Some input on input: Two analyses of student response to expert feedback in L2 writing

Modern Language Journal

Volumn 80, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 287-308

  Hedgcock, John ^a   Lefkowitz, Natalie ^b  

^a MONTEREY INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES   (United States)

^b CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0013050183     PISSN: 00267902     EISSN: 15404781     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1996.tb01612.x     Document Type: Article

References (105)

1. Anson, C. (Ed.). (1989). Writing and response: Theory, practice, and research. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
2. Baumlin, J. S., & Baumlin, T. F. (1989). Paper grading and the rhetorical stance. In B. Lawson, S. S. Ryan & W. R. Winterowd (Eds.), Encountering student texts: Interpretive issues in reading student writing (pp. 171-182). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
3. Bates, L., Lane, J., & Lange, E. (1993). Writing clearly: Responding to ESL compositions. Boston, MA: Heinle.
4. Bazerman, C. (1989). Reading student texts: Proteus grabbing Proteus. In Lawson, B., S. Sterr Ryan, & W. R. Winterowd (Eds.). Encountering student texts: Interpretive issues in reading student writing (pp. 139-146). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
5. Beach, R. (1979). The effects of between-draft teacher evaluation versus student self-evaluation on high school students' revising of rough drafts. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 111-119.
6. Blanton, L. (1987). Reshaping ESL students' perspectives of writing. ELT Journal, 41, 112-118.
7. Brannon, L., & Knoblauch, C. H. (1982). On students' rights to their own texts: A model of teacher response. College Composition and Communication, 33, 157-166.
8. Brown, J. D. (1991). Do English and ESL faculties rate writing samples differently? TESOL Quarterly, 25, 587-603.
9. Carson, J., & Leki, I. (Eds.). (1993). Readingin the composition classroom: Second language perspectives. Boston: Heinle.
10. Casanave, C. (1995). Local interactions: Constructing contexts for composing in a graduate sociology program. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic uniting in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy (pp. 83-100). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
11. 2 students' revision and self-correction skills. RELC Journal, 17 (2), 26-40.
12. Charles, M. (1990). Responding to problems in written English using a student self-monitoring technique. ELT Journal, 44, 286-293.
13. Chaudron, C. (1984). The effects of feedback on students' composition revisions. RELC Journal, 15, 1-14.
14. Cohen, A. (1987). Student processing of feedback on their compositions. In A. L. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 57-69). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
15. Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1985). Research methods in education. London: Croom Helm.
16. Connors, R., & Lunsford, A. (1993). Teachers' rhetorical comments on student papers. College Composition and Communication, 44, 515-524.
17. Cumming, A. (1989). Writing expertise and second-language proficiency. Language Learning, 39, 81-141.
18. Cumming, A. (1990). Expertise in evaluating second language compositions. Language Testing, 7, 31-51.
19. Davies, N., & Omberg, M. (1987). Peer group teaching and the composition class. System, 15, 313-323.
20. Devenney, R. (1989). How ESL teachers and peers evaluate and respond to student writing. RELC Journal, 20, 77-90.
21. Devine, J. (1993). The role of metacognition in second language reading and writing. In J. Carson & I. Leki (Eds.), Reading in the composition classroom: Second language perspectives (pp. 105-127). Boston: Heinle.
22. Dowsett, G. (1986). Interaction in the semi-structured interview. In M. Emery (Ed.), Qualitative research. Canberra: Australian Association of Adult Education.
23. Durst, R. K. (1990). The mongoose and the rat in composition research: Insights from the RTE annotated bibliography. College Composition and Communication, 41, 393-408.
24. Eisterhold, J. C. (1990). Reading-writing connections: Toward a description for second language learners. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 88-101). New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. Enginarlar, H. (1993). Student response to teacher feedback in EFL writing. System, 21, 193-204.
26. Faigley, L., Daly, J. A., & Witte, S. P. (1981). The role of writing apprehension in writing performance and competence. Journal of Educational Research, 75, 16-20.
27. Fathman, A., & Whalley, E. (1990). Teacher response to student writing: Focus on form versus content. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 178-190). New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Ferris, D. (1995). Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 33-53.
29. Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30. Flahive, D., & Bailey, N. (1993). Exploring reading/ writing relationships in adult second language learners. In I. Leki & J. Carson (Eds.), Reading in the composition classroom: Second language perspectives (pp. 128-140). Boston: Heinle.
31. Flower, L. (1988). The construction of purpose in writing and reading. College English, 50, 528-550.
32. Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1984). Images, plans and prose: The representation of meaning in writing. Written Communication, 1, 120-160.
33. Flower, L., Hayes,J. R., Carey, L., Schriver, K., & Stratman, J. (1986). Detection, diagnosis, and the strategies of revision. College Composition and Communication, 37, 16-55.
