Learner training for effective use of CALL

New Perspectives on CALL for Second Language Classrooms

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 45-67

  Hubbard, Philip ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84909398627     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410610775     Document Type: Chapter

References (46)

1. Anderson, N. (1999). Exploring second language reading: Issues and strategies. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
2. Anthony, E. (1963). Approach, method, and technique. English Language Teaching, 17, 63-67.
3. Averill, J., Chambers, E., & Dantas-Whitney, M. (2000). Investing in people, not just flashy gadgets. In E. Hanson-Smith (Ed.), Technology-enhanced learning environments (pp. 85-98). Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
4. Beller-Kenner, S. (1999). CALL issues: Introducing students to computers. In J. Egbert & E. Hanson-Smith (Eds.), CALL environments: Research, practice, and critical issues (pp. 362-385). Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
5. Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. London: Longman.
6. Benson, P., & Voller, P. (Eds.). (1997). Autonomy and independence in language learning. London: Longman.
7. Boling, E., & Soo, K.-S. (1999). CALL issues: Designing CALL software. In J. Egbert & E. Hanson-Smith (Eds.), CALL environments: Research, practice, and critical issues (pp. 442-456). Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
8. Brown, H. D. (2002). Strategies for success: A practical guide to learning English. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
9. Carrell, P. (1984). Evidence of formal schema in second language comprehension. Language Learning, 34, 87-112.
10. Carrell, P., Pharis, B. G., & Libreto, J. C. (1989). Metacognitive strategy training for ESL reading. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 647-678.
11. Davis, R. (2002). Randall's cyber listening lab. Retrieved December 7, 2002, from http://www.esllab.com
12. Eck, A., Legenhausen, L., & Wolff, D. (1994). Assessing telecommunications projects: Project types and their educational potential. In H. Jung & R. Vanderplank (Eds.), Barriers and bridges: Media technology in language learning (pp. 45-52). Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang.
13. Falsetti, J., Frizler, K., Schweitzer, E., & Younger, G. (1997). Getting started with MOOs: MOO and YOO-What to DOO. In T. Boswell (Ed.), New ways of using computers in language teaching (pp. 112-120). Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
14. Gaer, S. (1999). Classroom practice: An introduction to e-mail and World Wide Web projects. In J. Egbert & E. Hanson-Smith (Eds.), CALL environments: Research, practice, and critical issues (pp. 65-78). Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
15. Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. E. (1987). Looking in classrooms. New York: Harper & Row.
16. Healey, D. (1999). Theory and research: Autonomy and language learning. In J. Egbert & E. Hanson-Smith (Eds.), CALL environments: Research, practice, and critical issues (pp. 391-402). Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
17. Higgins, J. (1984). Learning with a computer. In S. Holden (Ed.), Teaching and the teacher (pp. 83-87). Oxford, England: Modern English Publications.
18. Holliday, L. (1999). Theory and research: Input, interaction, and CALL. In J. Egbert & E. Hanson-Smith (Eds.), CALL environments: Research, practice, and critical issues (pp. 181-188). Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
19. Hubbard, P. (1988). An integrated framework for CALL courseware evaluation. CALICO Journal, 6, 51-72.
20. Hubbard, P. (1992). A methodological framework for CALL courseware development. In M. Pennington & V. Stevens (Eds.), Computers in applied linguistics (pp. 39-66). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
21. Hubbard, P. (1996). Elements of CALL methodology: Development, evaluation, and implementation. In M. Pennington (Ed.), The power of CALL (pp. 15-32). Houston, TX: Athelstan.
22. Hubbard, P. (2001a). The use and abuse of meaning technologies. Contact, 27, 82-86. Available online at http://www.stanford.edu/~efs/phil/MT.pdf
23. Hubbard, P. (2001b, March). Understanding interactional sequences in tutorial CALL. Paper presented at the 35th annual TESOL Convention, St. Louis, MO. Retrieved December 6, 2002, from http://www.stanford.edu/~efs/phil/Hubbard-TESOL01.htm
24. Hubbard, P., Gordon, C., & Rylance, C. (1995). HyperACE Intermediate [Computer software]. Houston, TX: Athelstan.
25. Hubbard, P., & Tenney, K. (1996). MicroReport: Who, what, and where in the USA [Computer software]. New York: Gessler.
26. Huntley, H. (1997). Word processing mastery. In T. Boswell (Ed.), New ways of using computers in language teaching (pp. 5-6). Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
27. Jones, J. (2001). CALL and the teacher's role in promoting learner autonomy. CALL Electronic Journal Online, 3. Retrieved November 4, 2001, from http://www.clec.ritsumei.ac.jp/english/callejonline/6-1/jones.html
28. Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford, England: Pergamon.
29. Levy, M. (1997). Computer-assisted language learning: Context and conceptualization. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
30. Lewis, A., & Atzert, S. (2000). Dealing with computer-related anxiety in the project-oriented CALL classroom. CALL Journal, 13, 377-395.
31. Mandler, J. (1984). Stories, scripts, and scenes: Aspects of schema theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32. McDonough, S. (1995). Strategy and skill in learning a foreign language. London: Edward Arnold.
33. Morley, J. (1991). Listening comprehension in second/foreign language instruction. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second/foreign language (2nd ed., pp. 81-106). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
34. Morrison, B. (1997). How do you use it? In T. Boswell (Ed.), New ways of using computers in language teaching (pp. 7-10). Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
35. Murphy, J., & Stoller, F. (2001). Sustained-content language teaching: An emerging definition. TESOL Journal, 10, 3-7.
36. Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
37. Pellettieri, J. (2000). Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 59-86). New York: Cambridge University Press.
38. Pemberton, R., Li, E. S. L., Or, W. W. F., & Pierson, H. D. (Eds.). (1996). Taking control: Autonomy in language learning. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
39. Pennington, M. (1996). The power of the computer in language education. In M. Pennington (Ed.), The power of CALL (pp. 1-14). Houston, TX: Athelstan.
40. Peterson, P. (1991). A synthesis of methods for interactive listening. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second/foreign language (2nd ed., pp. 106-122). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
41. Richards, J., & Rodgers, T. (1982). Method: approach, design, and procedure. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 153-168.
42. Ryan, K. (1997). Using search engines for academic research. In P. Lewis & T. Shiozawa (Eds.), CALL: Basics and beyond (pp. 41-46). Tokyo: Japan Association of Language Teaching.
43. Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. New York: Oxford University Press.
44. Turbee, L. (1999). Classroom practice: MOO, WOO, and more-Language learning in virtual environments. In J. Egbert & E. Hanson-Smith (Eds.), CALL environments: Research, practice, and critical issues (pp. 346-361). Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
45. Warschauer, M., Shetzer, H., & Meloni, C. (2000). Internet for English teaching. Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
46. Windeatt, S., Hardisty, D., & Eastment, D. (2000). The Internet. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.