Brave new digital classroom: Technology and foreign language learning

Brave New Digital Classroom: Technology and Foreign Language Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1-189

  Blake, Robert J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84904526436     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (279)

1. Abrams, Z. I. 2003. The effects of synchronous and asynchronous CMC on oral performance. Modern Language Journal 87(2): 157-67.
2. Abrams, Z. I. 2006. From theory to practice: Intracultural CMC in the L2 classroom. In Calling on CALL: From theory and research to new directions in foreign language teaching, ed. L. Ducate and N. Arnold, 181-209. CALICO Monograph Series, vol. 5. San Marcos, TX: CALICO.
3. ACTFL. 1996. Standards for foreign language learning: Executive Summary. Retrieved August 31, 2007, from www.actfl.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid3324.
4. Adair-Hauck, B., L. Willingham-McLain, and B. Earnest-Youngs. 1999. Evaluating the integration of technology and second language learning. CALICO Journal 17(2): 269-306.
5. Al-Batal, M. 2007. Arabic and national language educational policy. Modern Language Journal 91(2): 268-71.
6. Allen, I. E., and J. Seaman. 2006. Making the grade: Online education in the United States, 2006. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium. Retrieved January 11, 2007, from www.sloan-c.org/publications/survey/index.asp.
7. Allen, I. E., and J. Seaman. 2007. Online nation: Five years of growth in online learning. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium. Retrieved April 2, 2008, from www.sloan-c.org/publications/survey/pdf/online-nation/pdf.
8. Arnold, N., and L. Ducate. 2006. CALL: Where are we and where do we go from here? In Calling on CALL: From theory and research to new directions in foreign language teaching, ed. N. Arnold and L. Ducate, 1-20. CALICO Monograph Series, vol. 5. San Marcos, TX: CALICO.
9. Arocena, F. 2006. Webmaestro. Retrieved March 27, 2006, from www.axis.org/usuarios/farocena/.
10. Arvan, L., and D. Musumeci. 1999. Instructor attitudes within the SCALE efficiency projects. Retrieved July 14, 2006, from www.sloanc.org/conference/ proceedings/1999Summer/papers/99summer- Arvan.pdf.
11. Bañados, E. 2006. A blended-learning pedagogical model for teaching and learning EFL successfully through an online interactive multimedia environment. CALICO Journal 23(3): 533-50.
12. Barson, J. 1991. The virtual classroom is born: What now? In Foreign language acquisition research and the classroom, ed. B. F. Freed, 364-83. Lexington, MA: Heath and Company.
13. Bauer, B., L. de Benedette, G. Furstenberg, S. Levet, and S. Waryn. 2006. The Cultura project. In Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education, ed. J. A. Belz and S. L. Thore, 31-62. Boston: Thomson Heinle.
14. Beatty, K. 2003. Teaching and researching computer- Assisted language learning. London: Longman.
15. Belz, J. A. 2002. Social dimensions of telecollaborative foreign language study. Language Learning & Technology 6(1): 60-81. Retrieved December 10, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol6num1/belz/.
16. Belz, J. A. 2003. Linguistic perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology 7(2): 68-117. Retrieved July 18, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/ vol7num2/belz.
17. Belz, J. A., and S. L. Thorne, eds. 2006. Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education. Boston: Thomson Heinle.
18. Bernstein, J., I. Barbier, E. Rosenfeld, and J. DeJong. 2004. Development and validation of an automatic spoken Spanish test. In InSTIL/ICALL 2004 symposium on computer assisted learning, NLP and speech technologies in advanced language learning systems, Venice, Italy, June 17-19, 2004, ISCA Archive. Retrieved May 2, 2006, from www.isca-speech.org/archive/icall2004.
19. Bertin, J.-C. 2001. CALL material structure and learner competence. In ICT and language learning: A European perspective, ed. A. Chambers and G. Davies, 83-100.
20. Bialystok, E., and K. Hakuta. 1994. In other words. New York: Basic Books.
21. Bickerton, D., T. Stenton, and M. Temmerman. 2001. In ICT and language learning: A European perspective, ed. A. Chambers and G. Davies, 53-66. Lisse: Sets and Zeitlinger.
22. Blake, R. 2000. Computer-mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology 4(1): 120-36.
23. Blake, R. 2005a. Bimodal chatting: The glue of a distance language learning course. CALICO Journal 22(3): 497-511.
24. Blake, R. 2005b. Review of Wimba: Voice management system 4.0. Ed. Jack Burston. Digital Language Lab Solutions. IALLT. 54-66.
25. Blake, R. 2006. Two heads are better than one: C[omputer] M[ediated] C[ommunication] for the L2 Curriculum. In Changing language education through CALL, ed. R. P. Donaldson and M. A. Haggstrom, 229-48. Abingdon: Routledge.
26. Blake, R. 2008. New trends in using technology in the language curriculum. 2007 Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 27 (March): 76-97.
27. Blake, R., J. Blasco, and C. Hernández. 2001. Tesoros CD-ROM: A multi-media-based course. Boecillo, Valladolid: Boecillo Editorial Multimedia (BeM) and New York: McGraw-Hill.
28. Blake, R., and A. Delforge. 2005. Language learning at a distance: Spanish without walls. In Selected papers from the 2004 NFLRC symposium: Distance education, distributed learning and language instruction (NetWork 44) [HTML document], ed. I. Thompson and D. Hiple. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i, National Foreign Language Resource Center. Retrieved June 16, 2006, from http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/NetWorks/NW44.
29. Blake, R., M. V. González Pagani, A. Ramos, and M. Marks. 2003. Al corriente: Curso intermedio de español. New York: McGraw-Hill.
