Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing

Written Corrective Feedback in Second Language Acquisition and Writing

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1-232

  Bitchener, John ^a   Ferris, Dana R ^b  

^a AUCKLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (New Zealand)

^b 350 W Thomas Rd   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84909303452     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203832400     Document Type: Book

References (316)

1. Adams, R. (2007). Do second language learners benefit from interacting with each other? In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 29-52). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Aljaafreh, A. & Lantolf, J.P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. Modern Language Journal, 78, 465-483.
3. Ammar, A. (2008). Prompts and recasts: Differential effects on second language morphosyntax. Language Teaching Research, 12, 183-210.
4. Ammar, A. & Spada, N. (2006). One size fits all? Recasts, prompts and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 543-574.
5. Anderson, J. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6. Anderson, J. (1985). Cognitive psychology and its implications (2nd ed.). New York: Freeman.
7. Anderson, J. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. Anson, C.M. (Ed.). (1989). Writing and response: Theory, practice, and research. Urbana, IL: NCTE.
9. Anson, C.M. (2000). Response and the social construction of error. Assessing Writing, 7, 5-21.
10. Ascher, A. (1993). Think about editing. Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle.
11. Ashwell, T. (2000). Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 227-258.
12. Atkinson, D. (1999). Culture in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 33, 625-654.
13. Atkinson, D. (2003). L2 writing in the postprocess era: Introduction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 3-15.
14. Bailey, N., Madden, C., & Krashen, S.D. (1974). Is there a "natural sequence" in adult second language learning? Language Learning, 24, 235-243.
15. Baldwin, R.G. (1960). Grading freshman essays. College Composition and Communication, 11, 110-114.
16. Bartholomae, D.G. (1980). The study of error. College Composition and Communication, 31, 253-269.
17. Bates, L., Lane, J., & Lange, E. (1993). Writing clearly: Responding to student writing. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
18. Bean, J.C. (1996). Engaging ideas: The professor's guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
19. Beason, L. (2001). Ethos and error: How business people react to errors. College Composition and Communication, 53, 33-64.
20. Benesch, S. (1993). ESL, ideology, and the politics of pragmatism. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 705-717.
21. Benesch, S. (1999). Thinking critically, thinking dialogically. TESOL Quarterly, 33, 573-580.
22. Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 102-118.
23. Bitchener, J. (2009). Measuring the effectiveness of written corrective feedback: A response to "Overgeneralization from a narrow focus: A response to Bitchener (2008)." Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(4), 276-279.
24. Bitchener, J. & Knoch, U. (2008). The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teaching Research, 12, 409-431.
25. Bitchener, J. & Knoch, U. (2009). The relative effectiveness of different types of direct written corrective feedback. System, 37(2), 322-329.
26. Bitchener, J. & Knoch, U. (2009). The value of a focused approach to written corrective feedback. ELT Journal 63(3), 204-211.
27. Bitchener, J. & Knoch, U. (2010). The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development: A ten month investigation. Applied Linguistics, 31, 193-214.
28. Bitchener, J. & Knoch, U. (2010). Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19, 207-217.
29. Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effective of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 191-205.
30. Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Holt.
31. Brannon, L. & Knoblauch, C.H. (1982). On students' rights to their own texts: A model of teacher response. College Composition and Communication, 33, 157-166.
32. Brereton, J.C. (1995). The origins of composition studies in the American college, 1875-1925. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
33. Broad, B. (2003). What we really value: Beyond rubrics in teaching and assessing writing. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.
34. Brooks, N. (1960). Language and language learning. New York: Harcourt.
35. Brown, D. (2010, March). Reshaping the value of grammatical feedback on L2 writing using colors. Paper presented at the International TESOL Convention, Boston, MA.
36. Brown, H.D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
37. Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38. Bruton, A. (2009). Designing research into the effect of error correction in L2 writing: Not so straightforward. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(2), 136-140.
39. Burt, M. (1975). Error analysis in the adult ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 9(1), 53-63.
40. Burt, M. & Kiparsky, C. (1972). The gooficon: A repair manual for English. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
41. Byrd, P. & Bunting, J. (2008). Myth 3: Where grammar is concerned, one size fits all. In J. Reid (Ed.), Writing myths: Applying second language research to classroom teaching (pp. 42-69). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
42. Cathcart, R. & Olsen, J. (1976). Teachers' and students' preferences for correction of classroom errors. In J. Fanselow & R. Crymes (Eds.), On TESOL 16 (pp. 41-43). Washington DC: TESOL.
43. Cazden, C., John, V., & Hymes, D. (1972). Functions of language in the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
44. Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 267-296.
45. Chaney, SJ. (1999). The effect of error types on error correction and revision. California State University, Sacramento, Department of English: M.A. thesis.
