RPA-coated single-stranded DNA as a platform for post-translational modifications in the DNA damage response

Cell Research

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 9-23

  Maréchal, Alexandre ^a   Zou, Lee ^a,b  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Phosphorylation; Post translational modification; RPA; SUMOylation; Ubiquitination

Indexed keywords

EUKARYOTA;

REPLICATION FACTOR A; SINGLE STRANDED DNA;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; DNA DAMAGE; HUMAN; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN PROCESSING;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; DNA DAMAGE; DNA, SINGLE-STRANDED; HUMANS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL; REPLICATION PROTEIN A;

EID: 84920274525     PISSN: 10010602     EISSN: 17487838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/cr.2014.147     Document Type: Review

References (188)

1. Wobbe CR, Weissbach L, Borowiec JA, et al. Replication of simian virus 40 origin-containing DNA in vitro with purified proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1987; 84:1834-1838.
2. Wold MS, Kelly T. Purification and characterization of replication protein A, a cellular protein required for in vitro replication of simian virus 40 DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988; 85:2523-2527.
3. Fairman MP, Stillman B. Cellular factors required for multiple stages of SV40 DNA replication in vitro. EMBO J 1988; 7:1211-1218.
4. Flynn RL, Zou L. Oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide-binding fold proteins: a growing family of genome guardians. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 2010; 45:266-275.
5. Fanning E, Klimovich V, Nager AR. A dynamic model for replication protein A (RPA) function in DNA processing pathways. Nucleic Acids Res 2006; 34:4126-4137.
6. Wold MS. Replication protein A: a heterotrimeric, single-stranded DNA-binding protein required for eukaryotic DNA metabolism. Annu Rev Biochem 1997; 66:61-92.
7. Oakley GG, Patrick SM. Replication protein A: directing traffic at the intersection of replication and repair. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed) 2010; 15:883-900.
8. Bae SH, Bae KH, Kim JA, Seo YS. RPA governs endonuclease switching during processing of Okazaki fragments in eukaryotes. Nature 2001; 412:456-461.
9. Dornreiter I, Erdile LF, Gilbert IU, von Winkler D, Kelly TJ, Fanning E. Interaction of DNA polymerase alpha-primase with cellular replication protein A and SV40 T antigen. EMBO J 1992; 11:769-776.
10. Waga S, Stillman B. Anatomy of a DNA replication fork revealed by reconstitution of SV40 DNA replication in vitro. Nature 1994; 369:207-212.
11. Yuzhakov A, Kelman Z, Hurwitz J, O'Donnell M. Multiple competition reactions for RPA order the assembly of the DNA polymerase delta holoenzyme. EMBO J 1999; 18:6189-6199.
12. Zou L, Elledge SJ. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 2003; 300:1542-1548.
13. Maréchal A, Zou L. DNA damage sensing by the ATM and ATR kinases. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2013; 5. pii: a012716.
14. Cimprich KA, Cortez D. ATR: an essential regulator of genome integrity. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2008; 9:616-627.
15. Li GM. Mechanisms and functions of DNA mismatch repair. Cell Res 2008; 18:85-98.
16. Krejci L, Altmannova V, Spirek M, Zhao X. Homologous recombination and its regulation. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40:5795-5818.
17. Iyama T, Wilson DM 3rd. DNA repair mechanisms in dividing and non-dividing cells. DNA Repair (Amst) 2013; 12:620-636.
18. Schramke V, Luciano P, Brevet V, et al. RPA regulates telomerase action by providing Est1p access to chromosome ends. Nat Genet 2004; 36:46-54.
19. Grudic A, Jul-Larsen A, Haring SJ, et al. Replication protein A prevents accumulation of single-stranded telomeric DNA in cells that use alternative lengthening of telomeres. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35:7267-7278.
20. Kim C, Paulus BF, Wold MS. Interactions of human replication protein A with oligonucleotides. Biochemistry 1994; 33:14197-14206.
21. Arunkumar AI, Stauffer ME, Bochkareva E, Bochkarev A, Chazin WJ. Independent and coordinated functions of replication protein A tandem high affinity single-stranded DNA binding domains. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:41077-41082.
22. Bochkarev A, Pfuetzner RA, Edwards AM, Frappier L. Structure of the single-stranded-DNA-binding domain of replication protein A bound to DNA. Nature 1997; 385:176-181.
23. Bochkareva E, Korolev S, Lees-Miller SP, Bochkarev A. Structure of the RPA trimerization core and its role in the multistep DNA-binding mechanism of RPA. EMBO J 2002; 21:1855-1863.
24. Bochkareva E, Belegu V, Korolev S, Bochkarev A. Structure of the major single-stranded DNA-binding domain of replication protein A suggests a dynamic mechanism for DNA binding. EMBO J 2001; 20:612-618.
