Data fusion methodologies for food and beverage authentication and quality assessment - A review

Analytica Chimica Acta

Volumn 891, Issue , 2015, Pages 1-14

  Borràs, Eva ^a   Ferré, Joan ^a   Boqué, Ricard ^a   Mestres, Montserrat ^a   Aceña, Laura ^a   Busto, Olga ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT ROVIRA I VIRGILI   (Spain)

Author keywords

Authentication; Beverage; Chemometrics; Classification; Data fusion; Food

Indexed keywords

BEVERAGES; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); DATA FUSION; FOOD PRODUCTS; SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSIS;

CHEMOMETRICS; CHROMATOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUES; CONTROL PROCESS; DATA FUSION STRATEGY; FOOD COMMODITY; FUSION METHODOLOGY; INSTRUMENTAL TECHNIQUES; QUALITY ASSESSMENT;

AUTHENTICATION;

OLIVE OIL;

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; CHEMOMETRICS; DATA ANALYSIS; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FOOD; FOOD PROCESSING; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; METHODOLOGY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS CONTROL; QUALITY CONTROL; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; SENSOR; SENSORY ANALYSIS; SEPARATION TECHNIQUE; SPECTROSCOPY; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; ANALYSIS; BEVERAGE; CHROMATOGRAPHY; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; FOOD ANALYSIS; FOOD QUALITY; HUMAN; PROCEDURES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

BEVERAGES; CHROMATOGRAPHY; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FOOD ANALYSIS; FOOD QUALITY; HUMANS; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS;

EID: 84941874576     PISSN: 00032670     EISSN: 18734324     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2015.04.042     Document Type: Review

References (109)