30. Blake, R., and C. Kramsch. 2007. Introduction to perspective volume. Modern Language Journal 91(2): 247-49.
31. Blake, R., and E. Zyzik. 2003. Who's helping whom? Learner/heritage speakers' networked discussions in Spanish. Applied Linguistics 24(4): 519-44.
32. Bley-Vroman, R. 1990. The logical problem of foreign language learning. Linguistic Analysis 20(1-2): 3-49.
33. Blyth, C. S. 1999. Untangling the web: Nonce's guide to language and culture on the Internet. New York: Nounce Publishing Consultants.
34. Brandl, K. 2002. Integrating internet-based reading materials into the foreign language curriculum: From teacher- To student-centered approaches. Language Learning & Technology 6(3): 87-107. Retrieved June 8, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol6num3/brandl/default.html.
35. Brandl, K. 2005. Are you ready to MOODLE? Language Learning and Technology 9(2): 16-23. Retrieved June 12, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/ vol9num2/review1/default.html.
36. Brecht, R., D. Davidson, and R. Ginsberg. 1995. Predictors of foreign language gain during study abroad. In Second language acquisition in a study abroad context, ed. Barbara F. Freed, 37-66. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.
37. Brinton, D., M. A. Snow, and M. Wesche. 1989. Content-based second language instruction. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
38. Brown, H. D. 2001. Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. White Plains, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.
39. Bruner, J. 1996. The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40. Burston, J. 1998. Antidote 98. CALICO Journal 16(2): 197-212.
41. Burston, J. 2003. Software selection: A primer on sources and evaluation. CALICO Journal 21(1): 29-40.
42. Burston, J. 2006. Working towards effective assessment of CALL. In Changing language education through CALL, ed. R. P. Donaldson and M. A. Haggstrom, 249-70. London: Routledge.
43. Byram, M. 1997. Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
44. Byram, M., B. Gribkova, and H. Starkey. 2002. Developing the intercultural dimension in language teaching: A practical introduction for teachers. Strasborg: Council of Europe.
45. Byrnes, H. 2000. Languages across the curriculum-Interdepartmental curriculum construction. In Languages across the curriculum: Interdisciplinary structures and internationalized education, ed. M-R. Kecht and K. von Hammerstein, 151-75. National East Asian Languages Resource Center. Columbus: Ohio State University.
46. Byrnes, H. 2006. Perspectives. Modern Language Journal 90(2): 244-46.
47. Cahill, D., and D. Catanzaro. 1997. Teaching first-year Spanish on-line. CALICO Journal 14(2): 97-114.
48. Carnegie Mellon University. 2000. Elementary French online. Retrieved December 10, 2006, from http://ml.hss.cmu.edu/languageonline/overview/overview. html.
49. Carr, S. 2000. As distance education comes of age, the challenge is keeping up with the students. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A3. Retrieved December 10, 2005, from www.chronicle.com.
50. Chapelle, C. 2001. Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing, and research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51. Chapelle, C. 2005. CALICO at center stage: Our emerging rights and responsibilities. CALICO Journal 23(1): 5-15.
52. Chen, Chin-chi. 2006. How webquests send technology to the background. In Teacher education in CALL, ed. P. Hubbard and M. Levy, 221-34. Language Learning & Language Teaching Series, vol. 14. Philadelphia: John Benjamin.
53. Chenoweth, N. A., C. M. Jones, and G. R. Tucker. 2006. Language online: Principles of design and methods of assessment. In Changing language education through CALL, ed. R. P. Donaldson and M. A. Haggstrom, 146-67. Abingdon: Routledge.
54. Chenoweth, N. A., and K. Murday. 2003. Measuring student learning in an online French course. CALICO Journal 20(2): 284-314.
55. Chomsky, N. 1986. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.
56. Chun, D. 1994. Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. System 22(1): 17-31.
57. Chun, D. 1998. Using computer- Assisted class discussion to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. In. Language learning online: Theory and practice in the ESL and L2 computer classroom, ed. J. Swaffar, S. Romano, P. Markley, and K. Arens, 57-80. Austin, TX: Labyrinth.
58. Chun, D. 2006. CALL technologies for L2 reading. In Calling on CALL: From theory and research to new directions in foreign language teaching, ed. L. Ducate and N. Arnold, 81-98. CALICO Monograph Series, vol. 5. San Marcos, TX: CALICO.
59. Chun, D. M. and J. L. Plass. 1997. Research on text comprehension in multimedia environment. Language Learning & Technology 1(1): 60-81.
60. Clifford, R. 1987. The status of computer- Assisted language learning. CALICO Journal 4(4): 9-16.
61. Cohen, A., and J. Sykes. 2006. Dancing with words: Strategies for learning pragmatics in Spanish. Retrieved May 11, 2006, from www.carla.umn.edu/speechacts/sp-pragmatics/home.html.
62. Colpaert, J. 2006. Pedagogy-driven design for online language teaching and learning. CALICO Journal 23(3): 477-97.
63. Cook, V. J. 2001. Using the first language in the classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review 57(3): 402-23.
64. Crandall, J., and G. R. Tucker. 1990. Content-based instruction in second and foreign languages. In Foreign language education: Issues and strategies, ed. A. Padilla, H., Fairchild, and C. Valadez, 187-200. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
65. Crump, B., and A. McIlroy. 2003. The digital divide: Why the don't-want- Tos won't compute: Lessons from a New Zealand ICT project. First Monday 8(12). Retrieved June 27, 2006, from http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue8-12/crump/ index.html.
66. Crystal, D. 2001. Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
67. Cummins, J. 1998. E-Lective language learning: Design of a computer- Assisted text based ESL/EFL learning system. TESOL Journal 7(3): 18-21.