25. Fan J, Pavletich NP. Structure and conformational change of a replication protein A heterotrimer bound to ssDNA. Genes Dev 2012; 26:2337-2347.
26. Wyka IM, Dhar K, Binz SK, Wold MS. Replication protein A interactions with DNA: differential binding of the core domains and analysis of the DNA interaction surface. Biochemistry 2003; 42:12909-12918.
27. Blackwell LJ, Borowiec JA. Human replication protein A binds single-stranded DNA in two distinct complexes. Mol Cell Biol 1994; 14:3993-4001.
28. Lao Y, Lee CG, Wold MS. Replication protein A interactions with DNA. 2. Characterization of double-stranded DNA-binding/helix-destabilization activities and the role of the zinc-finger domain in DNA interactions. Biochemistry 1999; 38:3974-3984.
29. Brill SJ, Bastin-Shanower S. Identification and characterization of the fourth single-stranded-DNA binding domain of replication protein A. Mol Cell Biol 1998; 18:7225-7234.
30. Bastin-Shanower SA, Brill SJ. Functional analysis of the four DNA binding domains of replication protein A. The role of RPA2 in ssDNA binding. J Biol Chem 2001; 276:36446-36453.
31. Toledo LI, Altmeyer M, Rask MB, et al. ATR prohibits replication catastrophe by preventing global exhaustion of RPA. Cell 2013; 155:1088-1103.
32. Jiang X, Klimovich V, Arunkumar AI, et al. Structural mechanism of RPA loading on DNA during activation of a simple pre-replication complex. EMBO J 2006; 25:5516-5526.
33. Loo YM, Melendy T. Recruitment of replication protein A by the papillomavirus E1 protein and modulation by single-stranded DNA. J Virol 2004; 78:1605-1615.
34. Shiotani B, Nguyen HD, Hakansson P, et al. Two distinct modes of ATR activation orchestrated by Rad17 and Nbs1. Cell Rep 2013; 3:1651-1662.
35. Kousholt AN, Fugger K, Hoffmann S, et al. CtIP-dependent DNA resection is required for DNA damage checkpoint maintenance but not initiation. J Cell Biol 2012; 197:869-876.
36. Sartori AA, Lukas C, Coates J, et al. Human CtIP promotes DNA end resection. Nature 2007; 450:509-514.
37. Bochkareva E, Kaustov L, Ayed A, et al. Single-stranded DNA mimicry in the p53 transactivation domain interaction with replication protein A. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102:15412-15417.
38. Jacobs DM, Lipton AS, Isern NG, et al. Human replication protein A: global fold of the N-terminal RPA-70 domain reveals a basic cleft and flexible C-terminal linker. J Biomol NMR 1999; 14:321-331.
39. Binz SK, Wold MS. Regulatory functions of the N-terminal domain of the 70-kDa subunit of replication protein A (RPA). J Biol Chem 2008; 283:21559-21570.
40. Gomes XV, Henricksen LA, Wold MS. Proteolytic mapping of human replication protein A: evidence for multiple structural domains and a conformational change upon interaction with single-stranded DNA. Biochemistry 1996; 35:5586-5595.
41. Oakley GG, Tillison K, Opiyo SA, Glanzer JG, Horn JM, Patrick SM. Physical interaction between replication protein A (RPA) and MRN: involvement of RPA2 phosphorylation and the N-terminus of RPA1. Biochemistry 2009; 48:7473-7481.
42. Umezu K, Sugawara N, Chen C, Haber JE, Kolodner RD. Genetic analysis of yeast RPA1 reveals its multiple functions in DNA metabolism. Genetics 1998; 148:989-1005.
43. Kim HS, Brill SJ. Rfc4 interacts with Rpa1 and is required for both DNA replication and DNA damage checkpoints in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 2001; 21:3725-3737.
44. Pellicioli A, Lee SE, Lucca C, Foiani M, Haber JE. Regulation of Saccharomyces Rad53 checkpoint kinase during adaptation from DNA damage-induced G2/M arrest. Mol Cell 2001; 7:293-300.
45. Lee SE, Moore JK, Holmes A, Umezu K, Kolodner RD, Haber JE. Saccharomyces Ku70, mre11/rad50 and RPA proteins regulate adaptation to G2/M arrest after DNA damage. Cell 1998; 94:399-409.
46. Zou L, Liu D, Elledge SJ. Replication protein A-mediated recruitment and activation of Rad17 complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100:13827-13832.
47. Lucca C, Vanoli F, Cotta-Ramusino C, et al. Checkpoint-mediated control of replisome-fork association and signalling in response to replication pausing. Oncogene 2004; 23:1206-1213.
48. Majka J, Binz SK, Wold MS, Burgers PM. Replication protein A directs loading of the DNA damage checkpoint clamp to 5′-DNA junctions. J Biol Chem 2006; 281:27855-27861.
