Heritage and community languages in the national language debate

Modern Language Journal

Volumn 91, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 252-255

  Wiley, Terrence G ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250666659     PISSN: 00267902     EISSN: 15404781     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00543_4.x     Document Type: Note

References (23)

1. Ammon, U. (2003). The international standing of the German language. In J. Maurais & M. A. Morris (Eds.), Languages in a globalizing world (pp. 231-249). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Baron, D. (1990). The English-only question: An official language for Americans ?New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
3. Brecht, R. D., & Rivers, W. P. (2000). Language and national security in the 21st century: The role of Title VI/Fulbright-Hays in supporting national language capacity. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
4. Crawford, J. (2002). Obituary: The Bilingual Education Act, 1968-2002. Policy Brief. Tempe: Language Policy Research Unit, Educational Policy Studies Laboratory, Arizona State University. Retrieved May 11, 2005, from http://www.asu.edu/educ/epsl/LPRU/features/article2.htm
5. Donahue, T. S. (1995). American language policy and compensatory opinion. In J. Tollefson (Ed.), Power and inequality in language education (pp. 112-141). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Draper, J. B., & Hicks, J. H. (2002). Foreign language enrollments in public secondary schools. Alexandria, VA: ACTFL.
7. Epstein, N. (1977). Language, ethnicity, and the schools: Policy alternatives for bilingual education. Washington, DC: Institute for Educational Leadership.
8. García, O. (2005). Positioning heritage languages in the United States. Modern Language Journal, 89, 601-605.
9. Graddol, D. (1997). The future of English?London: The British Council.
10. Grimes, B. F. (1996). Ethnologue: Languages of the world (13th ed.). Dallas, TX: SIL International.
11. Hayworth, J. D., & Eule, J. J. (2006). Whatever it takes: Illegal immigration, border security, and the war on terror. Washington, DC: Regnery.
12. Kloss, H. (1971). Language rights of immigrant groups. International Migration Review, 5, 250-268.
13. McClymer, J. F. (1982). The Americanization movement and the education of the foreign-born adult, 1914-1925. In B. J. Weiss (Ed.), Education and the European immigrant: 1840-1940 (pp. 96-116). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
14. National Intelligence Council. (2004, December). Mapping the global future. Report of the National Intelligence Council's 2020 Project, NIC. NCI 2004-13. Pittsburgh, PA: Government Accounting Printing Office.
15. Rhodes, N. C., & Branaman, L. E. (1999). Foreign language instruction in the United States: A national survey of elementary and secondary schools. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
16. Ricento, T. (2005). Problems with the "language-as-resource" discourse in the promotion of heritage languages in the U.S.A. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 9, 348-368.
17. Ruíz, R. (1984). Orientations in language planning. NABE Journal, 8, 15-34.
18. Simon, P. (1988). The tongue-tied American: Confronting the foreign language crisis. New York: Continuum.
19. Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (2002). Marvelous human rights rhetoric and grim realities: Language rights in education. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 1, 179-205.
20. Spolsky, B. (2004). Language policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Wiley, T. G. (1998). The imposition of World War I era English-only policies and the fate of German in North America. In T. Ricento & B. Burnaby (Eds.), Language and politics in the United States and Canada (pp. 211-241). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Wiley, T. G. (2004). Language policy and English-only. In E. Finegan & J. R. Rickford (Eds.), Language in the USA: Perspectives for the twenty-first century (pp. 319-338). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. U.S. Census 2000, Summary File 3, Table DP-2. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.