메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 82-99

Teacher-written feedback: Student perceptions, teacher self-assessment, and actual teacher performance

Author keywords

Second language writing; Student perceptions; Teacher feedback; Teacher self assessment

Indexed keywords


EID: 34548127909     PISSN: 10603743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2007.04.002     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (141)

References (44)
  • 1
    • 0242275946 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method?
    • Ashwell T. Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method?. Journal of Second Language Writing 9 (2000) 227-257
    • (2000) Journal of Second Language Writing , vol.9 , pp. 227-257
    • Ashwell, T.1
  • 2
    • 29244476254 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing
    • Bitchener J., Young S., and Cameron D. The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 14 (2005) 191-205
    • (2005) Journal of Second Language Writing , vol.14 , pp. 191-205
    • Bitchener, J.1    Young, S.2    Cameron, D.3
  • 4
    • 0242362238 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing
    • Chandler J. The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 12 (2003) 267-296
    • (2003) Journal of Second Language Writing , vol.12 , pp. 267-296
    • Chandler, J.1
  • 5
    • 34548132154 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Chapin, R. & Terdal, M. (1990). Responding to our response: Student strategies for responding to teacher written comments (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 328098).
  • 6
    • 0011432570 scopus 로고
    • Student processing of feedback on their compositions
    • Wenden A.L., and Rubin J. (Eds), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
    • Cohen A. Student processing of feedback on their compositions. In: Wenden A.L., and Rubin J. (Eds). Learner strategies in second language learning (1987), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 57-69
    • (1987) Learner strategies in second language learning , pp. 57-69
    • Cohen, A.1
  • 7
    • 34548129343 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Cohen, A. & Cavalcanti, M. (1990). Feedback on compositions: Teacher and student verbal reports. In M. Long & J. Richards (Series Eds.) & B. Kroll (Vol. Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (3rd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • 8
    • 1542512180 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Using self-assessment in early intervention training
    • Darling S., and Gallagher P. Using self-assessment in early intervention training. Journal of Early Intervention 25 (2003) 219-227
    • (2003) Journal of Early Intervention , vol.25 , pp. 219-227
    • Darling, S.1    Gallagher, P.2
  • 9
    • 0042891079 scopus 로고
    • Student response to teacher feedback in EFL writing
    • Enginarlar H. Student response to teacher feedback in EFL writing. System 21 (1993) 193-204
    • (1993) System , vol.21 , pp. 193-204
    • Enginarlar, H.1
  • 10
    • 34548142720 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Fatham, A. & Whalley, E. (1990). Teacher response to student writing: Focus on form versus content. In M. Long & J. Richards (Series Eds.) & B. Kroll (Vol. Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 178-90). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • 11
    • 84982701833 scopus 로고
    • Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms
    • Ferris D. Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms. TESOL Quarterly 29 (1995) 33-35
    • (1995) TESOL Quarterly , vol.29 , pp. 33-35
    • Ferris, D.1
  • 12
    • 84899363818 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The influence of teacher commentary on student revision
    • Ferris D. The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly 31 (1997) 315-339
    • (1997) TESOL Quarterly , vol.31 , pp. 315-339
    • Ferris, D.1
  • 13
    • 34548126240 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Responding to student errors: Issues and strategies
    • Ferris D. (Ed), The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI
    • Ferris D. Responding to student errors: Issues and strategies. In: Ferris D. (Ed). Treatment of error in second language student writing (2002), The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI 49-76
    • (2002) Treatment of error in second language student writing , pp. 49-76
    • Ferris, D.1
  • 15
    • 3342979589 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The "grammar correction" debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime ... ?)
    • Ferris D. The "grammar correction" debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime ... ?). Journal of Second Language Writing 13 (2004) 49-62
    • (2004) Journal of Second Language Writing , vol.13 , pp. 49-62
    • Ferris, D.1
  • 16
    • 34548132153 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction
    • Hylangd K., and Hyland F. (Eds), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
