Differential effects of oral and written corrective feedback in the ESL classroom

Studies in Second Language Acquisition

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 203-234

  Sheen, Younghee ^a  

^a AMERICAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957224409     PISSN: 02722631     EISSN: 14701545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0272263109990507     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Ammar, A., & Spada, N. (2006). One size fits all? Recasts, prompts, and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 543-574.
2. Ashwell, T. (2000). Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 227-257.
3. Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2008). The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teaching Research, 12, 409-431.
4. Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 191-205. (Pubitemid 41824128)
5. Bley-Vroman, R., & Chaudron, C. (1994). Elicited imitation as a measure of secondlanguage competence. In E. Tarone & A. D. Cohen (Eds.), Research methodology in second-language acquisition (pp. 245-262). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Butler, Y. (2002). Second language learners theories on the use of English articles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 451-480.
7. Carroll, S. (2001). Input and evidence: The raw material of second language acquisition. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
8. Carroll, S., & Swain, M. (1993). Explicit and implicit negative feedback: An empirical study of the learning of linguistic generalizations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 357-386.
9. Carroll, S., Swain, M., & Roberge, Y. (1992). The role of feedback in adult second language acquisition: Error correction and morphological generalizations. Applied Psycholinguistics , 13, 173-198.
10. Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 267-296. (Pubitemid 37340608)
11. Doughty, C. J. (2003). Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation, and enhancement. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 256-310). Oxford: Blackwell.
12. Doughty, C. J., & Varela, E. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In C. J. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 114-138). New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. Egi, T. (2007). Interpreting recasts as linguistic evidence: The role of linguistic target, length, and degree of change. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 511-537.
14. Ellis, N. C. (2005). At the interface: How explicit knowledge affects implicit language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 305-352.
15. Ellis, R. (2005 a). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 141-172. (Pubitemid 43308393)
16. Ellis, R. (2005 b). Researching the effects of form-focussed instruction on L2 acquisition. In K. Bardovi-Harlig & Z. Dörnyei (Eds.), Themes in SLA research (pp. 69-82). Amsterdam : Benjamins.
17. Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001). Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning, 51, 281-318. (Pubitemid 33285250)
18. Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 339-368. (Pubitemid 43615577)
19. Ellis, R., & Sheen, Y. (2006). Re-examining the role of recasts in L2 acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 575-600.
20. Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., & Takashima, H. (2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36, 353-371.
21. Fathman, A., & Whalley, E. (1990). Teacher response to student writing: Focus on form versus content. In B. F. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 178-190). New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Ferris, D. R. (1995). Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 33-53.
23. Ferris, D. R. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 315-339.
24. Ferris, D. R. (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 1-11.
25. Ferris, D. R. (2004). The "grammar correction" debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime?). Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 49-62.
26. Ferris, D. R., & Hedgcock, J. S. (2005). Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process, and practice (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Hedgcock, J. S. (2005). Taking stock of research and pedagogy in L2 writing. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 597-613). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Hedgcock, J. S., & Lefkowitz, N. (1992). Collaborative oral/aural revision in foreign language writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4, 51-70.
29. Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.
30. Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman. Lalande, J. (1982). Reducing composition error: An experiment. Modern Language Journal, 66, 140-149.
31. Leeman, J. (2003). Recasts and L2 development: Beyond negative evidence. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 37-63.
32. Leeman, J. (2007). Feedback in L2 learning: Responding to errors during practice. In R. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language (pp. 111-137). New York: Cambridge University Press.
33. Leki, I. (2000). Writing, literacy, and applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , 20, 99-115.
34. Liu, D., & Gleason, J. (2002). Acquisition of the article the by nonnative speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 1-26.
35. Loewen, S., & Philp, J. (2006). Recasts in adult English L2 classrooms: Characteristics, explicitness and effectiveness. Modern Language Journal, 90, 536-555. (Pubitemid 44782662)
36. Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
