Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language proficiency1

Advanced Language Learning: The Contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 95-108

  Swain, Merrill ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY; SECOND LANGUAGE;

EID: 85188096300     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (25)

1. Barnes, D. (1992) From Communication to Curriculum (2nd edn). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
2. Becker, A. L. (1991) ‘A short essav on languaging’, in F. Steier (ed.), Reflexivity: Knowing as Systemic Social Construction. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 226-34.
3. Carter, R. and McCarthy, M. (2004) ‘Talking, creating: interactional language, creativity, and context’. Applied Linguistics, 25, 62-88.
4. Chi, M. T. H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M-H. and LaVancher, C. (1994) ‘Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding’. Cognitive Science, 18, 439-77.
5. Cook, G. (2000) Language Play, Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Hall, L. M. (1996) ‘Languaging: The linguistics of psychotherapy. How language works psycho-therapeuticallv: An exploration into the art and science of “Therapeutic languaging” in four psychotherapies using general semantic formulations’. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, The Union Institute. Dissertation Abstracts International A, 57(11), 4717.
7. Lado, R. (1979) ‘Thinking and “languaging”: a psycholinguistic model of performance and learning’. Sophia Linguistica, 12, 3-24.
8. Nerlich, B. and Clarke. D. (2001) ‘Ambiguities we live bv: towards a pragmatics of polysemy’. Journal ofPragmatics. 33. 1-20.
9. O’Connell. D. C. (1988) Critical Essays on Language Use and Psychology. New York: Springer-Verlag.
10. Qi. D. S. and Lapkin, S. (2001) ‘Exploring the role of noticing in a three-stage second language writing task’. Journal of Second Language Writing. 10. 277-303.
11. Reddv, M. (1979) ‘The conduit metaphor’, in A. Ortonv (ed.). Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 164-201
12. Smagorinskv. P. (1998) ‘Thinking and speech and protocol analysis’. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 5. 157-77.
13. Swain, M. (2000) ‘The output hypothesis and bevond: mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue’, in J. Lantolf (ed.), Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford Lʼniversitv Press, pp. 97-114.
14. Swain, M. (2005) ‘The output hypothesis: theorv and research’, in E. Hinkel (ed.), Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 471-84.
15. Swain, M. (2006) ‘Verbal protocols: what does it mean for research to use speaking as a data collection tool?', in M. Chalhoub-Deville, C. Chapelle and P. Duff (eds) Inference and Generalizability in Applied Linguistics: Multiple Research Perspectives. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins pp. 97-113.
16. Swain, M. and Lapkin, S. (1998) ‘Interaction and second language learning: two adolescent French immersion students working together’. Modem Language Journal, 82, 320-37.
17. Swain, M. and Lapkin, S. (2002) ‘Talking it through: two French immersion learners’ response to reformulation’. International Journal of Educational Research (Special issue on the role of interaction in instructed language learning), 37, 285-304.
18. Swain, M. and Lapkin, S. (2006) ' “Oh, I get it now!" From production to comprehension in second language learning’, in D. M. Brinton and O. Kagan (eds), Heritage Language Acquisition: A New Field Emerging. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Tocalli-Beller, A. (2005) ‘Peer-peer Dialogue: Bringing Second Language Learning into Play’. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, OISE, University of Toronto.
20. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard LTniversity Press.
21. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987) The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky. Volume 1. Thinking and Speaking. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
22. Watanabe, Y. (2004) ‘Collaborative Dialogue between ESL Learners of Different Proficiency Levels: Linguistic and Affective Outcomes’. Unpublished M.A. thesis, OISE, University of Toronto.
23. Wells, G. (1999) Dialogic Inquiry: Toward a Sociocultural Practice and Theory of Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Wertsch, J. V. (1998) Mind as Action. New York: Oxford University Press.
25. Wesche, M. and Paribakht, S. (1996) ‘Assessing second language vocabulary knowledge: depth versus breadth’. Canadian Modem Language Review, 53, 13-40.