49. Maréchal A, Li JM, Ji XY, et al. PRP19 transforms into a sensor of RPA-ssDNA after DNA damage and drives ATR activation via a ubiquitin-mediated circuitry. Mol Cell 2014; 53:235-246.
50. Xu X, Vaithiyalingam S, Glick GG, Mordes DA, Chazin WJ, Cortez D. The basic cleft of RPA70N binds multiple checkpoint proteins, including RAD9, to regulate ATR signaling. Mol Cell Biol 2008; 28:7345-7353.
51. Haring SJ, Mason AC, Binz SK, Wold MS. Cellular functions of human RPA1. Multiple roles of domains in replication, repair, and checkpoints. J Biol Chem 2008; 283:19095-19111.
52. Liu Y, Vaithiyalingam S, Shi Q, Chazin WJ, Zinkel SS. BID binds to replication protein A and stimulates ATR function following replicative stress. Mol Cell Biol 2011; 31:4298-4309.
53. Kumagai A, Lee J, Yoo HY, Dunphy WG. TopBP1 activates the ATR-ATRIP complex. Cell 2006; 124:943-955.
54. Mordes DA, Glick GG, Zhao R, Cortez D. TopBP1 activates ATR through ATRIP and a PIKK regulatory domain. Genes Dev 2008; 22:1478-1489.
55. Lee J, Dunphy WG. Rad17 plays a central role in establishment of the interaction between TopBP1 and the Rad9-Hus1-Rad1 complex at stalled replication forks. Mol Biol Cell 2010; 21:926-935.
56. Lee J, Kumagai A, Dunphy WG. The Rad9-Hus1-Rad1 checkpoint clamp regulates interaction of TopBP1 with ATR. J Biol Chem 2007; 282:28036-28044.
57. Delacroix S, Wagner JM, Kobayashi M, Yamamoto K, Karnitz LM. The Rad9-Hus1-Rad1 (9-1-1) clamp activates checkpoint signaling via TopBP1. Genes Dev 2007; 21:1472-1477.
58. Puddu F, Granata M, Di Nola L, et al. Phosphorylation of the budding yeast 9-1-1 complex is required for Dpb11 function in the full activation of the UV-induced DNA damage checkpoint. Mol Cell Biol 2008; 28:4782-4793.
59. Mordes DA, Nam EA, Cortez D. Dpb11 activates the Mec1-Ddc2 complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105:18730-18734.
60. Navadgi-Patil VM, Burgers PM. Yeast DNA replication protein Dpb11 activates the Mec1/ATR checkpoint kinase. J Biol Chem 2008; 283:35853-35859.
61. Liu S, Shiotani B, Lahiri M, et al. ATR autophosphorylation as a molecular switch for checkpoint activation. Mol Cell 2011; 43:192-202.
62. Olson E, Nievera CJ, Liu E, Lee AY, Chen L, Wu X. The Mre11 complex mediates the S-phase checkpoint through an interaction with replication protein A. Mol Cell Biol 2007; 27:6053-6067.
63. Yoo HY, Kumagai A, Shevchenko A, Dunphy WG. The Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex mediates activation of TopBP1 by ATM. Mol Biol Cell 2009; 20:2351-2360.
64. Mer G, Bochkarev A, Gupta R, et al. Structural basis for the recognition of DNA repair proteins UNG2, XPA, and RAD52 by replication factor RPA. Cell 2000; 103:449-456.
65. Santocanale C, Neecke H, Longhese MP, Lucchini G, Plevani P. Mutations in the gene encoding the 34 kDa subunit of yeast replication protein A cause defective S phase progression. J Mol Biol 1995; 254:595-607.
66. Maniar HS, Wilson R, Brill SJ. Roles of replication protein-A subunits 2 and 3 in DNA replication fork movement in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 1997; 145:891-902.
67. Lee SH, Kim DK. The role of the 34-kDa subunit of human replication protein A in simian virus 40 DNA replication in vitro. J Biol Chem 1995; 270:12801-12807.
68. Arunkumar AI, Klimovich V, Jiang X, et al. Insights into hRPA32 C-terminal domain-mediated assembly of the simian virus 40 replisome. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2005; 12:332-339.
69. Ciccia A, Bredemeyer AL, Sowa ME, et al. The SIOD disorder protein SMARCAL1 is an RPA-interacting protein involved in replication fork restart. Genes Dev 2009; 23:2415-2425.
70. Bansbach CE, Betous R, Lovejoy CA, Glick GG, Cortez D. The annealing helicase SMARCAL1 maintains genome integrity at stalled replication forks. Genes Dev 2009; 23:2405-2414.
71. Yuan J, Ghosal G, Chen J. The annealing helicase HARP protects stalled replication forks. Genes Dev 2009; 23:2394-2399.
72. Postow L, Woo EM, Chait BT, Funabiki H. Identification of SMARCAL1 as a component of the DNA damage response. J Biol Chem 2009; 284:35951-35961.
