The relative effectiveness of different types of direct written corrective feedback

System

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 322-329

  Bitchener, John ^a   Knoch, Ute ^b  

^a AUCKLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Accuracy improvement; Error correction; Treating linguistic errors; Written corrective feedback

Indexed keywords

EID: 67349224972     PISSN: 0346251X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2008.12.006     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bitchener J. Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing 17 2 (2008) 69-124
2. Bitchener J., and Knoch U. The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teaching Research Journal 12 2 (2008) 409-431
3. Bitchener J., Young S., and Cameron D. The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 9 (2005) 227-258
4. Butler Y. Second language learners' theories on the use of English articles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24 (2002) 451-480
5. Carroll S. Input and Evidence: The Raw Material of Second Language Acquisition (2001), Benjamin, Amsterdam
6. Carroll S., and Swain M. Explicit and implicit negative feedback: an empirical study of the learning of linguistic generalizations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15 (1993) 357-386
7. Chandler J. The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 12 (2003) 267-296
8. DeKeyser R. The effect of error correction on L2 grammar knowledge and oral proficiency. Modern Language Journal 77 (1993) 501-514
9. Ellis R., Loewen S., and Erlam R. Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28 (2006) 339-368
10. Ferris D.R. Response to Student Writing: Implications for Second Language Students (2003), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
11. Ferris, D.R., Helt, M., 2000. Was Truscott right? New evidence on the effects of error correction in L2 writing classes. Paper presented at the American Association of Applied Linguistics Conference, March 11-14, 2000, Vancouver, BC.
12. Ferris D.R., and Roberts B. Error feedback in L2 writing classes: how explicit does it need to be?. Journal of Second Language Writing 10 (2001) 161-184
13. Ferris, D.R., Chaney, S.J., Komura, K., Roberts, B.J., McKee, S., 2000. Perspectives, problems, and practices in treating written error. Colloquium presented at International TESOL Convention, March 14-18, 2000, Vancouver, BC.
14. Havranek G., and Cesnik H. Factors affecting the success of corrective feedback. In: Foster-Cohen S., and Nizegorodzew A. (Eds). EuroSLA Yearbook vol. 1 (2003), Benjamin, Amsterdam
15. Kim H., and Mathes G. Explicit vs. implicit corrective feedback. The Korea TESOL Journal 4 (2001) 1-15
16. Lalande J.F. Reducing composition errors: an experiment. Modern Language Journal 66 (1982) 140-149
17. Leeman J. Recasts and second language development: beyond negative evidence. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25 (2003) 37-63
18. Lyster R. Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26 (2004) 399-432
19. Master P. Consciousness raising and article pedagogy. In: Belcher D., and Braine G. (Eds). Academic Writing in a Second Language: Essays on Research and Pedagogy (1995), Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, NJ
20. Muranoi H. Focus on form through interaction enhancement: integrating formal instruction into a communicative task in EFL classrooms. Language Learning 50 (2000) 617-673
21. Nagata H. Intelligent computer feedback for second language instruction. Modern Language Journal 77 (1993) 330-339
22. Robb T., Ross S., and Shortreed I. Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality. TESOL Quarterly 20 (1986) 83-93
23. Rosa E., and Leow R. Awareness, different learning conditions, and second language development. Applied Psycholinguistics 25 (2004) 269-292
24. Semke H. The effects of the red pen. Foreign Language Annals 17 (1984) 195-202
25. Sheen Y. The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners' acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly 41 (2007) 255-283
26. Truscott J. The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning 46 (1996) 327-369
27. Truscott J. The case for "the case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes": a response to Ferris. Journal of Second Language Writing 8 (1999) 111-122