Thoughts on some recent evidence concerning the affective advantage of peer feedback

Journal of Second Language Writing

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 321-326

  Zhang, Shuqiang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042205639     PISSN: 10603743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80119-2     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Berger, V. (1989). The effects of peer versus self feedback on ESL students' between-draft revisions. Unpublished masters thesis. San Diego State University, San Diego, CA.
2. Chaudron, C. (1984). Evaluating writing: effects of feedback on revision. RELC Journal 15, 1-14.
3. Cohen, A. (1987). Student processing of feedback on their compositions. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Strategies in Language Learning (pp. 57-69). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4. Connor, U., & Asenavage, K. (1994). Peer response groups in ESL writing classes: how much impact on revision? Journal of Second Language Writing 3, 257-276.
5. Curtis, A. (1997, November). "It is better to give than to receive": feedback in student writing. Paper presented at the World Skills Language and Living Conference, Victoria, British Columbia.
6. George, J.E. (1991). The role of teacher feedback in student revision: a case study. Unpublished manuscript.
7. Hedgcock, J., & Lefkowitz, N. (1994). Feedback on feedback: assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing. Journal of Second Language Writing 3, 141-163.
8. Jacobs, G.M., Curtis, A., Braine, G., & Huang, S. (1998). Feedback on student writing: taking the middle path. Journal of Second Language Writing 7, 307-317.
9. Leki, I. (1990). Potential problems with peer responding in ESL writing classes. CATESOL Journal 3, 5-19.
10. Leki, I. (1991). The preference of ESL students for error correction in college-level writing classes. Foreign Language Annals 24, 203-216.
11. Mendonça, C.O., & Johnson, K.E. (1994). Peer review negotiations: revision activities in ESL writing instruction. TESOL Quarterly 28, 745-769.
12. Nelson, G., & Carson, G.C. (1998). ESL students' perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups. Journal of Second Language Writing 7, 113-131.
13. Partridge, K.L. (1981). A comparison of the effectiveness of peer vs. teacher evaluation for helping students of English as a second language to improve the quality of their written compositions. Unpublished masters thesis. University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI.
14. Semke, H.D. (1984). Effects of the red pen. Foreign Language Annals 17, 195-202.
15. Zhang, S. (1995). Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing 4, 209-222.