73. Couch FB, Bansbach CE, Driscoll R, et al. ATR phosphorylates SMARCAL1 to prevent replication fork collapse. Genes Dev 2013; 27:1610-1623.
74. Yusufzai T, Kong X, Yokomori K, Kadonaga JT. The annealing helicase HARP is recruited to DNA repair sites via an interaction with RPA. Genes Dev 2009; 23:2400-2404.
75. Leman AR, Noguchi E. Local and global functions of Timeless and Tipin in replication fork protection. Cell Cycle 2012; 11:3945-3955.
76. Lok BH, Powell SN. Molecular pathways: understanding the role of Rad52 in homologous recombination for therapeutic advancement. Clin Cancer Res 2012; 18:6400-6406.
77. Diderich K, Alanazi M, Hoeijmakers JH. Premature aging and cancer in nucleotide excision repair-disorders. DNA Repair (Amst) 2011; 10:772-780.
78. Krokan HE, Bjoras M. Base excision repair. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2013; 5:a012583.
79. Errico A, Costanzo V, Hunt T. Tipin is required for stalled replication forks to resume DNA replication after removal of aphidicolin in Xenopus egg extracts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104:14929-14934.
80. Park MS, Ludwig DL, Stigger E, Lee SH. Physical interaction between human RAD52 and RPA is required for homologous recombination in mammalian cells. J Biol Chem 1996; 271:18996-19000.
81. Stigger E, Drissi R, Lee SH. Functional analysis of human replication protein A in nucleotide excision repair. J Biol Chem 1998; 273:9337-9343.
82. Li L, Lu X, Peterson CA, Legerski RJ. An interaction between the DNA repair factor XPA and replication protein A appears essential for nucleotide excision repair. Mol Cell Biol 1995; 15:5396-5402.
83. Kemp MG, Akan Z, Yilmaz S, et al. Tipin-replication protein A interaction mediates Chk1 phosphorylation by ATR in response to genotoxic stress. J Biol Chem 2010; 285:16562-16571.
84. Din S, Brill SJ, Fairman MP, Stillman B. Cell-cycle-regulated phosphorylation of DNA replication factor A from human and yeast cells. Genes Dev 1990; 4:968-977.
85. Brill SJ, Stillman B. Yeast replication factor-A functions in the unwinding of the SV40 origin of DNA replication. Nature 1989; 342:92-95.
86. Stephan H, Concannon C, Kremmer E, Carty MP, Nasheuer HP. Ionizing radiation-dependent and independent phosphorylation of the 32-kDa subunit of replication protein A during mitosis. Nucleic Acids Res 2009; 37:6028-6041.
87. Dutta A, Stillman B. cdc2 family kinases phosphorylate a human cell DNA replication factor, RPA, and activate DNA replication. EMBO J 1992; 11:2189-2199.
88. Fang F, Newport JW. Distinct roles of cdk2 and cdc2 in RP-A phosphorylation during the cell cycle. J Cell Sci 1993; 106:983-994.
89. Pan ZQ, Amin AA, Gibbs E, Niu H, Hurwitz J. Phosphorylation of the p34 subunit of human single-stranded-DNA-binding protein in cyclin A-activated G1 extracts is catalyzed by cdk-cyclin A complex and DNA-dependent protein kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994; 91:8343-8347.
90. Liu VF, Weaver DT. The ionizing radiation-induced replication protein A phosphorylation response differs between ataxia telangiectasia and normal human cells. Mol Cell Biol 1993; 13:7222-7231.
91. Zernik-Kobak M, Vasunia K, Connelly M, Anderson CW, Dixon K. Sites of UV-induced phosphorylation of the p34 subunit of replication protein A from HeLa cells. J Biol Chem 1997; 272:23896-23904.
92. Carty MP, Zernik-Kobak M, McGrath S, Dixon K. UV light-induced DNA synthesis arrest in HeLa cells is associated with changes in phosphorylation of human single-stranded DNA-binding protein. EMBO J 1994; 13:2114-2123.
93. Fotedar R, Roberts JM. Cell cycle regulated phosphorylation of RPA-32 occurs within the replication initiation complex. EMBO J 1992; 11:2177-2187.
94. Liaw H, Lee D, Myung K. DNA-PK-dependent RPA2 hyperphosphorylation facilitates DNA repair and suppresses sister chromatid exchange. PLoS One 2011; 6:e21424.
95. Binz SK, Sheehan AM, Wold MS. Replication protein A phosphorylation and the cellular response to DNA damage. DNA Repair (Amst) 2004; 3:1015-1024.
96. Olson E, Nievera CJ, Klimovich V, Fanning E, Wu X. RPA2 is a direct downstream target for ATR to regulate the S-phase checkpoint. J Biol Chem 2006; 281:39517-39533.
97. Vassin VM, Anantha RW, Sokolova E, Kanner S, Borowiec JA. Human RPA phosphorylation by ATR stimulates DNA synthesis and prevents ssDNA accumulation during DNA-replication stress. J Cell Sci 2009; 122:4070-4080.
