BEYOND EXPLICIT RULE LEARNING

Studies in Second Language Acquisition

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 195-221

  DeKeyser, Robert M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85137618680     PISSN: 02722631     EISSN: 14701545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0272263197002040     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Balcom, P. (1990). Elicited imitation: Some methodological considerations. In H. Burmeister & P. L. Rounds (Eds.), Variability in second language acquisition: Proceedings of the tenth meeting of the Second Language Research Forum (pp. 169-186). Eugene: University of Oregon.
2. Bley-Vroman, R., & Chaudron, C. (1994). Elicited imitation as a measure of L2 competence. In A. Cohen, S. M. Gass, & E. Tarone (Eds.), Research methodology in second language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Cattell, J. M. (1887). Experiments on the association of ideas. Mind, 12, 68-74.
4. Chaudron, C. (1988). Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Chaudron, C., & Russell, G. (1990, April). The status of elicited imitation as a measure of second language competence. Paper presented at the Ninth World Congress of Applied Linguistics, Thessaloniki, Greece.
6. Clyne, M. (1977). Multilingualism and pidginization in Australian industry. Ethnic Studies, 1, 40-55.
7. Ellis, N., & Schmidt, R. (1997). Morphology and longer distance dependencies: Laboratory research illuminating the A in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 145-172.
8. Ellis, R. (1986). Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Ferguson, C. (1975). Towards a characterization of English foreigner talk. Anthropological Linguistics, 17, 1-14.
10. Gallimore, R., & Tharp, R. G. (1981). The interpretation of elicited sentence imitation in a standardized context. Language Learning, 31, 269-392.
11. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1985). Surface information loss in comprehension. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 324-363.
12. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1988). Cognitive processes and mechanisms in language comprehension: The structure building framework (Tech. Rep. No. 88-3). Eugene: University of Oregon, Institute of Cognitive and Decision Sciences.
13. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Givon, T. (1990). Natural language learning and organized language teaching. In H. Burmeister & P. L. Rounds (Eds.), Variability in second language acquisition: Proceedings of the tenth meeting of the Second Language Research Forum (pp. 61-84). Eugene: University of Oregon.
15. Givon, T. (1992). The grammar of referential coherence as mental processing instructions. Linguistics, 30, 5-56.
16. Givon, T., Yang, L., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990). The processing of second language vocabulary: From attended to automated word recognition. In H. Burmeister & P. L. Rounds (Eds.), Variability in second language acquisition: Proceedings from the tenth meeting of the Second Language Research Forum (pp. 345-365). Eugene: University of Oregon.
17. Hood, L., & Schieffelin, B. B. (1978). Elicited imitation in two cultural contexts. Quarterly Newsletter of the Institute for Comparative Human Development, 2, 4-12.
18. Hulstijn, J. H. (1997). Introduction. Second language acquisition research in the laboratory: Possibilities and limitations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 131-144.
19. Jarvella, R. J. (1971). Syntactic processing of connected speech. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 409-416.
20. Kleifgen, J. A. (1985). Skilled variation in a kindergarten teacher?s use of foreigner talk. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 59-68). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
21. Krashen, S. D., & Terrell, T. D. (1983). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
22. Larsen-Freeman, D. (1976). An explanation for the morpheme acquisition order of second language learners. Language Learning, 26, 125-134.
23. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. H. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research. New York: Longman.
24. McLaughlin, B., Rossman, T., & McLeod, B. (1983). Second language learning: An information-processing perspective. Language Learning, 33, 135-157.
25. Meisel, J. (1977). Linguistic simplification: A study of immigrant workers? speech and foreigner talk. In S. Corder & E. Roulet (Eds.), The notions of simplification, interlanguages and pidgins, and their relation to second language pedagogy (pp. 88-113). Geneve, Switzeland: Droz.
26. Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 227-234.
27. Morton, J. (1969). The interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76, 340-354.
28. Munnich, E., Flynn S., & Martohardjono, G. (1994). Elicited imitation and grammaticality judgment tasks: What they measure and how they relate to each other. In A. Cohen, S. M. Gass, & E. Tarone (Eds.), Research methodology in second language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Neeley, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264-336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Petersen, S. E., Fox, P. T., Posner, M. I., Mintun, M., & Raichle, M. E. (1988). Positron emission tomographic studies of the cortical anatomy of single-word processing. Science, 240, 1627-1631.
31. Peterson, R. G., & McIntyre, C. W. (1973). The influence of semantic "relatedness" on linguistic information and retention. American Journal of Psychology, 86, 697-706.
32. Pollatsek, A., Well, A. D., & Schindler, R. M. (1975). Familiarity affects visual processing of words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 328-338.
33. Posner, M. I. (1986). Chronometric explorations of the mind, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Reicher, G. M. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 275-280.
35. Sachs, J. (1967). Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse. Perception and Psychophysics, 2, 437-442.
36. Schmidt, R. (1992). Psychological mechanisms underlying second language fluency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 357-386.
37. Sieroff, E., & Posner, M. I. (1988). Cueing spatial attention during processing of words and letter strings in normals. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 451-472.
38. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
39. Swain, M., Dumas, G., & Naiman, N. (1974). Alternatives to spontaneous speech: Elicited translation and imitation as indicators of second language competence. Working Papers on Bilingualism, 3, 68-79.
40. Terrell, T. D. (1977). A natural approach to second language acquisition and learning. Modern Language Journal, 61, 325-336.
41. Yang, L. R. (1993). The acquisition of a second language under controlled experimental conditions. Dissertation Abstracts International, 54, 4428A.
42. Yang, L. R. (1977). Tracking the acquisition of L2 vocabulary. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy (pp. 125-156). New York: Cambridge University Press.
43. Yang, L. R., & Givon, T. (1994). Tracking the acquisition of L2 grammar: Memory measures (Tech. Rep. No. 94-3). Eugene: University of Oregon, Institute for Cognitive and Decision Sciences.