68. Cummins, J., and D. Sayers. 1995. Brave new schools: Challenging cultural literacy through global learning networks. New York: St. Martin's Press.
69. Cziko, G. A., and S. Park. 2003. Internet audio communications for second language learning: A comparative view of six programs. Language Learning and Technology 7(1): 15-27. Retrieved June 1, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/ vol7num1/review1/default.html.
70. Davidson, D. 2004. Capabilities and outputs of the U.S. education system: Proficiency outputs. The National Language Conference. Retrieved July 17, 2006, from www.nlconference.org/docs/NLC-Commentary-Davidson.doc.
71. Davidson, D. 2007. Study abroad and outcomes measurements: The case of Russian. Modern Language Journal 91(2): 276-80.
72. Davies, G., ed. 2006. Information and communications technology for language teachers (ICT4LT). Slough, Thames Valley University. Retrieved August 31, 2006, from www.ict4lt.org.
73. Debski, R. 1997. Support of creativity and collaboration in the language classroom: A new role for technology. In Language learning through social computing: ALAA's occasional papers, ed. R. Debski, J. Gassin, and M. Smith, 16, 39-65. Melbourne: Applied Linguistics Association of Australia.
74. De Keyser, R. M. 2000. The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22(4): 499-533.
75. Delcloque, P. 2001. DISSEMINATE or not? Should we pursue a new direction: Looking for the third way in CALL development? In ICT and language learning: A European perspective, ed. A. Chambers and G. Davies, 67-82. Lisse: Sets and Zeitlinger.
76. Dodge, B. 2002. Webquest taskonomy: A taxonomy of tasks. Retrieved June 10, 2006, from http://webquest.sdsu.edu/taskonomy.html.
77. Donaldson, R. P., and M. A. Haggstrom. 2006. Changing language education through CALL. Abington: Routledge.
78. Doughty, C. 1998. Acquiring competence in a second language: Form and function. In Learning foreign and second languages, ed. Heidi Byrnes, 128-56. New York: Modern Language Association.
79. Doughty, C. J., and M. H. Long, eds. 2003a. The handbook of second language acquisition. London: Blackwell.
80. Doughty, C. J., and M. H. Long. 2003b. Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Language Learning and Technology 7(3): 50-80. Retrieved March 4, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/ vol7num3/doughty.
81. Dubreil, S. 2006. Getting perspective on culture through CALL. In Calling on CALL: From theory and research to new directions in foreign language teaching, ed. L. Ducate and N. Arnold, 237-68. CALICO Monograph Series, vol. 5. San Marcos, TX: CALICO.
82. Ducate, L., and L. Lomicka. 2005. Exploring the blogosphere: Use of web logs in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals 38(3): 408-19.
83. Echávez-Solano, N. 2003. A comparison of student outcomes and attitudes in technology-enhanced vs. traditional second-semester Spanish language courses. Unpublished PhD diss., University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
84. Egbert, J. 2005. CALL essentials: Principles and practice in CALL classrooms. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
85. Egbert, J., T. Paulus, and Y. Nakamichi. 2002. The impact of CALL instruction on classroom computer use: A foundation for rethinking technology in teacher education. Language Learning and Technology 6(3): 106-26. Retrieved June 25, 2007, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol6num3/egbert/default.html.
86. Ehsani, F., and E. Knodt. 1998. Speech technology in computer- Aided language learning: Strengths and limitations of a new CALL paradigm. Language Learning and Technology 2(1): 54-73. Retrieved January 1, 2007, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol2num1/article3/.
87. Ellis, N. C. 2002. Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24(2): 143-88.
88. Ellis, R. 1994. A study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
89. Ellis, R. 1997. Second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
90. Ellis, R. 2003. Task-based language teaching and learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
91. Epps, M. 2004. CALL: How does it make you feel? Unpublished master's thesis, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
92. Eskenazi, M. 1999. Using automatic speech processing for foreign language pronunciation tutoring: Some issues and a prototype. Language Learning and Technology 2(2): 62-76. Retrieved January 2, 2007, from http://llt.msu.edu/ vol2num2/article3/.
93. Eskenazi, M., and J. Brown. 2006. Teaching the creation of software that uses speech recognition. In Teacher education in CALL, ed. P. Hubbard and M. Levy, 135-51. Language Learning & Language Teaching Series, vol. 14. Philadelphia: John Benjamin.
94. Federal Language Training Laboratory. 1990. Éxito: High Technology Teaching Basic Spanish. Washington, DC.
95. Felix, U. 2003. Teaching language online: Deconstructing the myths. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 19(1): 118-38.
96. Fidelman, C. 1995-96. A language professional's guide to the world wide web. CALICO Journal 13(2-3): 113-40.
97. Fleming, S., D. Hiple, and Y. Du. 2002. Foreign language distance education: The University of Hawai'i experience. In New technologies and language learning: Cases in the less commonly taught languages, ed. C. A. Spreen, 13-54. Technical Report no. 25. Honolulu, HI: Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.
98. Fogg, B. J. 2003. Persuasive technology: Using computers to change what we think and do. Amsterdam: Morgan Kaufmann.
99. Freinet, C. 1994. Les oeuvres pédagogiques. Paris: Edition Seuil.
100. Fryer, L., and R. Carpenter. 2006. Emerging technologies: Bots as language learning tools. Language Learning & Technology 10(3): 8-14.
101. Fukkink, R. G., J. Hulstijn, and A. Simis. 2005. Does training of second-language word recognition skills affect reading comprehension? An experimental study. Modern Language Journal 89(1): 54-75.
