Learners processing, uptake, and retention of corrective feedback on writing: Case studies

Studies in Second Language Acquisition

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 303-334

  Storch, Neomy ^a   Wigglesworth, Gillian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957244779     PISSN: 02722631     EISSN: 14701545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0272263109990532     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. Modern Language Journal, 78, 465-483.
2. Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 102-118.
3. Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2008). The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teaching Research, 12, 409-431.
4. Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 267-296. (Pubitemid 37340608)
5. Cummings, A., Busch, M., & Zhou, A. (2002). Investigating learners goals in the context of adult second language writing. In S. Ransdell & M. Barbier (Eds.), New directions for research for L2 writing (pp. 189-208). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
6. Ferris, D. R. (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 1-10.
7. Ferris, D. R. (2002). Treatment of error in second language student writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
8. Given, L., & Schallert, D. (2008). Meeting in the margins: Effects of the teacher-student relationship on revision processes of EFLcollege students taking a composition course. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 165-182.
9. Goldstein, L. (2004). Questions and answers about teacher written commentary and student revisions: Teachers and students working together. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 63-80. (Pubitemid 38994108)
10. Goldstein, L. (2005). Teacher written commentary in second language writing classrooms. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
11. Guénette, D. (2007). Is feedback pedagogically correct? Research design issues in studies of feedback on writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 40-53.
12. Hyland, F. (1998). The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 255-286. (Pubitemid 128382537)
13. Hyland, F. (2003). Focusing on form: Student engagement with teacher feedback. System, 31, 217-230. (Pubitemid 36439463)
14. Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2006). Feedback on second language students writing. Language Teaching, 39, 83-101.
15. Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Context and issues in feedback on L2 writing: An introduction. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing (pp. 1-20). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Lalande, J. F. (1982). Reducing composition errors: An experiment. Modern Language Journal, 66, 140-149.
17. Lantolf, J. P., & Pavlenko, A. (2001). Second language activity theory: Understanding second language learners as people. In M. P. Breen (Ed.), Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research (pp. 141-158). New York: Pearson Education.
18. Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Nassaji, H., & Swain, M. (2000). A Vygotskian perspective on corrective feedback in L2: The effect of random versus negotiated help on the learning of English articles. Language Awareness, 9, 34-51.
20. Qi, D. S., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Exploring the role of noticing in a three-stage second language writing task. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 277-303. (Pubitemid 33634277)
21. Sachs, R., & Polio, C. (2007). Learners uses of two types of written feedback on a L2 writing revision task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 67-100.
22. Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 255-283.
23. Storch, N. (2008). Metatalk in a pair work activity: Level of engagement and implications for language development. Language Awareness, 17, 95-114.
24. Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2006, July). Reformulate or edit? Investigating the impact of different feedback practices. Paper presented at the 5th Pacific Second Language Research Forum, University of Queensland, Australia.
25. Swain, M. (2006). Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced language proficiency. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95-108). New York: Continuum.
26. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Journal, 82, 320-337. (Pubitemid 128770152)
27. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2003). Talking it through: Two French immersion learners response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 285-304. (Pubitemid 36861363)
28. Tardy, C. (2006). Appropriation, ownership, and agency: Negotiating teacher feedback in academic settings. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing (pp. 60-78). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Thornbury, S. (1997). Reformulation and reconstruction: Tasks that promote "noticing." ELT Journal, 51, 326-335.
30. Tocalli-Beller, A., & Swain, M. (2005). Reformulation: The cognitive conflict and L2 learning it generates. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15, 5-28. (Pubitemid 41658228)
31. Truscott, J. (2007). The effect of error correction on learners ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 255-272.