1. Esslinger S., Riedl J., Fauhl-Hassek C. Potential and limitations of non-targeted fingerprinting for authentication of food in official control. Food Res. Int. 2014, 60:189-204.
2. Regulation (EU) No. 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs, Off. J. Eur. Union L343 (2012) 1-29.
3. Regulation (EC) No. 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food saf, Off. J. Eur. Union L31 (2002) 1-24.
4. Council Directive 2001/110/EC of 20 December 2001 relating to honey, Off. J. Eur. Commun. L10 (2001) 47-52.
5. Council Regulation (EC) No. 247/2006 of 30 January 2006 laying down specific measures for agriculture in the outermost regions of the Union, Off. J. Eur. Union L42 (2006) 1-19.
6. Council Regulation (EC) No. 509/2006 of 20 March 2006 on agricultural products and foodstuffs as traditional specialities guaranteed, Off. J. Eur. Union L93 (2006) 1-11.
7. Council Regulation (EC) No. 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs, Off. J. Eur. Union (2006).
8. Council Regulation (EC) No. 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation), Off. J. Eur. Union L299 (2007) 1-149.
9. Regulation (EC) No. 110/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2008 on the definition, description, presentation, labelling and the protection of geographical indications of spirit drinks and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No, Off. J. Eur. Union L39 (2008) 16-54.
10. Luykx D.M.A.M., Van Ruth S.M. An overview of analytical methods for determining the geographical origin of food products. Food Chem. 2008, 107:897-911.
11. Sun D.-W. Modern Techniques for Food Authentication 2008, Elsevier/A, Amsterdam.
12. Lees M. Food Authenticity and Traceability 2015, Woodhead Publishing Limited and CRC Press LLC, 2003.
13. Kwan W.-O., Kowalski B.R., Skogerboe R.K. Pattern recognition analysis of elemental data. Wines of Vitis vinifera cv Pinot Noir from France and the United States. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1979, 27:1321-1326.
14. Forina M., Armanino C., Castino M., Ubigli M. Multivariate data analysis as a discriminating method of the origin of wines. Vitis 1986, 189-201.
15. Hall D.L., Llinas J. An introduction to multisensor data fusion. Proc. IEEE 1997, 85:6-23.
16. Steinmetz V., Sévila F., Bellon-Maurel V. A methodology for sensor fusion design: application to fruit quality assessment. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 1999, 74:21-31.
17. Sliwinska M., Wisniewska P., Dymerski T., Namiesnik W. Food analysis using artificial senses. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62:1423-1448.
18. Zakaria A., Shakaff A.Y.M., Adom A.H., Ahmad M.N., Masnan M.J., Abdul Aziz A.H., et al. Improved classification of Orthosiphon stamineus by data fusion of electronic nose and tongue sensors. Sensors 2010, 10:8782-8796.
19. Masnan M.J., Mahat N.I., Zakaria A., Shakaff A.Y.M., Adom A.H., Sa'ad F.S.A. Enhancing classification performance of multisensory data through extraction and selection of features. Proc. Chem. 2012, 6:132-140.
20. Li C., Heinemann P., Sherry R. Neural network and Bayesian network fusion models to fuse electronic nose and surface acoustic wave sensor data for apple defect detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2007, 125:301-310.
21. Huang L., Zhao J., Chen Q., Zhang Y. Nondestructive measurement of total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB-N) in pork meat by integrating near infrared spectroscopy, computer vision and electronic nose techniques. Food Chem. 2014, 145:228-236.
22. Rodríguez-Méndez M.L., Apetrei C., Gay M., Medina-Plaza C., de Saja J.A., Vidal S., et al. Evaluation of oxygen exposure levels and polyphenolic content of red wines using an electronic panel formed by an electronic nose and an electronic tongue. Food Chem. 2014, 155:91-97.
23. Banerjee R., Chattopadhyay P., Tudu B., Bhattacharyya N., Bandyopadhyay R. Artificial flavor perception of black tea using fusion of electronic nose and tongue response: a Bayesian statistical approach. J. Food Eng. 2014, 142:87-93.
24. Ouyang Q., Zhao J., Chen Q. Instrumental intelligent test of food sensory quality as mimic of human panel test combining multiple cross-perception sensors and data fusion. Anal. Chim. Acta 2014, 841:68-76.
25. Cole M., Covington J.A., Gardner J.W. Combined electronic nose and tongue for a flavour sensing system. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2011, 156:832-839.
