Recasts, language anxiety, modified output, and L2 learning

Language Learning

Volumn 58, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 835-874

  Sheen, Younghee ^a,b  

^a AMERICAN UNIVERSITY

^b AMERICAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Classroom research; Corrective feedback; Individual differences; Instructed second language acquisition; Interactional feedback; L2 learning; Language anxiety; Learner uptake; Modified output; Recasts

Indexed keywords

EID: 56649094171     PISSN: 00238333     EISSN: 14679922     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00480.x     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Ammar, A., & Spada, N. (2006). One size fits all? Recasts, prompts, and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 543 574.
2. Ayoun, D. (2001). The role of negative and positive feedback in the second language acquisition of the Passé Composé and Imparfait. Modern Language Journal, 85 (2 226 243.
3. Bailey, K. (1983). Competitiveness and anxiety in adult second language learning: Looking at and through the diary studies. In H. Seliger & M. Long (Eds Classroom oriented research in language learning. Rowley, MA : Newbury House.
4. Bigelow, M., deMas, R., Hansen, K., & Tarone, E. (2006). Literacy and oral recasts in SLA. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 665 689.
5. Bley-Vroman, R., & Chaudron, C. (1994). Elicited imitation as a measure of second-language competence. In E. Tarone & A. Cohen (Eds Research methodology in second-language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Butler, Y. (2002). Second language learners' theories on the use of English articles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24 (3 451 480.
7. Carpenter, H., Jeon, S., MacGregor, D., & Mackey, A 2006). Recasts as repetitions: learners' interpretations of native speaker responses. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28 (2 209 236.
8. Chastain, K. (1975). Affective and ability factors in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 25, 153 161.
9. Cheng, Y., Horwitz, E., & Schallert, D. (1999). Language anxiety: Differentiating writing and speaking components. Language Learning, 49, 417 446.
10. DeKeyser, R. (1993). The effect of error correction on L2 grammar knowledge and oral proficiency. Modern Language Journal, 77 (4 501 514.
11. Dörnyei, Z. (2003). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Dörnyei, Z., & MacIntyre, P. (2006). Questionnaire item pool. Unpublished manuscript. School of English Studies, University of Nottingham.
14. Doughty, C. (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed. Cognition and SLA (pp. 206 257). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
15. Doughty, C., & Varela, E. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
16. Egi, T. (2007a). Interpreting recasts as linguistic evidence: The roles of length and degree of change. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 511 537.
17. Egi, T. (2007b). Recasts, learners' perceptions, and L2 development. In A. Mackey (Ed Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies (pp. 249 267). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
18. Egi, T. (2008). Uptake, modified output, and learner perceptions of recasts. Colloquium paper presented at the 30th annual conference of the American Association of Applied Linguistics (AAAL), Washington, DC.
19. Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
20. Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 141 172.
21. Ellis, R. (2007). The differential effects of corrective feedback on two grammatical structures. In A. Mackey (Ed Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies (pp. 339 360). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
22. Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28 (2 339 368.
23. Ellis, R., & Sheen, Y. (2006). Re-examining the role of recasts in L2 acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28 (4 575 600.
24. Han, Z. (2002). A study of the impact of recasts on tense consistency in L2 output. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 543 572.
25. Havranek, G. (2002). When is corrective feedback most likely to succeed International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 255 270.
26. Havranek, G., & Cesnik, H. (2001). Factors affecting the success of corrective feedback. In S. Foster-Cohen and A. Nizegorodzew, EUROSLA Yearbook, Volume 1, 99 122.
27. Horwitz, E. (1987). Surveying student beliefs about language learning. In A. L. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds. Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 119 129). Hemel Hempstead, UK : Prentice Hall.
