Incidental focus on form and second language learning

Studies in Second Language Acquisition

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 361-386

  Loewen, Shawn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33644552444     PISSN: 02722631     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0272263105050163     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Bachman, L., & Palmer, A. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Bialystok, E. (1994). Analysis and control in the development of second language proficiency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 157-168.
3. Brown, J. D. (1996). Testing in language programs. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4. Davies, A., Brown, A., Elder, C., Hill, K., Lumley, T., & McNamara, T. (1999). Dictionary of language testing. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate.
5. de Bot, K. (1996). The psycholinguistics of the output hypothesis. Language Learning, 46, 529-555.
6. Doughty, C. (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 206-257). New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Douglas, D. (2001). Performance consistency in second language acquisition and language testing research: A conceptual gap. Second Language Research, 17, 442-456.
9. Ellis, R. (2001). Investigating form-focused instruction. Language Learning, 51(Suppl. 1), 1-46.
10. Ellis, R. (2004). The definition and measurement of L2 explicit knowledge. Language Learning, 54, 227-275.
11. Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001a). Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning, 51, 281-318.
12. Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001b). Preemptive focus on form in the ESL Classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 407-432.
13. Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Basturkmen, H. (1999). Focussing on form in the classroom (Occasional Papers, Number 13). Auckland, New Zealand: The University of Auckland, Institute of Language Teaching and Learning.
14. Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Genesee, F. (1987). Learning through two languages. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
17. Gravetter, F., & Wallnau, L. (1991). Essentials of statistics for the behavioral sciences. St. Paul, MN: West.
18. Greenhouse, J., Bromberg, J., & Fromm, D. (1995). An introduction to logistic regression with an application to the analysis of language recovery following a stroke. Journal of Communication Disorders, 28, 229-246.
19. Hatch, E., & Lazaraton, A. (1991). The research manual: Design and statistics for applied linguistics. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
20. Hosmer, D., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied logistic regression (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
21. Hulstijn, J. H. (1995). Not all grammar rules are equal: Giving grammar instruction its proper place in foreign language teaching. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 359-386). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai'i Press.
22. La Pierre, D. (1994). Language output in a cooperative learning setting: Determining its effects on second language learning. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Toronto (OISE), Toronto, Canada.
23. Laufer, B., & Nation, I. S. P. (1999). A vocabulary-size test of controlled productive ability. Language Testing, 16, 33-51.
24. Lightbown, P. (1998). The importance of timing in focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 177-196). New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. Loewen, S. (2002). The occurrence and effectiveness of incidental focus on form in meaning-focused ESL lessons. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
26. Loewen, S. (2003). Variation in the frequency and characteristics of incidental focus on form. Language Teaching Research, 7, 315-345.
27. Loewen, S. (2004). Uptake in incidental focus on form in meaning-focused ESL lessons. Language Learning, 54, 153-187.
28. Long, M. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
29. Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
30. Long, M., Inagaki, S., & Ortega, L. (1998). The role of implicit negative feedback in SLA: Models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. Modern Language Journal, 82, 357-371.
31. Long, M., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15-41). New York: Cambridge University Press.
32. Lyster, R. (1998a). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 48, 183-218.
33. Lyster, R. (1998b). Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 51-81.
34. Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37-66.
35. Nabei, T., & Swain, M. (2001). Learner awareness of recasts in classroom interaction: A case study of an adult EFL participant's second language learning. Language Awareness, 11, 43-63.
36. Nicholas, H., Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (2001). Recasts as feedback to language learners. Language Learning, 51, 719-758.
37. Oliver, R. (1995). Negative feedback in child NS-NNS conversation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 459-481.
38. Oliver, R. (2000). Age differences in negotiation and feedback in classroom and pairwork. Language Learning, 50, 119-151.
39. Pica, T. (2002). Subject-matter content: How does it assist the interactional and linguistic needs of classroom language learners? Modern Language Journal, 86, 1-19.
40. Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communication tasks for second language instruction and research. In G. Crookes & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9-34). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
41. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
42. Ross, S. (1992). Accommodative questions in oral proficiency interviews. Language Testing, 9, 173-186.
43. Saito, H. (1999). Dependence and interaction in frequency data analysis in SLA research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 453-475.
44. Savignon, S. J. (2000). Communicative language teaching. In M. Byram (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of language teaching and learning (pp. 124-129). London: Routledge.
45. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158.
46. Schmidt, R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (Tech. Rep. No. 9, pp. 1-63). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai'i Press.
47. Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp.3-32). New York: Cambridge University Press.
48. Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49. Slimani, A. (1989). The role of topicalization in classroom language learning. System, 17, 223-234.
50. Spada, N. (1997). Form-focussed instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching, 30, 73-87.
51. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in it development. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-252). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
52. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principles and practice in the study of language (pp. 125-144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
53. Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97-114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54. Swain, M. (2001). Examining dialogue: Another approach to content specification and to validating inferences drawn from test scores. Language Testing, 18, 275-302.
55. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16, 371-391.
56. VanPatten, B. (1990). Attending to content and form in the input: An experiment in consciousness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 287-301.
57. Williams, J. (2001). The effectiveness of spontaneous attention to form. System, 29, 325-340.