Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning

Language Learning and Technology

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 50-80

  Doughty, Catherine J ^a   Long, Michael H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042682180     PISSN: 10943501     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (155)

1. Altman, H. B., & James, C. V. (Eds.). (1980). Foreign language teaching: Meeting individual needs. Oxford, England: Pergamon.
2. Annett, J. (1969). Feedback and human behaviour. Baltimore: Penguin Books.
3. Arnone, M. (2001, November 23). Too close for comfort? Some experts fear that ties between Microsoft and Blackboard could diminish colleges' choices. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved February 10, 2003, from http://chronicle.merit.edu/free/v48/i13/13a02701.htm
4. Avrich, P. (1980). The modern school movement. Anarchism and education in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5. Ayoun, D. (2001). The role of negative and positive feedback in the second language acquisition of the passé compose and the imparfait. Modern Language Journal, 85(2), 226-243.
6. Barnes, D. (1976). From communication to curriculum. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books.
7. Bartlett, N. D. (in press). A double shot 2% mocha latte, please, with whip: Service encounters in two coffee shops and at a coffee cart. In M. H. Long (Ed.), Second language needs analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
8. Berry, D. (1997). How implicit is implicit learning? New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Berry, D., & Dienes, Z. (Eds.). (1993). Implicit learning: Theoretical and empirical issues. Hove, England: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10. Blake, R. (2000). Computer-mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 120-36. Retrieved February 10, 2003, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num1/blake/default.html
11. Cathcart, R. (1989). Authentic discourse and the Survival English curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 23(1), 105-126.
12. Chaudron, C. (1977). A descriptive model of discourse in the corrective treatment of learners' errors. Language Learning, 27(1), 29-46.
13. Chaudron, C. (1987). The role of error correction in second language teaching. In B. Das (Ed.), Patterns of classroom interaction in Southeast Asia (pp. 17-50). Singapore: Regional English Language Centre.
14. Chaudron, C., Doughty, C., Kim, Y., Kong, D., Lee, J., Lee, Y., Long, M. H., Rivers, R., & Urano, K. (in press). A Task-based needs analysis of a tertiary Korean as a foreign language program. In M. H. Long (Ed.), Second language needs analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
15. Choi, M.Y. (2000). Effects of recasts on irregular past tense verb morphology in Web-chat. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu.
16. Clark, R. E. (1985). Confounding in education computing research. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1(20), 137-148.
17. Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence language learning. Educational Technology Research & Development, 42(2), 21-29.
18. DeKeyser, R. (1993). The effect of error correction on L2 grammar knowledge and oral proficiency. Modern Language Journal, 77(4), 501-514.
19. Doughty, C. (1991). Second language acquisition does make a difference: evidence from an empirical study of SL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13(3), 431-469.
20. Doughty, C. (1992). Computer applications in second language acquisition research. In M. Pennington & V. Stevens (Eds.), Computers in applied linguistics: An international perspective (pp. 127-54). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters, Ltd.
21. Doughty, C. (2000a). Negotiating the linguistic environment. University of Hawaii Working Papers in ESL, 18(2), 47-85.
22. Doughty, C. (2000b, July). What do computers assist in language learning? Perspectives from SLA research and LT methodology. Plenary address at IATEFL CALL for the 21st Century, Barcelona, Spain.
23. Doughty, C. (2001a). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and Second Language Instruction (pp. 206-57). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Doughty, C. (2001b, March). Principles for CALL pedagogy. Plenary address at Hawaii Association of Language Teachers, Honolulu.
25. Doughty, C. (2003). Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation, and enhancement. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 256-310). New York: Basil Blackwell.
26. Doughty, C., & Long, M. H. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of second language acquisition. New York: Basil Blackwell.
