RNF4 is required for DNA double-strand break repair in vivo

Cell Death and Differentiation

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 490-502

  Vyas, R ^a,b   Kumar, R ^c   Clermont, F ^a,b   Helfricht, A ^c   Kalev, P ^b,d   Sotiropoulou, P ^e   Hendriks, I A ^c   Radaelli, E ^f   Hochepied, T ^g   Blanpain, C ^e   Sablina, A ^b,d   Van Attikum, H ^c   Olsen, J V ^h   Jochemsen, A G ^c   Vertegaal, A C O ^c   Marine, J C ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^c LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SYSTEMS BIOLOGY   (Belgium)

^e UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

^f UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^g GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^h UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

BRCA1; DNA damage; homologous recombination; MDC1; Rad51; RNF4; spermatogenesis

Indexed keywords

BRCA1 PROTEIN; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA; PROTEIN RNF4; RAD51 PROTEIN; SUMO PROTEIN; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE E3; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ALLELE; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; APOPTOSIS; ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE PHASE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DAMAGE; DNA END JOINING REPAIR; DNA REPAIR; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; FIBROBLAST; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; IONIZING RADIATION; MALE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN MODIFICATION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SPERMATOGENESIS; SUMOYLATION;

ALLELES; ANIMALS; BRCA1 PROTEIN; CELL LINE; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA REPAIR; GENOTYPE; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS; MICE; MICE, TRANSGENIC; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; RAD51 RECOMBINASE; RADIATION, IONIZING; SUMOYLATION; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; UBIQUITINATION;

MUS;