26. Winquist F., Lundström I., Wide P. The combination of an electronic tongue and an electronic nose. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 1999, 58:512-517.
27. Boilot P., Hines E.L., Gongora M.A., Folland R.S. Electronic noses inter-comparison, data fusion and sensor selection in discrimination of standard fruit solutions. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2003, 88:80-88.
28. Söderström C., Rudnitskaya A., Legin A., Krantz-Rülcker C. Differentiation of four Aspergillus species and one Zygosaccharomyces with two electronic tongues based on different measurement techniques. J. Biotechnol. 2005, 119:300-308.
29. Gutiérrez J.M., Haddi Z., Amari A., Bouchikhi B., Mimendia A., Cetó X., et al. Hybrid electronic tongue based on multisensor data fusion for discrimination of beers. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2013, 177:989-996.
30. Haddi Z., Alami H., El Bari N., Tounsi M., Barhoumi H., Maaref A., et al. Electronic nose and tongue combination for improved classification of Moroccan virgin olive oil profiles. Food Res. Int. 2013, 54:1488-1498.
31. Haddi Z., Mabrouk S., Bougrini M., Tahri K., Sghaier K., Barhoumi H., et al. E-Nose and e-Tongue combination for improved recognition of fruit juice samples. Food Chem. 2014, 150:246-253.
32. Gil-Sánchez L., Soto J., Martínez-Máñez R., Garcia-Breijo E., Ibáñez J., Llobet E. A novel humid electronic nose combined with an electronic tongue for assessing deterioration of wine. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2011, 171:152-158.
33. Buratti S., Ballabio D., Benedetti S., Cosio M.S. Prediction of Italian red wine sensorial descriptors from electronic nose, electronic tongue and spectrophotometric measurements by means of Genetic algorithm regression models. Food Chem. 2007, 100:211-218.
34. Rodríguez-Méndez M.L., Arrieta Á.A., Parra V., Bernal A., Vegas A., Villanueva S., et al. Fusion of three sensory modalities for the multimodal characterization of red wines. IEEE Sens. 2004, 348-354.
35. Casale M., Oliveri P., Armanino C., Lanteri S., Forina M. NIR and UV-vis spectroscopy, artificial nose and tongue: comparison of four fingerprinting techniques for the characterisation of Italian red wines. Anal. Chim. Acta 2010, 668:143-148.
36. Casale M., Casolino M.C., Oliveri P., Forina M. The potential of coupling information using three analytical techniques for identifying the geographical origin of Liguria extra virgin olive oil. Food Chem. 2010, 118:163-170.
37. Bagnasco L., Cosulich M.E., Speranza G., Medini L., Oliveri P., Lanteri S. Application of a voltammetric electronic tongue and near infrared spectroscopy for a rapid umami taste assessment. Food Chem. 2014, 157:421-428.
38. Rudnitskaya A., Kirsanov D., Legin A., Beullens K., Lammertyn J., Nicolaï B.M., et al. Analysis of apples varieties - comparison of electronic tongue with different analytical techniques. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2006, 116:23-28.
39. Vera L., Aceña L., Guasch J., Boqué R., Mestres M., Busto O. Discrimination and sensory description of beers through data fusion. Talanta 2011, 87:136-142.
40. Louw L., Roux K., Treadoux A., Tomic O., Næs T., Nieuwoudt H.H., et al. Characterization of selected South African young cultivar wines using FTMIR Spectroscopy gas chromatography, and multivariate data analysis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57:2623-2632.
41. Biancolillo A., Bucci R., Magrì A.L., Magrì A.D., Marini F. Data-fusion for multiplatform characterization of an italian craft beer aimed at its authentication. Anal. Chim. Acta 2014, 820:23-31.
42. Casale M., Oliveri P., Casolino M.C., Sinelli N., Zunin P., Armanino C., et al. Characterisation of PDO olive oil Chianti Classico by non-selective (UV-visible, NIR and MIR spectroscopy) and selective (fatty acid composition) analytical techniques. Anal. Chim. Acta 2012, 712:56-63.
43. Downey G., Briandet R., Wilson R.H., Kemsley E.K. Near- and mid-infrared spectroscopies in food authentication: coffee varietal identification. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1997, 45:4357-4361.
44. Alamprese C., Casale M., Sinelli N., Lanteri S., Casiraghi E. Detection of minced beef adulteration with turkey meat by UV-vis, NIR and MIR spectroscopy. LWT - Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 53:225-232.
45. Veselá A., Barros A.S., Synytsya A., Delgadillo I., Copíková J., Coimbra M.A. Infrared spectroscopy and outer product analysis for quantification of fat nitrogen, and moisture of cocoa powder. Anal. Chim. Acta 2007, 601:77-86.