27. Doughty, C., & Varela, E. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 114-38). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
28. Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998a). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
29. Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998b). Pedagogical choices in focus on form acquisition. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 197-262). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
30. Dudley-Evans, T., & St. John, M. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
31. Eckman, F. R., Bell, L., & Nelson, D. (1988). On the generalization of relative clause instruction in the acquisition of English as a second language. Applied Linguistics, 9(1), 1-20.
32. Ehrman, M., & Leaver, B. L. (2001). Development of a profile approach to learning style diagnosis. Unpublished manuscript. Arlington, VA: Foreign Service Institute.
33. Ellis, N. (2001). Memory for language. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 33-68). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
34. Ellis, R. (1989). Are classroom and naturalistic acquisition the same? A study of the classroom acquisition of German word order rules. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11(3), 305-328.
35. Fukuda, C., Komatsu-Yonezawa, S., Komori, S., & Zimmerman, E. (2001, March 17). A meta-analysis of a CMC project for L2 Japanese learners. Paper presented at the Hawai'i Association of Language Teachers conference, Honolulu.
36. Gass, S. M. (1982). From theory to practice. In M. Hines & W. Rutherford (Eds.), On TESOL '81 (pp. 129-139). Washington, DC: TESOL.
37. Gass, S. M. (2003). Input and interaction. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 224-255). New York: Basil Blackwell.
38. Gijselaers, W. H. (1996). Connecting problem-based practices with educational theory. In L. Wilkerson & W. H. Gijselaers (Eds.), Bringing problem-based learning to higher education: Theory and practice (pp. 13-21). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
39. González-Lloret, M. (2003). Designing task-based CALL to promote interaction: En Busca de Esmeraldas. Language Learning & Technology, 7(1), 86-104. Retrieved February 3, 2003, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num1/gonzalez/default.html
40. Grigorenko, E. L., Sternberg, R. J., & Ehrman, M. E. (2000). A theory-based approach to the measurement of foreign language learning ability: The Canal-F theory and test. Modern Language Journal, 84(3), 390-405.
41. Guttman, M. (1998). USC's IPR assists China in new smoking prevention efforts. HSC Weekly, 4(9). University of Southern California.
42. Hara, N. (1999). Students' frustrations with a Web-based distance education course: A taboo topic in the discourse. Manuscript summary. Retrieved February 3, 2003, from http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rre/message/1125
43. Harlow, L. L. (1987). Individualized instruction in foreign languages at the college level: A survey of programs in the United States. Modern Language Journal, 7(1), 389-394.
44. Hatch, E. (1978). Discourse analysis and second language acquisition. In E. Hatch (Ed.), Second language acquisition: A book of readings (pp. 402-435). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
45. Holt, D. D. (Ed.). (1993). Cooperative learning: A response to linguistic and cultural diversity. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
46. Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
47. Hyltenstam, K., & Abrahamsson, N. (2003). Maturational constraints in SLA. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 539-588). New York: Basil Blackwell.
48. Jacobs, G. M. (1998). Cooperative learning or just grouping students: The difference makes a difference. In W. A. Renandya & G. M. Jacobs (Eds.), Learners and language learning (pp. 172-193). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
49. Johnston, M. (1985). Syntactic and morphological progressions in learner English. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth Department of Immigration and Ethnic Affairs.
50. Johnston, M. (1997). Development and variation in learner language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Australian National University, Canberra.
51. Jordan, R. R. (1987). English for academic purposes: A guide and resource book for teachers. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
52. Kersten, A. W., & Earles, J. L. (2001). Less really is more for adults learning a miniature artificial language. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 250-273.
53. Kong, D. K. (2002). Effects of task complexity on second-language production. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Hawai'i at Manoa, Honolulu.
54. Kramer, R. (1978). Maria Montessori. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
55. Lapkin, S., Hart, D., & Swain, M. (1991). Early and middle French immersion programs: French language outcomes. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 48(1), 11-44.
56. Lee, Y.-G. (2002). Effects on task complexity on the complexity and accuracy of oral production in L2 Korean. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hawai'i at Manoa, Honolulu.