98. Liu S, Opiyo SO, Manthey K, et al. Distinct roles for DNA-PK, ATM and ATR in RPA phosphorylation and checkpoint activation in response to replication stress. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40:10780-10794.
99. Block WD, Yu Y, Lees-Miller SP. Phosphatidyl inositol 3-kinase-like serine/threonine protein kinases (PIKKs) are required for DNA damage-induced phosphorylation of the 32 kDa subunit of replication protein A at threonine 21. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32:997-1005.
100. Koivomagi M, Valk E, Venta R, et al. Cascades of multisite phosphorylation control Sic1 destruction at the onset of S phase. Nature 2011; 480:128-131.
101. Anantha RW, Vassin VM, Borowiec JA. Sequential and synergistic modification of human RPA stimulates chromosomal DNA repair. J Biol Chem 2007; 282:35910-35923.
102. Vassin VM, Wold MS, Borowiec JA. Replication protein A (RPA) phosphorylation prevents RPA association with replication centers. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24:1930-1943.
103. Anantha RW, Sokolova E, Borowiec JA. RPA phosphorylation facilitates mitotic exit in response to mitotic DNA damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105:12903-12908.
104. Murphy AK, Fitzgerald M, Ro T, et al. Phosphorylated RPA recruits PALB2 to stalled DNA replication forks to facilitate fork recovery. J Cell Biol 2014; 206:493-507.
105. Shi W, Feng Z, Zhang J, et al. The role of RPA2 phosphorylation in homologous recombination in response to replication arrest. Carcinogenesis 2010; 31:994-1002.
106. Lee DH, Pan Y, Kanner S, Sung P, Borowiec JA, Chowdhury D. A PP4 phosphatase complex dephosphorylates RPA2 to facilitate DNA repair via homologous recombination. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2010; 17:365-372.
107. Ashley AK, Shrivastav M, Nie J, et al. DNA-PK phosphorylation of RPA32 Ser4/Ser8 regulates replication stress checkpoint activation, fork restart, homologous recombination and mitotic catastrophe. DNA Repair (Amst) 2014; 21:131-139.
108. Vidal-Eychenie S, Decaillet C, Basbous J, Constantinou A. DNA structure-specific priming of ATR activation by DNAPKcs. J Cell Biol 2013; 202:421-429.
109. Reinhardt HC, Yaffe MB. Phospho-Ser/Thr-binding domains: navigating the cell cycle and DNA damage response. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2013; 14:563-580.
110. Ciccia A, Elledge SJ. The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives. Mol Cell 2010; 40:179-204.
111. Polo SE, Jackson SP. Dynamics of DNA damage response proteins at DNA breaks: a focus on protein modifications. Genes Dev 2011; 25:409-433.
112. Patrick SM, Oakley GG, Dixon K, Turchi JJ. DNA damage induced hyperphosphorylation of replication protein A. 2. Characterization of DNA binding activity, protein interactions, and activity in DNA replication and repair. Biochemistry 2005; 44:8438-8448.
113. Oakley GG, Patrick SM, Yao J, Carty MP, Turchi JJ, Dixon K. RPA phosphorylation in mitosis alters DNA binding and protein-protein interactions. Biochemistry 2003; 42:3255-3264.
114. Binz SK, Lao Y, Lowry DF, Wold MS. The phosphorylation domain of the 32-kDa subunit of replication protein A (RPA) modulates RPA-DNA interactions. Evidence for an intersub-unit interaction. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:35584-35591.
115. Serrano MA, Li Z, Dangeti M, et al. DNA-PK, ATM and ATR collaboratively regulate p53-RPA interaction to facilitate homologous recombination DNA repair. Oncogene 2013; 32:2452-2462.
116. Abramova NA, Russell J, Botchan M, Li R. Interaction between replication protein A and p53 is disrupted after UV damage in a DNA repair-dependent manner. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94:7186-7191.
117. Shao RG, Cao CX, Zhang H, Kohn KW, Wold MS, Pommier Y. Replication-mediated DNA damage by camptothecin induces phosphorylation of RPA by DNA-dependent protein kinase and dissociates RPA:DNA-PK complexes. EMBO J 1999; 18:1397-1406.
118. Yoo E, Kim BU, Lee SY, Cho CH, Chung JH, Lee CH. 53BP1 is associated with replication protein A and is required for RPA2 hyperphosphorylation following DNA damage. Oncogene 2005; 24:5423-5430.
119. Wu X, Yang Z, Liu Y, Zou Y. Preferential localization of hyperphosphorylated replication protein A to double-strand break repair and checkpoint complexes upon DNA damage. Biochem J 2005; 391:473-480.
120. Robison JG, Elliott J, Dixon K, Oakley GG. Replication protein A and the Mre11.Rad50.Nbs1 complex co-localize and interact at sites of stalled replication forks. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:34802-34810.
