Examining the discourses that shape our teacher identities

Curriculum Inquiry

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 453-469

  Marsh, Monica Miller ^a  

^a BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 18444376225     PISSN: 03626784     EISSN: 1467873X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-873X.00242     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Berk, L. E., and A. Winsler. 1995. Scaffolding children's learning: Vygotsky and early childhood education. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
2. Bloch, M. 1992. Critical perspectives on the historical relationship between child development and early childhood education research. In Reconceptualizing the early childhood curriculum: Beginning the dialogue, S. Kessler and E. B. Swadener, eds., pp. 3-20. New York: Teachers College Press.
3. Bodrova, E., and D. J. Leong. 1996. Tools of the mind: The Vygotskian approach to early childhood education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
4. Bredekamp, S. (ed.). 1987. Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
5. Bredekamp, S., and C. Copple. (eds.). 1997. Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs (revised edition). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
6. Britzman, D. 1991. Practice makes practice: A critical study of learning to teach. New York: State University of New York Press.
7. Burman, E. 1994. Deconstructing developmental psychology. New York: Routledge.
8. Cannella, G. S. 1997. Deconstructing early childhood education: Social justice and revolution. New York: Peter Lang.
9. Carnahan, R. S. 1980. The effects of teacher planning on classroom process. Tech. Rep. No.541. Madison, WI: Wisconsin R & D Center for Individualized Schooling.
10. Casey, K. 1993. I answer with my life: Life histories of women teachers working for social change. New York: Routledge.
11. Clandinin, J. D., and F. M. Connelly. 1987. Teachers' personal knowledge: What counts as personal in studies of the personal. Journal of Curriculum Studies 19(6): 487-500.
12. Cole, M., and S. Cole. 1996. The development of children. New York: Freeman and Company.
13. Fairclough, N. L. 1989. Language and power. New York: Longman.
14. Fenner, C. 1997. Yolonda's genius. New York: Alladin Paperbacks.
15. Gee, J. P. 1996. Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London: Taylor and Francis.
16. Gomez, M. L. In press. Learning to speak and teach in a new genre. World Studies in Education.
17. Kessler, S., and E. B. Swadener (eds.). 1992. Reconceptualizing the early childhood curriculum: Beginning the dialogue. New York: Teacher College Press.
18. Lubeck, S. 1994. The politics of developmentally appropriate practice: Exploring issues of culture, class, and curriculum. In Diversity and developmentally appropriate practices: Challenges for early childhood education, B. Mallory and R. New, eds., pp. 17-43. New York: Teachers College Press.
19. Mallory, B. and R. New (eds.). 1994. Diversity and developmentally appropriate practices: Challenges for early childhood education. New York: Teachers College Press.
20. Miller Marsh, M. 2002. The shaping of Ms. Nicholi: The discursive fashioning of teacher identities. Qualitative Studies in Education 15(3): 333-347.
21. Piaget, J. 1971. Psychology and epistemology. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.
22. Tharp, R. G., and R. Gallimore. 1988. Rousing minds to life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, M.
24. Zahorik, J. 1970. The effects of planning on teaching. Elementary School Journal 71: 143-151.