46. Dupuy N., Galtier O., Ollivier D., Vanloot P., Artaud J. Comparison between NIR MIR, concatenated NIR and MIR analysis and hierarchical PLS model. Application to virgin olive oil analysis. Anal. Chim. Acta 2010, 666:23-31.
47. Pizarro C., Rodríguez-Tecedor S., Pérez-del-Notario N., Esteban-Díez I., González-Sáiz J.M. Classification of spanish extra virgin olive oils by data fusion of visible spectroscopic fingerprints and chemical descriptors. Food Chem. 2013, 138:915-922.
48. Casale M., Armanino C., Casolino M.C., Forina M. Combining information from headspace mass spectrometry and visible spectroscopy in the classification of the Ligurian olive oils. Anal. Chim. Acta 2007, 589:89-95.
49. Ulloa P.A., Guerra R., Cavaco A.M., Rosa da Costa A.M., Figueira A.C., Brigas A.F. Determination of the botanical origin of honey by sensor fusion of impedance e-tongue and optical spectroscopy. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2013, 94:1-11.
50. 1H NMR spectroscopic and stable isotope (SNIF-NMR, 18O, 13C) data: application to wine analysis. Anal. Chim. Acta 2014, 833:29-39.
51. Silvestri M., Elia A., Bertelli D., Salvatore E., Durante C., Li vigni M., et al. A mid level data fusion strategy for the varietal classification of Lambrusco P.D.O. wines. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2014, 137:181-189.
52. Cozzolino D., Smyth H.E., Lattey K.A., Cynkar W.U., Janik L., Dambergs R.G., et al. Combining mass spectrometry based electronic nose, visible-near infrared spectroscopy and chemometrics to assess the sensory properties of Australian Riesling wines. Anal. Chim. Acta 2006, 563:319-324.
53. Longobardi F., Casiello G., Sacco D., Tedone L., Sacco A. Characterisation of the geographical origin of Italian potatoes, based on stable isotope and volatile compound analyses. Food Chem. 2011, 124:1708-1713.
54. Silvestri M., Bertacchini L., Durante C., Marchetti A., Salvatore E., Cocchi M. Application of data fusion techniques to direct geographical traceability indicators. Anal. Chim. Acta 2013, 769:1-9.
55. Drivelos S.A., Georgiou C.A. Multi-element and multi-isotope-ratio analysis to determine the geographical origin of foods in the European Union. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2012, 40:38-51.
56. Charve J., Chen C., Hegeman A.D., Reineccius G.A. Evaluation of instrumental methods for the untargeted analysis of chemical stimuli of orange juice flavour. Flavour Fragr. J. 2011, 26:429-440.
57. Di Natale C., Paolesse R., Burgio M., Martinelli E., Pennazza G., D'Amico A. Application of metalloporphyrins-based gas and liquid sensor arrays to the analysis of red wine. Anal. Chim. Acta 2004, 513:49-56.
58. Henningsson M., Östergren K., Sundberg R., Dejmek P. Sensor fusion as a tool to monitor dynamic dairy processes. J. Food Eng. 2006, 76:154-162.
59. Aranda-Sanchez J.I., Baltazar A., González-Aguilar G. Implementation of a Bayesian classifier using repeated measurements for discrimination of tomato fruit ripening stages. Biosyst. Eng. 2009, 102:274-284.
60. Dalle Zotte A., Ottavian M., Concollato A., Serva L., Martelli R., Parisi G. Authentication of raw and cooked freeze-dried rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) by means of near infrared spectroscopy and data fusion. Food Res. Int. 2014, 60:180-188.
61. Zude M., Herold B., Roger J.-M., Bellon-Maurel V., Landahl S. Non-destructive tests on the prediction of apple fruit flesh firmness and soluble solids content on tree and in shelf life. J. Food Eng. 2006, 77:254-260.
62. Mendoza F., Lu R., Cen H. Comparison and fusion of four nondestructive sensors for predicting apple fruit firmness and soluble solids content. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2012, 73:89-98.
63. Ruiz-Altisent M., Lleó L., Riquelme F. Instrumental quality assessment of peaches: fusion of optical and mechanical parameters. J. Food Eng. 2006, 74:490-499.
64. Cozzi G., Ferlito J., Pasini G., Contiero B., Gottardo F. Application of near-infrared spectroscopy as an alternative to chemical and color analysis to discriminate the production chains of Asiago d'Allevo cheese. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57:11449-11454.
65. Cosio M.S., Ballabio D., Benedetti S., Gigliotti C. Evaluation of different storage conditions of extra virgin olive oils with an innovative recognition tool built by means of electronic nose and electronic tongue. Food Chem. 2007, 101:485-491.