121. Wu X, Shell SM, Zou Y. Interaction and colocalization of Rad9/Rad1/Hus1 checkpoint complex with replication protein A in human cells. Oncogene 2005; 24:4728-4735.
122. Feng J, Wakeman T, Yong S, Wu X, Kornbluth S, Wang XF. Protein phosphatase 2A-dependent dephosphorylation of replication protein A is required for the repair of DNA breaks induced by replication stress. Mol Cell Biol 2009; 29:5696-5709.
123. Dou H, Huang C, Singh M, Carpenter PB, Yeh ET. Regulation of DNA repair through deSUMOylation and SUMOylation of replication protein A complex. Mol Cell 2010; 39:333-345.
124. Psakhye I, Jentsch S. Protein group modification and synergy in the SUMO pathway as exemplified in DNA repair. Cell 2012; 151:807-820.
125. Cremona CA, Sarangi P, Yang Y, Hang LE, Rahman S, Zhao X. Extensive DNA damage-induced sumoylation contributes to replication and repair and acts in addition to the mec1 checkpoint. Mol Cell 2012; 45:422-432.
126. Burgess RC, Rahman S, Lisby M, Rothstein R, Zhao X. The Slx5-Slx8 complex affects sumoylation of DNA repair proteins and negatively regulates recombination. Mol Cell Biol 2007; 27:6153-6162.
127. Shima H, Suzuki H, Sun J, et al. Activation of the SUMO modification system is required for the accumulation of RAD51 at sites of DNA damage. J Cell Sci 2013; 126:5284-5292.
128. Guo Z, Kanjanapangka J, Liu N, et al. Sequential posttranslational modifications program FEN1 degradation during cell-cycle progression. Mol Cell 2012; 47:444-456.
129. Prudden J, Pebernard S, Raffa G, et al. SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligases in genome stability. EMBO J 2007; 26:4089-4101.
130. Povlsen LK, Beli P, Wagner SA, et al. Systems-wide analysis of ubiquitylation dynamics reveals a key role for PAF15 ubiquitylation in DNA-damage bypass. Nat Cell Biol 2012; 14:1089-1098.
131. Chan SP, Kao DI, Tsai WY, Cheng SC. The Prp19p-associated complex in spliceosome activation. Science 2003; 302:279-282.
132. Song EJ, Werner SL, Neubauer J, et al. The Prp19 complex and the Usp4Sart3 deubiquitinating enzyme control reversible ubiquitination at the spliceosome. Genes Dev 2010; 24:1434-1447.
133. Zhang N, Kaur R, Lu X, Shen X, Li L, Legerski RJ. The Pso4 mRNA splicing and DNA repair complex interacts with WRN for processing of DNA interstrand cross-links. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:40559-40567.
134. Zhang N, Kaur R, Akhter S, Legerski RJ. Cdc5L interacts with ATR and is required for the S-phase cell-cycle checkpoint. EMBO Rep 2009; 10:1029-1035.
135. Beck BD, Park SJ, Lee YJ, Roman Y, Hromas RA, Lee SH. Human Pso4 is a metnase (SETMAR)-binding partner that regulates metnase function in DNA repair. J Biol Chem 2008; 283:9023-9030.
136. Mahajan KN, Mitchell BS. Role of human Pso4 in mammalian DNA repair and association with terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100:10746-10751.
137. Grote M, Wolf E, Will CL, et al. Molecular architecture of the human Prp19/CDC5L complex. Mol Cell Biol 2010; 30:2105-2119.
138. Wan L, Huang J. The PSO4 complex associates with RPA and modulates the activation of ATR. J Biol Chem 2014; 289:6619-6626.
139. Abbas M, Shanmugam I, Bsaili M, Hromas R, Shaheen M. The role of the human Psoralen 4 (hPso4) complex in replication stress and homologous recombination. J Biol Chem 2014; 289:14009-14019.
140. Gong Z, Chen J. E3 ligase RFWD3 participates in replication checkpoint control. J Biol Chem 2011; 286:22308-22313.
141. Liu S, Chu J, Yucer N, et al. RING finger and WD repeat domain 3 (RFWD3) associates with replication protein A (RPA) and facilitates RPA-mediated DNA damage response. J Biol Chem 2011; 286:22314-22322.
142. Davies AA, Huttner D, Daigaku Y, Chen S, Ulrich HD. Activation of ubiquitin-dependent DNA damage bypass is mediated by replication protein a. Mol Cell 2008; 29:625-636.
143. Jeong YT, Rossi M, Cermak L, et al. FBH1 promotes DNA double-strand breakage and apoptosis in response to DNA replication stress. J Cell Biol 2013; 200:141-149.
144. Galanty Y, Belotserkovskaya R, Coates J, Jackson SP. RNF4, a SUMO-targeted ubiquitin E3 ligase, promotes DNA double-strand break repair. Genes Dev 2012; 26:1179-1195.