37. Long, M. H. (2007). Recasts in SLA: The story so far. In M. H. Long (Ed.), Problems in SLA (pp. 75-116). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Lyster, R. (1998). Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 51-81.
39. Lyster, R. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 399-432.
40. Lyster, R. (2007). Learning and teaching languages through content: A counterbalanced approach. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
41. Lyster, R., & Izquierdo, J. (2009). Prompts versus recasts in dyadic interaction. Language Learning, 59, 453-498.
42. Lyster, R., Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (1999). A response to Truscotts Whats wrong with oral grammar correction. Canadian Modern Language Review, 55, 457-467.
43. Lyster, R., & Mori, H. (2006). Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 269-300. (Pubitemid 43615575)
44. Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37-66.
45. Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction, and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 557-587.
46. Mackey, A. (2007). The role of conversational interaction in second language acquisition. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies (pp. 1-26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47. Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2006). Pushing the methodological boundaries in interaction research: An introduction to the special issue. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 169-178.
48. Mackey, A., Gass, S. M., & McDonough, K. (2000). How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 471-497.
49. Muranoi, H. (2000). Focus on form through interaction enhancement: Integrating formal instruction into a communicative task in EFLclassrooms. Language Learning, 50, 617-673.
50. Nicholas, H., Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (2001). Recasts as feedback to language learners. Language Learning, 51, 719-758. (Pubitemid 33366926)
51. Oliver, R., & Mackey, A. (2003). Interactional context and feedback in child ESL classrooms. Modern Language Journal, 87, 519-533.
52. Pica, T. (1984). Methods of morpheme quantification: Their effect on the interpretation of second language data. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6, 69-78.
53. Polio, C. (2001). Research methodology in second language writing research: The case of text-based studies. In T. Silva & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), On second language writing (pp. 91-116). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
54. Polio, C., Fleck, C., & Leder, N. (1998). "If only I had more time": ESL learners changes in linguistic accuracy on essay revisions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 43-68. (Pubitemid 128413697)
55. Reichelt, M. (2001). A critical review of foreign language writing research on pedagogical approaches. Modern Language Journal, 85, 578-598.
56. Robb, T., Ross, S., & Shortreed, I. (1986). Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFLwriting quality. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 83-93.
57. Russell, J., & Spada, N. (2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for second language acquisition: A meta-analysis of the research. In J. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 133-164). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
58. Schmidt, R. (1995). Attention and awareness in foreign language learning. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
59. Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). New York: Cambridge University Press.
60. Schwartz, B. D. (1993). On explicit and negative evidence effecting and affecting competence and "linguistic behavior." Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 147-163.
61. Sheen, Y. (2004). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings. Language Teaching Research, 8, 263-300.
62. Sheen, Y. (2006). Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and learner uptake. Language Teaching Research, 11, 361-392.
63. Sheen, Y. (2007 a). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 255-283.
64. Sheen, Y. (2007 b). The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 301-322). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
65. Sheen, Y. (2008). Recasts, language anxiety, modified output and L2 learning. Language Learning, 58, 835-874.
66. Sheen, Y., Wright, D., & Moldawa, A. (2009). Differential effects of focused and unfocused written correction on the accurate use of grammatical forms by adult ESL learners. System, 37, 556-569.
67. Susser, B. (1993). ESL/EFLprocess writing with computers. CAELL Journal, 4, 16-22.
68. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125-144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
69. Trofimovich, P., Ammar, A., & Gatbonton, E. (2007). How effective are recasts? The role of attention, memory, and analytical ability. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies (pp. 171-195). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
70. Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46, 327-369. (Pubitemid 126118425)
71. Truscott, J. (1999). The case for "the case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes": A response to Ferris. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 111-122.
72. Truscott, J. (2004). Evidence and conjecture on the effects of correction: A response to Chandler. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 337-343. (Pubitemid 40004199)
73. Truscott, J. (2007). The effect of error correction on learners ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 255-272.
74. Zamel, V. (1983). The composing processes of advanced ESL students: Six case studies. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 165-187.
75. Zamel, V. (1987). Recent research on writing pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 697-715.