57. Levelt, W., & Kelter, S. (1982). Surface form and memory in question answering. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 78-106.
58. Liang, X., Mohan, B. A., & Early, M. (1998). Issues of cooperative learning in ESL classes: A literature review. TESL Canada Journal, 15(2), 13-23.
59. Lightbown, P. M. (1983). Exploring relationships between developmental and instructional sequences. In H. W. Seliger & M. H. Long (Eds.), Classroom-oriented research on second language acquisition (pp. 217-243). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
60. Logan, G. E. (1973). Individualizing foreign language learning: An organic process. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
61. Long, M. H. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 126-141.
62. Long, M. H. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: task-based language teaching. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modeling and assessing second language development (pp. 77-99). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
63. Long, M. H. (1988). Instructed interlanguage development. In L. M. Beebe (Ed.), Issues in second language acquisition: Multiple perspectives (pp. 115-41). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House/Harper and Row.
64. Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. B. Ginsberg., & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
65. Long, M. H. (1996a). Authenticity and learning potential in L2 classroom discourse. In G. M. Jacobs (Ed.), Language classrooms of tomorrow: Issues and responses (pp. 148-169). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
66. Long, M. H. (1996b). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K Bahtia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). New York: Academic Press.
67. Long, M. H. (1997). Focus on form in task-based language teaching. Text from the McGraw-Hill videoconference: Grammar in the communicative classroom. Retrieved February 3, 2003, from http://www.mhhe.com/socscience/foreignlang/top.htm
68. Long, M. H. (2000a). Focus on form in task-based language teaching. In R. L. Lambert & E. Shohamy (Eds.), Language policy and pedagogy (pp. 179-192). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
69. Long, M. H. (2000b). Acquisition and teaching. In M. Byram (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language teaching (pp. 4-5). London: Routledge.
70. Long, M. H. (in press, a). Task-based language teaching. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
71. Long, M. H. (in press, b). Methodological issues in learner needs analysis. In M. H. Long (Ed.), Second language needs analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
72. Long, M. H. (Ed.). (in press, c). Second language needs analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
73. Long, M. H. (in press, d). Recasts in SLA: The story so far. In M. H. Long (Ed.), Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
74. Long, M. H., & Crookes, G. (1992). Three approaches to task-based language teaching. TESO Quarterly, 26(1), 27-56.
75. Long, M. H., & Crookes, G. (1993). Units of analysis in syllabus design: The case for task. In G. Crookes & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Tasks in pedagogical context. Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9-54). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
76. Lightbown, P. M. (1983). Exploring relationships between developmental and instructional sequences. In H. W. Seliger & M. H. Long (Eds.), Classroom-oriented research on second language acquisition (pp. 217-243). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
77. Logan, G. E. (1973). Individualizing foreign language learning: An organic process. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
78. Long, M. H. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 126-141.
79. Long, M. H. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: task-based language teaching. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modeling and assessing second language development (pp. 77-99). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
80. Long, M. H. (1988). Instructed interlanguage development. In L. M. Beebe (Ed.), Issues in second language acquisition: Multiple perspectives (pp. 115-41). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House/Harper and Row.
81. Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. B. Ginsberg., & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
82. Long, M. H. (1996a). Authenticity and learning potential in L2 classroom discourse. In G. M. Jacobs (Ed.), Language classrooms of tomorrow: Issues and responses (pp. 148-169). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
83. Long, M. H. (1996b). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K Bahtia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). New York: Academic Press.
84. Long, M. H. (1997). Focus on form in task-based language teaching. Text from the McGraw-Hill videoconference: Grammar in the communicative classroom. Retrieved February 3, 2003, from http://www.mhhe.com/socscience/foreignlang/top.htm
85. Long, M. H. (2000a). Focus on form in task-based language teaching. In R. L. Lambert & E. Shohamy (Eds.), Language policy and pedagogy (pp. 179-192). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
86. Long, M. H. (2000b). Acquisition and teaching. In M. Byram (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language teaching (pp. 4-5). London: Routledge.
