The Classroom as Rhizome: New Strategies for Diagramming Knotted Interactions

Qualitative Inquiry

Volumn 18, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 557-570

  de Freitas, Elizabeth ^a  

^a ADELPHI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

assemblage; classroom interaction; Deleuze; diagram; entanglement; knot

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864380177     PISSN: 10778004     EISSN: 15527565     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1077800412450155     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bennett J.Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 2010:.
2. BraidottiR. (2006). Affirming the affirmative: On nomadic affectivity. Rhizomes, 11/12. Retrieved at http://www.rhizomes.net/issue11/braidotti.html.
3. Buchanan I.The problem of the body in Deleuze and Guattari, or, what can a body do?.Body & Society. 1997;3:73-91.
4. Châtelet G.Les enjeux du mobile. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer; 2000:.
5. Clough P. T.,Halley J.The affective turn: Theorizing the social. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 2007:.
6. Coole D.Rethinking agency: A phenomenologyical approach to embodiment and agentic capacities.Political Studies. 2005;53 (1): 124-142.
7. de Freitas E.,Sinclair N.Diagram, gesture, agency: Theorizing embodiment in the mathematics classroom.Educational Studies in Mathematics. 2012;:.
8. Deleuze G.The fold: Leibniz and the Baroque. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 1993:.
9. Deleuze G.Difference and repetition. New York, NY: Columbia University Press; 1994:.
10. Deleuze G.,Guattari F.A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 1987:.
11. Deleuze G.,Guattari F.What is philosophy?. New York, NY: Columbia University Press; 1994:.
12. Frichot H.Deleuze and space. Buchanan I.Lambert G., ed. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press; 2005:61-79.
13. Gale K.An inquiry into the ethical nature of a Deleuzian creative educational practice.Qualitative Inquiry. 2010;16 (5): 303-309.
14. GilbertJ. (2004). Signifying nothing: "Culture," "discourse" and the sociality of affect. Culture Machine, 6. Retrieved at http://www.culturemachine.net/index.php/cm/article/viewArticle/8/7.
15. Goodley D. A.Becoming rhizomatic parents: Deleuze, Guattari and disabled babies.Disability and Society. 2007;22 (2): 145-160.
16. Gough N.Rhozomantically becoming cyborg: Performing posthuman pedagogies.Educational Philosophy and Theory. 2004;36:253-265.
17. Gough N.Methodologies for researching mathematics, science and technological education in societies in transition. Washington, DC: UNESCO and SAARSTE; 2005:.
18. Gough N.Changing planes: Rhizosemiotic play in transnational curriculum inquiry.Studies in the Philosophy of Education. 2007;26:279-294.
19. Grosz E.Choas, territory, art: Deleuze and the framing of the earth. New York, NY: Columbia University Press; 2008:.
20. Hudson J. M.,Bruckman A. S.The bystander effect: A lens for understanding patterns of participation.The Journal of the Learning Sciences. 2004;13 (2): 165-195.
21. Jackson A. Y.,Mazzei L. A.Voice in qualitative inquiry: Challenging conventional, interpretive and critical conceptions in qualitative research. New York, NY: Routledge; 2009:.
22. Knoespel K. J.Figuring space: Philosophy, mathematics and physics. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer; 2000:ix-xxiii.
23. Latour B.Representation in scientific practice. Lynch M.Woolgar S., ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1990:19-68.
24. Latour B.We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1993:.
25. Lynch M.Pictures of nothing? Visual construals in social theory.Sociological Theory. 1991;9 (1): 1-21.
26. Maclure M.The naming of parts: A wavering critique of coding. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association; 2011New Orleans, LA; 2011
27. Maclure M.Facing Deleuze: Affect in education and research. Presentation at the American Educational Research Association; 2010Denver, CO; 2010.
28. Maclure M.The naming of parts: A wavering critique of coding. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association; 2011New Orleans, LA; 2011.
29. Means A.Aesthetics, affect and educational politics.Educational Philosophy and Theory. 2011;43 (10): 1088-1102.
30. Nathan M. J.,Knuth E. J.A study of whole classroom mathematical discourse and teacher change.Cognition and Instruction. 2003;21 (2): 175-207.
31. Ringrose J.Beyond discourse: Using Deleuze and Guattari's schizoanalysis to explore affective assemblages, heterosexually striated space, and lines of flight online and at school.Educational Philosophy and Theory. 2011;43 (6): 598-618.
32. St. Pierre E. A.Deleuzian concepts for education: The subject undone.Educational Philosophy and Theory, [New Zealand]. 2004;36 (3): 283-296.
33. Semetsky I.Deleuze, education, and becoming. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers; 2006:.
34. Sermijn J.,Davlieger P.,Loots G.The narrative construction of the self: Selfhood as a rhizomatic story.Qualitative Inquiry. 2008;14 (4): 632-650.
35. Serres M.The five senses: A philosophy of mingled bodies. London: Continuum International Publishing Group; 2008:.
36. Tamboukou M.Machinic assemblages: Women, art education and space.Discourse. 2008;29 (3): 359-375.
37. Webb T.Remapping power in educational micropolitics.Critical Studies in Education. 2008;49 (2): 127-142.
38. Wyatt J.,Gale K.The textor, the nomads, and a labyrinth: A response to Graham Bradley.Qualitative Inquiry. 2011;17 (6): 493-497.
39. Wyatt J.,Gale K.,Gannon S.,Davies B.Deleuzian thought and collaborative writing: A play in four acts.Qualitative Inquiry. 2010;16 (9): 730-741.