    • Ferris D. Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction. In: Hylangd K., and Hyland F. (Eds). Feedback in second language writing (2006), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 81-104
    • (2006) Feedback in second language writing , pp. 81-104
    • Ferris, D.1
  • 17
    • 84944329409 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Teacher response to student writing: Issues in oral and written feedback
    • Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
    • Ferris D., and Hedgcock J. Teacher response to student writing: Issues in oral and written feedback. Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process, and practice (1998), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 123-168
    • (1998) Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process, and practice , pp. 123-168
    • Ferris, D.1    Hedgcock, J.2
  • 18
    • 0037540913 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • For Kyla: What does the research say about responding to ESL writers?
    • Silva T., and Matsuda P. (Eds), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
    • Goldstein L. For Kyla: What does the research say about responding to ESL writers?. In: Silva T., and Matsuda P. (Eds). On second language writing (2001), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 73-90
    • (2001) On second language writing , pp. 73-90
    • Goldstein, L.1
  • 19
    • 3343015618 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Questions and answers about teacher written commentary and student revision: Teachers and students working together
    • Goldstein L. Questions and answers about teacher written commentary and student revision: Teachers and students working together. Journal of Second Language Writing 13 (2004) 63-80
    • (2004) Journal of Second Language Writing , vol.13 , pp. 63-80
    • Goldstein, L.1
  • 20
    • 34548126241 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Feedback and revision in second language writing: Contextual, teacher, and student variables
    • Hyland K., and Hyland F. (Eds), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
    • Goldstein L. Feedback and revision in second language writing: Contextual, teacher, and student variables. In: Hyland K., and Hyland F. (Eds). Feedback in Second Language Writing (2006), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 185-205
    • (2006) Feedback in Second Language Writing , pp. 185-205
    • Goldstein, L.1
  • 22
    • 34548126242 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Feedback in portfolio-based writing courses
    • Hyland K., and Hyland F. (Eds), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
    • Hamp-Lyons L. Feedback in portfolio-based writing courses. In: Hyland K., and Hyland F. (Eds). Feedback in second language writing (2006), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 140-161
    • (2006) Feedback in second language writing , pp. 140-161
    • Hamp-Lyons, L.1
  • 23
    • 0013098692 scopus 로고
    • Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing
    • Hedgcock J., and Lefkowitz N. Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing. Journal of Second Language Writing 3 (1994) 141-163
    • (1994) Journal of Second Language Writing , vol.3 , pp. 141-163
    • Hedgcock, J.1    Lefkowitz, N.2
  • 24
    • 0013050183 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Some input on input: Two analyses of student response to expert feedback in L2 writing
    • Hedgcock J., and Lefkowitz N. Some input on input: Two analyses of student response to expert feedback in L2 writing. The Modern Language Journal 80 (1996) 287-308
    • (1996) The Modern Language Journal , vol.80 , pp. 287-308
    • Hedgcock, J.1    Lefkowitz, N.2
  • 26
    • 0013094624 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers
    • Hyland F. The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing 7 (1998) 255-286
    • (1998) Journal of Second Language Writing , vol.7 , pp. 255-286
    • Hyland, F.1
  • 27
    • 84979447538 scopus 로고
    • An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second-language writing skills
    • Kepner C. An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second-language writing skills. The Modern Language Journal 75 (1991) 305-313
    • (1991) The Modern Language Journal , vol.75 , pp. 305-313
    • Kepner, C.1
  • 28
    • 0031494049 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning
    • Koriat A. Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 126 (1997) 349-370
    • (1997) Journal of Experimental Psychology: General , vol.126 , pp. 349-370
    • Koriat, A.1
  • 29
    • 34548132155 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Leki, I. (1990). Coaching from the margins: Issues in written response. In M. H. Long & J. C. Richards (Series Eds.) & B. Kroll (Vol. Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 178-90). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • 30
    • 33847607240 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • "You cannot ignore": L2 graduate students' response to discipline-based written feedback
