Preference mapping by PO-PLS: Separating common and unique information in several data blocks

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 8-16

  Måge, Ingrid ^a   Menichelli, Elena ^a,b   Næs, Tormod ^a,c  

^a NOFIMA   (Norway)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Multi block analysis; PLS regression; PO PLS; Preference mapping

Indexed keywords

EID: 83855165759     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.08.003     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Carroll, J.D. (1968). Generalisation of canonical analysis to three or more sets of variables. Proceedings of the 76'th convention of the American Psychological Association, vol. 3. 227-228.
2. Dahl T., Næs T. A bridge between Tucker-1 and Carroll's generalised canonical analysis. Computational statistics and data analysis 2006, 50(11):3086-3098.
3. Esbensen K. Multivariate Data Analysis - in Practice. An Introduction to Multivariate Data Analysis and Experimental Design 2002, Camo Software, Oslo, Norway. 5th ed.
4. Escofier B., Pagès J. Multiple factor analysis (AFMULT package). Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 1994, 18(1):121-140.
5. Hanafi M., Kiers H. Analysis of K sets of data, with differential emphasis on agreement between and within sets. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 2006, 51:1491-1508.
6. Hedderley D., Wakeling I. A comparison of imputation techniques for internal preference mapping, using Monte Carlo simulation. Food Quality and Preference 1995, 6:281-297.
7. Helgesen H., Næs T. Selection of dry fermented lamb sausages for consumer testing. Food Quality and Preference 1995, 6:109-120.
8. Helgesen H., Solheim R., Næs T. Consumer preference mapping of dry fermented lamb sausages. Food Quality and Preference 1997, 8(2):97-109.
9. Hotelling H. Relations between two sets of variates. Biometrika 1936, 28:321-327.
10. Jørgensen K., Mevik B.H., Næs T. Combining designed experiments with several blocks of spectroscopic data. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2007, 88(2):154-166.
11. Jørgensen K., Segtnan V., Thyholt K., Næs T. A comparison of methods for analysing regression models with both spectral and designed variables. Journal of Chemometrics 2004, 18(10):451-464.
12. Kettenring J.R. Canonical analysis of several sets of variables. Biometrika 1971, 58:433-451.
13. Kohler A., Hanafi M., Bertrand D., Oust Janbu A., Naderstad T., Naderstad K., Qannari M., Martens H. New concepts for investigating several sets of data in modern bioscience. Modern Concepts in Biomedical Vibrational Spectroscopy 2009, Blackwell Publishing, USA, (chapter 15). P. Lasch, J. Kneipp (Eds.).
14. Måge, I. (2008a). The Multivariate Approach to Product Development (Flavoured Waters): Multivariate modelling of sensory profiles. (Retrieved 2011-08-03). http://www.camo.com/resources/application-notes.html.
15. Måge, I. (2008b). The Multivariate Approach to Product Development (Flavoured Waters): Multivariate preference mapping, (Retrieved 2011-08-03). http://www.camo.com/resources/application-notes.html.
16. Måge, I. (2008c). The Multivariate Approach to Product Development (Flavoured Waters): Quality assessment of sensory data), (Retrieved 2011-08-03). http://www.camo.com/resources/application-notes.html.
17. Måge I., Mevik B.H., Næs T. Regression models with process variables and parallel blocks of raw material measurements. Journal of Chemometrics 2008, 22:443-456.
18. Martens H., Næs T. Multivariate Calibration 1989, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
19. Martens M., Tenenhaus M., Vinzi V.E., Martens H. The use of partial least squares methods in new food production development. Consumer-Led Food Products Development 2007, 492-523. Woodhead Publishing Lmt., Cambridge, England. H. MacFie (Ed.).
20. McEwan J.A. Preference mapping for product optimization. Multivariate Analysis of Data in Sensory Science, Vol.16, Data Handling in Science and Technology 1996, 71-102. Elsevier Science B.V, Amsterdam. T. Næs, E. Risvik (Eds.).
21. Moskowitz H.R., Silcher M. The applications of conjoint analysis and their possible uses in Sensometrics. Food Quality and Preference 2006, 17(3-4):145-165.
22. Næs T., Brockhoff P., Tomic O. Statistics for sensory and consumer science 2010, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.
23. Næs, T., Tomic,O., Mevik, B-H., & Martens, H. (2010). Path modelling by sequential PLS regression. Journal of Chemometrics, in press.
24. Næs T., Lengard V., Johansen S.B., Hersleth M. Alternative methods for combining design variables and consumer preference with information about attitudes and demographics in conjoint analysis. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21(4):368-378.
25. Westerhuis J.A., Kourti T., MacGregor J.F. Analysis of multiblock and hierarchical PCA and PLS models. Journal of Chemometrics 1998, 12(5):301-321.
26. Wold J.P., Veberg A., Nilsen A.A. Influence of storage time and color of light upon photooxidation in cheese. A study based on sensory analysis and fluorescence spectroscopy. Int. Dairy Journal 2006, 16:1218-1226.