46. Chomsky, N. (1959). Review of verbal behavior by B.F. Skinner. Language, 35, 26-58.
47. Cohen, A. (1987). Student processing of feedback on their compositions. In A.L. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 57-69). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
48. Cohen, A. & Cavalcanti, M. (1990). Feedback on written compositions: Teacher and student verbal reports. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 155-177). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49. Cohen, A.D. & Robbins, M. (1976). Toward assessing interlanguage performance: The relationship between selected errors, learners' characteristics, and learners' expectations. Language Learning, 26, 45-66.
50. Connor, U. & Kaplan, R.B. (Eds.). (1987). Writing across languages: Analysis of L2 text. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
51. Connors, R. (1985). Mechanical correctness as a focus in composition instruction. College Composition and Communication, 36, 61-72.
52. Connors, R. (1997). Composition-Rhetoric: Backgrounds, theory, and pedagogy. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
53. Connors, R. (2003). Grammar in American college composition: An historical overview. In L. Ede & A.A. Lunsford (Eds.), Selected essays of Robert J. Connors (pp. 117-138). Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin's.
54. Connors, R. & Lunsford, A.A. (1988). Frequency of formal errors in current college writing, or Ma and Pa Kettle do research. College Composition and Communication, 39(4), 395-409.
55. Connors, R. & Lunsford, A.A. (1993). Teachers' rhetorical comments on student papers. College Composition and Communication, 44, 200-223.
56. Conrad, S.M. (2008). Myth 6: Corpus-based research is too complicated to be useful for writing teachers. In J. Reid (Ed.), Writing myths: Applying second language research to classroom teaching (pp. 115-139). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
57. Corder, S.P. (1967). The significance of learners' errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 5, 161-170.
58. Corder, S.P. (1973). Introducing applied linguistics. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
59. Council of Writing Program Administrators (2008). WPA outcomes statement for first- year composition. Retrieved from www.wpacouncil.org/positions/outcomes.html (accessed December 15, 2010).
60. Coxhead, A. & Byrd, P. (2007). Preparing writing teachers to teach the vocabulary and grammar of academic prose. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(3), 129-147.
61. Dabaghi, A. & Basturkmen, H. (2009). The effectiveness of implicit and explicit error correction on learners' performance. System, 31, 82-98.
62. Davis, A.L. (Ed.). (1972). Culture, class, and language variety. Urbana, IL: NCTE.
63. DeKeyser, R.M. (1997). Beyond explicit rule learning: Automatizing second language morphosyntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 195-222.
64. DeKeyser, R.M. (2001). Automaticity and automatization. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 125-151). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
65. DeKeyser, R.M. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 313-348). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
66. DeKeyser, R.M. (Ed.). (2007). Practice in a second language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
67. de Villiers, P.A. & de Villiers, J.G. (1973). A cross-sectional study of the development of grammatical morphemes in child speech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1, 299-310.
68. Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J.P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33-56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
69. Dulay, H. & Burt, M. (1973). Should we teach children syntax? Language Learning, 24, 245-258.
70. Dykema, K.W. (1940). Criteria of correctness. College English, 1(7), 616-623.
71. Ellis, N.C. (2005). At the interface: How explicit knowledge affects implicit language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 305-352.
72. Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 339-368.
73. Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., & Takashima, H. (2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36, 353-371.
74. Enginarlar, H. (1993). Student response to teacher feedback in EFL writing. System, 21, 193-204.
75. Ervin-Tripp, S. (1970). Structure and process in language acquisition. In J. Alatis (Ed.), 21st annual Georgetown roundtable on language and linguistics. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
76. Eskey, D.E. (1983). Meanwhile, back in the real world. Accuracy and fluency in second language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 315-323.
77. Evans, N., Hartshorn, J., McCollum, R., & Wolfersberger, M. (2010). Contextualizing corrective feedback in second language writing pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 14, 445-464.
78. Falk, J. (1968). Nominalizations in Spanish. In Studies in Linguistics and Language Learning V. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
79. Fathman, A. & Whalley, E. (1990). Teacher response to student writing: Focus on form versus content. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 178-190). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
80. Ferris, D.R. (1994). Rhetorical strategies in student persuasive writing: Differences between native and non-native speakers. Research in the Teaching of English, 28, 45-65.
81. Ferris, D.R. (1995). Can advanced ESL students be taught to correct their most serious and frequent errors? CATESOLJournal, 8(1), 41-62.
82. Ferris, D.R. (1995). Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 33-53.
83. Ferris, D.R. (1995). Teaching students to self-edit. TESOL Journal 4(4), 18-22.
84. Ferris, D.R. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 315-339.
85. Ferris, D.R. (1999). The case of grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing 8(1), 1-11.
86. Ferris, D.R. (2002). Treatment of error in second language student writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
87. Ferris, D.R. (2003). Response to student writing: Research implications for second language students. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
88. Ferris, D.R. (2004). The "grammar correction" debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime.?) Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 49-62.
