Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom

CALICO Journal

Volumn 13, Issue 2-3, 1995, Pages 7-26

  Warschauer, Mark ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

CALL; Computer mediated communication; Electronic discussion

Indexed keywords

EID: 85071048019     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20569017     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1558/cj.v13i2-3.7-26     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Alker, H.R. (1965). Mathematics and Politics. New York: Macmillan.
2. Barker, T., and F. Kemp (1990). “Network Theory: A Postmodern Pedagogy for the Written Classroom.” Computers and Community: Teaching Composition in the Twentyfirst Century, edited by C. Handa. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
3. Boiarsky, C. (1990). “Computers in the Classroom: The Instruction, the Mess, the Noise, the Writing.” Computers and Community: Teaching Composition in the Twenty-first Century, edited by C. Handa. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
4. Chun, D. (1994). “Using Computer Networking to Facilitate the Acquisition of Interactive Competence.” System 22, 1, 17-31.
5. Cohen, M., and N. Miyake (1986). “A Worldwide Intercultural Network: Exploring Electronic Messaging for Instruction.” Instruction Science 15, 257-273.
6. Cummins, S., and D. Sayers (1990). “Education 2001: Learning Networks and Educational Reform.” Computers in the Schools 7, 1/2, 1-29.
7. DiMatteo, A. (1990). “Under Erasure: A Theory for Interactive Writing in Real Time.” Computers and Composition 7 (S.I.), 71-84.
8. DiMatteo, A. (1991). “Communication, Writing, Learning: An Anti-instrumentalist View of Network Writing.” Computers and Composition 8, 3, 5-19.
9. Ferrara, K., H. Brunner, and G. Whittemore (1991). “Interactive Written Discourse as an Emergent Register.” Written Communication 8, 1, 9-33.
10. Flores, M. (1990). “Computer Conferencing: Composing a Feminist Community of Writers.” Computers and Community: Teaching Composition in the Twenty-first Century, edited by C. Handa, 107-139. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
11. Hartman, K., C. Neuwirth, S. Kiesler, L. Sproull, C. Cochran, M. Palmquist, and D. Zubrow (1991). “Patterns of Social Interaction and Learning to Write: Some Effects of Networked Technologies.” Written Communication 8, 1, 79-113.
12. Hiltz, S.R., and M. Turoff (1978). The Network Nation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Huff, C., and R. King (1988). “An Experiment in Electronic Collaboration.” Interacting by Computer: Effects on Small Group Style and Structure, edited by J.D. Goodchilds. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Atlanta.
14. Kelm, O. (1992). “The Use of Synchronous Computer Networks in Second Language Instruction: A Preliminary Report.” Foreign Language Annals 25, 5, 441-454.
15. Kern, R. (1995). “Restructuring Classroom Interaction with Networked Computers: Effects on Quantity and Quality of Language Production.” Modern Language Journal 79, 4.
16. Long, M. H. (in press). “The Role of the Linguistic Environment in Second Language Acquisition.” Handbook of Research on Language Acquisition. Volume 2: Second Language Acquisition, edited by W. C. Ritchie and T. K. Bhatia. New York: Academic Press.
17. Long, M. H., and P. A. Porter (1985). “Group Work, Interlanguage Talk, and Second Language Acquisition.” TESOL Quarterly 19, 2, 207-227.
18. Mabrito, M. (1991). “Electronic Mail as a Vehicle for Peer Response: Conversations of High- and Low-apprehensive Writers.” Written Communication 8, 4, 509-532.
19. Mabrito, M. (1992). “Computer-mediated Communication and High-apprehensive Writers: Rethinking the Collaborative Process.” The Bulletin December, 26-30.
20. McGuire, T., S. Kiesler, and J. Siegel (1987). “Group and Computer-mediated Discussion Effects in Risk Decision Making.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52, 5, 917-930.
21. Moran, C. (1991). “We Write, but Do We Read?” Computers and Composition 8, 3, 51-61.
22. Murray, D. (1988). “Computer-mediated Communication: Implications for ESP.” English for Specific Purposes 7, 3-18.
23. Paramskas, D. (1993). “Computer-assisted Language Learning (CALL): Increasingly into an Ever More Electronic World.” The Canadian Modern Language Review 50, 1, 124-143.
24. Selfe, C. (1990). “Technology in the English Classroom: Computers Through the Lens of Feminist Theory.” Computers and Community: Teaching Composition in the Twenty-first Century, edited by C. Handa. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
25. Soh, B. L., and Y. P. Soon (1991). “English by E-mail: Creating a Global Classroom Via the Medium of Computer Technology.” ELT Journal 45, 4, 287-292.
26. Sproull, L., and S. Kiesler (1991). Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Sullivan, N., and E. Pratt (in press). “A Comparative Study of Two ESL Writing Environments: A Computer-assisted Classroom and a Traditional Oral Classroom.” System 24, 4.
28. Tella, S. (1992). Boys, Girls, and E-mail: A Case Study in Finnish Senior Secondary Schools. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Department of Teacher Education.
29. Wang, Y. M. (1993). E-mail Dialogue Journaling in an ESL Reading and Writing Classroom. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oregon at Eugene.
30. Weisband, S., S. Schneider, and T. Connolly (in press). “Electronic Communication and Social Information: Status Salience and Status Differences.” Academy of Management Journal.