    • Hyland K., and Hyland F. (Eds), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
    • Leki I. "You cannot ignore": L2 graduate students' response to discipline-based written feedback. In: Hyland K., and Hyland F. (Eds). Feedback in second language writing (2006), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 266-286
    • (2006) Feedback in second language writing , pp. 266-286
    • Leki, I.1
  • 31
    • 84937183171 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Composition studies and ESL writing: A disciplinary division of labor
    • Matsuda P. Composition studies and ESL writing: A disciplinary division of labor. College Composition and Communication 50 (1999) 699-721
    • (1999) College Composition and Communication , vol.50 , pp. 699-721
    • Matsuda, P.1
  • 32
    • 0043124972 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The effects of peer and teacher feedback on student writing
    • Paulus T. The effects of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 8 (1999) 265-289
    • (1999) Journal of Second Language Writing , vol.8 , pp. 265-289
    • Paulus, T.1
  • 34
    • 0000201744 scopus 로고
    • TESL student reaction to written comments on their written work
    • Radecki P.M., and Swales J. TESL student reaction to written comments on their written work. System 16 (1988) 355-365
    • (1988) System , vol.16 , pp. 355-365
    • Radecki, P.M.1    Swales, J.2
  • 35
    • 34548142718 scopus 로고
    • Responding to student writing
    • Reid J.M. (Ed), Regents/Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
    • Reid J. Responding to student writing. In: Reid J.M. (Ed). Teaching ESL writing (1993), Regents/Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 205-228
    • (1993) Teaching ESL writing , pp. 205-228
    • Reid, J.1
  • 36
    • 0001263357 scopus 로고
    • Two feedback types: Do they make a difference?
    • Sheppard K. Two feedback types: Do they make a difference?. RELC Journal 23 (1992) 103-110
    • (1992) RELC Journal , vol.23 , pp. 103-110
    • Sheppard, K.1
  • 37
    • 0348078638 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The genre of the end comment: Conventions in teacher responses to student writing
    • Smith S. The genre of the end comment: Conventions in teacher responses to student writing. College Composition and Communication 48 (1997) 249-268
    • (1997) College Composition and Communication , vol.48 , pp. 249-268
    • Smith, S.1
  • 38
    • 0012697843 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The concept of control in teacher response: Defining the varieties of "directive" and "facilitative" commentary
    • Straub R. The concept of control in teacher response: Defining the varieties of "directive" and "facilitative" commentary. College Composition and Communication 47 (1996) 223-251
    • (1996) College Composition and Communication , vol.47 , pp. 223-251
    • Straub, R.1
  • 39
    • 0030507912 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes
    • Truscott J. The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning 46 (1996) 327-369
    • (1996) Language Learning , vol.46 , pp. 327-369
    • Truscott, J.1
  • 40
    • 10844243171 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Evidence and conjecture on the effects of correction: A response to Chandler
    • Truscott J. Evidence and conjecture on the effects of correction: A response to Chandler. Journal of Second Language Writing 13 (2004) 337-343
    • (2004) Journal of Second Language Writing , vol.13 , pp. 337-343
    • Truscott, J.1
  • 41
    • 34548142719 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Self-assessment, reflection, and the new teacher of writing
    • Smith J., and Yancey K. (Eds), Hampton, Cresskill, NJ
    • Weiser I. Self-assessment, reflection, and the new teacher of writing. In: Smith J., and Yancey K. (Eds). Self-assessment and development in writing (2000), Hampton, Cresskill, NJ 139-156
    • (2000) Self-assessment and development in writing , pp. 139-156
    • Weiser, I.1
  • 42
    • 34548139858 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • An examination of teachers' "learning to act on reflection"
    • Wold L. An examination of teachers' "learning to act on reflection". Reading Research and Instruction 42 (2003) 52-74
    • (2003) Reading Research and Instruction , vol.42 , pp. 52-74
    • Wold, L.1
  • 43
    • 34548139861 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reflections on self-assessment
    • Smith J., and Yancey K. (Eds), Hampton, Cresskill, NJ
    • Yancey K., and Smith J. Reflections on self-assessment. In: Smith J., and Yancey K. (Eds). Self-assessment and development in writing (2000), Hampton, Cresskill, NJ 139-156
    • (2000) Self-assessment and development in writing , pp. 139-156
    • Yancey, K.1    Smith, J.2
  • 44
    • 84981660758 scopus 로고
    • Responding to student writing
    • Zamel V. Responding to student writing. TESOL Quarterly 19 (1985) 79-98
    • (1985) TESOL Quarterly , vol.19 , pp. 79-98
    • Zamel, V.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.