89. Ferris, D.R. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 81-104). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
90. Ferris, D.R. (2008a). Feedback: Issues and options. In P. Friedrich (Ed.), Teaching academic writing (pp. 93-124). London: Continuum Press.
91. Ferris, D.R. (2008b). Myth 5: Students must learn to correct all their writing errors. In J. Reid (Ed.), Writing myths: Applying second language research to classroom teaching (pp. 90-114). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
92. Ferris, D.R. (2009). Teaching college writing to diverse student populations. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
93. Ferris, D.R. (2010). Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA: Intersections and practical applications. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 181-201.
94. Ferris, D.R. (2011). Written discourse analysis and L2 teaching. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. II) (pp. 643-662). New York: Routledge.
95. Ferris, D.R. & Hedgcock, J.S. (2005). Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process, and practice (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
96. Ferris, D.R. & Roberts, BJ. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 161-184.
97. Ferris, D.R., Brown, J., Liu, H., & Stine, M.E.A. (2011). Responding to L2 writers in college writing classes: What teachers say and what they do. TESOL Quarterly, 45, 207-234.
98. Ferris, D.R., Liu, H., & Rabie, B. (2011). "The job of teaching writing": Teacher views of responding to student writing. Writing and Pedagogy, 3(1), 39-77.
99. Ferris, D.R., Liu, H., Senna, M., & Sinha, A. (2010, April). Written corrective feedback & individual variation in L2 writing. Paper presented at the CATESOL State Conference, Santa Clara, CA.
100. Ferris, D., Pezone, S., Tade, C., & Tinti, S. (1997). Teacher commentary on student writing: Descriptions and implications. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6, 155-182.
101. Foin, A. & Lange, E. (2007). Generation 1.5 writers' success in correcting errors marked on an out-of-class paper. CATESOL Journal, 19, 146-163.
102. Fox, L. (1992). Focus on editing. London: Longman.
103. Frantzen, D. (1995). The effects of grammar supplementation on written accuracy in an intermediate Spanish content course. The Modern Language Journal, 79(3), 329-344.
104. Fries, C.C. (1940). American English grammar. New York: Appleton.
105. Frodesen, J. (1991). Grammar in writing. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (2nd ed.) (pp. 274-276). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
106. Frodesen, J. & Holten, C. (2003). Grammar and the ESL writing class. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing (pp. 141-161). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
107. George, H.V. (1972). Common errors in language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
108. Gilbert, A.H. (1922) What shall we do with freshman themes? English Journal, 11, 392-403.
109. Ginsburg, H. & Opper, S. (1969). Piaget's theory of intellectual development: An introduction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
110. Glenn, C. & Goldthwaite, M.A. (2008). The St. Martin's guide to teaching writing (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin's.
111. Gray-Rosendale, L. (1998). Inessential writings: Shaughnessy's legacy in a socially- constructed landscape. Journal of Basic Writing, 17(3), 43-75.
112. Guenette, D. (2007). Is feedback pedagogically correct? Research design issues in studies of feedback in writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(1), 40-53.
113. Hairston, M. (1981). Not all errors are created equal: Nonacademic readers in the professions respond to lapses in usage. College English, 43: 794-806.
114. Hairston, M. (1986). On not being a composition slave. In C.W. Bridges (Ed.), Training the new teacher of college composition (pp. 117-124). Urbana, IL: NCTE.
115. Harap, H. (1930). The most common grammatical errors. English Journal, 19, 440-446.
116. Harklau, L., Losey, K., & Siegal, M. (Eds.). (1999). Generation 1.5 meets college composition: Issues in the teaching of writing to U.S.-educated learners of ESL. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
117. Harley, B. & Swain, M. (1984). The interlanguage of immersion students and its implications for second language teaching. In A. Davies, C. Criper & A. Howatt (Eds.), Interlanguage (pp. 291-311). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
118. Hartshorn, J.K., Evans, N.W., Merrill, P.F., Sudweeks, R.R., Strong-Krause, D., & Anderson, N.J. (2010). The effects of dynamic corrective feedback on ESL writing accuracy. TESOL Quarterly, 44, 84-109.
119. Hartwell, P. (1985). Grammar, grammars, and the teaching of grammar. College English, 47, 105-127.
120. Haswell, R.H. (1983). Minimal marking. College English, 45, 600-604.
121. Havranek, G. (2002). When is corrective feedback most likely to succeed? International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3-4), 255-270. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00004-1
122. Heaton, J.B. & Turton, N.D. (1987). Longman dictionary of common errors. London: Pearson Longman.
123. Hedgcock, J. & Lefkowitz, N. (1994). Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity in second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3, 141-163.