145. Luo K, Zhang H, Wang L, Yuan J, Lou Z. Sumoylation of MDC1 is important for proper DNA damage response. EMBO J 2012; 31:3008-3019.
146. Guzzo CM, Berndsen CE, Zhu J, et al. RNF4-dependent hybrid SUMO-ubiquitin chains are signals for RAP80 and thereby mediate the recruitment of BRCA1 to sites of DNA damage. Sci Signal 2012; 5:ra88.
147. Vyas R, Kumar R, Clermont F, et al. RNF4 is required for DNA double-strand break repair in vivo. Cell Death Differ 2013; 20:490-502.
148. Yin Y, Seifert A, Chua JS, Maure JF, Golebiowski F, Hay RT. SUMO-targeted ubiquitin E3 ligase RNF4 is required for the response of human cells to DNA damage. Genes Dev 2012; 26:1196-1208.
149. Jackson SP, Durocher D. Regulation of DNA damage responses by ubiquitin and SUMO. Mol Cell 2013; 49:795-807.
150. Panier S, Ichijima Y, Fradet-Turcotte A, et al. Tandem protein interaction modules organize the ubiquitin-dependent response to DNA double-strand breaks. Mol Cell 2012; 47:383-395.
151. Fradet-Turcotte A, Canny MD, Escribano-Diaz C, et al. 53BP1 is a reader of the DNA-damage-induced H2A Lys 15 ubiquitin mark. Nature 2013; 499:50-54.
152. Chaudhuri J, Khuong C, Alt FW. Replication protein A interacts with AID to promote deamination of somatic hypermutation targets. Nature 2004; 430:992-998.
153. Brosh RM, Li JL, Kenny MK, et al. Replication protein A physically interacts with the Bloom's syndrome protein and stimulates its helicase activity. J Biol Chem 2000; 275:23500-23508.
154. Doherty KM, Sommers JA, Gray MD, et al. Physical and functional mapping of the replication protein a interaction domain of the werner and bloom syndrome helicases. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:29494-29505.
155. Wong JM, Ionescu D, Ingles CJ. Interaction between BRCA2 and replication protein A is compromised by a cancer-predisposing mutation in BRCA2. Oncogene 2003; 22:28-33.
156. Bae KH, Kim HS, Bae SH, Kang HY, Brill S, Seo YS. Bimodal interaction between replication-protein A and Dna2 is critical for Dna2 function both in vivo and in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res 2003; 31:3006-3015.
157. Kim DH, Lee KH, Kim JH, et al. Enzymatic properties of the Caenorhabditis elegans Dna2 endonuclease/helicase and a species-specific interaction between RPA and Dna2. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33:1372-1383.
158. Shao RG, Cao CX, Zhang H, Kohn KW, Wold MS, Pommier Y. Replication-mediated DNA damage by camptothecin induces phosphorylation of RPA by DNA-dependent protein kinase and dissociates RPA:DNA-PK complexes. EMBO J 1999; 18:1397-1406.
159. Sparks JL, Kumar R, Singh M, Wold MS, Pandita TK, Burgers PM. Human exonuclease 5 is a novel sliding exonuclease required for genome stability. J Biol Chem 2012; 287:42773-42783.
160. Fujimoto M, Takaki E, Takii R, et al. RPA assists HSF1 access to nucleosomal DNA by recruiting histone chaperone FACT. Mol Cell 2012; 48:182-194.
161. VanDemark AP, Blanksma M, Ferris E, Heroux A, Hill CP, Formosa T. The structure of the yFACT Pob3-M domain, its interaction with the DNA replication factor RPA, and a potential role in nucleosome deposition. Mol Cell 2006; 22:363-374.
162. Gupta R, Sharma S, Sommers JA, Kenny MK, Cantor SB, Brosh RM Jr. FANCJ (BACH1) helicase forms DNA damage inducible foci with replication protein A and interacts physically and functionally with the single-stranded DNA-binding protein. Blood 2007; 110:2390-2398.
163. MacKay C, Toth R, Rouse J. Biochemical characterisation of the SWI/SNF family member HLTF. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2009; 390:187-191.
164. Robison JG, Elliott J, Dixon K, Oakley GG. Replication protein A and the Mre11.Rad50.Nbs1 complex co-localize and interact at sites of stalled replication forks. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:34802-34810.
165. Oakley GG, Tillison K, Opiyo Sa, Glanzer JG, Horn JM, Patrick SM. Physical interaction between replication protein A (RPA) and MRN: involvement of RPA2 phosphorylation and the N-terminus of RPA1. Biochemistry 2009; 48:7473-7481.
166. Xu X, Vaithiyalingam S, Glick GG, Mordes Da, Chazin WJ, Cortez D. The basic cleft of RPA70N binds multiple checkpoint proteins, including RAD9, to regulate ATR signaling. Mol Cell Biol 2008; 28:7345-7353.
