What we really value: Beyond Rubrics in teaching and assessing writing

What We Really Value: Beyond Rubrics in Teaching and Assessing Writing

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 1-175

  Broad, Bob ^a  

^a ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901556295     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (54)

1. Agar, Michael H. 1980. The Professional Stranger. New York: Academic Press.
2. Agar, Michael H. 1986. Speaking of Ethnography. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.
3. Allen, Michael S. 1995. Valuing Differences: Portnet's First Year. Assessing Writing 2 (1): 67-89.
4. Axelrod, Rise B., and Charles Cooper. 1991. The St. Martin's Guide to Writing. Short 3d ed. New York: St. Martin's.
5. Barritt, Loren, Patricia L. Stock, and Francelia Clark. 1986. Researching Practice: Evaluating Assessment Essays. College Composition and Communication 38:315-27.
6. Baxter Magolda, Marcia B. 2001. Making Their Own Way: Narratives for Transforming Higher Education to Promote Self-Development. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
7. Belanoff, Pat, and Peter Elbow. 1991. Using Portfolios to Increase Collaboration and Community in a Writing Program. In Portfolios: Process and Product, edited by P. Belanoff and M. Dickson. Portsmouth, N.H.: Boynton/Cook (Heinemann).
8. Berlin, James A. 1996. Rhetorics, Poetics, and Cultures. Urbana, Ill.: National Council of Teachers of English.
9. Broad, Bob 1997. Reciprocal Authorities in Communal Writing Assessment: Constructing Textual Value within a "New Politics of Inquiry". Assessing Writing 4 (2): 133-67.
10. Broad, Bob. 2000. Pulling Your Hair Out: Crises of Standardization in Communal Writing Assessment. Research in the Teaching of English 35 (2): 213-60.
11. Broad, Robert L. 1994a. "Portfolio Scoring: A Contradiction in Terms. In New Directions in Portfolio Assessment, edited by L. Black, Donald A. Daiker, Jeffrey Sommers, and Gail Stygall. Portsmouth, N.H.: Boynton/Cook (Heinemann).
12. Broad, Robert L. 1994b. Working in the City: Building Community and Negotiating Difference in a Portfolio Assessment Program. Ph.D. diss., Miami University (Ohio).
13. Carter, James R. 1999. The Individual Map User. Website. http://lilt.ilstu.edu/jrcarter/icamuc/individuals.html.
14. Charmaz, Kathy. 2000. Grounded Theory: Objectivist and Constructivist Methods. In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
15. Charney, Davida. 1984. The Validity of Using Holistic Scoring to Evaluate Writing: A Critical Overview. Research in the Teaching of English 18:65-81.
16. Cronbach, Lee J. 1990. Essentials of Psychological Testing. 5th ed. New York: Harper.
17. Delandshere, Ginette, and Anthony R. Petrosky. 1998. Assessment of Complex Performances: Limitations of Key Measurement Assumptions. Educational Researcher 27 (2): 14-24.
18. Diederich, Paul B., John W. French, and Sydell T. Carlton. 1961. Factors in Judgments of Writing Ability (ETS Research Bulletin 61-15). Princeton: Educational Testing Service.
19. Elbow, Peter. 2001. Conversation with author, Oxford, Ohio, 5 October.
20. Elbow, Peter, and Pat Belanoff. 1991. State University of New York at Stony Brook Portfolio-based Evaluation Program. In Portfolios: Process and Product, edited by P. Belanoff and M. Dickson. Portsmouth, N.H.: Boynton/Cook (Heinemann).
21. Faigley, Lester. 1989. Judging Writing, Judging Selves. College Composition and Communication 40 (8): 395-412.
22. Faigley, Lester. 1992. Fragments of Rationality: Postmodernity and the Subject of Composition. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
23. Fife, Jane Mathison, and Peggy O'Neill. 2001. Moving Beyond the Written Comment: Narrowing the Gap Between Response Practice and Research. College Composition and Communication 53 (2): 300-21.
24. Flower, Linda. 1989. Cognition, Context, and Theory Building. College Composition and Communication 40 (3): 282-311.
25. Glaser, Barney G., and Anselm L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.
26. Guba, Egon. 1978. Toward a Methodology of Naturalistic Inquiry in Educational Evaluation. Los Angeles: University of California Graduate School of Education.