124. Hedgcock, J. & Lefkowitz, N. (1996). Some input on input: Two analyses of student response to expert feedback on L2 writing. Modern Language Journal, 80, 287-308.
125. Hendrickson, J.M. (1977). Error analysis and selective correction in the adult ESL classroom: An experiment. ERIC: Centre for Applied Linguistics, Arlington, Virginia. EDRS: ED 135 260.
126. Hendrickson, J.M. (1978). Error correction in foreign language teaching: Recent theory, research, and practice. Modern Language Journal, 62, 387-398.
127. Hendrickson, J.M. (1980). The treatment of error in written work. Modern Language Journal, 64, 216-221.
128. Hendrickson, J.M. (1981). Error analysis and error correction in language teaching. SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
129. Hillocks, G. Jr. (1986). Research on written composition: New directions for teaching. Urbana, IL: NCTE.
130. Hinkel, E. (2002). Second language writers' text. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
131. Horner, B. (1992). Rethinking the "sociality" of error: Teaching editing as negotiation. Rhetoric Review, 11, 172-199.
132. Horner, B. (1994). Mapping errors and expectations for basic writing: From the "frontier field" to the "border country." English Education (Feb., 1994), 29-51.
133. Horowitz, D. (1986). Process not product: Less than meets the eye. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 141-144.
134. Hulstijn, J.H. (1995). Not all grammar rules are equal: Giving grammar instruction its proper place in foreign language teaching. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness inforeign language learning (pp. 359-386). Honolulu: University of Hawaii.
135. Hussein, A.I. (1971). Remedial English for speakers of Arabic: A psycholinguistic approach. Unpublished Ph D dissertation. University of Texas at Austin.
136. Hyland, F. & Hyland, K. (2001). Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 185-212.
137. Hyland, K. (2002). Teaching and researching writing. London: Longman.
138. Jacobs, G.M., Curtis, A., Braine, G., & Huang, S. (1998). Feedback on student writing: Taking the middle path. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 307-318.
139. Janopolous, M. (1992). University faculty tolerance of NS and NNS writing errors. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, 109-122.
140. Johns, A.M. (1990). L1 composition theories: Implications for developing theories of L2 composition. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 24-36). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
141. Johns, A.M. (1995). Genre and pedagogical purposes. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4, 181-190.
142. Johnson, D. & Roen, D. (Eds.). (1989). Richness in writing: Empowering ESL students. New York: Longman.
143. Johnson, K. (1996). Language teaching and skill learning. Oxford: Blackwell.
144. Johnston, M. (1985). Syntactic and morphological progressions in learner English. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth Department of Immigration and Ethnic Affairs.
145. Kaplan, R.B. & Grabe, W. (2002). A modern history of written discourse analysis. Journal of Second Language Writing, 11, 191-223.
146. Kennedy, G. (1973). Conditions for language learning. In J.W. Oller, Jr. & J. Richards (Eds.), Focus on the learner: Pragmatic perspectives for the language teacher (pp. 66-82). New York: Newbury House.
147. Kepner, C.G. (1991). An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second-language writing skills. Modern Language Journal, 5, 305-313.
148. Klima, E. & Bellugi, V. (1966). Syntactic regularities in the speech of children. In J. Lyons & R. Wales (Eds.), Psycholinguistic papers (pp. 183-219). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
149. Knoblauch, C.H. & Brannon, L. (1981). Teacher commentary on student writing: The state of the art. Freshman English News, 10 (Fall, 1981), 1-4.
150. Knoblauch, C.H. & Brannon, L. (2006). Introduction: The emperor (still) has no clothes-revisiting the myth of improvement. In R. Straub (Ed.), Key Works on Teacher Response (pp. 1-16). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Heinemann.
151. Knoblauch, C.H. & Brannon, L. (2006). Teacher commentary on student writing: The state of the art. In R. Straub (Ed.), Key works on teacher response: An anthology (pp. 69-76). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton Cook/Heinemann.
152. Krashen, S.D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
153. Krashen, S.D. (1982). Principles and practices in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.
154. Krashen, S.D. (1984). Writing: Research, theory, and application. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
155. Krashen, S.D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.
156. Krashen, S.D. (2003). Explorations in language acquisition and use: The Taipei lectures. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
157. Kroll, B. (Ed.). (1990). Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
158. Kroll, B.M. & Schafer, J.C. (1978). Error-analysis and the teaching of composition. College Composition and Communication, 29, 242-248.
159. Kubota, R. (2001). Discursive construction of the images of U.S. classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 9-38.
160. Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia, PA: University of Philadelphia Press.