87. Long, M. H. (in press, a). Task-based language teaching. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
88. Long, M. H. (in press, b). Methodological issues in learner needs analysis. In M. H. Long (Ed.), Second language needs analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
89. Long, M. H. (Ed.). (in press, c). Second language needs analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
90. Long, M. H. (in press, d). Recasts in SLA: The story so far. In M. H. Long (Ed.), Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
91. Long, M. H., & Crookes, G. (1992). Three approaches to task-based language teaching. TESO Quarterly, 26(1), 27-56.
92. Long, M. H., & Crookes, G. (1993). Units of analysis in syllabus design: The case for task. In G. Crookes & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Tasks in pedagogical context. Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9-54). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
93. Lightbown, P. M. (1983). Exploring relationships between developmental and instructional sequences. In H. W. Seliger & M. H. Long (Eds.), Classroom-oriented research on second language acquisition (pp. 217-243). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
94. Logan, G. E. (1973). Individualizing foreign language learning: An organic process. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
95. Long, M. H. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 126-141.
96. Long, M. H. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: task-based language teaching. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modeling and assessing second language development (pp. 77-99). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
97. Long, M. H. (1988). Instructed interlanguage development. In L. M. Beebe (Ed.), Issues in second language acquisition: Multiple perspectives (pp. 115-41). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House/Harper and Row.
98. Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. B. Ginsberg., & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
99. Long, M. H. (1996a). Authenticity and learning potential in L2 classroom discourse. In G. M. Jacobs (Ed.), Language classrooms of tomorrow: Issues and responses (pp. 148-169). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
100. Long, M. H. (1996b). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K Bahtia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). New York: Academic Press.
101. Long, M. H. (1997). Focus on form in task-based language teaching. Text from the McGraw-Hill videoconference: Grammar in the communicative classroom. Retrieved February 3, 2003, from http://www.mhhe.com/socscience/foreignlang/top.htm
102. Long, M. H. (2000a). Focus on form in task-based language teaching. In R. L. Lambert & E. Shohamy (Eds.), Language policy and pedagogy (pp. 179-192). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
103. Long, M. H. (2000b). Acquisition and teaching. In M. Byram (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language teaching (pp. 4-5). London: Routledge.
104. Long, M. H. (in press, a). Task-based language teaching. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
105. Long, M. H. (in press, b). Methodological issues in learner needs analysis. In M. H. Long (Ed.), Second language needs analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
106. Long, M. H. (Ed.). (in press, c). Second language needs analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
107. Long, M. H. (in press, d). Recasts in SLA: The story so far. In M. H. Long (Ed.), Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
108. Long, M. H., & Crookes, G. (1992). Three approaches to task-based language teaching. TESO Quarterly, 26(1), 27-56.
109. Long, M. H., & Crookes, G. (1993). Units of analysis in syllabus design: The case for task. In G. Crookes & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Tasks in pedagogical context. Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9-54). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
110. Long, M. H., Doughty, C., & Chaudron, C. (1999-2001). Task-based language teaching in foreign language education. Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center. Retrieved February 3, 2003, from http://www.nflrc.hawaii.edu/project_home.cfm
111. Long, M. H., & Norris, J. M. (2000). Task-based teaching and assessment. In M. Byram (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language teaching (pp. 597-603). London: Routledge.
112. Long, M. H., & Porter, P. (1985). Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 19(2), 207-27.
113. Long, M. H., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in second language acquisition (pp. 15-41). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
114. Long, M. H., & Ross, S. (1993). Modifications that preserve language and content. In M. Tickoo (Ed.), Simplification: Theory and application (pp. 29-52). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
115. Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. F. (2001). Individual differences in second language proficiency: Working memory as "language aptitude." In A. F. Healy & L. E. Bourne (Eds.), Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention (pp. 339-364). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
116. Negretti, R. (1999). Web-based activities and SLA: A conversational analysis approach. Language Learning & Technology, 3(1), 75-87. Retrieved February 3, 2003, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol3num1/negretti/index.html
117. Newport, E. (1990). Maturational constraints on language learning. Cognitive Science, 14, 11-28.
118. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 5(3), 417-528.
