Mathematics and the body: Material entanglements in the classroom

Mathematics and the Body: Material Entanglements in the Classroom

Volumn 9781107039483, Issue , 2013, Pages 1-261

  Freitas, Elizabeth De ^a   Sinclair, Nathalie ^b  

^a ADELPHI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84929749950     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139600378     Document Type: Book

References (437)

1. Ahlquist, R. (2001). Critical multicultural mathematics curriculum: Multiple connections through the lenses of race, ethnicity, gender, and social class. In J. E. Jacobs, J. R. Becker, & G. F. Glimer (eds.), Changing the faces of mathematics: Perspectives on gender (pp. 25-36). Reston, VA: NCTM Publishing.
2. Adler, J. (2001). Teaching mathematics in multilingual classrooms. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
3. Alibali, M. W., & Nathan, M. J. (2012). Embodiment in mathematics teaching and learning: Evidence from students’ and teachers’ gestures. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(2), 247-286.
4. Alliez, É. (2004). The signature of the world: What is Deleuze and Guattari's philosophy?London: Continuum.
5. Apple, M. (1999). Power, meaning, and identity: Essays in critical educational studies. New York: Peter Lang.
6. Applebaum, P. (1999). Target: Number. In S. R. Steinberg, J. L. Kincheloe, & P. H. Hinchey (eds.), The post-formal reader: Cognition and education (pp. 423-448). London: Falmer Press.
7. Aristotle. (1986). De anima [On the soul]. (H. Lawson-Trancred, Trans.). New York: Penguin.
8. Asperger, H. (1944/1991) ‘Autistic psychopathy’ in childhood. In U. Frith (ed.), Autism and Asperger Syndrome (pp. 37-92). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1944)
9. Asperger, H. (1944). Die ‘autistischen Psychopathen’ im Kindesalter. Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten, 117, 76-136.
10. Atweh, B., Bleicher, R. E., & Cooper, T. J. (1998). The construction of the social context of mathematics classrooms: A sociolinguistic analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(1), 63-82.
11. Badiou, A. (2008). Number and numbers. New York: Polity Press.
12. Bakhtin, M. M. (1952/ 1986). The problem of speech genres. (V. McGee, Trans.). In C. Emerson & M. Holquist (eds.), Speech genres and other late essays (pp. 60-102). Austin: The University of Texas Press. (Original work published 1952)
13. Bakker, A., & Hoffmann, M. H. G. (2005). Diagrammatic reasoning as the basis for developing concepts: A semiotic analysis of students’ learning about statistical distribution. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60, 333-358.
14. Balacheff, N. (1988). Aspects of proof in pupils’ practice of school mathematics. In D. Pimm (ed.), Mathematics, teachers and children (pp. 216-235). London: Hodder and Stoughton.
15. Ball, D. L. (1993). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics. Elementary School Journal, 93(4), 373-397.
16. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is - or might be - the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform?Educational Researcher, 25, 6-14.
17. Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: How matter comes to matter. Signs, 28(3), 801-831.
18. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
19. Barad, K. (2008). Living in a posthumanist material world: Lessons from Schrodinger's cat. In A. Smelik & N. Lykke (eds.), Bits of life: Feminism at the intersections of media, bioscience, and technology (pp. 165–176). Seattle: University of Washington Press.
20. Barad, K. (2010). Quantum entanglements and hauntological relations of inheritance: dis/continuities, spacetime enfoldings, and justice-to-come. Derrida Today, 3(2), 240-268.
21. Barad, K. (2011). Nature's queer performativity. Critical Humanities and Social Sciences, 19(2), 121-158.
22. Baron-Cohen, S. (2001). Theory of mind in normal development and autism. Prisme, 34, 174-183.
23. Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., Martin, J., & Clubley, L. (2001). The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): Evidence from Asperger Syndrome/high-functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31, 5-17.
24. Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Stone, V., & Rutherford, M. (1999). A mathematician, a physicist and a computer scientist with Asperger Syndrome. Neurocase, 5, 475-483.
25. Bartolini-Bussi, M., & Boni, M. (2003). Instruments for semiotic mediation in primary school classrooms. For the Learning of Mathematics, 23(2), 12-19.
26. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. Baxter, J. A., Woodward, J., Voorhies, J., & Wong, J. (2002). We talk about it, but do they get it? Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17, 173-185.
28. Becker, A. L. (1995). Beyond translation: Essays toward a modern philology. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
29. Benbow, C. B. (1987). Possible biological correlates of precocious mathematical reasoning ability. Trends in the Neurosciences, 10, 17-20.
30. Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
31. Benwell, B., & Stokoe, E. H. (2006). Discourse and identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
32. Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique. London: Taylor & Francis.
33. Bhabha, H. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge.
34. Bhabha, H. (2003). A statement for the Critical Inquiry board. Critical Inquiry, 30(2).
35. Bishop, A. J. (1988). Mathematical enculturation: A cultural perspective on mathematics education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
36. Boaler, J., & Humphreys, C. (2005). Connecting mathematical ideas: Middle school cases of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
37. Bochicchio, D., Cole, S., Ostein, D., Rodriguez, V., Staples, M., Susia, P., & Truxan, M. (2009). Shared language. Mathematics Teacher, 102(8), 606-613.
38. Boi, L. (2004). Questions regarding Husserlian geometry and phenomenology. A study of the concept of manifold and spatial perception. Husserl Studies, 20, 207-267.
39. Boler, M., & Zembylas, M. (2003). Discomforting truths: The emotional terrain of understanding difference. In P. P. Trifonas (ed.), Pedagogies of difference: Rethinking education for social change (pp. 110-136). New York: Routledge-Falmer.
40. Borgioli, G. M. (2008). A critical examination of learning disabilities in mathematics: Applying the lens of ableism. Journal of Thought, 43(12), 131-147.
41. Bostock, D. (2009). The philosophy of mathematics: An introduction. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
42. Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
43. Brantlinger, E. (2001). Poverty, class, and disability: A historical, social, and political perspective. Focus on Exceptional Children, 33(7), 1-19.
44. Brantlinger, E. (2004). Confounding the needs and confronting the norms: An extension of Reid and Valle's essay. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(6), 490-499.
45. Bremigan, E. G. (2001). Dynamic diagrams. Mathematics Teacher, 94(7), 566-574.
46. Bremigan, E. G. (2005). An analysis of diagram modification and construction in students’ solutions to applied calculus problems. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 36(3), 248-277.
47. Breyfogle, M. L., McDuffie, A. M., & Wohlhuter, K. A. (2010). Developing curricular reasoning for grades preK-12 mathematics instruction. In B. Reys, R. E. Reys, & R. Rubenstein (eds.), Mathematics curriculum: Issues, trends, and future directions. NCTM 2010 Yearbook (pp. 307-320). Reston, VA: NCTM Publishing.
48. Briggs, C. L. (1993). Metadiscursive practices and scholarly authority in folkloristics. Journal of American Folklore, 106(422), 387-434.
49. Brouwer, L. E. J. (1952). Historical background, principles and methods of intuitionism. South African Journal of Science, 49, 139-146.
50. Brown, J. R. (2008). Philosophy of mathematics: A contemporary introduction to the world of proofs and pictures (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
51. Brown, T., & McNamara, O. (2011). Becoming a mathematics teacher: Identity and identifications. New York: Springer.
52. Brown, S. I., & Walter, M. I. (1983). The art of problem posing. Philadelphia: Franklin Institute Press.
53. Burbules, N. C. (2006). Rethinking the virtual. In J. Weiss, J. Nolan & P. Trifonas (eds.), The international handbook of virtual learning environments (pp. 37-58). Dordrecht: The Netherlands: Springer.