28. Horwitz, E. (2000). It ain't over till it's over: On foreign language anxiety, first language deficits, and the confounding of variables. Modern Language Journal, 84, 256 259.
29. Horwitz, E. (2001). Language anxiety and achievement. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 112 126.
30. Horwitz, E., Horwitz, B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. Modern Language Journal, 70, 125 132.
31. Horwitz, E., & Young, D. (1991). Language anxiety. Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice-Hall.
32. Ishida, M. (2004). Effects of recasts on the acquisition of the aspectual form -te i-(ru) by learners of Japanese as a foreign language. Language Learning, 54, 311 394.
33. Kleinmann, H. (1978). The strategy of avoidance in adult second language acquisition. In W. Richie (Ed. Second language acquisition research: Issues and implications (pp. 157 174). New York : Academic Press.
34. Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford : Pergamon.
35. Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London : Longman.
36. Krashen, S. (1998). Comprehensible output System, 26, 175 182.
37. Krashen, S. (2003). Explorations in language acquisition and use. Portsmouth, NH : Heinemann.
38. Leeman, J. (2003). Recasts and second language development: Beyond negative evidence. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25 (1 37 63.
39. Leeman, J. (2007). Feedback in L2 learning: Responding to errors during practice. In R. DeKeyser (Ed Practice in a second language (pp. 111 137). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
40. Liu, D., & Gleason, J. (2002). Acquisition of the article the by nonnative speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24 (1 1 26.
41. Loewen, S. (2005). Incidental focus on form and second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27 (3 361 386.
42. Loewen, S., & Nabei, T. (2007). Measuring the effects of oral corrective feedback on L2 knowledge. In A. Mackey (Ed Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies (pp. 361 377). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
43. Loewen, S., & Philp, J. (2006). Recasts in the adult English L2 classroom: Characteristics, explicitness, and effectiveness. Modern Language Journal, 90, 536 556.
44. Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413 468). New York : Academic Press.
45. Long, M. H. (2006). Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
46. Long, M. H., Inagaki, S., & Ortega, L. (1998). The role of implicit negative feedback in SLA: Models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. Modern Language Journal, 82, 357 371.
47. Loughrin-Sacco, S. (1992). More than meets the eye: An ethnography of an elementary French Class. Canadian Modern Language Review, 49, 80 101.
48. Lyster, R. (1998a). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 48, 183 218.
49. Lyster, R. (1998b). Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 51 81.
50. Lyster, R. (2002). The importance of differentiating negotiation of form and meaning in classroom interaction. In P. Burmeister, T. Piske, & A. Rohde (Eds An integrated view of language development: Papers in honor of Henning Wode (pp. 381 397). Trier, Germany : Wissen-schaftlicher Verlag Trier.
51. Lyster, R. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 399 432.
52. Lyster, R. (2007). Learning and teaching languages through content: A counterbalanced approach. Amsterdam : Benjamins.
53. Lyster, R., & Izquierdo, J. (in press). The effects of prompts versus recasts in dyadic interaction. Language Learning, 59 (2).
54. Lyster, R., & Mori, H. (2006). Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28 (2 269 300.
55. Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37 66.
56. MacIntyre, P. (1999). Language anxiety: A review of the research for language teachers. In D. J. Young (Ed Affect in foreign language and second language learning (pp. 24 45). Boston : McGraw-Hill.
57. MacIntyre, P., & Gardner, R. (1989). Anxiety and second language learning: Toward a theoretical clarification. Language Learning, 39, 251 275.
58. MacIntyre, P., & Gardner, R. (1991). Methods and results in the study of foreign language anxiety: A review of the literature. Language Learning, 41, 25 57.
59. MacIntyre, P., & Gardner, R. (1994). The subtle effects of induced anxiety on cognitive processing in the second language. Language Learning, 44, 283 305.
60. Mackey, A. (2006). Feedback, noticing and instructed second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 27 (3 405 430.
61. Mackey, A. (2007). The role of conversational interaction in second language acquisition. In A. Mackey (Ed Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies (pp. 1 26). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
62. Mackey, A., Gass, S., & McDonough, K. (2000). How do learners perceive interactional feedback Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22 (4 471 497.
63. Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies (pp. 407 452). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
64. Mackey, A., & Oliver, R. (2002). Interactional feedback and children's L2 development. System, 30, 459 477.
65. Mackey, A., & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings The Modern Language Journal, 82, 338 356.
66. Mackey, A., Philp, J., Egi, T., Fujii, A., & Tatsumi, T. (2002). Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback and L2 development. In P. Robinson (Ed Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 181 209). Philadelphia : Benjamins.
67. McDonough, K. (2005). Identifying the impact of negative feedback and learners' responses on ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 79 103.
68. McDonough, K., & Mackey, A. (2006). Responses to recasts: Repetitions, primed production, and linguistic development. Language Learning, 56 (4 693 720.
69. Muranoi, H. (2000). Focus on form through interaction enhancement: Integrating formal instruction into a communicative task in EFL classrooms. Language Learning, 50 (4 617 673.
70. Nicholas, H., Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2001). Recasts as feedback to language learners. Language Learning, 51 (4 719 758.
71. Nobuyoshi, J., & Ellis, R. (1993). Focused communication tasks and second language acquisition. English Language Teaching Journal, 47, 203 210.
72. Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417 528.
73. Oliver, R. (1995). Negative feedback in child NS-NNS conversation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 459 483.
74. Oliver, R. (2000). Age differences in negotiation and feedback in classroom and pairwork. Language Learning, 50, 119 151.
75. Oliver, R., & Mackey, A. (2003). Interactional context and feedback in child ESL classrooms. Modern Language Journal, 87, 519 533.
76. Philp, J. (2003). Constraints on "noticing the gap": Nonnative speakers' noticing of recasts in NS-NNS interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 99 126.
77. Pica, T. (1991). Foreign language classrooms: Making them research-ready and researchable. In B. Freed (Ed Foreign language acquisition research and classroom. Lexington, MA : D.C. Heath.
78. Price, M. (1991). The subjective experience of foreign language anxiety: Interviews with highly anxious students. In E. Horwitz & D. Young (Eds Language anxiety (pp. 101 108). Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice-Hall.
79. Russell, J., & Spada, N. (2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for second language acquisition: A meta-analysis of the research. In J. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 133 164). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
80. Saito, Y., Garza, T., & Horwitz, E. (1999). Foreign language reading anxiety. Modern Language Journal, 83 (2 202 218.
81. Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Malden, MA : Blackwell.
82. Sheen, Y. (2004). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings. Language Teaching Research, 8, 263 300.
83. Sheen, Y. (2006a). Corrective feedback, individual differences and the acquisition of articles by second language learners. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nottingham.
84. Sheen, Y. (2006b). Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and learner uptake. Language Teaching Research, 10 (4 361 392.
85. Sparks, R. L., & Ganschow, L. (1991). Foreign language learning differences: Affective or native language aptitude differences Modern Language Journal, 75, 3 16.
86. Sparks, R. L., Ganschow, L., & Javorsky, J. (2000). Déjà vu all over again: A response to Saito, Horwitz, and Garza. Modern Language Journal, 84, 251 259.
87. Spielmann, G., & Radnofsky, M. L. (2001). Learning language under tension: New directions from a qualitative study. Modern Language Journal, 85 (2 259 278.
88. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235 253). Rowley, MA : Newbury House.
89. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125 144). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
90. Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471 483). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
91. Trofimovich, P., Ammar, A., & Gatbonton, E. (2007). How effective are recasts? The role of attention, memory, and analytical ability. In A. Mackey (Ed Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies (pp. 171 195). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
92. Woodrow, L. (2006). Anxiety and speaking English as a second language. RELC Journal, 37, 308 328.
93. Young, D. (1990). An investigation of students' perspectives on anxiety and speaking. Foreign Language Annals, 23, 539 553.