102. Furstenberg, G., S. Levet, K. English, and K. Maillet. 2001. Giving a virtual voice to the silent language of culture: The Cultura project. Language Learning and Technology 5(1): 55-102. Retrieved July 13, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol5num1/furstenberg/default.html.
103. Gale, L. E. 1989. Macario, Montevidisco, and Interactive Dígame: Developing interactive video for language instruction. In Modern technology in foreign language education: Applications and projects, ed. W. F. Smith, 235-48. Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook.
104. Garrett, N., and P. Liddell. 2004. The new language centers: New mandates, new horizons. In New perspectives on CALL for second language classrooms, ed. S. Fotos and C. Browne, 27-40. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
105. Garrett, Nina. 1986. The problem with grammar: What kind can the language learner use? Modern Language Journal 70(2): 133-48.
106. Garrett, Nina. 1988. Computers in foreign language education: Teaching, learning, and language- Acquisition research. ADFL Bulletin 19(3): 6-12. Retrieved June 27, 2006, from http://www.mla.org/adfl/bulletin/V19N3/193006.htm.
107. Garrett, Nina. 1991. Technology in the service of language learning: Trends and issues. Modern Language Journal 75(1): 74-101.
108. Gass, S., and L. Selinker. 2001. Second language acquisition: An introductory course, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
109. Gass, S. M. 1997. Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
110. Gass, S. M., A. Mackey, and T. Pica. 1998. The role of input and interaction in second language acquisition: Introduction to the special issue. Modern Language Journal 82(3): 299-307.
111. Gass, S. M., and E. Varonis. 1994. Input, interaction and second language production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16(3): 283-302.
112. Genesee, F. 1994. Integrating language and content: Lessons from immersion. Educational Practice Report 11. National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning. Retrieved June 9, 2006, from www.ncbe.gwu.edu/miscpubs/ncrcdsll/epr11.htm.
113. Global Reach. 2004. Retrieved June 7, 2006, from http://global-reach.biz/ globstats/index.php3.
114. Godwin-Jones, B. 1998. Dynamic web page creation. Language Learning and Technology, 1(2): 9-15. Retrieved June 7, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/ vol1num2/emerging/default.html.
115. Godwin-Jones, B. 2002. Multilingual computing. Language Learning and Technology 6(2): 6-11. Retrieved July 7, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol6num2/ emerging/default.html.
116. Godwin-Jones, B. 2003a. Emerging technologies: Blogs and wikis: environments for on-line collaboration. Language Learning and Technology 7(2): 12-16. Retrieved April 2, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/emerging/.
117. Godwin-Jones, B. 2003b. Emerging technologies: Tools for distance education: Toward convergence and integration. Language Learning and Technology 7(3): 18-22. Retrieved September 1, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num3/ emerging/.
118. Godwin-Jones, B. 2004. Language in action: From webquests to virtual realities. Language Learning and Technology 8(3): 9-14. Retrieved June 17, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol8num3/emerging/default.html.
119. Goertler, S., and P. Winke, eds. 2008. Opening doors through distance language education: Principles, perspectives, and practices. San Marcos, TX: CALICO.
120. Gonglewski, M. 1999. Linking the Internet to the National Standards for Foreign Language Learning. Foreign Language Annals 32(3): 348-62.
121. Goodfellow, R., I. Jeffreys, T. Miles, and T. Shirra. 1996. Face- To-face learning at a distance? A study of a videoconferencing try-out. ReCALL 8(2): 5-16.
122. Grabe, W. 2004. Research on teaching reading. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 24 (March): 44-69.
123. Green, A., and B. Earnest-Youngs. 2001. Using the web in elementary French and German courses: Quantitative and qualitative study results. CALICO Journal 19(1): 89-123.
124. Grefenstette, J. N. 2000. Estimation of English and non-English language use on the WWW. Proceedings of RIAO<#213>2000: Content-based multimedia information access. Paris, April 12-14. 237-46.
125. Gregg, K. 1984. Krashen's monitor and Occam's razor. Applied Linguistics 5(2): 79-100.
126. Hanson-Smith, E. 2006. Communities of practice for pre- And in-service teacher education. In Teacher education in CALL, ed. P. Hubbard and M. Levy, 305-15. Language Learning & Language Teaching Series, vol. 14. Philadelphia: John Benjamin.
127. Hatch, E. 1978. Acquisition of syntax in a second language. In Understanding second and foreign language learning: Issues and approaches, ed. J. Richards, 34-70. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
128. Hauck, M., and U. Stickler. 2006. What does it take to teach online? CALICO Journal 23(3): 463-75.
129. Heift, T. 2001. Intelligent language tutoring systems for grammar practice. Zeitschrift für Interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht [online], 6(2): 15. Retrieved December 28, 2006, from www.spz.tu-darmstadt.de/ projekt-ejournal/jg-06-2/beitrag/heift2.htm.
130. Heift, T 2002. Learner control and error correction in ICALL: Browsers, peekers and adamants. CALICO Journal 19(3): 295-313.
131. Heift, T. 2004. Corrective feedback and learner uptake in CALL. ReCALL 16(2): 416-31.
132. Heift, T., and M. Schulze. 2007. Parsers and pedagogues: Errors and intelligence in computer assisted language learning. London: Routledge.
133. Holliday, L. 1995. NS syntactic modifications in NS-NSS negotiation as input data for second language acquisition of syntax. Unpublished PhD diss., University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
134. Holmberg, B., M. Shelley, and C. White. 2005. Distance education and languages: Evolution and change. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
135. Horn, R. 1992. How to get little or no effect and make no significant difference. Performance and instruction, 31 (January): 29-32. Retrieved July 10, 2006, from http://66.249.93.104/search?qcache:dpTmrkyUrogJ:www.stanford.edu/ rhorn/a/topic/edu/artclHowtoGetLttleorNoEffct.pdf?no?significant? differences&hlen&gles&ctclnk&cd6&clientfirefox- A.