161. Lalande, J.F. II (1982). Reducing composition errors: An experiment. Modern Language Journal, 66, 140-149.
162. Lane, J. & Lange, E. (1993). Writing clearly: An editing guide. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle. (2nd ed. 1999).
163. Lantolf, J.P. (Ed.). (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
164. Lantolf, J.P. & Appel, G. (1994). Theoretical frameworks: An introduction to Vygotskian perspectives on second language research. In J. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 1-15). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
165. Lantolf, J.P. & Thorne, S. (2007). Sociocultural theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
166. Lee, I. (2008). Understanding teachers' written feedback practices in Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), 69-85.
167. Lee, I. (2009). Ten mismatches between teachers' beliefs and written feedback practice. ELT Journal, 63(1), 13-22.
168. Leki, I. (1990a). Coaching from the margins: Issues in written response. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 57-68). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
169. Leki, I. (1990b). Potential problems with peer responding in ESL writing classes. CATESOLJournal, 3, 5-19.
170. Leki, I. (1991). The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college-level writing classes. Foreign Language Annals, 24, 203-218.
171. Leki, I. (2004). Foreword. In S. Bruce & B. Rafoth (Eds.), ESL writers: A guide for writing center tutors (pp. xi-xii). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Heinemann.
172. Leonard, S.A. & Moffett, H.Y. (1927). Current definitions of levels in English usage. English Journal, 16, 345-359.
173. Leontiev, A.A. (1981). Psychology and the language learning process. London: Pergamon.
174. Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 309-365.
175. Lightbown, P. & Spada, N. (2008). How languages are learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
176. Loewen, S. (2005). Incidental focus on form and second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 361-386.
177. Loewen, S. (2011). The role of feedback. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (in press). New York: Routledge.
178. Loewen, S. & Nabei, T. (2007). Measuring the effects of oral corrective feedback on L2 knowledge. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 361-378). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
179. Long, M.H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, D. Coste, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
180. Long, M.H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
181. Long, M.H. & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in second language acquisition (pp. 15-41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
182. Lunsford, A.A. & Lunsford, K.J. (2008). "Mistakes are a fact of life": A national comparative study. College Composition and Communication, 59, 781-806.
183. Lunsford, R.F. & Straub, R. (2006). Twelve readers reading: A survey of contemporary teachers' commenting strategies. In R. Straub (Ed.), Key works on teacher response (pp. 159-189). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Heinemann.
184. MacDonald, S.P. (2007). The erasure of language. College Composition and Communication, 58, 585-625.
185. Mackey, A. & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 433-464). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
186. Mackey, A. & Oliver, R. (2002). Interactional feedback and children's L2 development. System, 30, 459-477.
187. Mackey, A. & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction in second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? The Modern Language Journal, 82, 338-356.
188. Mackey, A., Philp, J., Egi, T., Fujii, A., & Tatsumi, T. (2002). Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback and L2 development. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 181-210). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
189. Matsuda, P.K. (2003a). Process and post-process: A discursive history. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(1), 65-83.
190. Matsuda, P.K. (2003b). Second-language writing in the twentieth century: A situated historical perspective. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing (pp. 15-34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
191. McCrimmon, J.M. (1939). Commas and conformity. College English, 1(1), 68-70.
192. McDonough, K. (2006). Interaction and syntactic priming: English L2 speakers' production of dative constructions. Studies in Second Language cquisition, 28, 179-207.
193. McDonough, K. (2007). Interactional feedback and the emergence of simple past activity verbs in L2 English. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 323-338). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
194. McLaughlin, B. (1978). The Monitor Model: Some methodological considerations. Language Learning, 28, 309-332.
195. McLaughlin, B. (1980). Theory and research in second language learning: An emerging paradigm. Language Learning, 30, 331-350.
196. McLaughlin, B. (1987). Theories of second language learning. London: Edward Arnold.
197. McLaughlin, B. (1990). Restructuring. Applied Linguistics, 11, 113-128.
198. Mitchell, R. & Myles, F. (2004). Second language learning theories. London: Hodder Education.
199. Montgomery, J.L. & Baker, W. (2007). Teacher-written feedback: Student perceptions, teacher self-assessment, and actual teacher performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 82-99.
200. Nassaji, H. & Swain, M. (2000). A Vygotskian perspective on corrective feedback in L2: The effect of random versus negotiated help on the learning of English articles. Language Awareness, 9(1), 34-51. doi10.1080/09658410008667135.
201. National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE) (1974). Resolution on students' right to their own language. Retrieved from www.ncte.org/positions/statements/ righttoownlanguage (accessed February 20, 2010).
