No child left behind: Issues of assessing students with the most significant cognitive disabilities

Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 243-251

  Perner, Darlene E ^a  

^a BLOOMSBURG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548492268     PISSN: 15470350     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Arizona Department of Education. (2006, October) . Alternate Assessment Manual for the Arizona Student Achievement Program. Retrieved December 12, 2006, from http://www.ade.az.gov/ess/Special Projects/aims-a/.
2. Browder, D. M. (2001). Curriculum and assessment for students with moderate and severe disabilities. New York: The Guilford Press.
3. Browder, D. M., Fallin, K., Davis, S., & Karvonen, M. (2003). Considerations of what may influence student outcomes on alternate assessment. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 255-270.
4. Browder, D. M., Spooner, F., Algozzine, R., AhlgrimDezell, L., Flowers, C., & Karvonen, M. (2003). What we know and need to know about alternate assessment. Exceptional Children, 70, 45-61.
5. Browder, D. M., Wakeman, S. Y., & Flowers, C. (2006). Assessment of progress in the general curriculum for students with disabilities. Theory into Practice, 45, 249-259.
6. Crawford, L., & Tindal, G. (2006). Policy and practice: Knowledge and beliefs of education professionals related to the inclusion of students with disabilities in a state assessment. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 208-217.
7. Council for Exceptional Children. (2005, May 13). CEC responds to education Secretary Spellings' announcement on the New "Common Sense" Guidelines for NCLB Flexibility. Retrieved June 3, 2005, from http://www.cec.sped.org/pp/ legislative_update/modules/news/article.php?storyid = 106.
8. Council for Exceptional Children. (2004). Policy on assessment and accountability. Council for Exceptional Children 2004 Policy Manual; Section Three, Part 1, Chapter 3, Para. 15. Retrieved June 3, 2005, from http://www.cec.sped.org/pp/ Assessment-Accountability_Policy.pdf.
9. Flowers, C., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Browder, D., & Spooner, F. (2005). Teachers' perceptions of alternate assessments. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 30(2), 81-92.
10. Illinois State Board of Education. (2006, August) Illinois Alternate Assessment 2006-2007 Implementation Manual. Retrieved December 12, 2006, from http://www.isbe.state.il.us/assessment/pdfs/ alt_implementation_manual.pdf.
11. Kampfer, S., Horvath, L., Kleinert, H., & Kearns, J. (2001). Teachers' perceptions of one state's alternate assessment: Implications for practice and preparation. Exceptional Children, 67, 361-374.
12. Kansas State Department of Education. (2006, August). Kansas Alternate Assessment 2006-2007 Teacher's Guide. Retrieved December 12, 2006, from http://www.tensped.Grg/ksde/assmts/ ksalt/kaatchguide.pdf.
13. Kleinert, H., Green, P., Hurte, M., Clayton, J., & Oetinger, C. (2002). Creating and using meaningful alternate assessment. Teaching Exceptional Children, 34(4), 40-47.
14. Kleinert, H., & Reams, J. (Eds.). (2001). Alternate assessment: Measuring outcomes and supports for students with disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
15. Kleinert, H., & Thurlow, M. (2001). An introduction to alternate assessment. In H. Kleinert & J. Kearns (Eds.), Alternate assessment: Measuring outcomes and supports for students with disabilities (pp.1-15). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
16. Kohl, F. L., McLaughlin, M. J., & Nagle, K. (2006). Alternate achievement standards and assessments: A descriptive investigation of 16 states. Exceptional Children, 73, 107-123.
17. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 PL 107-110, 115 Stat.1425 (2002).
18. PASA. (2005-2007). PASA Project (University of Pittsburg). Connecting Students with the Most Severe Cognitive Disabilities to Pennsylvania Academic Standards, Pennsylvania Alternate System of Assessment. Retrieved January 14, 2007, from http://www.pasaassessment.org/administration/ index.do.
19. South Dakota Department of Education, (n.d.). Alternate Assessment. Retrieved January 14, 2007, from http:// doe.sd.gov/oess/ specialed/news/altassessment. asp; http://doe.sd.gov/ octa/assessment/dakSTEP/ docs/2005%20STAARS%20Technical%20Manual. pdf; and http://doe.sd.gov/oess/ specialed/news/ docs/Spring%2007%20Dakota%20STEP-A%20TCH. pdf.
20. Tindal, G., McDonald, M., Tedesco, M., Glasgow, A., Almond, P., Crawford, L., et al. (2003). Alternate assessment in reading and math: Development and validation for students with significant disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69, 481-494.
21. Towles-Reeves, E., & Kleinert, H. (2006). The impact of one state's alternate assessment upon instruction and IEP development. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 25(3), 31-39.
22. U.S. Department of Education. (2003). Title I-Improving the Academic Achievement of the Disadvantaged; Final Rule, 68 Federal Registry 236 (December 9, 2003) (codified at 34 C.F.R. pt. 200).
23. U.S. Department of Education. (2004, January 14). Charting the course: States decide major provisions under No Child Left Behind. News Release. Retrieved August 15, 2005, from http://www. ed.gov/news/pressreleases/2004/01/ 01142004. html#special.
24. U.S. Department of Education. (2005, May 10). Raising achievement: A new path for No Child Left Behind. News Release. Retrieved August 15, 2005, from http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/ raising/new-path-long.html.
25. Washburn-Moses, L. (2003). What every special educator should know about high-stakes testing. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(4), 12-15.
26. Yovanoff, P., & Tindal, G. (2007). Scaling early reading alternate assessments with statewide measures. Exceptional Children, 73, 184-201.
27. Ysseldyke, J., Nelson, J. R., Christenson, S., Johnson, D. R., Dennison, A., Trizenberg, H., et al. (2004). What we know and need to know about the consequences of high-stakes testing for students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 70, 75-94.
28. Zatta, M., & Pullin, D. (2004, April 10). Education and alternate assessment for students with significant cognitive disabilities: Implications for educators. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(16). Retrieved June 3, 2005, from http://epaa.asu. edu/epaa/vl2nl6/