54. Burton, L. (1999). Why is intuition so important to mathematicians but missing from mathematics education? For the Learning of Mathematics, 19(3), 27-32.
55. Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter. New York: Routledge.
56. Butler, J. (1997). The psychic life of power: Theories in subjection. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
57. Cavaillès, J. (1970). Logic and the theory of science. In J. J. Kockelmans & T. J. Kisiel (eds.), Phenomenology and the natural sciences (pp. 353-409). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
58. Ceglowski, D. (2002). Research as relationship. In D. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (eds.), The qualitative inquiry reader (pp. 5-24). Thousand Oaks, CA: Jossey-Bass.
59. Châtelet, G. (1987). L’enchantement du virtuel. Chimeres, 2. Retrieved from http://www.revue-chimeres.fr/drupal_chimeres/?q=node/16
60. Châtelet, G. (1993/2000). Figuring space: Philosophy, mathematics, and physics. (R. Shore & M. Zagha, Trans.). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer. (Original work published as Les enjeux du mobile, 1993)
61. Châtelet, G. (2006). Interlacing the singularity, the diagram and the metaphor. In S. B. Duffy (Ed. and Trans.), Virtual mathematics: The logic of difference (pp. 31-45). Manchester: Clinamen.
62. Cheah, P. (2010). Non-dialectical materialism. In D. Coole & S. Frost (eds.), New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics (pp. 70-91). London: Duke University Press.
63. Christensen, O. R., Stentoft, D., & Valero, P. (2008). Power distributions in the network of mathematics education practices. In E. de Freitas & K. Nolan (eds.), Opening the research text: Critical insights and in(ter)ventions into mathematics (pp. 147-154). New York: Springer.
64. Christie, F., & Martin, J. R. (Eds.). (2007). Language, knowledge and pedagogy: Linguistic and sociological perspectives. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
65. Clagett, M. (1968). Nicole Oresme and the medieval geometry of qualities and motions. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
66. Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1995). Teacher's professional knowledge landscapes. New York: Teachers College Press.
67. Clandinin, D. J., and Connelly, F. M., (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
68. Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (Eds.). (2004). Hypothetical learning trajectories [Special issue]. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 163-184.
69. Clough, P. (2002). Narratives and fictions in educational research. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
70. Coates, J. (1996). Women talk. Oxford: Blackwell.
71. Coates, J. (2003). Men talk. Oxford: Blackwell.
72. Cole, A. L., & Knowles, J. G. (2003). Provoked by art: Theorizing arts-informed inquiry. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
73. Colebrook, C. (2008). Bourgeois thermodynamics. In I. Buchanan & N. Thoburn (eds.), Deleuze and politics (pp.121-138). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
74. Colebrook, C. (2013). Modernism without women: The refusal of becoming-woman (and post-feminism). Deleuze Studies, 7(4), 427-455.
75. Combes, M. (2013). Gilbert Simondon and the philosophy of the transindividual. (T. Lamarre, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
76. Confrey, J., Maloney, A., Nguyen, K., Mojica, G., & Myers, M. (2009). Equipartitioning/splitting as a foundation of rational number reasoning. In M. Tzekaki, M. Kaldrimidou, & C. Sakonidis (eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME 33) (Vol. 1, pp. 345-352). Thessaloniki, Greece: PME.
77. Coole, D., & Frost, S. (Eds.). (2010). New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics. London: Duke University Press.
78. Coxeter, H. S. M. (1974). Projective geometry (2nd ed.). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
79. Crary, J. (1990). Techniques of the observer: On vision and modernity in the nineteenth century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
80. Crowe, M. (1985). A history of vector analysis: The evolution of the idea of a vectorial system. New York: Dover Publications.
81. Cutler, A., & MacKenzie, I. (2011). Bodies of learning. In L. Guillaume & J. Hughes (eds.), Deleuze and the body (pp. 53-72). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
82. Davis, B., & Simmt, E. (2003). Understanding learning systems: Mathematics education and complexity science. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(2), 137-167.
83. Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. B. (2004). Education of the gifted and talented (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
84. de Freitas, E. (2004a). Pre-service teachers and the re-inscription of whiteness: Disrupting dominant cultural codes through textual analysis. Teaching Education, 16(2), 151-164
85. de Freitas, E. (2004b). Plotting intersections along the political axis: The interior voice of dissenting mathematics teachers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 55, 259-274.
86. de Freitas, E. (2008a). Troubling teacher identity: Preparing mathematics teachers to teach for diversity. Teaching Education, 19(1), 43-55.
87. de Freitas, E. (2008b). Enacting identity through narrative: Interrupting the procedural discourse in mathematics classrooms. In T. Brown (ed.), The psychology of mathematics education: A psychoanalytic displacement (pp. 139-155). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
88. de Freitas, E. (2010). Making mathematics public: Aesthetics as the distribution of the sensible. Educational Insights, 13(1). Retrieved from http://www.cci.educ.ubc.ca/publication/insights/v13n01/articles/defreitas/index.html
89. de Freitas, E. (2012a). The classroom as rhizome: New strategies for diagramming knotted interaction. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(7), 557-570.
90. de Freitas, E. (2012b). The diagram as story: Unfolding the event-structure of the mathematical diagram. For the Learning of Mathematics, 32(2), 27-33
91. de Freitas, E. (2012c). What were you thinking? A Deleuzian/Guattarian analysis of communication in the mathematics classroom. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 45(3), 287-300.
92. de Freitas, E. (2013). The mathematical event: Mapping the axiomatic and the problematic in school mathematics. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 32(6), 581-599.
93. de Freitas, E., & McCarthy, M. (2012). (Dis)orientation and spatial sense: Topological thinking in the middle grades. Paper presented at CERME 8, Working Group 4: Geometrical Thinking, Manavgat-Side, Antalya-Turkey.
94. de Freitas, E., & Sinclair, N. (2012). Diagram, gesture, agency: Theorizing embodiment in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80, 133-152.
95. de Freitas, E. & Zolkower, B. (2009). Using social semiotics to prepare mathematics teachers to teach for social justice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(3), 187-203.
96. de Freitas, E., & Zolkower, B. (2011). Developing teacher capacity to explore non-routine problems through a focus on the social semiotics of mathematics classroom discourse. Research in Mathematics Education, 13(3), 229-247.
97. Delanda, M. (2006). A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. London & New York: Continuum.
98. Delanda, M. (2008). Deleuze, materialism and politics. In I. Buchanan & N. Thoburn (eds.), Deleuze and politics (pp. 160-177). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
99. Deleuze, G. (1984). Kant's critical philosophy: The doctrine of the faculties. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
100. Deleuze, G. (1990). The logic of sense. (M. Lester, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
101. Deleuze, G. (1993). The fold: Leibniz and the Baroque. Minneapolis: Regents of the University of Minnesota Press.
102. Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition. (P. Patton, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
103. Deleuze, G. (2001). Pure immanence: Essays on a life. (J. Rajchman, Trans.). New York: Zone Books.
104. Deleuze, G. (2003). Francis Bacon: The logic of sensation. (D. W. Smith, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
105. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
106. Derrida, J. (1974). Of grammatology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
107. Dewey, J. (1902). The Child And The Curriculum. In L. A. Hickman & T. M. Alexander (eds.), The essential Dewey (Vol. 1, pp. 236-245). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
108. Dietiker, L. (2012). The mathematics textbook as story: A literary approach to interrogating mathematics curriculum. (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
109. Diezmann, C. M., & English, L. D. (2001). Promoting the use of diagrams as tools for thinking. In A. A. Cuoco (ed.), 2001 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics yearbook: The role of representation in school mathematics (pp. 77-89). Reston, VA: NCTM Publishing.