34. Frantzen, D., & Rissel, D. (1987). Learner self-correction of written compositions: What does it show us? In B. Van Patten, T. Dvorak, & J. Lee (Eds.), Foreign language learning (pp. 92-107). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
35. Freedman, S. W. (1979). How characteristics of student essays influence teachers' evaluations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 328-338.
36. Freedman, S. W. (1984). The evaluation of, and response to student writing: A review. Resources in Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 247 605).
37. Freedman, S. W. (Ed.). (1985). The acquisition of written language: Response and revision. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
38. Freedman, S. W. (1987). Response to student writing. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
39. Gee, T. (1972). Students' responses to teacher comments. Research in the Teaching of English, 6, 212-221.
40. Goldstein, L., & Conrad, S. (1990). Student input and negotiation of meaning in ESL writing conferences. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 443-460.
41. Gordon, C. (1990). Changes in readers' and writers' metacognitive knowledge: Some observations. Reading Research and Instruction, 30, 1-14.
42. Gorsuch, R. L. (1974). Factor analysis. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.
43. Gungle, B., & Taylor, V. (1989). Writing apprehension and second language writers. In D. Johnson & D. Roen (Eds.), Richness in writing: Empowering ESL students (pp. 235-248). New York: Longman.
44. Hamp-Lyons, L. (Ed.). (1991). Assessing second language writing in academic contexts. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
45. Harris, W. (1977). Teacher response to student writing: A study of the response patterns of high school English teachers to determine the basis for teacher judgment of student writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 11, 175-185.
46. Hatch, E., & Lazaraton, A. (1991). The research manual: Design and statistics for applied linguistics. New York: Newbury House.
47. Hedgcock, J., & Lefkowitz, N. (1992). Collaborative oral/aural revision in foreign language writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, 255-276.
48. Hedgcock, J., & Lefkowitz, N. (1994). Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3, 141-163.
49. Hendrickson, J. M. (1984). The treatment of error in written work. In S. McKay (Ed.), Composing in a second language (pp. 145-159). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
50. Henning, G. (1991). Issues in evaluating and maintaining an ESL writing assessment program. In L. Hamp-Lyons (Ed.), Assessing second language writing in academic contexts (pp. 279-291). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
51. Hillocks, G. (1982). The interaction of instruction, teacher comment, and revision in teaching the composing process. Research in the Teaching of English, 16, 261-278.
52. Hillocks, G. (1986). Research on written composition: New directions for teaching. Urbana, IL: ERIC Clearing-house on Reading and Communication Skills and the National Conference on Research in English.
53. Hyland, K. (1990). Providing productive feedback. ELT Journal, 44, 279-285.
54. Jacobs, G. (1987). First experiences with peer feedback on compositions: Student and teacher reaction. System, 15, 325-333.
55. Johns, A. (1986). The ESL student and the revision process: Some insights from schema theory. Journal of Basic Writing, 5, 70-80.
56. Johns, A. (1993). Reading and writing tasks in English for academic purposes classes: Products, processes, and resources. In J. Carson & I. Leki (Eds.), Reading in the composition classroom: Second language perspectives (pp. 274-289). Boston: Heinle.
57. Johnson, D., & Roen, D. (Eds.). (1989). Richness in writing: Empowering ESL students. New York: Longman.
58. Jones, S. (1985). Problems with monitor use in second language composing. In M. Rose (Ed.), When a writer can't write: Studies in writers block and other composing process problems (pp. 96-118). New York: The Guilford Press.
59. Kepner, C. G. (1991). An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second-language writing skills. The Modern Language Journal, 75, 305-313.
60. Kerlinger, F. N. (1986). Foundations in behavioral research (3rd Ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
61. Kim, J., & Mueller, C. (1978). Introduction to factor analysis: What it is and how to do it. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
62. Knoblauch, C., & Brannon, L. (1981). Teacher commentary on student writing: The state of the art. Freshman English News, 10, 1-4.
63. Kobayashi, T. (1992). Native and nonnative reactions to ESL compositions. TESOL. Quarterly, 26, 81-112.
64. Krashen, S. D. (1984). Writing: Research, theory, and application. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
65. Land, R., & Whitley, C. (1989). Evaluating second language essays in regular composition classes: Toward a pluralistic U. S. rhetoric. In D. Johnson & D. Roen (Eds.), Richness in writing: Empowering ESL students (pp. 284-293). New York: Longman.
66. Langer, J., & Applebee, A. (1987). How writing shapes thinking: A study of teaching and learning. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
67. Lazaraton, A. (1995). Qualitative research in applied linguistics: A progress report. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 455-472.
