The Semantic Hyperspace: Accumulating Mathematical Knowledge Across Semiotic Resources and Modalities

Disciplinarity: Functional Linguistic and Sociological Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 217-236

  O’Halloran, Kay L ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85086244942     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (32)

1. Baldry, A. P. and Thibault, P. J. (2006), Multimodal Transcription and Text Analysis. London: Equinox.
2. Bateman, J. (2008), Multimodality and Genre: A Foundation for the Systematic Analysis of Multimodal Documents. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
3. Bateman, J. (in press), The decomposability of semiotic modes, in K. L. O’Halloran and
4. B. A. Smith (eds), Multimodal Studies: Issues and Domains. London and New York: Routledge.
5. Bednarek, M. and Martin, J. R. (eds), (2010), New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation. London and New York: Continuum.
6. Christie, F. (1997), Curriculum macrogenres as forms of initiation into a culture, in F. Christie and J. R. Martin (eds), Genre and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School. London: Continuum, 134-160.
7. Christie, F. (2002), Classroom Discourse Analysis: A Functional Perspective. London and New York: Continuum.
8. Christie, F. and Martin, J. R. (eds), (2007), Language, Knowledge a.nd Pedagogy: Functional Linguistic and Sociological Perspectives. London and New York: Continuum. Clarke, D. (ed.), (2001), Perspectives on Practice and Meaning in Mathematics a.nd Science Classrooms. Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
9. Davis, P. J. (2006), Ma.thematics and Commonsense: A Case of Creative Tension. Wellesley, MA: A. K. Peters Ltd.
10. Halliday, M. A. K. (1978), Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
11. Halliday, M. A. K. (1993), Some grammatical problems in scientific English, in M. A. K. Halliday and J. R. Martin (eds), Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. London: Falmer Press, 69-85.
12. Halliday, M. A. K. (2004), An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd edn, revised by C. M. I. M Matthiessen ed.). London: Arnold.
13. Halliday, M. A. K. (2006), The Language of Science (Collected Works of M. A. K Halliday) (Vol. 5). London and New York: Continuum.
14. Halliday, M. A. K. and Martin, J. R. (1993), Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. London: Falmer Press.
15. Iedema, R. (2001), Resemioticization. Semiotica 137-1/4, 23-39.
16. Jewitt, C. (ed.), (2009), Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. London: Routledge.
17. Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (1996), Reading Ima.ges: The Grammar of Visual Design (1st edn). London: Routledge (2nd edn 2006).
18. Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (2001), Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication Discourse. London: Arnold.
19. Lemke, J. L. (2003), Mathematics in the middle: Measure, picture, gesture, sign, and word, in M. Anderson, A. Sáenz-Ludlow, S. Zellweger and V. V. Cifarelli (eds), Educational Perspectives on Mathematics as Semiosis: From Thinking to Interpreting to Knowing. Ottawa: Legas, 215-234.
20. Martin, J. R. and Veel, R. (eds), (1998), Reading Science: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science. London: Routledge.
21. O’Halloran, K. L. (1996), The Discourses ofSecondary School Mathematics. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Murdoch University, Western Australia.
22. O’Halloran, K. L. (1999), Towards a systemic functional analysis of multisemiotic mathematics texts. Semiotica 124-1/2, 1-29.
23. O’Halloran, K. L. (2004a), Discourses in secondary school mathematics classrooms according to social class and gender, in J. A. Foley (ed.), Language, Education and Discourse: Functional Approaches. London: Continuum, 191-225.
24. O’Halloran, K. L.(ed.), (2004b), Multimodal Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.
25. O’Halloran, K. L. (2005), Mathematical Discourse: Language, Symbolism and Visual Images. London and New York: Continuum.
26. O’Halloran, K. L. (2007), Mathematical and scientific forms of knowledge: A systemic functional multimodal grammatical approach, in F. Christie and J. R. Martin (eds), Language, Knowledge and Pedagogy: Functional Linguistic and Sociological Perspectives. London and New York: Continuum, 205-236.
27. O’Halloran, K. L. (2008), Inter-semiotic expansion of experiential meaning: Hierarchical scales and metaphor in mathematics discourse, in C. Jones and E. Ventola (eds), New Developments in the Study of Ideational Meaning: From Language to Multimodality. London: Equinox.
28. O’Halloran, K. L. (2009), Historical changes in the semiotic landscape: From calculation to computation, in C. Jewitt (ed.), Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. London: Routledge, 98-113.
29. O’Halloran, K. L., Judd, K. and E. M. K. L. (forthcoming), New techniques for multimodal analysis: The synthesis of systemic functional theory and dynamical systems theory, in S. Norris (ed.), Multimodality in Practice: Investigating Theory-in-Practice through Methodology. New York and London: Routledge.
30. Schleppegrell, M. J. (2007), The linguistic challenges of mathematics teaching and learning: A research review. Reading and Writing Quarterly 23(2): 139-159.
31. van Leeuwen, T. (2005), Introducing Social Semiotics. London: Routledge.
32. Veel, R. (1999), Language, knowledge and authority in school mathematics, in F. Christie (ed.), Peda,gogy and the Shaping of Consciousness: Linguistic and Social Processes. London: Cassell, 185-216.