66. Ottavian M., Fasolato L., Serva L., Facco P., Barolo M. Data fusion for food authentication: fresh/frozen-thawed discrimination in West African Goatfish (Pseudupeneus prayensis) Fillets. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2014, 7:1025-1036.
67. Korel F., Luzuriaga D.A., Balaban M.Ö. Objective quality assessment of raw tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fillets using electronic nose and machine vision. Sens. Nutr. Qual. Food 2001, 66:1018-1024.
68. Liu D., Pu H., Sun D.-W., Wang L., Zeng X.-A. Combination of spectra and texture data of hyperspectral imaging for prediction of pH in salted meat. Food Chem. 2014, 160:330-337.
69. Ignat T., Alchanatis V., Schmilovitch Z. Maturity prediction of intact bell peppers by sensor fusion. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2014, 104:9-17.
70. Cozzolino D., Cynkar W.U., Shah N., Smith P.A. Can spectroscopy geographically classify Sauvignon Blanc wines from Australia and New Zealand?. Food Chem. 2011, 126:673-678.
71. Hong X., Wang J. Detection of adulteration in cherry tomato juices based on electronic nose and tongue: comparison of different data fusion approaches. J. Food Eng. 2014, 126:89-97.
72. Di Natale C., Paolesse R., Macagnano A., Mantini A., D'Amico A., Legin A.A., et al. Electronic nose and electronic tongue integration for improved classification of clinical and food samples. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2000, 64:15-21.
73. Bruwer M.-J., MacGregor J.F., Bourg W.M. Fusion of sensory and mechanical testing data to define measures of snack food texture. Food Qual. Prefer. 2007, 18:890-900.
74. J.M. Gutiérrez, L. Moreno-Barón, X. Cetó, A. Mimendia, M. Valle, Data Fusion in Electronic Tongue for qualitative analysis of beers, Paper presented at Nat. Biol. Inspired Comput. (NaBIC), 2012 Fourth World Congress (2012, 5-9 Nov.) 59-65.
75. Banerjee R., Tudu B., Shaw L., Jana A., Bhattacharyya N., Bandyopadhyay R. Instrumental testing of tea by combining the responses of electronic nose and tongue. J. Food Eng. 2012, 110:356-363.
76. Hong X., Wang J., Qiu S. Authenticating cherry tomato juices - discussion of different data standardization and fusion approaches based on electronic nose and tongue. Food Res. Int. 2014, 60:173-179.
77. Berrueta L.A., Alonso-Salces R.M., Héberger K. Supervised pattern recognition in food analysis. Data Anal. Chromatogr. 2007, 1158:196-214.
78. Prieto N., Gay M., Vidal S., Aagaard O., de Saja J.A., Rodríguez-Méndez M.L. Analysis of the influence of the type of closure in the organoleptic characteristics of a red wine by using an electronic panel. Food Chem. 2011, 129:589-594.
79. Apetrei I.M., Rodríguez-Méndez M.L., Apetrei C., Nevares I., del Alamo M., de Saja J.A. Monitoring of evolution during red wine aging in oak barrels and alternative method by means of an electronic panel test. Food Res. Int. 2012, 45:244-249.
80. Roussel S., Bellon-Maurel V., Roger J.-M., Grenier P. Authenticating white grape must variety with classification models based on aroma sensors, FT-IR and UV spectrometry. J. Food Eng. 2003, 60:407-419.
81. Roussel S., Bellon-Maurel V., Roger J.-M., Grenier P. Fusion of aroma, FT-IR and UV sensor data based on the Bayesian inference. Application to the discrimination of white grape varieties. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2003, 65:209-219.
82. Di Natale C., Zude-Sasse M., Macagnano A., Paolesse R., Herold B., D'Amico A. Outer product analysis of electronic nose and visible spectra: application to the measurement of peach fruit characteristics. Anal. Chim. Acta 2002, 459:107-117.
83. 1H NMR and UV-visible data fusion for determining Sudan dyes in culinary spices. Talanta 2011, 84:829-833.
84. Drivelos S.A., Higgins K., Kalivas J.H., Haroutounian S.A., Georgiou C.A. Data fusion for food authentication. Combining rare earth elements and trace metal to discriminate Fava Santorinis from other yellow split peas using chemometric tools. Food Chem. 2014, 165:316-322.
85. T. Sundic, S., Marco, J., Samitier, P. Wide, Electronic Tongue and Electronic Nose Data Fusion in Classification with Neural Networks and Fuzzy Logic Based Models, Paper presented at Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference. IMTC 2000. Proceedings of the 17th IEE, 3 (2000) 1474-1479.