202. Ohta, A. (2000). Rethinking recasts: A learner-centred examination of corrective feedback in the Japanese classroom. In J.K. Hall & L. Verplaetse (Eds.), Second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction (pp. 47-71). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.
203. Ohta, A. (2001). Second language acquisition processes in the classroom: Learning Japanese. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.
204. Olsson, M. (1972). Intelligibility: A study of errors and their importance. Research Bulletin No 12, Department of Educational research, Gothenburg School of Education, Gothenburg, Sweden. EDRS: ED 072 681.
205. O'Malley, J. & Chamot, A. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
206. Patthey-Chavez, G.G. & Ferris, D.R. (1997). Writing conferences and the weaving of multivoiced texts in college composition. Research in the Teaching of English, 31, 51-90.
207. Piaget, J. (1970). Genetic epistemology. Columbia, OH: Columbia University Press.
208. Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1966). The psychology of the child (H. Weaver, Trans.). New York: Basic Books.
209. Pienemann, M. (1981). Der Zweitsprachenerwerb auslandischer Arbeitskinder. Bonn: Bouvier.
210. Pienemann, M. (1987). Determining the influence of instruction on L2 speech processing. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 83-113.
211. Pienemann, M. (1989). Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics, 10, 52-79.
212. Pienemann, M. (1998). Language processing and second language acquisition: Processability theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
213. Pienemann, M. & Mackey, A. (1993). An empirical study of children's ESL development and Rapid Profile. In P. McKay (Ed.), ESL development: Language and literacy in schools (Volume 2) (pp. 115-259). Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia and National Languages and Literacy Institute of Australia.
214. Polio, C., Fleck, C., & Leder, N. (1998). "If only I had more time": ESL learners' changes in linguistic accuracy on essay revisions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 43-68.
215. Politzer, R. & Ramirez, A. (1973). A error analysis of the spoken English of Mexican- American pupils in a bilingual school and a monolingual school. Language Learning, 18, 35-53.
216. Powell, P.B. (1973). An investigation of selected syntactical and morphological structures in the conversation of secondary students after two years study of French. Unpublished PhD dissertation. The Ohio State University.
217. Radecki, P. & Swales, J. (1988). ESL student reaction to written comments on their written work. System, 16, 355-365.
218. Raimes, A. (1985). What unskilled ESL students do as they write: A classroom study of composing. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 229-258.
219. Raimes, A. (1987). Language proficiency, writing ability, and composing strategies: A study of ESL college student writers. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 229-258.
220. Raimes, A. (1992). Grammar troublespots. New York: St. Martin's Press.
221. Ramanathan, V. & Atkinson, D. (1999). Individualism, academic writing, and ESL writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 45-75.
222. Reid, J. (1994). Responding to ESL students' texts: The myths of appropriation. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 273-292.
223. Reid, J. (1998). "Eye" learners and "ear" learners: Identifying the language needs of international students and U.S. resident writers. In P. Byrd & J.M. Reid (Eds.), Grammar in the composition classroom: Essays on teaching ESL for college-bound students (pp. 3-17). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
224. Reid, J. (2005). "Ear" learners and error in US college writing. In P. Bruthiaux, D. Atkinson, W. Eggington, W. Crabbe, & V. Ramanathan. (Eds.), Directions in Applied Linguistics (pp.117-278). Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
225. Revesz, AJ. & Han, Z. (2006). Task content familiarity, task type and efficacy of recasts. Language Awareness, 15, 160-178.
226. Richards, J.C. (1973a). Error analysis and second language strategies. In J.W. Oller, Jr. & J.C. Richards (Eds.), Focus on the learner: Pragmatic perspectives for the language teacher (pp. 114-135). New York: Newbury House.
227. Richards, J.C. (1973b). A non-contrastive approach to error analysis. In J.W. Oller, Jr. & J.C. Richards (Eds.), Focus on the learner: Pragmatic perspectives for the language teacher (pp. 96-113). New York: Newbury House.
228. Robb, T., Ross, S., & Shortreed, I. (1986). Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 83-93.
229. Roberge, M. (2002). California's Generation 1.5 immigrants: What experiences, characteristics, and needs do they bring to our English classes? CATESOLJournal, 14(1), 107-129.
230. Roberge, M. (2009). A teacher's perspective on Generation 1.5. In M. Roberge, M. Siegal, & K. Losey (Eds.), Generation 1.5 in college composition (pp. 3-24). New York: Routledge.
231. Roberge, M., Siegal, M., & Harklau, L. (Eds.). (2009). Generation 1.5 in college composition. New York: Routledge.
232. Roberts, B. (1999). Can error logs raise more than consciousness? The effects of error logs and grammar feedback on ESL students' final drafts. Unpublished master's thesis, California State University, Sacramento.
