The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 grammar: A meta-analysis of the research

Language Learning and Language Teaching

Volumn 13, Issue , 2006, Pages 133-164

  Russell, Jane ^a   Spada, Nina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 82555205115     PISSN: 15699471     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (87)

1. Ammar, A. (2003). Corrective feedback and L2 learning: Elicitation and recasts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
2. Ammar, A., & Spada, N. (in press). One size fits all? Recasts, prompts and the acquisition of English possessive determiners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28 (4).
3. Ashwell, T. (2000). Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 227-257.
4. Blain, S. (2001). Study of verbal peer feedback on the improvement of the quality of writing and the transfer of knowledge in Francophone students in grade 4 living in a minority situation in Canada. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 14(2), 156-170.
5. Braidi, S. (2002). Reexamining the role of recasts in native-speaker/non-native speaker interactions. Language Learning, 52, 1-42.
6. Bruton, A., & Samuda, V. (1980). Learner and teacher roles in the treatment of oral error in group work. RELC Journal, 11, 49-63.
7. Carroll, S., & Swain, M. (1993). Explicit and implicit negative feedback: An empirical study of the learning of linguistic generalization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 357-386.
8. Carroll, S., Swain, M., & Roberge, Y. (1992). The role of feedback in adult second language acquisition: Error correction and morphological generalizations. Applied Psycholinguistics, 13, 173-198.
9. Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 267-296.
10. Chaudron, C. (1977). A descriptive model of discourse in the corrective treatment of learners' errors. Language Learning, 27, 29-46.
11. Chaudron, C. (1984). The effects of feedback on students' composition revisions. RELC Journal, 15, 1-14.
12. Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (1994). Handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
13. DeKeyser, R. (1993). The effect of error correction on L2 grammar knowledge and oral proficiency. Modern Language Journal, 77, 501-514.
14. Doughty, C. (1994). Fine-tuning of feedback by competent speakers to language learners. In J. Alatis (Ed.), Strategic interaction and language acquisition: Theory, practice, and research. GURT 1993 (pp. 96-108). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
15. Doughty, C., & Varela, E. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 114-138). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16. Ellis, R. (2001). Introduction: Investigating form-focused instruction. Language Learning, 51(Supplement 1), 1-46.
17. Fathman, A. K., & Whalley, E. (1990). Teacher response to student writing: Focus on form versus content. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 178-190). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18. Fazio, L. (2001). The effect of corrections and commentaries on the journal writing accuracy of minority- and majority-language students. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 235-249.
19. Ferris, D. R. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 315-339.
20. Ferris, D., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 161-184.
21. Fotos S. & Ellis, R. (1991). Communicating about grammar: A task-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 605-628.
22. Greenhouse, J. B., & Iyengar, S. (1994). Sensitivity analysis and diagnostics. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), Handbook of research synthesis (pp. 383-398). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
23. Havranek, G. (1999). The effectiveness of corrective feedback: Preliminary results of an empirical study. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangere, 2, 189-206.
24. Hedgcock, J., & Lefkowitz, N. (1992). Collaborative oral/aural revision in foreign language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, 255-276.
25. Herron, C. (1991). The Garden Path correction strategy in the foreign language classroom. French Review, 64, 966-977.
26. Herron, C., & Tomasello, M. (1988). Learning grammatical structures in a foreign language: Modeling versus feedback. French Review, 61, 910-922.
27. Hyland, F. (1998). The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 255-286.
28. Iwashita, N. (2003). Negative feedback and positive evidence in task-based interaction: Differential effects on L2 development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 1-36.
29. Iwashita, N. (2001). The effect of learner proficiency on corrective feedback and modified output in NN-NN interaction. System, 29, 267-287.
30. Kepner, C. G. (1991). An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second language writing skills. Modern Language Journal, 75, 305-313.
31. Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
32. Lalande, J. F., II. (1982). Reducing composition errors: An experiment. Foreign Language Annals, 17(2), 109-117.
33. Lapkin, S., Swain, M., & Smith, M. (2002). Reformulation and the learning of French pronominal verbs in a Canadian French immersion context. Modern Language Journal, 86, 485-507.
34. Lee, I. (1997). ESL learners' performance in error correction in writing: Some implications for teaching. System, 25, 465-477.
35. Leeman, J. (2003). Recasts and second language development: Beyond negative evidence. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 37-63.
36. Lin, Y.-H., & Hedgcock, J. (1996). Negative feedback incorporation among high-proficiency and low-proficiency Chinese-speaking learners of Spanish. Language Learning, 46, 567-611.
37. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993). The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 48, 1181-1209.
38. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39. Lochtman, K. (2000). The role of negative feedback in experiential vs. analytical foreign language teaching. Paper presented at the Conference on Instructed Second Language Learning. Brussels, Belgium.
40. Long, M. H. & Porter, P. (1985). Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 27-56.
41. Long, M., Inagaki, S., & Ortega, L. (1998). The role of implicit negative feedback in SLA: Models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. Modern Language Journal, 82, 357-371.
42. Lyster, R. (1994). The effect of functional-analytic teaching on aspects of French immersion students' sociolinguistic competence. Applied Linguistics, 15, 263-287.