136. Hubbard, P. 1996. Elements of CALL methodology: Development, evaluation, and implementation. In The power of CALL, ed. M. Pennington, 15-33. Bolsover, TX: Athelstan.
137. Hubbard, P. 2004. Learner training for effective use of CALL. In New perspectives on CALL for the second language classroom, ed. S. Fotos and C. Browne, 45-67. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
138. Hubbard, P. 2006. Evaluating CALL software. In Calling on CALL: From theory and research to new directions in foreign language teaching, ed. L. Ducate and N. Arnold, 313-38. San Marcos, TX: CALICO.
139. Hubbard, P., and C. Bradin Siskin. 2004. Another look at tutorial CALL. ReCALL 16(2): 448-61.
140. Hubbard, P., and M. Levy. 2006a. The scope of CALL education. In Teacher education in CALL, ed. P. Hubbard and M. Levy, 3-20. Philadelphia: John Benjamin.
141. Hubbard, P., and M. Levy eds. 2006b. Teacher education in CALL. Language Learning & Language Teaching, vol. 14. Philadelphia: John Benjamin.
142. Hymes, D. 1974. Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
143. Internet World Stats. 2006. Retrieved June 3, 2006, from http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats7.htm.
144. Jeon-Ellis, G., R. Debski, and J. Wigglesworth. 2005. Oral interaction around computers in the project-oriented CALL classroom. Language Learning and Technology 9(3): 121-45. Retrieved June 7, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/ vol9num3/jeon/default.html.
145. Jones, C. M. 1999. Introduction to special issue on language courseware design. CALICO Journal 17(1): 5-7.
146. Juozulynas, V. 1994. Errors in the compositions of second-year German students: An empirical study for parser-based iCALL. CALICO Journal 12(1): 5-17.
147. Karp, A. 2002. Modification of glosses and its effect on incidental L2 vocabulary learning in Spanish. Unpublished PhD diss., University of California, Davis.
148. Kassen, M. A., R. Z. Lavine, K. Murphy-Judy, and M. Peters. 2007. Preparing and developing technology-proficient L2 teachers. CALICO Monograph Series, vol. 6. San Marcos, TX: CALICO.
149. Keeton, M. T. 2004. Best online instructional practices: Report of phase I of an ongoing study. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 8(2): 75-100.
150. Kern, R. 1995. Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and quality of language production. Modern Language Journal 79(4): 457-76.
151. Kern, R., P. Ware, and M. Warschauer. 2004. Crossing frontiers: New directions in online pedagogy and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 24 (March): 243-60.
152. Kern, R. G., and M. Warschauer. 2000. Theory and practice of network-based language teaching. In Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice, ed. M. Warschauer and R. Kern, 1-19. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
153. Knight, S. 1994. Dictionary use while reading: The effects on comprehension and vocabulary acquisition for students of different verbal abilities. Modern Language Journal 78(3): 285-99.
154. Kramsch, C. 1986. Proficiency versus achievement: Reflections on the proficiency movement. ADFL Bulletin, 18, 22-24. Retrieved July 10, 2006, from http://web2.adfl.org/adfl/bulletin/v18n1/181022.htm.
155. Kramsch, C. 1993. Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
156. Kramsch, C. 2000. Social discursive construction of self in L2 learning. In Sociocultural theory and second language learning, ed. J. Lantolf, 133-54. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
157. Kramsch, C. 2002. In search of the intercultural. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6(2): 275-85.
158. Kramsch, C. 2005. Post 9/11: Foreign languages between knowledge and power. Applied Linguistics 26(4): 545-67.
159. Kramsch, C., and R. Anderson. 1999. Teaching text and context through multimedia. Language Learning and Technology 2(2): 31-42. Retrieved June 11, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol2num2/article1/index.html.
160. Kramsch, C., F. A'Ness, and W. S. E. Lam. 2000. Authenticity and authorship in the computer-mediated acquisition of L2 literacy. Language Learning and Technology 4(2): 78-104. Retrieved June 7, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num2/kramsch/default.html.
161. Krashen, S. 1982. Principles and practice in second language acquisition. London: Pergamon.
162. Krashen, S. 1985. The input hypothesis: issues and implications, London: Longman.
163. Krashen, S. 2004. The power of reading. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
164. Krashen, S., and T. Terrell. 1983. The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
165. Lafford, B. 2004. Review of Tell me more. Language learning and technology 8(3): 21-34. Retrieved January 1, 2007, from http://llt.msu.edu/ vol8num3/review1.
166. Lafford, P., and B. Lafford. 2005. CMC technologies for teaching foreign languages: What's on the horizon? CALICO Journal 22(3): 679-710.
167. Lafford, B., P. Lafford, and J. Sykes. 2007. Entre dicho y hecho: An assessment of the application of research from second language acquisition and related fields to the creation of Spanish CALL materials for lexical acquisition. CALICO Journal 24(3): 497-529.
168. Lai, C., and Y. Zhao. 2005. Introduction: The essence of second language education and technology integration. In Research in technology and second language learning: Developments and Directions, ed. Y. Zhao, 401-9. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
169. Lai, P., and J. Biggs. 1994. Who benefits from mastery learning? Contemporary Educational Psychology 19(1): 13-23.
170. Lam, Y. 2000. Technophilia v. technophobia: A preliminary look at why second language teachers do or do not use technology in their classrooms. Canadian Modern Language Review 56(3): 389-420.
