Busch, T. W., & Rogers, D. C. (2007). Providing instruction and monitoring student performance. Beyond Behavior, 17(1), 31-38.
171. Yell, M. L., Katsiyannas, A., & Shriner, J. G. (2006). The No Child Left Behind Act, adequate yearly progress, and student with disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38(4), 32-39.
172. Yell, M. L., & Rozalski, M. E. (2008). Academic interventions: Effective instruction. In M.Yell, N.Meadows, E.Drasgow, & J.Shriner (Eds.), Educating students with emotional and behavioral disorders in general and special education classrooms (pp. 282-335). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
173. Zorfass, J. M., Fideler, E. F., Clay, K., & Brann, A. (2007). Enhancing content literacy: Software tools help struggling students. Technology in Action, 2(6), 1-12.