Improved classification of Orthosiphon stamineus by data fusion of electronic nose and tongue sensors

Sensors

Volumn 10, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 8782-8796

  Zakaria, Ammar ^a   Md Shakaff, Ali Yeon ^a   Adom, Abdul Hamid ^a   Ahmad, Mohd Noor ^a   Masnan, Maz Jamilah ^a   Aziz, Abdul Hallis Abdul ^a   Fikri, Nazifah Ahmad ^a   Abdullah, Abu Hassan ^a   Kamarudin, Latifah Munirah ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MALAYSIA PERLIS   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Data fusion; Electronic nose; Electronic tongue; LDA; Orthosiphon stamineus; PCA

Indexed keywords

COMMERCIAL SOURCES; DATA FUSION TECHNIQUE; ELECTRONIC NOSE; ELECTRONIC NOSE (E-NOSE); LDA; LINEAR DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; ORTHOSIPHON STAMINEUS; PCA;

DATA FUSION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

ELECTRONIC TONGUES;

ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; ELECTRONICS; FOOD HANDLING; METHODOLOGY; NOSE; ORTHOSIPHON; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; TASTE; TONGUE;

DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; ELECTRONICS; FOOD TECHNOLOGY; NOSE; ORTHOSIPHON; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; TASTE; TONGUE;

EID: 77957991121     PISSN: 14248220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/s101008782     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Mendez, M.L.R.; Arrieta, A.A.; Parra, V.; Bernal, A.; Vegas, A.; Villanueva, S.; Osuna, R.G.; de Saja, J.A. Fusion of three sensory modalities for the multimodal characterization of red wines. IEEE Sens. J. Vol. 2004, 4, 342-347.
2. Guadarrama, A.; Fernández, J.A.; Íñiguez, M.; Souto, J.; de Saja, J.A. Discrimination of wine aroma using an array of conducting polymers sensors in conjunction with solid-phase micro-extraction (SPME) technique. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2001, 77, 401-408.
3. Schaller, E.; Zenhausern, S.; Zesiger, T.; Bosset, J.O.; Escher, F. Use of preconcentration techniques applied to a MS-based?electronic nose?. Analysis 2000, 28, 743-749.
4. Gardner, J.W.; Bartlett, P.N. Electronic Noses: Principles and Applications; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1999.
5. Lvova, L.; Legin, A.; Vlasov, Y.; Cha, G.S.; Nam, H. Multicomponent analysis of Korean green tea by means of disposable all-solid-state potentiometric electronic tongue microsystem. Sens. Actuat. B:Chem. 2003, 95, 391-399.
6. Hidayat, W.; Shakaff, A.Y.M.; Ahmad, M.N.; Adom, A.H. Classification of agarwood oil using an electronic nose. Sensors 2010, 10, 4675-4685.
7. Bhattacharya, N.; Tudu, B.; Jana, A.; Ghosh, D.; Bandhopadhyaya, R.; Bhuyan, M. Preemptive identification of optimum fermentation time for black tea using electronic nose. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2008, 131, 110-116.
8. Dutta, R.; Kashwan, K.R.; Bhuyan, M.; Hines, E.L.; Gardner, J.W. Electronic nose based tea quality standardization. Neural Netw. 2003, 16, 847-853.
9. Legin, A.M.; Rudnitskaya, A.; Yu. G.; Vlasov, A.V.; Di Natale, C.; D'Amico, A. The features of the electronic tongue in comparison with the characteristics of the discrete ion-selective sensors. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 1999, 58, 464-468.
10. Vlasov, Y.; Legin, A.; Rudnitskaya, A.; D'Amico, A.; Di Natale, C. Electronic tongue-new analytical tool for liquid analysis on the basis of non-specific sensors and methods of pattern recognition. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2000, 65, 235-236.
11. Toko, K. Taste sensor. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2000, 64, 205-215.
12. Persaud, K.; Dodd, G. Analysis of discrimination mechanisms in the mammalian olfactory system using a model nose. Nature 1982, 299, 352-355.
13. Delwiche, J.F. The impact of perceptual interactions on perceived flavor. Food Qual. Prefer. 2004, 15, 137-146
14. Winquist, F.; Lundstrom, I.; Wide, P. The combination of an electronic tongue and an electronic nose. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 1999, 58, 512-517.
15. Natale, C.D.; Paolesse, R.; Macagnano, A.; Mantini, A.; D'Amico, A.; Legin, A.; Lvova, L.; Rudnitskaya, A.; Vlasov, Y. Electronic nose and electronic tongue integration for improved classification of clinical and food samples. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2000, 64, 15-21.
16. Boilot, P.; Hines, E.L.; Gongora, M.A.; Folland, R.S. Electronic Noses inter-comparison, data fusion and sensor selection in discrimination of standard fruit solutions. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2002, 88, 80-88.
17. Winquist, F.; Holmin, S.; Krantz-Rulcker, C.; Wide, P.; Lundstrom, I. A hybrid electronic tongue. Anal. Chim. Acta 2000, 406, 147-157.
18. Sim, C.O.; Ahmad, M.N.; Ismail, Z.; Othman, A.R.; Noor, N.A.; Zaihidee, E.M. Chemometric Classification of Herb-Orthosiphon stamineus according to its geographical origin using virtual chemical sensor based upon fast GC. Sensors 2003, 3, 458-471.
19. Legin, A.; Rudnitskaya, A. Chalcogenide Glass Electrodes. Available online: http://www.electronictongue.com/price01.html (accessed on 15 March 2009).
20. National Instruments. NI USB-6008. Available online: http://sine.ni.com/nips/cds/view/p/lang/en/nid/14604 (accessed on 15 March 2009).
21. Gardner, J.W.; Boilot, P.; Hines, E.L. Enhancing electronic nose performance by sensor selection using a new integer-based genetic algorithm. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2005, 106, 114-121.
22. Steinmetz, V.; Sevila, F.; Bellon-Maurel, V. A Methodology for sensor fusion design: Application to fruit quality assessment. J. Agric. Engng. Res. 1999, 74, 21-31.
23. Berrueta, L.A.; Alonso-Slaces, R.M.; Heberger, K. Supervised pattern recognition in food analysis. J. Chrom: A 2007, 1158, 196-214.
24. Tabachnick, B.G.; Fidell, L.S. Using Multivariate Statistics; Pearson Education: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2007.