171. Lange, D. L., C. A. Klee, R. M. Paige, and Y. A. Yershova, eds. 2000. Culture as the core: Interdisciplinary perspectives on culture learning in the language curriculum. Minneapolis, MN: Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition.
172. Lantolf, J., ed. 2000. Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
173. Lantolf, J., and W. Frawley. 1988. Proficiency: Understanding the construct. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 10(2): 181-95.
174. Larsen-Freeman, D., and M. Long. 1991. An introduction to second language acquisition research. New York: Longman.
175. Laurillard, D. 2002. Rethinking university teaching (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
176. Leaver, B. L., and J. R. Willis. 2004. Task-based instruction in foreign language education: Practices and program. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
177. Lee, L. 2004. Learners' perspectives on networked collaborative interaction with native speakers of Spanish in the U.S. Language, Learning and Technology 8(1): 83-100. Retrieved July 20, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/ vol8num1/lee.
178. LeLoup, J. W., and R. Ponterio. 2003. Interactive and multimedia techniques in online language lessons: A sampler. Language Learning & Technology 7(3): 4-17.
179. LeLoup, J. W., and R. Ponterio. 2004. FLTEACH: On-line professional development preservice and inservice foreign language teachers. In The Heinle professional series in language instruction. Vol. 1, Teaching with technology, ed. L. Lomicka and J. Cooke-Plagwitz, 26-44. Boston: Heinle.
180. LeLoup, J. W., and R. Ponterio. 2005. On the net: Vocabulary support for Independent online reading. Language Learning and Technology 9(2): 3-7. Retrieved August 30, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol9num2/net/default.html.
181. Lenhart, A., M. Madden, and P. Hitlin. 2005, July 27. Teens and technology: Youth are leading the transition to a fully wired and mobile nation. Pew International & American Life Project. Retrieved July 3, 2006, from www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/162/report-display.asp.
182. Levelt, W. 1989. Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
183. Levet, S., and S. Waryn, 2006. Using the web to develop students' in-depth understanding of foreign cultural attitudes and values. In Changing language education through CAL, ed. R. P. Donaldson and M. A. Haggstrom, 95-118. Abingdon: Routledge.
184. Levine, G., and S. Morse. 2004. Integrating diverse digital media in a global simulation German course. In The Heinle professional series in language instruction. Vol. 1, Teaching with technology, ed. L. Lomicka and J. Cooke-Plagwitz, 138-45. Boston: Heinle.
185. Levy, M. 1997. Computer- Assisted language learning: Context and conceptualisation. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
186. Levy, M. 2006. Effective use of CALL technologies: Finding the right balance. In Changing language education through CALL, ed. R. P. Donaldson and M. A. Haggstrom, 1-18. Abingdon: Routledge.
187. Levy, M., and G. Stockwell. 2006. CALL dimensions: Options and issues in computer assisted language learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
188. Lightbrown, P. M., and N. Spada. 1993. How languages are learned. New York: Oxford University Press.
189. Lomicka, L. 2006. Understanding the other: Intercultural exchange and CMC. In Calling on CALL: From theory and research to new directions in foreign language teaching, ed. L. Ducate and N. Arnold, 211-36. CALICO Monograph Series, vol. 5. San Marcos, TX: CALICO.
190. Lomicka, L., and J. Cooke-Plagwitz, eds. 2004. The Heinle professional series in language instruction: Vol. 1, Teaching with technology. Boston, MA: Heinle.
191. Long, M., and P. Robinson. 1998. Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition, ed. C. Doughty and J. Williams, 15-41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
192. Long, M. H. 1981. Input, interaction and second language acquisition. In Native language and foreign language acquisition, ed. H. Winitz, 259-78. New York: Annals of the New York Academy of Science.
193. Long, M. H 1991. Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective, ed. Claire Kramsch and Ralph Ginsberg, 39-52. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
194. MacWhinney, B. 1997. Implicit or explicit processes. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19, 277-81.
195. Magnan, S. 2007. Reconsidering communicative language teaching for national goals. Modern Language Journal 91(2): 249-52.
196. Marton, F., and S. Booth, 1997. Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
197. McGinnis, S. 1994. The less common alternative: A report from the Task Force for Teacher Training in the Less Commonly Taught Languages. ADFL Bulletin 25(2): 17-22.
198. McLaughlin, B. 1987. Theories of second language learning. London: Edward Arnold.
199. McLuhan, M. 1964. Understanding media: The extension of man. New York: Signet.
200. Meskill, C. 2005. Triadic scaffolds: Tools for teaching English language learners with computers. Language Learning and Technology 9(1): 46-59. Retrieved June 12, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol9num1/meskill/default.html.
201. Montrul, S. 2004. Subject and object expression in Spanish heritage speakers: A case of morpho-syntactic convergence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7(2): 125-42.
202. Moore, J. 2004. A synthesis of Sloan-C effective practices. Retrieved May 15, 2007, from http://www.sloan-c.org/effective/.
203. Murray, G. L. 1999. Autonomy and language learning in a simulated environment. System 27, 295-308.
204. Murray, J., D. Morgenstern, and G. Furstenberg. 1989. The Athena Language Learning project: Design issues for the next generation of computer based languagelearning tools. In Modern technology in foreign language education: Applications and projects, ed. W. F. Smith, 97-118. Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook.
205. Nagata, N. 1993. Intelligent computer feedback for second language instruction. Modern Language Journal 77: 330-38.
206. Nagata, N. 1995. An effective application of natural language processing in second language instruction. CALICO Journal 13(1): 47-67.
207. Nagata, N. 1996. Computer vs. workbook instruction in second language acquisition. CALICO Journal 14(1): 53-75.
208. Nagata, N. 2002. An application of natural language processing to web-based language learning. CALICO Journal 19(3): 583-99.
