Effects of dynamic corrective feedback on ESL writing accuracy

TESOL Quarterly

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 84-109

  Hartshorn, K James ^a   Evans, Norman W ^a   Merrill, Paul F ^a   Sudweeks, Richard R ^a   Strong Krause, Diane ^a   Anderson, Neil J ^a  

^a BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950674185     PISSN: 00398322     EISSN: 15457249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5054/tq.2010.213781     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Ayoun, D. (2001). The role of negative and positive feedback in the second language acquisition of passé composé and imparfait. Modern Language Journal, 85, 226-243.
2. Azevedo, R., & Bernard, R. M. (1995). A meta-analysis of the effects of feedback in computer-based instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13, 109-125.
3. Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 102-118.
4. Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2008). The value of a focused approach to written corrective feedback. Language Teaching Research, 12, 409-431.
5. Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 191-205.
6. Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. Corder, S. P. (1981). Error analysis and interlanguage. London, England: Oxford University Press.
9. DeKeyser, R.(2001). Automaticity and automatization. In P. Robinson(Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 125-151). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
10. DeKeyser, R. (2007). Skill acquisition theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Wiliams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition(pp.97-113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., & Takashima, H. (2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36, 353-371.
12. Evans, N. W., Hartshorn, K. J., McCollum, R. M., & Wolfersberger, M. (In press). Contextualizing corrective feedback in L2 writing pedagogy. Language Teaching Research.
13. Ferris, D. R. (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 1-11.
14. Ferris, D. R. (2004). The ''Grammar Correction'' debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime....?). Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 49-62.
15. Ferris, D. R. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 81-104). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
16. Grabe, W. (2001). Notes toward a theory of second language writing. In T. Silva & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), On second language writing (pp. 39-57). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Gu, S., & Wang, T. (2008). The impact of negative feedback, noticing, and modified output on EFL question development. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 40, 270-278.
18. Guénette, D. (2007). Is feedback pedagogically correct? Research design issues in studies of feedback on writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 40-53.
19. Guzzo, R. A., Jette, R. D., & Katzell, R. A. (1985). The effects of psychologically based intervention programs on productivity: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 38, 275-291.
20. Hinkel, E.(2002). Second language writers' text: Linguistic and rhetorical features. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. Hinkel, E. (2004). Teaching academic ESL writing: Practical techniques in vocabulary and grammar. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22. Hino, J. (2006). Linguistic information supplied by negative feedback: A study of its contribution to the process of second language acquisition (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
23. Huck, S. W. (2008). Reading statistics and research (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
24. Hunt, K. W. (1965). Grammatical structures written at three grade levels. Urbana, IL: The National Council of Teachers of English.
25. Iwashita, N. (2003). Negative feedback and positive evidence in task-based interaction: Differential effects on L2 development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 1-36.
26. Kepner, C. G. (1991). An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second-language writing skills. Modern Language Journal, 75,305-313.
27. Kirschner, P. (2002). Cognitive load theory: Implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning. Learning and Instruction, 12, 1-10.
28. Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: Historical review, a meta-analysis and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254-284.
29. Linacre, J. M. (1994). Many-faceted Rasch measurement. Chicago, IL: MESA Press.
30. Linacre, J. M. (2006). Facets Rasch measurement computer program (Version 3.6). Chicago, IL: Winsteps.com.
31. Long, M., Inagaki, S., & Ortega, L. (1998). The role of implicit negative feedback in SLA: Models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. Modern Language Journal, 82, 357-371.
32. McDonough, K. (2005). Identifying the impact of negative feedback and learners' responses on ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27,79-103.
33. McNamara, T. F. (1996). Measuring second language performance. London, England: Longman.
34. Odlin, T. (1989). Language transfer: Cross-linguistic influence in language learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
35. Ortega, L. (2003). Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 24, 492-518.
36. Paas, F. G. W. C., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2004). Cognitive load theory: Instructional implications of the interaction between information structures and cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32, 1-8.
37. Pawlak, M. (2005). The feasibility of integrating form and meaning in the language classroom: A qualitative study of classroom discourse. Glottodidactica, 30-31, 283-294.
38. Pollitt, A., & Hutchinson, C. (1987). Calibrated graded assessment: Rasch partial credit analysis of performance in writing. Language Testing, 4, 72-92.
39. Ranta, L., & Lyster, R. (2007). A cognitive approach to improving immersion students' oral language abilities: The awareness-practice-feedback sequence. In R. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 141-160). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
40. Ringbom, H. (1987). The role of the first language in foreign language learning. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
41. Russell Valezy, J., & Spada, N. (2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for second language acquisition: A meta-analysis of the research. In J. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 133-164). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
42. Schumacker, R. E. (1999). Many-faceted Rasch analysis with crossed, nested, and mixed designs. Journal of Outcome Measurement, 3, 323-338.
43. Shadish, W., Cook, T., & Campbell, D. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inferences. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
44. Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners' acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 255-283.
45. Silva, T. (1993). Toward an understanding of the distinct nature of L2 writing: The ESL research and its implications. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 657-675.
46. Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
47. Truscott, J.(1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46, 327-369.
48. Truscott, J. (1999). The case for ''the case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes'': A response to Ferris. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 111-122.
49. Truscott, J. (2004). Dialogue: Evidence and conjecture on the effects of correction: A response to Chandler. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 337-343.
50. Truscott, J. (2007). The effect of error correction on learners' ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 255-272.
51. Truscott, J., & Hsu, A. Y. (2008). Error correction, revision, and learning. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 292-305.
52. Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H. (1998). Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy, and complexity. Manoa, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
53. Wright, B. D., & Linacre, J. M. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8, 370.