110. Dowling, P. (1998). The sociology of mathematics education: Mathematical myths/pedagogic texts. London: The Falmer Press.
111. Doxiadis, A. (2003, January 3). Embedding mathematics in the soul: Narrative as a force in mathematics education. Opening address to the Third Mediterranean Conference on Mathematics Education, Athens. Retrieved from http://www.apostolosdoxiadis.com/i les/essays/embeddingmath.pdf
112. Doxiadis, A. (2004, June 11). The mystery of the black knight’s Noetherian ring. Keynote address at the Fields Symposium on online mathematical investigation as a narrative experience, University of Western Ontario.
113. Doxiadis, A., & Mazur, B. (Eds.). (2011). Circles disturbed: The interplay of mathematics and narrative. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
114. Drake, C., Spillane, J. P., & Hufferd-Ackles, K. (2001). Storied identities: Teacher learning and subject matter context. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(1), 1-23.
115. Dreyfus, T., & Eisenberg, T. (1986). On the aesthetics of mathematical thought. For the Learning of Mathematics, 6(1), 2-10.
116. Driscoll, M. (2003). The sound of problem solving. In H. L. Schoen & R. I. Charles (eds.), Teaching mathematics through problem solving: Grades 6-12 (pp. 161-175). Reston, VA: NCTM Publishing.
117. Dunn, T. K. (2005). Engaging prospective teachers in critical reflection: Facilitating a disposition to teach mathematics for diversity. In A. Rodriguez & R. Kitchen (eds.), Preparing mathematics and science teachers for diverse classrooms: Promising strategies for transformative pedagogy (pp. 143-158). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
118. Dupuis, J. (2012). Gilles Deleuze, Félix Guattari et Gilles Châtelet. Paris: Harmattan.
119. Dürrenmatt, F. (1989). Durcheinandertal. Zürich: Diogenes.
120. Eide, B. L., & Eide, F. F. (2011). The dyslexic advantage: Unlocking the hidden potential of the dyslexic brain. New York: Penguin.
121. Ellis, C. (2004). The ethnographic I: A methodological novel about autoethnography. Lanham, MD: Altamira Press.
122. Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. P. (2000). Auto-ethnographic inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (pp. 733-768). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
123. Ellis, C., and Bochner, A.P., (2002). Ethnographically speaking. Lanham, MD: Altamira Press.
124. Ernest, P. (1991). The philosophy of mathematics education. London: Routledge-Falmer.
125. Ernest, P. (1998). Social constructivism as a philosophy of mathematics. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
126. Fairclough, N. (1993). Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. In A. Jaworski & N. Coupland (eds.), The discourse reader (pp. 183-212). New York: Routledge.
127. Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. New York: Routledge.
128. Felman, S. (1990). Jacques Lacan and the adventure of insight: Psychoanalysis in contemporary culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
129. Ferguson, A. (2013). The heretic: Who is Thomas Nagel and why are so many of his fellow academics condemning him? The Weekly Standard, 18(27). Retrieved from http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/heretic_707692.html
130. Ferrara, F., Pratt, D., & Robutti, O. (2006). The role and uses of technologies for the teaching of algebra and calculus. In A. Gutiérrez & P. Boero (eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 237-273). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
131. Ferrara, F. & Nemirovsky, R. (2005). Connecting talk, gesture, and eye motion for the microanalysis of mathematics learning. In H. L. Chick, & J. L. Vincent, (Eds.). Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 1, pp. 138-142. Melbourne: PME.
132. Ferrara, F., & Savioli, K. (2009). Why could not a vertical line appear? Imagining to stop time. In M. Tzekaki, M. Kaldrimidou, & C. Sakonidis (eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME 33) (Vol. 3, pp. 33-40). Thessaloniki, Greece: PME.
133. Feser, E. (2010). The last superstition: A refutation of the new atheism. South Bend, IN: Saint Augustine's Press.
134. Fitzgerald, M. (2000) Is the cognitive style of the persons with the Asperger's Syndrome also a ‘mathematical style’?, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30(2), 175-176.
135. Fitzgerald, M. (2002). Asperger's Disorder and mathematicians of genius. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32(1), 59-60.
136. Fitzgerald, M. (2004). Autism and creativity: Is there a link between autism in men and exceptional ability? London: Routledge.
137. Fomin, D., Genkin, S., & Itenberg, I. (1996). Mathematical circles (Russian Experience). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
138. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Appleton, A. C. (2002). Explicitly teaching for transfer: Effects on the mathematical problem-solving performance of students with mathematics disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17, 90-106.
139. Fuson, K. C. (1988). Children's counting and concepts of number. New York: Springer.
140. Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain's concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21, 1-25.
141. Gates, P. (2002). Issues of equity in mathematics education: Defining the problem, seeking solutions. In L. Haggarty (ed.), Teaching mathematics in secondary schools (pp. 211-228). London: Routledge-Falmer.
142. Gee, J. P. (1991). A linguistic approach to narrative. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 1, 15-39.
143. Gee, J. P. (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis. London & New York: Routledge.
144. Gifford, S. (2006). Dyscalculia: Myths and models. Research in Mathematics Education, 8, 35-51.
145. Gleick, J. (1987). Chaos: Making a new science. London: Penguin Publishing.
146. Goguen, J. (1991). A categorical manifesto. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science 1(1), 49-67.
147. Gough, N. (2004). RhizomANTically becoming-cyborg: Performing posthuman pedagogies. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 36, 253-265.
148. Goodley, D. (2009). Bringing the psyche back into disability studies: The case of the body with/out organs. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 3(3), 257-272.
149. Grawemeyer, B. & Cox, R. (2008). The effects of users’ background diagram knowledge and task characteristics upon information display selection. In G. Stapleton, J. Howse, & J. Lee (eds.), Diagrammatic Representation and Inference, 5th International Conference, Diagrams 2008, Proceedings (pp. 321-334). Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5223. Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer.
150. Greiffenhagan, C. (in press). The materiality of mathematics: Presenting mathematics at the blackboard. British Journal of Sociology.
151. Grosz, E. (1994). Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
152. Grosz, E. A. (Ed.). (1999). Becomings: Explorations in time, memory and futures. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
153. Grosz, E. A. (2001). Architecture from the outside: Essays on virtual and real space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
154. Grosz, E. (2010). Political matters: Feminism, materialism, and freedom. In D. H. Coole & S. Frost (eds.), New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics (pp. 139-157). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
155. Gutstein, E. (2000). Increasing equity: Challenges and lessons from a state systemic initiative. In W. G. Secada (ed.), Changing the faces of mathematics: Perspectives on multiculturalism and gender equity (pp. 25-36). Reston, VA: NCTM Publishing.
156. Gutstein, E. (2006). Reading and writing the world with mathematics: Toward a pedagogy for social justice. New York: Routledge.
157. Hacking, I. (2013). Why is there philosophy of mathematics at all? In M. Pitici & D. Mumford (eds.), The best writing on mathematics 2012 (pp. 234-254). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
158. Hadamard, J. (1945). The psychology of invention in the mathematical field. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
159. Hall, R., & Nemirovsky, R. (2011). Histories of modal engagements with mathematical concepts: A theory memo. Retrieved from http://www.sci.sdsu.edu/tlcm/all-articles/Histories_of_modal_engagement_with_mathematical_concepts.pdf
160. Hall, S. (1996). Introduction: Who needs identity? In S. Hall & P. de Guy (eds.), Questions of cultural identity (pp. 1-17). London: Sage Publications.
161. Hallahan, D. P., & Mock, D. R. (2006). A brief history of the field of learning disabilities. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 16-29). New York: The Guilford Press.
162. Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. Victoria, Australia: Edward Arnold.
163. Halliday, M. A. K. (1991). Towards probabilistic interpretations. In E. Ventola (ed.), Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs: Vol. 55. Functional and systemic linguistics approaches and uses (pp. 39-61). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
164. Halliday, M. A. K. (1993). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5, 93-116.
165. Halliday, M. A. K. (2007). The notion of ‘context’ in language education. In J. J. Webster (ed.), Language and education (pp. 269-290). London: Continuum Press.
166. Hardy, G. H. (1929). Mathematical proof. Mind, New Series, 38(149), 1-25.
167. Hardy, G. H. (1940). A mathematician's apology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
168. Harroway, D. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
169. Healy, L., & Fernandes, S. H. A. A. (2011). The role of gestures in the mathematical practices of those who do not see with their eyes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77, 157-174.
170. Healy, L., & Powell, A. (2013). Understanding and overcoming ‘disadvantage’ in learning mathematics. In M. A. Clements, A. Bishop, C. Keitel-Kreidt, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K.-S. Leung (eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 69-100). Berlin: Springer.
171. Hehir, T. (2005). New directions in special education: Eliminating ableism in policy and practice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
172. Heidegger, M. (1977). Sein und Zeit [Being and time]. Tübingen, Germany: Max Niemeyer.
173. Henry, M. (2000). Incarnation: Une philosophie de la chair [Incarnation: A philosophy of the flesh]. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
174. Henry, M. (2005). Voir l’invisible: Sur Kandinsky [Seeing the invisible: On Kandinsky]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
175. Herbel-Eisenmann, B. (2007). From intended curriculum to written curriculum: Examining the ‘voice’ of a mathematics textbook. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38, 344-369.
176. Herbel-Eisenmann, B., & Wagner, D. (2010). Appraising lexical bundles in mathematics classroom discourse: Obligation and choice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(1), 43-63.
177. Herbst, P. (2002). Establishing a custom of proving in American school geometry: Evolution of the two-column proof in the early twentieth century. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49(3), 283-312.
178. Hersh, R. (1997). What is mathematics, really? New York: Oxford University Press.
179. Hersh, R., & John-Steiner, V. (2011). Loving and hating mathematics: Challenging the myths of mathematical life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
180. Hewitt, D. (1999). Arbitrary and necessary: A way of viewing the mathematics curriculum. For the Learning of Mathematics, 19(3), 2-9.
181. Hickey-Moody, A. (2009). Little war machines: Posthuman pedagogy and its media. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 3(3), 273-280.
182. Hoffmann, M. H. G. (2005). Signs as means for discoveries: Peirce and his concepts of ‘diagrammatic reasoning,’ ‘theorematic deduction,’ ‘hypostatic abstraction,’ and ‘theoric transformation’. In M. H. G. Hoffmann, J. Lenhard, & F. Seeger (eds.), Activity and sign: Grounding mathematics education (pp. 45-56). New York: Springer.
183. Hooks, B. (2000). Where we stand: Class matters. New York: Routledge University.
184. Hughes, M. (1986). Children and number: Difficulties in learning mathematics. Oxford: Blackwell.
185. Husserl, E. (2001). Analysis concerning passive and active synthesis: Lectures on transcendental logic. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
186. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
187. Hwang, S., & Roth, W.-M. (2011). Scientific and mathematical bodies: The interface of culture and mind. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
188. Ilyenkov, E. V. (1977). Dialectical logic. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
189. Ingold, T. (2007). Lines: A brief history. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
190. Ingold, T. (2008). When ANT meets SPIDER: Social theory for arthropods. In C. Knappett & L. Malafouris (eds.), Material agency: Towards a non-anthropocentric approach (pp. 209-215). New York: Springer.
191. Ingold, T. (2010). Bringing things to life: Creative entanglements in a world of materials (NCRM Working Paper). University of Manchester: Realities/Morgan Centre.
192. Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. London: Routledge.
193. Ivins, W. (1938/1975). On the rationalization of sight. New York: Da Capo Press. (Original work published 1938)
194. Ivins, W. M., Jr., (1945/1964). Art and geometry: A study of space intuitions. New York: Dover Publications. (Original work published 1945)
195. Jackiw, N. (1991, 2001). The Geometer's Sketchpad Software. Emeryville, CA: Key Curriculum Press.
196. Jackiw, N. (2006). Mechanism and magic in the psychology of dynamic geometry. In N. Sinclair, D. Pimm, & W. Higginson (eds.), Mathematics and aesthetics: New approaches to an ancient affinity (pp. 145-159). New York: Springer.
197. Jackiw, N., & Sinclair, N. (2009). Sounds and pictures: Dynamism and dualism in dynamic geometry. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41, 413-426.
198. Jaffe, A., & Quinn, F. (1993). Theoretical mathematics: Toward a cultural synthesis of mathematics and theoretical physics. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 29(1), 1-13.
199. Jaffe, A. & Quinn, F. (1994). Response to comments on ‘theoretical mathematics’. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 30(2), 208-211.
200. James, I. (2002). Remarkable mathematicians: From Euler to von Neumann. Cambridge: The Mathematical Association of America/Cambridge University Press.
201. James, I. (2003). Autism in mathematicians. The Mathematical Intelligencer, 25(4), 62-65.
202. James, I. (2004). Remarkable physicists: From Galileo to Yukawa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
203. Jaworski, A., & Coupland, N. (Eds.). (1993). The discourse reader. New York: Routledge.
204. Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13-23). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
205. Jullien, C. (2008). Esthétique et mathématiques: Une exploration goodmanienne. Rennes, France: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
206. Kanner, L. (1943). Autistic disturbances of affective contact. Nervous Child, 2, 217-250.
207. Kastberg, S., Norton, A., & Klerlein, J. (2009). Trusting students. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 17, 423-429.
208. Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
209. Kirby, V. (2011). Quantum anthropologies: Life at large. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
210. Kittler, F. (1999). Gramophone, film, typewriter. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
211. Klibansky, R., Panofsky, E., & Saxl, F. (1964). Saturn and melancholy: Studies in the history of natural philosophy, religion and art. London: Nelson.
212. Kline, M. (1953). Mathematics in Western culture. London: George Allen and Unwin.
213. Knoespel, K. (2000). Introduction: Diagrammatic writing and the configuration of space. In G. Châtelet, Figuring space (pp. ix-xxiii). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
214. Krause, R., & Rölli, M. (2008). Micropolitical associations. In I. Buchanan & N. Thoburn (eds.), Deleuze and politics (pp.240-254). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
215. Kristeva, J. (1980). Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art. (T. Gora, A. Jardine, Trans. & L. S. Roudiez, Ed.). New York: Columbia Press.
216. Krull, W. (1930/1987). The aesthetic viewpoint in mathematics. The Mathematical Intelligencer, 9(1), 48-52. (Original work published 1930)
217. Labov, W. (2006). Narrative pre-construction. Narrative Inquiry, 16(1), 37-45.
218. Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis. In J. Helm (ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts (pp. 12-44). Seattle, WA: Washington University Press.
219. Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and refutations: The logic of mathematical discovery. J. Worrall & E. Zahar (Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
220. Lakatos, I. (1978). Mathematics, science and epistemology: Philosophical papers (Vol. 2). J. Worral, & G. Currie (Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
221. Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.
222. Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27(1), 29-64.
223. Lather, P. (1986). Issues of validity in openly ideological research: Between a rock and a soft place. Interchange, 17(4), 63-84.