233. Robinson, P. (1971). Oral expression tests: 2. English Language Teaching Journal, 25, 260-266.
234. Rouse, J. (1979). The politics of composition. College Composition and Communication, 41, 1-12.
235. Russell, J. & Spada, N. (2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 grammar: A meta-analysis of the research. In J. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesising research on language learning and teaching (pp. 133-164). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
236. Sachs, R. & Polio, C. (2007). Learners' uses of two types of written feedback on a L2 writing revision task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29(1), 67-100.
237. Sachs, R. & Suh, B. (2007). Textually enhanced recasts, learner awareness, and L2 outcomes in synchronous computer-mediated interaction. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 324-338). New York: Oxford University Press.
238. Saito, H. (1994). Teachers' practices and students' preferences for feedback on second language writing: A case study of adult ESL learners. TESL Canada Journal, 11(2), 46-70.
239. Santa, T. (2006). Dead letters: Error in composition, 1873-2004. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
240. Santos, T. (1988). Professors' reactions to the academic writing of nonnative-speaking students. TESOL Quarterly, 22, 69-90.
241. Sapir, E. (1921). Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt.
242. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158.
243. Schmidt, R. (1992). Psychological mechanisms underlying second language fluency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 357-385.
244. Schmidt, R. (1994). Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. Aila Review, 11, 11-26.
245. Schmidt, R. (1995). Attention and awareness inforeign language learning. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.
246. Schmidt, R. & Frota, S. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case of an adult learner of Portuguese. In R.R. Day (Ed.) Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 237-322). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
247. Schuemann, C. (2008). Myth 2: Teaching citation is someone else's job. In J. Reid (Ed.), Writing myths: Applying second language research to classroom teaching (pp. 18-41). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
248. Searle, D. & Dillon, D. (1980). The message of marking: Teacher written responses to student writing at intermediate grade levels. Research in the Teaching of English, 14, 233-242.
249. Searle, D. & Dillon, D. (2006). The message of marking: Teacher written responses to student writing at intermediate grade levels. In R. Straub (Ed.), Key works on teacher response: An anthology (pp. 57-68). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton Cook/Heinemann.
250. Selinker, L. (1969). Language transfer. General Linguistics 9, 67-92.
251. Semke, H. (1984). The effects of the red pen. Foreign Language Annals, 17, 195-202.
252. Sharwood Smith, M. (1981). Consciousness raising and the second language learner. Applied Linguistics, 2, 159-169.
253. Sharwood Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(2), 165-179.
254. Sharwood Smith, M. (1994). Second language learning: Theoretical foundations. Harlow: Longman.
255. Shaughnessy, M.P. (1977). Errors and expectations. New York: Oxford University Press.
256. Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners' acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 255-283.
257. Sheen, Y. (2008). Recasts, language anxiety, modified output and L2 learning. Language Learning, 58, 835-874.
258. Sheen, Y. (2010). Differential effects of oral and written corrective feedback in the ESL classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 201-234.
259. Sheen, Y., Wright, D., & Moldawa, A. (2009). Differential effects of focused and unfocused written correction on the accurate use of grammatical forms by adult ESL learners. System, 37(4), 556-569.
260. Sheppard, K. (1992). Two feedback types: Do they make a difference? RELCJournal, 23, 103-110.
261. Silva, T. (1988). Comments on Vivian Zamel's "Recent research on writing pedagogy". TESOL Quarterly, 22, 517-519.
262. Silva, T. (1990). Second language composition instruction: Developments, issues, and directions in ESL. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 11-23). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
263. Silva, T. (1993). Toward an understanding of the distinct nature of L2 writing: The ESL research and its implications. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 657-677.
264. Silva, T. (1997). On the ethical treatment of ESL writers. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 359-363.
265. Silva, T. & Matsuda, P.K. (Eds.). (2005). Second language writing research: Perspectives on the process of knowledge construction. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
266. Silva, T. & Matsuda, P.K. (Eds.). (2010). Practicing theory in second language writing. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.
267. Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
268. Skehan, P. & Forster, P. (2001). Cognition and tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 183-205). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
269. Skinner, B.F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
270. Slobin, D. (1970). Universals of grammatical development in children. In G. Flores d'Arcais & W. Levelt (Eds.), Advances in psycholinguistics. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing.
271. Sommers, N. (1980). Revision strategies of student writers and experienced adult writers. College Composition and Communication, 31, 378-388.
272. Sommers, N. (1982). Responding to student writing. College Composition and Communication, 33, 148-156.
273. Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52, 119-158.
274. Storch, N. & Wigglesworth, G. (2010a). Students engagement with feedback on writing: the role of learner agency. In R. Batstone (Ed.), Sociocognitive perspectives on language use/learning (pp. 166-185). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
275. Storch, N. & Wigglesworth, G. (2010b). Learners' processing, uptake, and retention of corrective feedback on writing: Case studies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 303-334.
