Virtual encounters: The murky and furtive world of mathematical inventiveness

ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 239-252

  Sinclair, Nathalie ^a   de Freitas, Elizabeth ^b   Ferrara, Francesca ^c  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b ADELPHI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878522487     PISSN: 18639690     EISSN: 18639704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11858-012-0465-3     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Burbules, N. C. (2006). Rethinking the virtual. In J. Weiss, et al. (Eds.), The International handbook of virtual learning environments (pp. 37-58). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
2. Châtelet, G. (1993). Les enjeux du mobile. Paris: Seuil.
3. Châtelet, G. (2000). Figuring space: philosophy, mathematics and physics. (trans: Shore, R., & Zagha, M.). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
4. Clagett, M. (1968). Nicole Oresme and the medieval geometry of qualities and motions. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
5. Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. B. (2004). Education of the gifted and talented (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
6. De Freitas, E., & Sinclair, N. (2012). Diagram, gesture, agency: theorizing embodiment in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80, 133-152.
7. Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition (trans: Patton, P.). New York: Columbia University Press.
8. Ferrara, F., Pratt, D., & Robutti, O. (2006). The role and uses of technologies for the teaching of algebra and calculus. In A. Gutierrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 237-273). Rotterdam: Sense.
9. Jackiw, N. (2006). Mechanism and magic in the psychology of dynamic geometry. In N. Sinclair, D. Pimm, & W. Higginson (Eds.), Mathematics and aesthetics: New approaches to an ancient affinity. New York: Springer.
10. Leikin, R. (2009). Multiple proof tasks: Teacher practice and teacher education. In Proceedings of ICMI Study-19: Proofs and proving.
11. Leikin, R., Berman, A., & Koichu, B. (Eds.) (2009). Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
12. Nemirovsky, R., & Ferrara, F. (2009). Mathematical imagination and embodied cognition. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70, 159-174.
13. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.
14. Plucker, J. A., & Beghetto, R. A. (2004). Why creativity is domain general, why it looks domain specific, and why the distinction does not matter. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko, & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 153-168). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
15. Rotman, B. (2008). Becoming beside ourselves: The alphabet, ghosts, and distributed human beings. Durham: Duke University Press.
16. Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
17. Weil, A. (1992). The apprenticeship of a mathematician (trans: Gage, J.). Berlin: Birkhäuser.