224. Lather, P. (2007). Getting lost: Feminist efforts toward a double(d) science. New York: SUNY Press.
225. Latour, B. (1990). Drawing things together. In M. Lynch & S. Woolgar (eds.), Representation in scientific practice (pp. 19-68). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
226. Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
227. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
228. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
229. Lecercle, J-J. (2002). Deleuze and language. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
230. Leikin, R. (2009). Multiple proof tasks: Teacher practice and teacher education. In F. Lin, F. Hsieh, G. Hanna, & M. de Villers (eds.), Proceedings of the ICMI Study-19 Conference: Proof and Proving in Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 31-36). Taipei: ICMI.
231. Leikin, R., Berman, A., & Koichu, B. (Eds.). (2009). Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
232. Lemke, J. (2000). Opening up closure: Semiotics across scales. In J. Chandler & G. V. D. Vijver (eds.), Closure: Emergent organizations and their dynamics (pp. 100-111). New York: New York Academy of Science Press.
233. Lemke, J. (2002). Ideology, intertextuality and the communication of science. In P. H. Fries, M. Cummings, D. Lockwood, & W. Spruiell (eds.), Relations and functions within and around language (pp. 32-55). New York: Continuum.
234. Leonard, J., & Jackson Dantley, S. (2005). Breaking through the ice: Dealing with issues of diversity in mathematics and science education courses. In A. Rodriguez & R. Kitchen (eds.), Preparing mathematics and science teachers for diverse classrooms: Promising strategies for transformative pedagogy (pp. 87-118). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
235. Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
236. Lerman. S. (2005, May 27). Identity in mathematics education. Keynote presentation at The Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group, University of Ottawa.
237. Linton, S. (1998). Claiming disability: Knowledge and identity. New York: New York University Press.
238. Lockhart, P. (2009). A mathematician's lament: How school cheats us out of our most fascinating and imaginative art form. New York: Bellevue Literary Press.
239. Loveland, K. (1991). Social affordances and interaction: Autism and the affordances of the human environment. Ecological Psychology, 3(2), 99-119.
240. Lundin, S. (2011). Hating school, loving mathematics: On the ideological function of critique and reform in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1), 73-85.
241. MacLure, M. (2010, May 4). Facing Deleuze: Affect in education and research. Presentation at The American Educational Research Association, Denver, CO.
242. Malafouris, L. (2008). Between drains, bodies and things: Tectonoetic awareness and extended self. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 363, 1993-2002.
243. Malloy, C. (2004). Equity in mathematics education is about access. In R. N. Rubenstein & G. W. Bright (eds.), Perspectives on the teaching of mathematics (pp. 1-14). Reston, VA: NCTM Publishing.
244. Manning, E. (2009). Relationscapes: Movement, art, philosophy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
245. Manning, E., & Massumi, B. (2010, November 11). Coming alive in a world of texture: For neurodiversity. Keynote presentation at the Thinking - Resisting - Reading the Political Conference, Giessen, Germany. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DqUaEcO30T0
246. Marion, J.-L. (2002). Being given: Toward a phenomenology of givenness. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
247. Marion, J.-L. (2004). The crossing of the visible. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
248. Marschark, M., Spencer, P. E., Adams, J., & Sapere, P. (2011). Evidence-based practice in educating deaf and hard-of-hearing children: Teaching to their cognitive strengths and needs. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 26, 3-16.
249. Marsh, M. (2002). Examining the discourses that shape our teacher identities. Curriculum Inquiry, 32(4), 453-469.
250. Martin, J. R. (1993). Genre and literacy: Modeling context in educational linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 141-172.
251. Martin, J. R. (2007). Construing knowledge: A functional linguistic perspective. In F. Christie & J. R. Martin (eds.), Language, knowledge and pedagogy: Linguistic and sociological perspectives (pp. 34-64). London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
252. Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
253. Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Boston: Shambhala.
254. McCrink, K., & Spelke, E. S. (2010). Core multiplication in childhood. Cognition, 116(2), 204-216.
255. McCullough, W. S. (1965). Embodiments of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
256. McNeill, D. (2001). Analogic/analytic representations and cross-linguistic differences in thinking for speaking. Cognitive Linguistics, 11, 43-60.
257. McNeill, D. (2003). Pointing and morality in Chicago. In S. Kita (ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture and cognition meet (pp. 139-170). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
258. McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
259. Mendick, H. (2006). Masculinities in mathematics. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
260. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phenomenologie de la perception [Phenomenology of perception]. Paris: Gallimard.
261. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962/2004). Excerpt from Phenomenology of perception. (K. Paul, Trans.). In T. Baldwin (ed.), Basic Writings. New York: Routledge.
262. Miller, J. (1992). Teachers, autobiography, and curriculum: Critical and feminist perspectives. In B. B. Swadner & S. Kessler (eds.), Reconceptualizing the early childhood curriculum (pp. 103-122). New York: Teachers College Press.
263. Mitchell, W. J. T. (2001). Seeing disability [Special issue]. Public Culture, 13(3), 391-397.
264. Molland, G. (1991/1995). Implicit versus explicit geometrical methodologies: The case of construction. In G. Molland, Mathematics and the medieval ancestry of physics (pp. 181-196). Brookfield, VT: Variorum. (Original work published 1991)
265. Morgan, C. (2005). Words, definitions and concepts in discourses of mathematics teaching and learning. Language and Education, 19(2), 103-117.
266. Morgan, C. (2006). What does social semiotics have to offer mathematics education research? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61, 219-245.
267. Moses, R. P., & Cobb, C. E. (2001). Radical equations: Civil rights from the Mississippi to the Algebra Project. Boston: Beacon Press.
268. Movshovitz-Hadar, N. (1988). School mathematics theorems: An endless source of surprise. For the Learning of Mathematics, 8(3), 34-39.
269. Mukhopadhyay, S., & Greer, B. (2001). Modeling with purpose: Mathematics as a critical tool. In B. Atweh, H. Forgasz, & B. Nebres (eds.), Socio-cultural research on mathematics education: An international perspective (pp. 295-312). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
270. Munn, P., & Reason, R. (2007). Arithmetic difficulties: Developmental and instructional perspectives. Educational and Child Psychology, 24(2), 5-14.
271. Nagel, T. (2012). Mind and cosmos: Why the materialist neo-Darwinian conception of nature is almost certainly false. New York: Oxford University Press.
272. Nancy, J.-L. (2007). Listening. New York: Fordham University Press.
273. Nemirovsky, R. (2003). Three conjectures concerning the relationship between body activity and understanding mathematics. In N. A. Pateman, B. J. Dougherty, & J. T. Zilliox (eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME 27) (Vol. 1, pp. 103-135). Honolulu: PME.
274. Nemirovsky, R., & Ferrara, F. (2009). Mathematical imagination and embodied cognition. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70, 159-174.
275. Nemirovsky, R., Rasmussen, C., Sweeney, G., & Wawro, M. (2012). When the classroom floor becomes the complex plane: Addition and multiplication as ways of bodily navigation. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(2), 287-323.
276. Netz, R. (1999). The shaping of deduction in Greek mathematics: A study in cognitive history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
277. Netz, R. (2009). Ludic proof: Greek mathematics and the Alexandrian aesthetic. New York: Cambridge University Press.
278. Netz, R., Noel, W., Wilson, N., & Tchernetska, N. (2011). The Archimedes palimpsest (vols. 1-2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
279. Niremberg, D., & Niremberg, R. (2011). Badiou's number: A critique of mathematical ontology. Critical Inquiry, 37(4), 583-614.
280. Novick, L. R. (2004). Diagram literacy in preservice math teachers, computer science majors, and typical undergraduates: The case of matrices, networks, and hierarchies. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6, 307-342.