68. Leki, I. (1990). Coaching from the margins: Issues in written response. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 57-68). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69. Leki, I. (1991). The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college-level writing classes. Foreign Language Annals, 24, 203-218.
70. Leki, I. (1995). Good writing: I know it when I see it. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy (pp. 23-46). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
71. Leki, I., & Carson, J. (1994). Students' perceptions of EAP writing instruction and writing needs across the disciplines. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 81-101.
72. Makino, T-Y. (1993). Learner self-correction in EFL written compositions. ELT Journal, 47, 337-341.
73. Mangelsdorf, K. (1989). Parallels between speaking and writing in second language acquisition. In D. Johnson & D. Roen (Eds.), Richness in writing: Empowering ESL students (pp. 134-145). New York: Longman.
74. Mangelsdorf, K., & Schlumberger, A. (1992). ESL student response stances in a peer-review task. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, 235-254.
75. Masny, D., & Foxall, J. (1993). Writing apprehension in L2 (Applied Linguistics Interest Section Report). TESOL Matters, 3 (1), 9.
76. Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
77. Odell, L. (1989). Responding to responses: Good news, bad news, and unanswered questions. In B. Lawson, S. Sterr Ryan, & W. R. Winterowd (Eds.), Encountering student texts: Interpretive issues in reading student writing (pp. 221-234). Urbana, IL: NCTE.
78. Pedhazur, E. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction (2nd Ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
79. Prior, P. (1995). Redefining the task: An ethnographic examination of writing and response in graduate seminars. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy (pp. 47-82). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
80. Radecki, P. M., & Swales, J. M. (1988). ESL students' reaction to written coments on their written work. System, 16, 355-365.
81. Raimes, A. (1985). What unskilled ESL students do as they write: A classroom study of composing. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 229-258.
82. Reid, J. (1989). English as a second language composition in higher education: The expectations of the academic audience. In D. Johnson, & D. Roen (Eds.), Richness in writing: Empowering ESL students (pp. 220-234). New York: Longman.
83. Reid, J. (1993). Teaching ESL writing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Regents.
84. Reid, J. (1994). Responding to ESL students' texts: The myths of appropriation. TESOL Quarterly, 28 (2), 273-292.
85. Robb, T., Ross, S., & Shortreed, I. (1986). Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 83-93.
86. Roen, D. (1989). Developing effective assignments for second language writers. In D. Johnson & D. Roen (Eds.), Richness in writing: Empowering ESL students (pp. 193-206). New York: Longman.
87. Roen, D. H., & Willey, R. J. (1988). The effects of audience awareness on drafting and revising. Research in the Teaching of English, 22, 75-88.
88. Rose, M. (Ed.). (1985). When a writer can't write: Studies in writer's block and other composing process problems, New York: The Guilford Press.
89. Santos, T. (1988). Professors' reactions to the academic writing of nonnative-speaking students. TESOL Quarterly, 22, 69-90.
90. Seliger, H., & Shohamy, E. (1989). Second language research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
91. Semke, H. D. (1984). The effects of the red pen. Foreign Language Annals, 17, 195-202.
92. Shaughnessy, M. (1977). Errors and expectations. New York: Oxford University Press.
93. Sheppard, K. (1992). Two feedback types: Do they make a difference? RELC Journal, 23, 103-110.
94. Silva, T. (1993). Toward an understanding of the distinct nature of L2 writing: The ESL research and its implications. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 657-677.
95. Sommers, N. (1980). Revision strategies of student writers and experienced adult writers. College Composition and Communication, 31, 378-387.
96. Sommers, N. (1984). Responding to student writing. In S. McKay (Ed.), Composing in a second language (pp. 160-169). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
97. Sommers, N. (1987). Responding to student writing. In A. Matsuhashi (Ed.), Writing in real time: Modelling production processes (pp. 160-169). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
98. Stanley, J. (1992). Coaching student writers to be effective peer evaluators. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, 217-233.
99. Turner, J. (1993). Using Likert scales in L2 research: Another researcher comments. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 736-739.
100. Winer, L. (1992). 'Spinach to chocolate': Changing awareness and attitudes in ESL writing teachers. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 57-79.
101. Vann, R. J., Meyer, D. E., & Lorenz, F. O. (1984). Error gravity: A study of faculty opinions of ESL errors. TESOL Quarterly, 18, 427-440.
102. Zamel, V. (1983). The composing processes of advanced ESL students: Six case studies. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 165-187.
103. Zamel, V. (1985). Responding to student writing. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 79-101.
104. Zamel, V. (1987). Recent research on writing pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 697-715.
105. Zhang, S. (1985). The differential effects of source of corrective feedback on ESL writing proficiency. Hawai'i Occasional Paper No. 9. Honolulu, HI: Department of English as a Second Language, University of Hawai'i at Manoa, Manoa, HI.