Differential effects of focused and unfocused written correction on the accurate use of grammatical forms by adult ESL learners

System

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 556-569

  Sheen, Younghee ^a   Wright, David ^a   Moldawa, Anna ^a  

^a AMERICAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Feedback in second language writing; Focused error correction; Written corrective feedback

Indexed keywords

EID: 70449520185     PISSN: 0346251X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2009.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ashwell T. Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method. Journal of Second Language Writing 9 (2000) 227-257
2. Bitchener J. Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing 17 2 (2008) 102-118
3. Bitchener J., and Knoch U. The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teaching Research 12 3 (2008) 409-431
4. Bitchener J., Young S., and Cameron D. The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 14 (2005) 191-205
5. Chandler J. The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 12 (2003) 267-296
6. Cohen A., and Robbins M. Toward assessing interlanguage performance. The relationship between selected errors, learners' characteristics, and learners' explanations. Language Learning 26 (1976) 45-66
7. DeKeyser R. The effect of error correction on L2 grammar knowledge and oral proficiency. Modern Language Journal 77 4 (1993) 501-514
8. Ellis R. Methodological options in grammar teaching materials. In: Hinkel E., and Fotos S. (Eds). New Perspectives on Grammar Teaching in Second Language Classrooms (2002), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 155-179
9. Ellis R., Loewen S., and Erlam R. Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28 (2006) 339-368
10. Ellis R., Sheen Y., Murakami M., and Takashima H. The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System 36 (2008) 353-371
11. Fathman A., and Whalley E. Teacher response to student writing: focus on form versus content. In: Kroll B. (Ed). Second Language Writing: Research Insights for The Classroom (1990), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 178-190
12. Ferris D. Treatment of Error in Second Language Writing Classes (2002), University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor
13. Ferris D., and Hedgcock J. Teaching ESL Composition: Purpose, Process, & Practice. 2nd Edition (2005), Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
14. Ferris D., and Roberts B. Error feedback in L2 writing classes: how explicit does it need to be?. Journal of Second Language Writing 10 (2001) 161-184
15. Guénette D. Is feedback pedagogically correct? Research design issues in studies of feedback on writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 16 (2007) 40-53
16. Han Z.-H. A study of the impact of recasts on tense consistency in L2 output. TESOL Quarterly 36 (2002) 543-572
17. Kepner C.G. An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second-language writing skills. Modern Language Journal 75 (1991) 305-313
18. Krashen S.D. Principles and Practices in Second Language Acquisition (1982), Pergamon Press, New York
19. Lalande J. Reducing composition error: an experiment. Modern Language Journal 66 (1982) 140-149
20. Long M. Teacher feedback on learner error: mapping cognitions. In: Brown H.D., Yorio C.A., and Crymes R.H. (Eds). On TESOL '77 (1977), TESOL, Washington, DC 278-293
21. Lyster R. Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26 (2004) 399-432
22. Polio C., Fleck C., and Leder N. "If only I had more time:" ESL learners' changes in linguistic accuracy on essay revisions. Journal of Second Language Writing 7 (1998) 43-68
23. Robb T., Ross S., and Shortreed I. Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality. TESOL Quarterly 20 (1986) 83-93
24. Sheen Y. The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners' acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly 41 2 (2007) 255-283
25. Sheppard K. Two feedback types: do they make a difference?. Regional English Center Journal 23 (1992) 103-110
26. Swain M. Three functions of output in second language learning. In: Cook G., and Seidlhofer B. (Eds). Principle and Practice in Applied Linguistics: Studies in Honor of H.G. Widdowson (1995), Oxford University Press, Oxford 125-144
27. Truscott J. The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning 46 (1996) 327-369
28. Truscott J. The case for "the case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes": a response to Ferris. Journal of Second Language Writing 8 (1999) 111-122
29. Truscott J. Evidence and conjecture on the effects of correction: a response to Chandler. Journal of Second Language Writing 13 (2004) 337-343
30. Truscott J. The effect of error correction on learners' ability to write s accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing 16 (2007) 255-272