281. Nunes, T. (2004). Teaching mathematics to deaf children. London: Whurr Publishers.
282. Núñez, R. (2006). Do real numbers really move? Language, thought, and gesture: The embodied cognitive foundations of mathematics. In R. Hersh (ed.), 18 unconventional essays on the nature of mathematics (pp. 160-181). New York: Springer.
283. Núñez, R., Edwards, L., & Matos, J. F. (1998). Embodied cognition as grounding for situatedness and context in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39, 45-65.
284. Nunokawa, K. (2001). Surprises in mathematics lessons. For the Learning of Mathematics, 21(3), 43-50.
285. Nunokawa, K. (2004). Solvers’ making of drawings in mathematical problem solving and their understanding of the problem situations. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 35, 173-183.
286. Nunokawa, K. (2006). Using drawings and generating information in mathematical problem solving processes. Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(3), 33-54.
287. O’Halloran, K. L. (2005). Mathematical discourse: Language, symbolism and visual images. London & New York: Continuum.
288. O’Halloran, K. L. (2010). The semantic hyperspace: Accumulating mathematical knowledge across semiotic resources and modes. In F. Christie & K. Maton (eds.), Disciplinarity: Functional linguistic and sociological perspectives (pp. 217-236). London & New York: Continuum.
289. O’Halloran, K. L., & Smith, B. A. (2011). Multimodal studies. In K. L. O’Halloran & B. A. Smith. (Eds.), Multimodal studies: Exploring issues and domains (pp. 1-13). London & New York: Routledge.
290. Ober, J. (2007). The original meaning of ‘democracy’: Capacity to do things, not majority rule (Princeton/Stanford Working Papers in Classics). Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1024775
291. Olive, J., & Steffe, L. (2002). Schemes, schemas and director systems (An integration of Piagetian scheme theory with Skemp's model of intelligent learning). In D. O. Tall & M. O. J. Thomas (eds.), Intelligence, learning and understanding in mathematics: A tribute to Richard Skemp (pp. 97-130). Flaxton, QLD: Post Pressed.
292. Ong, W. J. (1982). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London: Methuen.
293. Otte, M. (2005). Mathematics, sign and activity. In M. H. G. Hoffman, J. Lenhard, & F. Seeger (eds.), Activity and sign: Grounding mathematics education (pp. 9-22). New York: Springer.
294. Overboe, J. (2001). A critique of the ableist model of disability as lack. Paper presented at the Society for Literature and Science Conference 2001: Technologies, Bodies, Narratives: The Accountability of Scientific and Medical Practices Session, Buffalo, NY.
295. Overboe, J. (2007a). Ableist limits on self-narration: The concept of post-personhood. In V. Raoul, C. Canam, A. Henderson, & C. Paterson (eds.), Unfitting stories: Narrative approaches to disease, disability, and trauma (pp. 175-182). Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
296. Overboe, J. (2007b). Disability and genetics: Affirming the bare life (the state of exception). In S. J. Reuters & K. Neves-Graca (eds.), Genes and society: Looking back on the future [Special issue]. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 44(2), 219-235.
297. Overboe, J. (2007c). Vitalism: Subjectivity exceeding racism, sexism, and (psychiatric) ableism. In P. Parekh (ed.), Intersecting gender and disability Perspectives in rethinking postcolonial identities [Special issue]. Wagadu, Journal of Transnational Women's and Gender Studies, 4, 22-34.
298. Overboe, J. (2009a). Affirming an impersonal life: A different register for disability studies. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 3(3), 241-256.
299. Overboe, J. (2009b). Introduction: Deleuze, disability, and difference. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 3(3), 217-220.
300. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.
301. Parkinson, G. H. R., & Morris, M. (Eds. & Trans.). (1973). Leibniz: Philosophical writings. London: Everyman's Library.
302. Paterson, K., & Hughes, B. (1999). Disability studies and phenomenology: The carnal politics of everyday life. Disability and Society, 14(5), 597-610.
303. Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency and science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
304. Pimm. D. (1993). From should to could: Reflections on possibilities of mathematics teacher education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 13(2), 27-32.
305. Pimm. D. (2006). Drawing on the image in mathematics and art. In N. Sinclair, D. Pimm, & W. Higginson (eds.), Mathematics and the aesthetic: New approaches to an ancient affinity (pp. 160-189). New York: Springer.
306. Pimm. D., Beisiegel, M., & Meglis, I. (2008). Would the real Lakatos please stand up? Interchange: A Quarterly Review of Education, 39(4), 469-481.
307. Pimm. D., & Sinclair, N. (2009). Audience, style and criticism. For the Learning of Mathematics, 29(2), 23-27.
308. Plucker, J. A., & Beghetto, R. A. (2004). Why creativity is domain general, why it looks domain specific, and why the distinction does not matter. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko, & J. L. Singer (eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 153-168). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
309. Poincaré, H. (1905). Science and hypothesis. New York: The Science Press.
310. Poincaré, H. (1908/1956). Mathematical creation. In J. Newman (ed.), The world of mathematics (Vol. 4, pp. 2041-2050). New York: Simon and Schuster. (Original work published 1908)
311. Pólya, G. (1981). Mathematical discovery: On understanding, learning, and teaching problem solving (Vol. 2). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
312. Popkewitz, T. (1998). Struggling for the soul: The politics of schooling and the construction of the teacher. New York: Teachers College Press.
313. Popkewitz, T. (2004). The alchemy of the mathematics curriculum: Inscriptions and the fabrication of the child. American Educational Research Journal, 41(1), 3-34.
314. Povey, H., Burton, L., Angier, C., & Boylan, M. (2004). Learners as authors in the mathematics classroom. In B. Allen & S. Johnston-Wilder (eds.), Mathematics education: Exploring the culture of learning (pp. 43-56). New York: Routledge-Falmer.
315. Radden, J. (2000). The nature of melancholy: From Aristotle to Kristeva. New York: Oxford University Press.
316. Radford, L. (2003). Gestures, speech, and the sprouting of signs: A semiotic-cultural approach to students’ types of generalization. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(1), 37-70.
317. Radford, L. (2004). Rescuing perception: Diagrams in Peirce's theory of cognitive activity. Paper presented at ICME 10, Denmark, Copenhagen.
318. Radford, L. (2008). The ethics of being and knowing: Towards a cultural theory of learning. In L. Radord, G. Schubring, & F. Seeger (eds.), Semiotics in mathematics education: Epistemology, history, classroom and culture (pp. 215-234). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
319. Radford, L. (2009). ‘No! He starts walking backwards!’: Interpreting motion graphs and the question of space, place and distance. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41, 467-480.
320. Radford, L., & Roth, W.-M. (2011). A cultural-historical perspective on mathematics teaching and learning. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
321. Rajchman, J. (2000). The Deleuze connections. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
322. Rancière, J. (2002). The aesthetic revolution and its outcomes: Emplotments of autonomy and heteronomy. New Left Review, 14(March/April), 133-151.
323. Rancière, J. (2004). The politics of aesthetics: The distribution of the sensible. (G. Rockhill, Trans.). New York: Continuum.
324. Rancière, J. (2009). Contemporary art and the politics of aesthetics. In B. Hinderliter, W. Kaizen, & V. Maimon, Communities of sense: Rethinking aesthetics and politics (pp. 31-50). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
325. Rancière, J. (2010). Dissensus: On politics and aesthetics. (S. Corcoran, Trans. & Ed.). London: Continuum Press.
326. Raoul, V., Canam, C., Henderson, A., & Paterson, C. (2007). Making sense of disease, disability, and trauma: Normative and disruptive stories. In V. Raoul, C. Canam, A. Henderson, & C. Paterson (eds.), Unfitting stories: Narrative approaches to disease, disability, and trauma (pp. 3-10). Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
327. Redman, P. (2005). The narrative formation of identity revisited: Narrative construction, agency and the unconscious. Narrative Inquiry, 15(1), 25-44.