209. National Center for Educational Statistics. 2006. Enrollment in degree-granting institutions: Total enrollment. Retrieved August 31, 2007, from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/projections/sec2b.asp.
210. Nieves, K. A. 1996. The development of a technology-based class in beginning Spanish: Experiences with using EXITO. Unpublished PhD diss., George Mason University.
211. O'Dowd, R. 2003. Understanding the other side: Intercultural learning in a Spanish-English e-mail exchange. Language Learning and Technology 7(2): 118-44.
212. O'Dowd, R. 2005. Negotiating sociocultural and institutional contexts: The case of Spanish- American Telecollaboration. Language and Intercultural Communication 5(1): 40-56.
213. O'Dowd, R 2006. Telecollaboration and the development of intercultural communicative competence. Munich: Langenscheidt ELT GmbH.
214. O'Dowd, R., and M. Ritter. 2006. Understanding and working with failed communication in tele collaborative exchanges. CALICO Journal 23(3): 623-42.
215. O'Rourke, B. 2005. Form-focused interaction in online tandem learning. CALICO Journal 22(3): 433-66.
216. O'Rourke, B., and K. Schwienhorst. 2003. Talking text: Reflections on reflection in computer-mediated communication. In Learner autonomy in foreign language teaching: Teacher, learner, curriculum, assessment, ed. D. Little, J. Ridley, and E. Ushioda, 47-60. Dublin: Authentik.
217. Osuna, M. M., and C. Meskill, 1998. Using the world wide web to integrate Spanish language and culture: A pilot study. Language Learning and Technology, 1(2): 71-92. Retrieved June 12, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol1num2/article4/ default.html.
218. Payne, S. 2004. Making the most of synchronous and asynchronous discussion in foreign language instruction. In The Heinle professional series in language instruction. Vol. 1, Teaching with technology, ed. L. Lomicka and J. Cooke-Plagwitz, 79-93. Boston: Heinle.
219. Payne, S., and P. J. Whitney. 2002. Developing L2 oral proficiency through synchronous CMC: Output, working memory and interlanguage development. CALICO Journal 20(1): 7-32.
220. Pedersen, K. M. 1987. Research on CALL. In Modern media in foreign language education: Theory and implementation, ed. W. Smith, 99-132. Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook.
221. Pellettieri, J. 2000. Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence. In Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice, ed. M. Warschauer and R. Kern, 59-86. New York: Cambridge University Press.
222. Phillips, J. 1984. Practical implications of recent research in reading. Foreign Language Annals 17(4): 285-96.
223. Pica, T. 1994. Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning 44: 493-527.
224. Pica, T., R. Kanagy, and J. Falodun. 1993. Choosing and using communication tasks for second language instruction. In Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice, ed. G. Crookes and S. M. Gass, 9-34. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
225. Pinker, S. 1994[1995]. The language instinct. New York: W. Morrow and Co. and Harper Perennial.
226. Quinn, R. 1990. Our progress in integrating modern methods and computercontrolled learning for successful language study. Hispania 73(1): 297-311.
227. Reeves, B., and C. Nass. 1996. The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications and Cambridge University Press.
228. Reynard, R. 2007, May 9. Instructional strategies for blogging. Campus Technology. Retrieved May 14, 2007, from www.campustechnology/article.aspx?aid? 47775.
229. Rheingold, H. 2000. The virtual community. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Retrieved May 24, 2006, from www.rheingold.com/vc/book/3.html.
230. Roblyer, M. D. 1988. The effectiveness of microcomputers in education: A review of research from 1980-87. T.H.E. Journal 16(2): 85-89.
231. Robb, T. N. 2006. Helping teachers to help themselves. In Teacher education in CALL, ed. P. Hubbard and M. Levy, 335-47. Language Learning & Language Teaching Series, vol. 14. Philadelphia: John Benjamin.
232. Russell, T. L. 2001. The no significant difference phenomenon, 5th ed. The International Distance Education Certification Center.
233. Salaberry, R. 1996. A theoretical foundation for the development of pedagogical tasks in computer mediated communication. CALICO Journal 14(1): 5-34.
234. Salaberry, R. 1997. "The role of input and output practice in second language acquisition." The Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue canadiene des langues vivantes, 53(2): 422-51.
235. Salaberry, R. 2001. The use of technology for second language learning and teaching: A retrospective. Modern Language Journal 85(1): 39-56.
236. Schaumann, C., and A. Green. 2004. Enhancing the study of literature with the web. In The Heinle professional series in language instruction. Vol. 1, Teaching with technology, ed. L. Lomicka and J. Cooke-Plagwitz, 79-93. Boston: Heinle.
237. Schmidt, R. W. 1990. The role of consciousness in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics 11(2): 219-58.
238. Schmidt, R. W., and S. N. Frota. 1986. Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition, ed. R. R. Day, 237-326. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
239. Schulze, M. 2001. Human language technologies in computer- Assisted language learning. In ICT and language learning: A European perspective, ed. A. Chambers and G. Davies, 111-32. Lisse: Sets and Zeitlinger.
240. Scida, E., and R. E. Saury. 2006. Hybrid courses and their impact on student and classroom performance: A case study at the University of Virginia. CALICO Journal 23(3): 517-31.
241. Selber, S. A. 2004. Multiliteracies for a digital age. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
242. Skehan, P. 1989. Individual differences in second-language learning. London: Arnold.
243. Smith, Bryan. 2003. Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. Modern Language Journal 87(1): 38-54.
244. Soo, K., and Y. Ngeow. 1998. Effective English as a second language (ESL) instruction with interactive multimedia: The MCALL project. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 7(1): 71-89.