86. Buratti S., Benedetti S., Scampicchio M., Pangerod E.C. Characterization and classification of Italian Barbera wines by using an electronic nose and an amperometric electronic tongue. Anal. Chim. Acta 2004, 525:133-139.
87. Z. Haddi, S.M. Boughrini, A.A. Ihlou, H.S. Mabrouk, A.M. Barhoumi, N. El Bari, et al., Geographical Classification of Virgin Olive Oils by combining the Electronic Nose and Tongue, Paper presented at the IEEE Sensors (2012, 28-31 Oct.).
88. Apetrei C., Apetrei I.M., Villanueva S., de Saja J.A., Gutierrez-Rosales F., Rodríguez-Méndez M.L. Combination of an e-nose, an e-tongue and an e-eye for the characterisation of olive oils with different degree of bitterness. Anal. Chim. Acta 2010, 663:91-97.
89. Brás L.P., Bernardino S.A., Lopes J.A., Menezes J.C. Multiblock PLS as an approach to compare and combine NIR and MIR spectra in calibrations of soybean flour. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2005, 75:91-99.
90. Kuncheva L.I. Combining Pattern Classifiers: Methods and Algorithms 2004, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.
91. Doeswijk T.G., Smilde A.K., Hageman J.A., Westerhuis J.A., van Eeuwijk F.A. On the increase of predictive performance with high-level data fusion. Anal. Chim. Acta 2011, 705:41-47.
92. G. Shafer, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, Princeton, NJ, 1976.
93. S.C. Thomopoulos, Theories in distributed decision fusion: comparison and generalization, Ed. P.S. Schenker (SPIE 1383), Sens. Fusion III 3D Percept. Recognit., International Society for Optics and Photonics (1991) 623-634.
94. Acar E., Rasmussen M.A., Savorani F., Næs T., Bro R. Understanding data fusion within the framework of coupled matrix and tensor factorizations. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2013, 129:53-63.
95. Doeswijk T.G., Hageman J.A., Westerhuis J.A., Tikunov Y., Bovy A., van Eeuwijk F.A. Canonical correlation analysis of multiple sensory directed metabolomics data blocks reveals corresponding parts between data blocks. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2011, 107:371-376.
96. Casale M., Sinelli N., Oliveri P., Di Egidio V., Lanteri S. Chemometrical strategies for feature selection and data compression applied to NIR and MIR spectra of extra virgin olive oils for cultivar identification. Talanta 2010, 80:1832-1837.
97. Andersen C.M., Bro R. Variable selection in regression-a tutorial. J. Chemom. 2010, 24:728-737.
98. Smolinska A., Blanchet L., Coulier L., Ampt K.A.M., Luider T., Hintzen R.Q., et al. Interpretation and visualization of non-linear data fusion in Kernel space: study on metabolomic characterization of progression of multiple sclerosis. PLoS One 2012, 7:e38163.
99. Smilde A.K., Westerhuis J.A., de Jong S. A framework for sequential multiblock component methods. J. Chemom. 2003, 17:323-337.
100. Westerhuis J.A., Kourti T., MacGregor J.F. Analysis of multiblock and hierarchical PCA and PLS models. J. Chemom. 1998, 12:301-321.
101. Jing M., Cai W., Shao X. Multiblock partial least squares regression based on wavelet transform for quantitative analysis of near infrared spectra. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2010, 100:22-27.
102. Måge I., Menichelli E., Næs T. Preference mapping by PO-PLS: separating common and unique information in several data blocks. Food Qual. Prefer. 2012, 24:8-16.
103. Naes T., Tomic O., Mevik B.-H., Martens H. Path modelling by sequential PLS regression. J. Chemom. 2011, 25:28-40.
104. Biancolillo A., Måge I., Næs T. Combining SO-PLS and linear discriminant analysis for multi-block classification. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2015, 141:58-67.
105. Steinmetz V., Roger J.-M., Moltó E., Blasco J. On-line fusion of colour camera and spectrophotometer for sugar content prediction of apples. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 1999, 73:207-216.
106. Baltazar A., Aranda J.I., González-Aguilar G. Bayesian classification of ripening stages of tomato fruit using acoustic impact and colorimeter sensor data. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2008, 60:113-121.
107. Xiaobo Z., Jiewen Z. Apple quality assessment by fusion three sensors. IEEE Sens. 2005, 389-392.
108. Rong L., Ping W., Wenlei H. A novel method for wine analysis based on sensor fusion technique. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2000, 66:246-250.
109. Ros F., Guillaume S., Bellon-Maurel V. Classification of a granular product using high-level fusion of vision features. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 1997, 68:115-124.