328. Rée, J. (1999). I see a voice: A philosophical history of language, deafness and the senses. London: Harper Collins.
329. Rice, S. (2002). The social construction of ‘disabilities’: The role of law. Educational Studies, 33, 169-180.
330. Riskin, J. (2002). Science in the age of sensibility: The sentimental empiricists of the French Enlightenment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
331. Ringrose, J. (2010). Beyond discourse: Using Deleuze and Guattari's schizoanalysis to explore affective assemblages, heterosexually striated space, and lines of flight online and at school. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(6), 1-21.
332. Robutti, O. (2006). Motion, technology, gesture in interpreting graphs. The International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 13(30), 117-126.
333. Rodriguez, A. J., & Kitchen, R. S. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing mathematics and science teachers for diverse classrooms: Promising strategies for transformative pedagogy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
334. Rogers, M. P., Malancharuvil-Berkes, E., Mosley, M., Hui, D., & O’Garro Joseph, G. (2005). Critical discourse analysis in education: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 365-416.
335. Rota, G. (1997). Indiscrete thoughts. Boston: Birkhäuser.
336. Roth, W.-M. (2010). Incarnation: Radicalizing the embodiment of mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 30(2), 8-17.
337. Roth, W.-M. (2011). Geometry as objective science in elementary classrooms: Mathematics in the flesh. New York: Routledge.
338. Rotman, B. (2000). Mathematics as sign: Writing, imagining, counting. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
339. Rotman, B. (2008). Becoming beside ourselves: The alphabet, ghosts, and distributed human beings. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
340. Rotman, B. (2012). Topology, algebra, diagrams. Theory, Culture, Society, 29, 247-260.
341. Rowland, T. (1995). Hedges in mathematics talk: Linguistic pointers to uncertainty. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 29(4), 327-353.
342. Rowland, T. (2000). The pragmatics of mathematics education: Vagueness in mathematical discourse. London: Falmer Press.
343. Russell, B. (1903). The principles of mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
344. Russell, B. (1919). The study of mathematics. In Mysticism and logic: And other essays (p. 60). Cambridge: Longmans, Green & Company.
345. Sacks, O. (1984). A leg to stand on. New York: Touchstone.
346. Sasaki, B. (2002). Toward a pedagogy of coalition. In A. A. Macdonald & S. Sanchez-Casal (eds.), Twenty-first-century feminist classrooms: Pedagogies of identity and difference (pp. 31-58). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
347. Sawyer, W. (1955). Prelude to mathematics. Harmondsworth: Pelican.
348. Saxe, G. B., Shaughnessy, M. M., Shannon, A., Langer-Osuna, J. M., Chinn, R., & Gearhart, M. (2007). Learning about fractions as points on the number line. In The learning of mathematics, 69th yearbook of The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 221-236). Reston, VA: NCTM Publishing.
349. Schegloff, E. A. (1997). Whose text? Whose context? Discourse and society, 8(2), 165-87.
350. Scher, D. (1995). Exploring conic sections with The Geometer's Sketchpad. Berkeley, CA: Key Curriculum Press.
351. Schmittau, J. (2003). Cultural historical theory and mathematics education. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, S. Miller, & V. Ageyev (eds.), Vygotsky's educational theory in cultural context (pp. 225-245). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
352. Schrödinger, E. (1935/1983). The present situation in quantum mechanics. In J. A. Wheeler & W. Zurek (eds.), Quantum theory and measurement (pp.152-167). Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1935)
353. Schulze, A., & Sevenoak, F. (1913). Plane geometry. New York: Macmillan.
354. Semetsky, I. (2006). Deleuze, education, and becoming. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
355. Serres, M. (2008). The five senses: A philosophy of mingled bodies. (M. Sankey & P. Cowley, Trans.). London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
356. Serres, M. (2011). Variations on the body. (R. Burke, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
357. Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
358. Shaffer, D. W., & Kaput, J. (1999). Mathematics and virtual culture: A cognitive evolutionary perspective on technology and mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 37(2), 97-119.
359. Shakespeare, T., & Watson, N. (2001). The social model of disability: An outdated ideology? In S. N. Barnartt & B. M. Altman (eds.), Exploring Theories and Expanding Methodologies: Where We Are and Where We Need to Go Series: Research in social science and disability (Vol. 2, pp. 9-28). Amsterdam & New York: JAI.
360. Shapiro, S. (2000). Thinking about mathematics: The philosophy of mathematics. New York: Oxford University Press.
361. Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2009). Animation: The fundamental, essential, and properly descriptive concept. Continental Philosophy Review, 42, 375-400.
362. Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2012). Movement and mirror neurons: A challenging and choice conversation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 11(3), 385-401.
363. Simondon, G. (2005). L’individuation à la lumière des notions de forme et d’information. Grenoble: Editions Jérôme Millon.
364. Sinclair, N. (2010). Knowing more than we can tell. In B. Sriraman & L. English (Eds.). Theories of mathematics education: Seeking new frontiers (pp. 591-608). Berlin: Springer.
365. Sinclair, N., de Freitas, E., & Ferrara, F. (2013). Virtual encounters: The murky and furtive world of mathematical inventiveness. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(2), 239-252.
366. Sinclair, N., & Gol Tabaghi, S. (2010). Drawing space: Mathematicians’ kinetic conceptions of eigenvectors. Education Studies in Mathematics, 74(3), 223-240.
367. Sinclair, N., & Jackiw, N. (2011). On the origins of dynamic number in the breakdown of structural, metaphoric, and historic conceptions of human mathematics. In P. Liljedahl, S. Oesterle, & D. Allan (eds.), Proceedings/Actes 2010 Annual Meeting/Rencontre Annuelle (pp. 137-146). Burnaby, BC: CMESG/GCEDM.
368. Sinclair, N., & Pimm. D. (2009). The many and the few: Mathematics, democracy and the aesthetic. Educational Insights, 13(1). Retrieved from http://educationalinsights.ca/v13n01/articles/sinclair_pimm/index.html
369. Skemp, R. (1979). Intelligence, learning and action - A foundation for theory and practice in education. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
370. Skovsmose, O. (1994). Towards a philosophy of critical mathematics education. London: Springer.
371. Skovsmose, O., & Borba, M. (2004). Research methodology and critical mathematics education. In P. Valero & R. Zevenbergen (eds.), Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education: Issues of power in theory and methodology (pp. 207-226). New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
372. Skovsmose, O., & Valero, P. (2002). Democratic access to powerful mathematical ideas. In L. D. English (ed.), The handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 383-408). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
373. Smith, D. (2003). Deleuze on Bacon: Three conceptual trajectories in The logic of sensation. In G. Deleuze, Francis Bacon: The logic of sensation (pp. vii-xxvii). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
374. Smith, D. (2005). Deleuze on Leibniz: Difference, continuity, and the calculus. In S. H. Daniel (ed.), Current continental theory and modern philosophy (pp. 127-147). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. 127-147.
375. Smith, D. W. (2006). Axiomatics and problematics as two modes of formalization: Deleuze's epistemology of mathematics. In S. Duffy (ed.), Virtual mathematics: The logic of difference (pp. 145-168). Manchester, UK: Clinamen Press.
376. Smith, D. W. (2007). The conditions of the new. Deleuze Studies, 1(1), 1-21.
377. Snyder, S. L., & Mitchell, D. T. (2001). Re-engaging the body: Disability studies and the resistance to embodiment [Special issue]. Public Culture, 13(3), 367-390.