245. Sotillo, S. M. 2000. Discourse functions and syntactic complexity in synchronous and asynchronous communication. Language Learning and Technology 4(1): 82-119. Retrieved December 10, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num1/ sotillo/default.html.
246. Stryker, S. B., and B. L. Leaver, eds. 1997. Content-based instruction in foreign language education: Models and methods. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
247. Swaffar, J. 1998. Networking language learning: introduction. In Language learning online: Theory and practice in the ESL and L2 computer classroom, ed. J. Swaffar, S. Romano, P. Markley, and K. Arens, 1-15. Austin, TX: Labyrinth Publications.
248. Swain, M. 1985. Communicative competence: some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In Input in second language acquisition, ed. C. Madden and S. M. Gass, 235-53. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
249. Swain, M 2000. The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In Sociocultural theory and second language learning, ed. J. P. Lantolf, 97-114. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
250. Terrell, T. D., M. Andrade, J. Egasse, and M. Muñoz. 2002. Dos mundos. New York: McGraw-Hill.
251. Thompson, I., and D. Hiple. 2005. Preface. In Selected papers from the 2004 NFLRC symposium: Distance education, distributed learning and language instruction (NetWork 44), ed. I. Thompson and D. Hiple. [HTML document]. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i, National Foreign Language Resource Center. Retrieved March 6, 2006, from http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/NetWorks/NW44.
252. Thorne, S. L. 2003. Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language Learning and Technology 7(2): 38-67. Retrieved July 18, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/thorne/.
253. Thorne, S. L., and J. S. Payne. 2005. Evolutionary trajectories, Internet-mediated expression, and language education. CALICO Journal 22(3): 371-97.
254. Turing, A. 1950. Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59(236): 433-60. Retrieved August 30, 2006, from http://cogprints.org/499/00/turing.html.
255. Underwood, J. 1984. Linguistics, computers, and the language teacher. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
256. Underwood, J. 1989. On the edge: Intelligent CALL in the 1990s. Computers and the Humanities 23(1): 71-84.
257. Ushida, E. 2007. Robo-Sensei Personal Japanese Tutor, version 1.0. CALICO Journal, 24(2): 408-20.
258. Van de Pol, J. 2001. Spanish without walls: Using technology to teach language anywhere. Retrieved April 16, 2008, from http://ittimes.ucdavis.edu/ mar2001/blake.html.
259. van Dijk, J. A. G. M. 2005. The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. London: Sage.
260. Van Patten, B. 1996. Input processing and grammar instruction: Theory and research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
261. Varonis, E. M., and S. M. Gass. 1985. Non-native/non-native conversations: A model for negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics 6(1): 71-90.
262. Vogel, T. 2001. Learning out of control: Some thoughts on the world wide web in learning and teaching foreign languages. In ICT and language learning: A European perspective, ed. A. Chambers and G. Davies, 135-45. Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.
263. Vygotsky, L. 1962. Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
264. Walczynski, S. 2002. Applying the job characteristics model to Mallard web-based classes. Unpublished PhD diss., Illinois State University.
265. Ware, P. D., and C. Kramsch, 2005. Toward an intercultural stance: Teaching German and English through tele collaboration. Modern Language Journal 89(2): 190-205.
266. Warschauer, M. 1995. Virtual connections. Honolulu, HI: Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center, University of Hawai'i at M&amacr$ noa.
267. Warschauer, M. 1997a. Computer-mediated collaborative learning. Modern Language Journal 81(4): 470-81.
268. Warschauer, M. 1997b. Comparing face- To-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal 13(2-3): 7-26.
269. Warschauer, M. 2002. Reconceptualizing the digital divide. First Monday 7(7). Retrieved June 30, 2006, from http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue7-7/ warschauer/index.html.
270. Warschauer, M. 2004. Technological change and the future of CALL. In New perspectives on CALL for second and foreign language classrooms, ed. S. Fotos and C. Brown, 15-25). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
271. Warschauer, M., and I. De Florio-Hansen. 2003. Multilingualism, identity, and the Internet. In Multiple identity and multilingualism, ed. A. Hu and I. De Florio- Hansen, 155-79. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
272. Warschauer, M., M. Knobel, and L. Stone. 2004. Technology and equity in schooling: Deconstructing the digital divide. Educational Policy 18(4): 562-88.
273. Warschauer, M., L. Turbee, and B. Roberts. 1996. Computer learning networks and student empowerment. System 24: 1-14.
274. Weizenbaum, J. 1966. ELIZA- A computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine [electronic version]. Communications of the ACM 9(1): 35-36. Retrieved January 11, 2007, from http://i5.nyu.edu/mm64/x52.9265/january1966.html.
275. Wildner-Bassett, M. E. 2005. CMC as written conversation: A critical socialconstructivist view of multiple identities and cultural positioning in the L2/C2 classroom. CALICO Journal 22(3): 635-56.
276. Wiley, T. 2007. Heritage and community languages in the national language debate: Beyond xenophobia and national security as bases for U.S. policy. Modern Language Journal 91(2): 252-55.
277. Winke, P., and D. MacGregor. 2001. Review of Hot Potatoes. Language Learning and Technology 5(2): 28-33. Retrieved September 1, 2006, at http://llt.msu.edu/vol5num2/review3/default.htm.
278. Young, J. 2002. Hybrid teaching seeks to end the divide between traditional and online instruction. Chronicle of Higher Education 48(28): A33.
279. Zhao, Y., M. J. Alvarez- Torres, B. Smith, and H. S. Tan. 2005. The non-neutrality of technology: A theoretical analysis and empirical study of computer mediated communication technologies. In Research in technology and second language learning: Developments and directions, ed. Y. Zhao, 281-316. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.