EID: 84873704658     PISSN: 13509047     EISSN: 14765403     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/cdd.2012.145     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Jackson SP, Bartek J. The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease. Nature 2009; 461: 1071-1078.
2. Ciccia A, Elledge SJ. The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives. Mol Cell 2010; 40: 179-204.
3. Wyman C, Kanaar R. DNA double-strand break repair: all's well that ends well. Annu Rev Genet 2006; 40: 363-383.
4. Rothkamm K, Kruger I, Thompson LH, Lobrich M. Pathways of DNA double-strand break repair during the mammalian cell cycle. Mol Cell Biol 2003; 23: 5706-5715.
5. Misteli T, Soutoglou E. The emerging role of nuclear architecture in DNA repair and genome maintenance. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009; 10: 243-254.
6. Polo SE, Jackson SP. Dynamics of DNA damage response proteins at DNA breaks: A focus on protein modifications. Genes Dev. 2011;25:409-409.
7. Rogakou EP, Pilch DR, Orr AH, Ivanova VS, Bonner WM. DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139. J Biol Chem 1998; 273 5858-5868.
8. Stucki M, Clapperton JA, Mohammad D, Yaffe MB, Smerdon SJ, Jackson SP et al. MDC1 directly binds phosphorylated histone H2AX to regulate cellular responses to DNA doublestrand breaks. Cell 2005; 123: 1213-1226.
9. Panier S, Durocher D. Regulatory ubiquitylation in response to DNA double-strand breaks. DNA Repair (Amst) 2009; 8: 436-443.
10. Mailand N, Bekker-Jensen S, Faustrup H, Melander F, Bartek J, Lukas C et al. RNF8 ubiquitylates histones at DNA double-strand breaks and promotes assembly of repair proteins. Cell 2007; 131: 887-900.
11. Huen MS, Grant R, Manke I, Minn K, Yu X, Yaffe MB et al. RNF8 transduces the DNA-damage signal via histone ubiquitylation and checkpoint protein assembly. Cell 2007; 131: 901-914.
12. Bekker-Jensen S, Mailand N. The ubiquitin- and SUMO-dependent signaling response to DNA double-strand breaks. FEBS Lett 2011; 585: 2914-2919.
13. Bergink S, Jentsch S. Principles of ubiquitin and SUMO modifications in DNA repair. Nature 2009; 458: 461-467.
14. Galanty Y, Belotserkovskaya R, Coates J, Polo S, Miller KM, Jackson SP. Mammalian SUMO E3-ligases PIAS1 and PIAS4 promote responses to DNA double-strand breaks. Nature 2009; 462: 935-939.
15. Morris JR, Boutell C, Keppler M, Densham R, Weekes D, Alamshah A et al. The SUMO modification pathway is involved in the BRCA1 response to genotoxic stress. Nature 2009; 462: 886-890.
16. Sun H, Leverson JD, Hunter T. Conserved function of RNF4 family proteins in eukaryotes: targeting a ubiquitin ligase to SUMOylated proteins. EMBO J 2007; 26: 4102-4112.
17. Prudden J, Pebernard S, Raffa G, Slavin DA, Perry JJ, Tainer JA et al. SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligases in genome stability. EMBO J 2007; 26: 4089-4101.
18. Tatham MH, Geoffroy MC, Shen L, Plechanovova A, Hattersley N, Jaffray EG et al. RNF4 is a poly-SUMO-specific E3 ubiquitin ligase required for arsenic-induced PML degradation. Nat Cell Biol 2008; 10: 538-546.
19. Kosoy A, Calonge TM, Outwin EA, O'Connell MJ. Fission yeast Rnf4 homologs are required for DNA repair. J Biol Chem 2007; 282: 20388-20394.
20. Barry KC, Abed M, Kenyagin D, Werwie TR, Boico O, Orian A et al. The Drosophila STUbL protein Degringolade limits HES functions during embryogenesis. Development 2011; 138: 1759-1769.
21. Hu XV, Rodrigues TM, Tao H, Baker RK, Miraglia L, Orth AP et al. Identification of RING finger protein 4 (RNF4) as a modulator of DNA demethylation through a functional genomics screen. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011; 107: 15087-15092.
22. Migliorini D, Bogaerts S, Defever D, Vyas R, Denecker G, Radaelli E et al. Cop1 constitutively regulates c-Jun protein stability and functions as a tumor suppressor in mice. J Clin Invest 2011; 121: 1329-1343.
23. Hayashi S, Lewis P, Pevny L, McMahon AP. Efficient gene modulation in mouse epiblast using a Sox2Cre transgenic mouse strain. Mech Dev 2002; 119(Suppl 1): S97-S101.
24. Celeste A, Petersen S, Romanienko PJ, Fernandez-Capetillo O, Chen HT, Sedelnikova OA et al. Genomic instability in mice lacking histone H2AX. Science 2002; 296: 922-927.
25. Lou Z, Minter-Dykhouse K, Franco S, Gostissa M, Rivera MA, Celeste A et al. MDC1 maintains genomic stability by participating in the amplification of ATM-dependent DNA damage signals. Mol Cell 2006; 21: 187-200.
26. Kolas NK, Chapman JR, Nakada S, Ylanko J, Chahwan R, Sweeney FD et al. Orchestration of the DNA-damage response by the RNF8 ubiquitin ligase. Science 2007; 318: 1637-1640.
27. Ward IM, Minn K, van Deursen J, Chen J. p53 Binding protein 53BP1 is required for DNA damage responses and tumor suppression in mice. Mol Cell Biol 2003; 23: 2556-2563.
28. Bartek J, Bartkova J, Lukas J. DNA damage signalling guards against activated oncogenes and tumour progression. Oncogene 2007; 26: 7773-7779.
29. Lukas C, Falck J, Bartkova J, Bartek J, Lukas J. Distinct spatiotemporal dynamics of mammalian checkpoint regulators induced by DNA damage. Nat Cell Biol 2003; 5: 255-260.
30. Yin Y, Seifert A, Chua JS, Maure JF, Golebiowski F, Hay RT et al. SUMO-targeted ubiquitin E3 ligase RNF4 is required for the response of human cells to DNA damage. Genes Dev 2012; 26: 1196-1208.
31. Galanty Y, Belotserkovskaya R, Coates J, Jackson SP. RNF4, a SUMO-targeted ubiquitin E3 ligase, promotes DNA double-strand break repair. Genes Dev 2012; 26: 1179-1195.
32. Luo K, Zhang H, Wang L, Yuan J, Lou Z. Sumoylation of MDC1 is important for proper DNA damage response. EMBO J 2012; 31: 3008-3019.
33. Schimmel J, Larsen KM, Matic I, van Hagen M, Cox J, Mann M et al. The ubiquitinproteasome system is a key component of the SUMO-2/3 cycle. Mol Cell Proteomics 2008; 7: 2107-2122.
34. Pierce AJ, Hu P, Han M, Ellis N, Jasin M. Ku DNA end-binding protein modulates homologous repair of double-strand breaks in mammalian cells. Genes Dev 2001; 15: 3237-3242.
35. Ogiwara H, Ui A, Otsuka A, Satoh H, Yokomi I, Nakajima S et al. Histone acetylation by CBP and p300 at double-strand break sites facilitates SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling and the recruitment of non-homologous end joining factors. Oncogene 2011; 30: 2135-2146.
36. San Filippo J, Sung P, Klein H. Mechanism of eukaryotic homologous recombination. Annu Rev Biochem 2008; 77: 229-257.
37. Longhese MP, Bonetti D, Guerini I, Manfrini N, Clerici M. DNA double-strand breaks in meiosis: checking their formation, processing and repair. DNA Repair (Amst) 2009; 8: 1127-1138.
38. Li L, Halaby MJ, Hakem A, Cardoso R, El Ghamrasni S, Harding S et al. Rnf8 deficiency impairs class switch recombination, spermatogenesis, and genomic integrity and predisposes for cancer. J Exp Med 2010; 207: 983-997.
39. Bohgaki T, Bohgaki M, Cardoso R, Panier S, Zeegers D, Li L et al. Genomic instability, defective spermatogenesis, immunodeficiency, and cancer in a mouse model of the RIDDLE syndrome. PLoS Genet 2011; 7: e1001381.
40. Fryrear KA, Guo X, Kerscher O, Semmes OJ. The Sumo-targeted ubiquitin ligase RNF4 regulates the localization and function of the HTLV-1 oncoprotein Tax. Blood 2011; 119: 1173-1181.
41. Eladad S, Ye TZ, Hu P, Leversha M, Beresten S, Matunis MJ et al. Intra-nuclear trafficking of the BLM helicase to DNA damage-induced foci is regulated by SUMO modification. Hum Mol Genet 2005; 14: 1351-1365.
42. Dou H, Huang C, Singh M, Carpenter PB, Yeh ET. Regulation of DNA repair through deSUMOylation and SUMOylation of replication protein A complex. Mol Cell 2010; 39: 333-345.
43. Arnaudeau C, Lundin C, Helleday T. DNA double-strand breaks associated with replication forks are predominantly repaired by homologous recombination involving an exchange mechanism in mammalian cells. J Mol Biol 2001; 307: 1235-1245.
44. Ouyang KJ, Woo LL, Zhu J, Huo D, Matunis MJ, Ellis NA. SUMO modification regulates BLM and RAD51 interaction at damaged replication forks. PLoS Biol 2009; 7: e1000252.