276. Straub, R. (1997). Students' reactions to teacher comments: An exploratory study. Research in the Teaching of English, 31, 91-119.
277. Straub, R. (2000). The practice of response: Strategies for commenting on student writing. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
278. Straub, R. (Ed.). (2006). Key works on teacher response. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Heinemann.
279. Straub, R. & Lunsford, R.F. (1995). Twelve readers reading: Responding to college student writing. Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
280. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S.M. Gass & C.G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
281. Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16, 371-391.
282. Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Journal, 82, 320-337.
283. Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. (2002). Talking it through: Two French immersion learners' response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3-4), 285-304.
284. Swain, M., Brooks, L., & Tocalli-Beller, A. (2002). Peer-peer dialogue as a means of second language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 171-185.
285. Tate, G., Rupiper, A., & Schick, K. (Eds.). (2001). A guide to composition pedagogies. New York: Oxford University Press.
286. Taylor, B.P. (1981). Content and written form: A two-way street. TESOL Quarterly, 15, 5-13.
287. Towell, R. & Hawkins, R. (1994). Approaches to second language acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
288. Trofimiovitch, P., Ammar, A., & Gatbonton, E. (2007). How effective are recasts? The role of attention, memory, and analytical ability. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies (pp. 171-195). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
289. Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46, 327-369.
290. Truscott, J. (1999). The case for "the case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes": A response to Ferris. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 111-122.
291. Truscott, J. (2004). Evidence and conjecture: A response to Chandler. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 337-343.
292. Truscott, J. (2007). The effect of error correction on learners' ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 255-272.
293. Truscott, J. (2009). Arguments and appearances: A response to Chandler. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 59-60.
294. Truscott, J. & Hsu, A.Y-P. (2008). Error correction, revision, and learning. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 292-305.
295. Valdes, G. (1992). Bilingual minorities and language issues in writing: Toward professionwide responses to a new challenge. Written Communication, 9 (1), 85-136.
296. van Beuningen, C., de Jong, N. H., & Kuiken, F. (2008). The effect of direct and indirect corrective feedback on L2 learners' written accuracy. ITL International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 156, 279-296.
297. van Beuningen, C., de Jong, N. H., & Kuiken, F. (2012). Evidence on the effectiveness of comprehensive error correction in Dutch multilingual classrooms. Language Learning (forthcoming).
298. Vann, R., Lorenz, F., & Meyer, D. (1991). Error gravity: Faculty response to errors in written discourse of nonnative speakers of English. In L. Hamp-Lyons (Ed.), Assessing second language writing in academic contexts (pp. 181-195). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
299. Vann, R., Meyer, D., & Lorenz, F. (1984). Error gravity: A study of faculty opinion of ESL errors. TESOL Quarterly, 18, 427-440.
300. Wall, S. & Hull, G. (1989). The semantics of error: What do teachers know? In C.M. Anson (Ed.), Writing and response: Theory, practice, and research (pp. 261-292). Urbana, IL: NCTE.
301. Weaver, C. (1996). Teaching grammar in context. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Heinemann.
302. Wilkins, D. (1968). A review of trends in language teaching. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 6, 99-107.
303. Williams, F. (Ed.). (1970). Language and poverty. Chicago: Markham Publishing Co.
304. Williams, J.M. (1981). The phenomenology of error. College Composition and Communication, 32, 152-168.
305. Wolfe, D.L. (1967). Some theoretical aspects of language learning and language teaching. Language Learning, 17, 173-188.
306. Wolfram, W. & Fasold, R.W. (1974). The study of social dialects in American English. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
307. Wykoff, G.S. (1939). An open letter to the educational experts on teaching composition. College English, 1(2), 140-146.
308. Xu, C. (2009). Overgeneralization from a narrow focus: A response to Ellis et al. (2008) and Bitchener (2008). Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(4), 270-275.
309. Yang, Y. & Lyster, R. (2010). Effects of form-focused practice and feedback on Chinese EFL learners' acquisition of regular and irregular past tense forms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 235-263.
310. Zamel, V. (1976). Teaching composition in the ESL classroom: What we can learn from research in the teaching of English. TESOL Quarterly, 10, 67-76.
311. Zamel, V. (1982). Writing: The process of discovering meaning. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 195-209.
312. Zamel, V. (1983). The composing processes of advanced ESL students. Six case studies. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 165-187.
313. Zamel, V. (1985). Responding to student writing. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 79-102.
314. Zamel, V. (1987). Recent research on writing pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 697-715.
315. Zhang, S. (1995). Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4, 209-222.
316. Zhang, S. (1999). Thoughts on some recent evidence concerning the affective advantage of peer feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 321-326.