43. Lyster, R. (1998a). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 48, 183-218.
44. Lyster (1998b). Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 51-81.
45. Lyster, R. (2001). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 51, 265-301.
46. Lyster, R. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focussed instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 399-432.
47. Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37-66.
48. Lyster, R., Lightbown, P. M. & Spada, N. (1999). A response to Truscott's “What's wrong with oral grammar correction. Canadian Modern Language Review, 55, 546-467.
49. Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction, and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 557-587.
50. Mackey, A., Gass, S., & McDonough, K. (2000). How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 471-497.
51. Mackey, A., & Oliver, R. (2002). Interactional feedback and children's L2 development. System, 30, 459-477.
52. Mackey, A., & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? Modern Language Journal, 82, 338-356.
53. Makino, T.-Y. (1993). Learner self-correction in EFL written compositions. ELT Journal, 43, 337-341.
54. Matt, G. E., & Cook, T. D. (1994). Threats to the validity of research synthesis. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), Handbook of research synthesis (pp. 503-520). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
55. Morris, F. A. (2002). Negotiation moves and recasts in relation to error types and learner repair in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 35, 395-404.
56. Muranoi, H. (2000). Focus on form through interaction enhancement: Integrating formal instruction into a communicative task in EFL classrooms. Language Learning, 50, 617-673.
57. Nabei, T., & Swain, M. (2002). Learner awareness of recasts in classroom interaction: A case study of an adult EFL students' second language learning. Language Awareness, 11, 43-63.
58. Nassaji, H., & Swain, M. (2000). A Vygotskian perspective on corrective feedback in L2: The effect of random versus negotiated help on the learning of English articles. Language Awareness, 9, 34-51.
59. Nicholas, H., Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2001). Recasts as feedback to language learners. Language Learning, 51, 719-758.
60. Nobuyoshi, J., & Ellis, R. (1993). Focused communication tasks and second language acquisition. ELT Journal, 47(3), 203-210.
61. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417-527.
62. Ohta, A. S. (2000). Re-thinking recasts: A learner-centered examination of corrective feedback in the Japanese language classroom. In J. K. Hall & L. Verplaeste (Eds.), The construction of second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction (pp. 47-71). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
63. Oliver, R. (1995). Negative feedback in child NS-NNS conversation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 459-481.
64. O'Relly, L. V., Flaitz, J., & Kromrey, J. D. (2001). Two modes of correcting communicative tasks: Recent findings. Foreign Language Annals, 34(3), 246-257.
65. Panova, I., & Lyster, R. (2002). Patterns of corrective feedback and uptake in an adult ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 573-595.
66. Paulus, T. M. (1999). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 265-289.
67. Philp, J. (2003). Constraints on 'noticing the gap': Nonnative speakers' noticing of recasts in NS-NNS interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 99-126.
68. Pica, T. (1988). Interlanguage adjustments as an outcome of NS-NNS negotiated interaction. Language Learning, 38, 45-73.
69. Pica, T., Lincoln-Porter, F., Paninos, D., & Linnell, J. (1996). Language learners' interaction: How does it address the input, output, and feedback needs of L2 learners? TESOL Quarterly, 30, 59-84.
70. Qi, D. S., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Exploring the role of noticing in a three-stage second language writing task. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 277-303.
71. Robb, T., Ross, S., & Shortreed, I. (1986). Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 83-95.
72. Russell, J. M. (2003). Synthesizing the corrective feedback literature: Challenges for meta-analyses. Unpublished master's thesis, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto. Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
73. Samuda, V. & Rounds, P. (1993). Critical episodes: Reference points for analyzing a task in action. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks in a pedagogical context: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 125-138). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
74. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158.
75. Schwartz, B. (1993). On explicit and negative data effecting and affecting competence and linguistic behavior. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 143-145.
76. Semke, H. D. (1984). Effects of the red pen. Foreign Language Annals, 17(3), 195-202.
77. Slavin, R. E. (1986). Best evidence synthesis: An alternative to meta-analysis and traditional reviews. Educational Researcher, 15(9), 5-11.
78. Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Journal, 83, 320-337.
79. Sze, C. (2002). A case study of the revision process of a reluctant ESL student writer. TESL Canada Journal, 19(2), 21-36.
80. Tomasello, M., & Herron, C. (1988). Down the Garden Path: Inducing and correcting overgeneralization errors in the foreign language classroom. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 237-246.
81. Tomasello, M., & Herron, C. (1989). Feedback for language transfer errors: The Garden Path technique. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 385-395.
82. Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46, 327-369.
83. Truscott, J. (1999). What's wrong with oral grammar correction. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 55, 437-455.
84. Van den Branden, K. (1997). Effects of negotiation on language learners' output. Language Learning, 47, 589-636.
85. Villamil, O. S., & De Guerrero, M. C. M. (1998). Assessing the impact of peer revision on L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 19, 491-514.
86. Wilson, D. B. (2001). Effect size determination program. (Version dated 07/25/2001) [Computer software]. University of Maryland, College Park: Author.
87. Zobl, H. (1985). Grammars in search of input and intake. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 329-344). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.