Recommendations for accommodations implications of (In)consistency

Remedial and Special Education

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 194-206

  Ketterlin Geller, Leanne R ^a   Alonzo, Julie ^a   Braun Monegan, Jenelle ^a,b   Tindal, Gerald ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

^b Learning Point Associates   (United States)

^c Castle McIntosh Knight Endowed   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548062622     PISSN: 07419325     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/07419325070280040101     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Author.
2. Bullis, M., Bull, B., Johnson, B., & Peters, D. (1994). Young adults who are hearing and deaf in a transition study: Did they and their parents supply similar data? Exceptional Children, 60, 323-333.
3. Campbell, C., & Evans, J. A. (2000). Investigations of preservice teachers' classroom assessment practices during student teaching. The Journal of Educational Research, 93, 350-355.
4. Children's Educational Services. (1987), Standard reading passages: Measures for screening and progress monitoring. Minneapolis, MN: Author.
5. Cicchetti, D. V., & Feinstein, A. R. (1990). High agreement but low Kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 43, 551-558.
6. Elliott, J., Ysseldyke, J., Thurlow, M., & Erickson, R. (1998). What about assessment and accountability: Practical implications for educators. Teaching Exceptional Children, 31(2), 20-27.
7. Elliott, S. N., Kratochwill, T. R., & McKevitt, B. C. (2000). Experimental analysis of the effects of testing accommodations on the scores of students with and without disabilities. Journal of School Psychology, 39, 3-24.
8. Elliott, S. N., McKevitt, B. C., & Kettler, R. J. (2002). Testing accommodations research and decision making: The case of "good" scores being highly valued but difficult to achieve for all students. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 35, 153-166.
9. Fleiss, J. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
10. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D., (1992). Identifying a measure for monitoring student reading progress. School Psychology Review, 21, 45-58.
11. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1999). Fair and unfair testing accommodations. School Administrator, 56(10), 24-29.
12. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2001), Helping teachers formulate sound test accommodation decisions for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 174-181.
13. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Eaton, S. B., Hamlett, C., Binkley, E., & Crouch, R. (2000). Using objective data sources to enhance teacher judgments about test accommodations. Exceptional Children, 67, 67-81.
14. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Eaton, S. B., Hamlett, C. L., & Karns, M. (2000). Supplementing teacher judgments of mathematics test accommodations with objective data sources. School Psychology Review, 29, 65-85.
15. Haladyna, T., & Downing, S. M. (2004). Construct irrelevant variance in high stakes testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 25(1), 6-16.
16. Hasbrouck, J., & Tindal, G. (2005). Oral reading fluency: 90 years of measurement (Technical Report No. 33). Eugene: University of Oregon, College of Education, Behavioral Research and Teaching.
17. Helwig, R., Rozek-Tedesco, M. A., & Tindal, G. (2002). An oral versus a standard administration of a large-scale mathematics test. The Journal of Special Education, 36, 39-47.
18. Helwig, R., & Tindal, G. (2003). An experimental analysis of accommodation decisions on large-scale mathematics tests. Exceptional Children, 69, 211-225.
19. Hollenbeck, K., Tindal, G., & Almond, P. (1998). Teachers' knowledge of accommodations as a validity issue in high-stakes testing. The Journal of Special Education, 32, 175-183.
20. Howell, K. W., & Nolet, V. (2000). Curriculum-based evaluation: Teaching and decision making. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson.
21. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004) (reauthorization of Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990)
22. Jayanthi, M., Epstein, M. H., Polloway, E. A., & Bursuck, W. D. (1996). A national survey of general education teachers' perceptions of testing adaptations. The Journal of Special Education, 30, 99-115.
23. Ketterlin-Geller, L. R. (2003). Establishing a validity argument for universally designed assessments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene.
24. Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., Yovanoff, P., & Tindal, G. (2007). Developing a new paradigm for accommodations research. Exceptional Children, 73(3), 331-347.
25. National Center on Educational Outcomes. (2003). Special topic area: Accommodations for students with disabilities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
26. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. § 6301 et seq.
27. O'Sullivan, R. G., & Johnson, R. L. (1993, April). Using performance assessments to measure teachers' competence in classroom assessments. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
28. Parker, R., Hasbrouck, J. E., & Tindal, G. (1992). The maze as a classroom-based reading measure: Construction methods, reliability, and validity. The Journal of Special Education, 26, 195-218.
29. Schafer, W. D. (1991). Essential assessment skills in professional education of teachers. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 10(1), 3-6, 12.
30. Schulte, A. A. G., Elliott, S. N., & Kratochwill, T. R. (2000). Educators' perceptions and documentation of testing accommodations for students with disabilities. Special Services in the Schools, 16(1/2), 35-56.
31. Shin, J., Deno, S. L., & Espin, C. (2000). Technical adequacy of the maze task for curriculum-based measurement of reading growth. The Journal of Special Education, 34, 164-172.
32. Shriner, J. G., & DeStefano, L. (2003). Participation and accommodation in state assessment: The role of individualized education programs. Exceptional Children, 69, 147-161.
33. Sireci, S. G., Li, S., & Scarpati, S. (2003). The effects of test accommodation on test performance: A review of the literature (Center for Educational Assessment Research Report no. 485). Amherst: University of Massachusetts, School of Education.
34. Siskind, T. G. (1993). Teachers' knowledge about test modifications for students with disabilities. Diagnostique, 18, 145-157.
35. Stiggins, R. J. (1999). Evaluating classroom assessment training in teacher education programs. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 18(1), 23-27.
36. Thompson, S. J., Morse, A. B., & Sharpe, M. (2004). Accommodations manual: How to choose and use accommodations for students with disabilities. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
37. Thompson, S., & Thurlow, M. (2003), State special education outcomes: Marching on. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
38. Tindal, G., & Fuchs, L. (1999), A summary of research on test changes: An empirical basis for defining accommodations. Lexington, KY: Mid-South Regional Resource Center.
39. Tindal, T., & Ketterlin-Geller, L. R. (2004). Research on mathematics test accommodations relevant to NAEP testing. Washington, DC: National Assessment Governing Board. Retrieved January 31, 2004 from http://www.nagb.org/pubs/conferences/tindal.pdf
40. Wise, S. L., Lukin, L. E., & Roos, L. L. (1991). Teacher beliefs about training in testing and measurement. Journal of Teacher Education, 42(1), 37-42.
41. Yell, M. L., & Stecker, P. M. (2003). Developing legally correct and educationally meaningful IEPs using curriculum-based measurement. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 28(3/4), 73-88.