167. Daniely Y, Borowiec JA. Formation of a complex between nucleolin and replication protein A after cell stress prevents initiation of DNA replication. J Cell Biol 2000; 149:799-810.
168. Dornreiter I, Erdile LF, Gilbert IU, von Winkler D, Kelly TJ, Fanning E. Interaction of DNA polymerase alpha-primase with cellular replication protein A and SV40 T antigen. EMBO J 1992; 11:769-776.
169. Li R, Botchan MR. The acidic transcriptional activation domains of VP16 and p53 bind the cellular replication protein A and stimulate in vitro BPV-1 DNA replication. Cell 1993; 73:1207-1221.
170. Dutta A, Ruppert JM, Aster JC, Winchester E. Inhibition of DNA replication factor RPA by p53. Nature 1993; 365:79-82.
171. Wan L, Lou J, Xia Y, et al. hPrimpol1/CCDC111 is a human DNA primase-polymerase required for the maintenance of genome integrity. EMBO Rep 2013; 14:1104-1112.
172. Ellison V, Stillman B. Biochemical characterization of DNA damage checkpoint complexes: clamp loader and clamp complexes with specificity for 5′ recessed DNA. PLoS Biol 2003; 1:E33.
173. Stauffer ME, Chazin WJ. Physical interaction between replication protein A and Rad51 promotes exchange on single-stranded DNA. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:25638-25645.
174. Hays SL, Firmenich AA, Massey P, Banerjee R, Berg P. Studies of the interaction between Rad52 protein and the yeast single-stranded DNA binding protein RPA. Mol Cell Biol 1998; 18:4400-4406.
175. Wang M, Park JS, Ishiai M, Hurwitz J, Lee SH. Species specificity of human RPA in simian virus 40 DNA replication lies in T-antigen-dependent RNA primer synthesis. Nucleic Acids Res 2000; 28:4742-4749.
176. Park CJ, Lee JH, Choi BS. Solution structure of the DNA-binding domain of RPA from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its interaction with single-stranded DNA and SV40 T antigen. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33:4172-4181.
177. Unsal-Kacmaz K, Chastain PD, Qu PP, et al. The human Tim/Tipin complex coordinates an Intra-S checkpoint response to UV that slows replication fork displacement. Mol Cell Biol 2007; 27:3131-3142.
178. Nagelhus TA, Haug T, Singh KK, et al. A sequence in the N-terminal region of human uracil-DNA glycosylase with homology to XPA interacts with the C-terminal part of the 34-kDa subunit of replication protein A. J Biol Chem 1997; 272:6561-6566.
179. Brosh RM, Orren DK, Nehlin JO, et al. Functional and physical interaction between WRN helicase and human replication protein A. J Biol Chem 1999; 274:18341-18350.
180. Machwe A, Lozada E, Wold MS, Li G-M, Orren DK. Molecular cooperation between the Werner syndrome protein and replication protein A in relation to replication fork blockage. J Biol Chem 2010; 286:3497-3508.
181. Shen JC, Lao Y, Kamath-Loeb A, Wold MS, Loeb LA. The N-terminal domain of the large subunit of human replication protein A binds to Werner syndrome protein and stimulates helicase activity. Mech Ageing Dev 2003; 124:921-930.
182. Daughdrill GW, Buchko GW, Botuyan MV, et al. Chemical shift changes provide evidence for overlapping single-stranded DNA- and XPA-binding sites on the 70 kDa subunit of human replication protein A. Nucleic Acids Res 2003; 31:4176-4183.
183. He Z, Henricksen LA, Wold MS, Ingles CJ. RPA involvement in the damage-recognition and incision steps of nucleotide excision repair. Nature 1995; 374:566-569.
184. Saijo M, Takedachi A, Tanaka K. Nucleotide excision repair by mutant xeroderma pigmentosum group A (XPA) proteins with deficiency in interaction with RPA. J Biol Chem 2011; 286:5476-5483.
185. de Laat WL, Appeldoorn E, Sugasawa K, Weterings E, Jaspers NG, Hoeijmakers JH. DNA-binding polarity of human replication protein A positions nucleases in nucleotide excision repair. Genes Dev 1998; 12:2598-2609.
186. Matsunaga T, Park CH, Bessho T, Mu D, Sancar A. Replication protein A confers structure-specific endonuclease activities to the XPF-ERCC1 and XPG subunits of human DNA repair excision nuclease. J Biol Chem 1996; 271:11047-11050.
187. Bessho T, Sancar A, Thompson LH, Thelen MP. Reconstitution of human excision nuclease with recombinant XPF-ERCC1 complex. J Biol Chem 1997; 272:3833-3837.
188. Fisher LA, Bessho M, Wakasugi M, Matsunaga T, Bessho T. Role of interaction of XPF with RPA in nucleotide excision repair. J Mol Biol 2011; 413:337-346.