27. Guba, Egon G., and Yvonna S. Lincoln. 1989. Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage.
28. Gubrium, Jaber F., and James A. Holstein. 2000. Analyzing Interpretive Practice. In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
29. Hacker, Diana. 1992. A Writer's Reference. 2d ed. New York: St. Martin's.
30. Huot, Brian A. 1993. The Influence of Holistic Scoring Procedures on Reading and Rating Student Essays. In Validating Holistic Scoring for Writing Assessment: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, edited by M. M. Williamson and B. A. Huot. Cresskill, N.J.: Hampton.
31. Huot, Brian A. 1996. Toward a New Theory of Writing Assessment. College Composition and Communication 47 (4): 549-66.
32. Huot, Brian A. 2002 (Re)Articulating Writing Assessment for Teaching and Learning. Logan: Utah State University Press.
33. Illinois Standard Achievement Test of Writing. 2002. Website. http://www.isbe.net/assessment/writeperfdef.html.
34. Kushner, Tony. 1996. Angels in America: A Gay Fantasia on National Themes (Part Two: Perestroika, Revised Version). New York: Theatre Communications Group.
35. Messick, Samuel. 1989. Validity. In Educational Measurement, edited by R. L. Linn. Washington, D.C.: National Council on Measurement in Education.
36. Miles, Matthew B., and A. M. Huberman. 1984. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.
37. Moss, Pamela A. 1992. Shifting Conceptions of Validity in Educational Measurement: Implications for Performance Assessment. Review of Educational Research 62 (3): 229-258.
38. Moss, Pamela A. 1994. Can There Be Validity Without Reliability? Educational Researcher 23 (2): 5-12.
39. Moss, Pamela A. 1996. Enlarging the Dialogue in Educational Measurement: Voices from Interpretive Research Traditions. Educational Researcher 25 (1): 20-28, 43.
40. Neal, Michael. 2002. What Validity Is and Is Not and Why That's Important. Paper read at Conference on College Composition and Communication, Chicago, Illinois.
41. North, Stephen. 1987. The Making of Knowledge in Composition: Portrait of an Emerging Field. Upper Montclair, N.J.: Boynton/Cook.
42. Patton, Michael Quinn. 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 2d ed. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage.
43. Pula, Judith J., and Brian A. Huot. 1993. A Model of Background Influences on Holistic Raters. In Validating Holistic Scoring for Writing Assessment: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, edited by M. M. Williamson and B. A. Huot. Cresskill, N.J.: Hampton.
44. Reynolds, Nedra. 1990. Issues of Consensus, Authority, and Resistance: A Study/Story of a Rater-Training Session. Paper read at University of New Hampshire Conference on the Writing Process, October 5-7, Durham, New Hampshire.
45. Sosnoski, James J. "The Psycho-Politics of Error." Pre-Text 10.1-2 (1989): 33-52.
46. Strauss, Anselm L. 1987. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
47. Strauss, Anselm, and Juliet Corbin. 1994. Grounded Theory Methodology: An Overview. In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
48. Strauss, Anselm, and Juliet Corbin. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
49. Walvoord, Barbara E., and Virginia Johnson Anderson. 1998. Effective Grading: A Tool for Learning and Assessment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
50. White, Edward M. 1994. Teaching and Assessing Writing. 2d ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
51. Wiggins, Grant. 1994. The Constant Danger of Sacrificing Validity to Reliability: Making Writing Assessment Serve Writers. Assessing Writing 1 (1): 129-39.
52. Williams, Joseph M. 1981. The Phenomenology of Error. College Composition and Communication 32 (May): 152-68.
53. Williamson, Michael M. 1993. An Introduction to Holistic Scoring: The Social, Historical, and Theoretical Context for Writing Assessment. In Validating Holistic Scoring for Writing Assessment: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, edited by M. M. Williamson and B. A. Huot. Cresskill, N.J.: Hampton.
54. Yancey, Kathleen Blake. 1999. Looking Back as We Look Forward: Historicizing Writing Assessment. College Composition and Communication 50 (3): 483-503.