378. Solomon, Y. (2009). Mathematical literacy: Developing identities of inclusion. New York: Routledge.
379. Staats, S. K. (2008). Poetic lines in mathematics discourse: A method from linguistic anthropology. For the Learning of Mathematics, 28(2), 26-32.
380. Staats, S. K., & Batteen, C. (2010). Linguistic indexicality in algebra discourse. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 29, 41-56.
381. Stanley, D. (2002). A response to Nunokawa's article: ‘Surprises in mathematics lessons’. For the Learning of Mathematics, 22(1), 15-16.
382. Stevens, R. (2000). Who counts what as math? Emergent and assigned mathematics problems in a problems-based classroom. In J. Boaler, (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 105-145). London: Ablex Publishing.
383. Stevens, R. (2012). The missing bodies of mathematical thinking and learning have been found. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(2), 337-346.
384. Stockero, S. L., & van Zoest, L. R. (2011). Making student thinking public. Mathematics Teacher, 104(9), 704-709.
385. Stokoe, E. H. (2005). Analysing gender and language. Journal of sociolinguistics, 9(1), 118-33.
386. Stokoe, E., & Edwards, D. (2006). Story formation in talk-in-interaction. Narrative Inquiry, 16(1), 56-65.
387. Straus, E. (1935/1963). The primary world of the senses: A vindication of sensory experience. (J. Needleman, Trans.). (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press (Original work published as Vom Sinn der Sinne, 1935)
388. Stylianou, D. A., & Silver, E. A. (2004). The role of visual representations in advanced mathematical problem solving: An examination of expert-novice similarities and differences. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(4), 353-387.
389. Tahta, D. (1980). About geometry. For the Learning of Mathematics, 1(1), 2-9.
390. Tall, D. (2011). Crystalline concepts in long-term mathematical invention and discovery. For the Learning of Mathematics, 31(1), 3-8.
391. Tannen, D. (2007). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. New York: Cambridge University Press.
392. Tate, W. F. (2005). Race, retrenchment, and the reform of school mathematics. In E. Gutstein & B. Peterson (eds.), Rethinking mathematics: Teaching social justice by the numbers (pp. 31-40). Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools.
393. Tate, W., & Rousseau, C. (2002). Access and opportunity: The political and social context of mathematics education. In L. D. English (ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 271-300). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
394. Thibault, P. J. (2004a). Agency and consciousness in discourse: Self-other dynamics as a complex system. London & New York: Continuum.
395. Thibault, P. J. (2004b). Brain, mind, and the signifying body: An ecosocial semiotic theory. London & New York: Continuum.
396. Titchkosky, T. (2006). Disability, self, and society. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
397. Titchkosky, T. (2007). Reading and writing disability differently: The textured life of embodiment. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
398. Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
399. Tracy, K. (2002). Everyday talk: Building and reflecting identities. New York: Guilford Press.
400. UPIAS. (1976/1997). Fundamental Principles of Disability. Retrieved from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/UPIAS/fundamental%20principles.pdf
401. Valero, P. (2004). Socio-political perspectives on mathematics education. In P. Valero & R. Zevenbergen (eds.), Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education: Issues of power in theory and methodology (pp. 5-23). New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
402. Valero, P., & Zevenbergen, R. (Eds.). (2004). Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education: Issues of power in theory and methodology. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
403. Veel, R. (1999). Language, knowledge, and authority in school mathematics. In F. Christie (ed.), Pedagogy and the shaping of consciousness (pp. 185-216). London: Cassell.
404. Vygotsky, L. (1934/1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1934)
405. Vygotsky, L., & Luria, A. (1994). Tool and symbol in child development. In R. van der Veer & J. Valsiner (eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 99-174). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
406. Walkerdine, V. (1988). The mastery of reason: Cognitive development and the production of rationality. London: Routledge.
407. Walkerdine, V. (1998). Counting girls out. London: Falmer.
408. Walkerdine, V. (1990). Difference, cognition, and mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 10(3), 51-56.
409. Walkington, J. (2005). Becoming a teacher: Encouraging development of teacher identity through reflective practice. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 33(1), 53-64.
410. Walshaw, M. (2004a). A powerful theory of active engagement. For the Learning of Mathematics, 24(3), 4-10.
411. Walshaw, M. (Ed.). (2004b). Mathematics education within the postmodern. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
412. Walshaw, M., & Brown, T. (2012). Affective productions of mathematical experience. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1-2), 185-199.
413. Webb, T. (2008). Remapping power in educational micropolitics. Critical Studies in Education, 49(2), 127-142.
414. Weil, A. (1992). The apprenticeship of a mathematician. (J. Gage, Trans.). Berlin: Birkhäuser.
415. Weissglass, J. (2000). No compromise on equity in mathematics education: Developing an infrastructure. In W. G. Secada (ed.), Changing the faces of mathematics: Perspectives on multiculturalism and gender equity (pp. 5-24). Reston, VA: NCTM Publishing.
416. Wendell, S. (1993). Feminism, disability, and transcendence of the body. Canadian Women's Studies, 17(4), 116-122.
417. West, T. G. (2004). Thinking like Einstein: Returning to our virtual roots with the emerging revolution in computer information visualization. Amherst, MA: Prometheus Books.
418. Wetherall, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse and Society, 9(3). 431-456.
419. Whitehead, A. N. (1951). Mathematics and the good. In P. Schipp (Ed.). The philosophy of Alfred North Whitehead (pp. 666-681). La Salle: Open Court.
420. Whitin, P., & Whitin, D. J. (2002). Promoting communication in the mathematics classroom. Teaching Children Mathematics, 9(4), 205-211.
421. Widdicombe, S. (1998). Identity as an analyst's and a participant's resource. In C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe (eds.), Identities in talk. London: Sage.
422. Widdowson, H. G. (2004). Text, context, pretext. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
423. Wilensky, U. (1991). Abstract meditations on the concrete and concrete implications for mathematics education. In I. Harel & S. Papert (eds.), Constructionism (pp. 193-204). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
424. Williams, E., & Costall, A. (2000). Taking things more seriously: Psychological theories of autism and the material-social divide. In P. Graves (ed.), Matter, materiality and modern culture (pp. 97-111). Routledge: London.
425. Wing, L. (1969). The handicaps of autistic children: A comparative study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 10, 1-40.
426. Winks, J. (1999). Critical pedagogy: Notes from the real world (2nd ed.). New York: Allyn and Bacon.
427. Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical investigations (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
428. Wittgenstein, L. (1978). Remarks on the foundations of mathematics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
429. Woffitt, R. (2005). Conversation analysis and discourse analysis: A comparative and critical introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
430. Woodward, J. (2004). Mathematics education in the United States: Past to present. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 16-31.
431. Woodward, J., & Montague, M. (2002). Meeting the challenge of mathematics reform for students with LD. Journal of Special Education, 36(2), 89-101.
432. Wortham, S. (2006). Learning identity: The joint emergence of social identification and academic learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
433. Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458-477.
434. Yackel, E., & Hanna, G. (2003). Reasoning and proof. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. E. Schifter (eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 227-236). Reston, VA: NCTM Publishing.
435. Yates, F. (1979). The occult philosophy in the Elizabethan Age. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
436. Young, K. (1999). Narrative embodiments: Enclaves of the self in the realm of medicine. In A. Jaworski & N. Coupland (eds.), The discourse reader (pp. 428-441). New York: Routledge.
437. Zevenbergen, R. (2003). Teachers’ beliefs about teaching mathematics to students from socially disadvantaged backgrounds: Implications for social justice. In L. Burton (ed.), Which way social justice and mathematics education? (pp. 133-152). London: Praeger.