119. Ochs, E. O., & Schieffelin, B. B. (Eds.). (1979). Developmental pragmatics. New Youk: Academic Press.
120. Ohmaye, E. (1998). Simulation-based language learning: An architecture and a multi-media authoring tool. In R. Schank (Ed.), Inside multi-media case based instruction (pp. 1-100). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.
121. Oxford, R. L. (1997). Cooperative learning; collaborative learning; and interaction: Three communicative strands in the language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 443-456.
122. Pavesi, M. (1986) Markedness, discoursal modes, and relative clause formation in a formal and an informal context. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 81, 38-55.
123. Pellettieri, J. (2000). Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence in the virtual foreign language classroom. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern, (Eds.), Networkbased language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 59-86). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
124. Pica, T. (1983). Adult acquisition of English as a second language under different conditions of exposure. Language Learning, 33(4), 465-97.
125. Pica, T., Lincoln-Porter, F., Paninos, D., & Linnell, J. (1996). Language learners' interaction: How does it address the input, output, and feedback needs of language learners? TESOL Quarterly, 30(1), 59-84.
126. Pienemann, M. (1984). Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6(2), 186-214.
127. Pienemann, M. (1989). Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 52-79.
128. Pienemann, M., Johnston, M., & Brindley, G. (1988). Constructing an acquisition-based procedure for second language assessment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10(2), 217-243.
129. Robinson, P. (1981). Esp (English for Specific Purposes: The present position). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
130. Robinson, P. (2001a). Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 287-318). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
131. Robinson, P. (2001b). Task complexity, task difficulty and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 27-57.
132. Salaberry, R. (2000). Pedagogical design of computer mediated communication tasks: learning objectives and technological capabilities. Modern Language Journal, 84(1), 28-37.
133. Sawyer, M., & Ranta, L. (2001). Aptitude, individual differences, and instructional design. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 310-353). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
134. Schank, R. C., & Cleary, C. (1994). Engines for Education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Retrieved online July 16, 2003, from http://www.engines4ed.org/hyperbook/
135. Schenkein, J. (1980). A taxonomy for repeating action sequences in natural discourse. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production, volume 1: Speech and talk (pp. 21-47). New York: Academic Press.
136. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129-158.
137. Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
138. Schumann, J. H. (1979). The acquisition of English negation by speakers of Spanish: A review of the literature. In R. W. Andersen (Ed.), The acquisition and use of Spanish and English as first and second languages (pp. 3-32). Washington, DC: TESOL.
139. Schwartz, B. D. (1993). On explicit and negative data effecting and affecting competence and linguistic behavior. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 147-163.
140. Shavelson, R. J., & Stern, P. (1981). Research on teachers' pedagogical thoughts, judgments and behavior. Review of Educational Research, 51, 455-498.
141. Shotton, J. (1993). No master high or low. Libertarian education and schooling in Britain, 1890-1990. Bristol, England: Libertarian Education.
142. Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
143. Smith, M. P. (1983). The libertarians and education. London: George Allen & Unwin.
144. Spadaro, K. (1996). Maturational constraints on lexical acquisition in a second language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Western Australia, Perth.
145. Stadler, M., & Frensch, P. (Eds.). (1998). Handbook of implicit learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
146. Swaffer, J. K., Arens, K., & Morgan, M. (1982). Teacher classroom practices: redefining method as task hierarchy. Modern Language Journal, 66(1), 24-33.
147. Versweyveld, L. (2001, January 20). New software tool to discover needle in haystack of medical literature using linguistic analysis. Virtual Medical Worlds Monthly. Retrieved February 10, 2003, from http://www.hoise.com/vmw/01/articles/vmw/LV-VM-03-01-18.html
148. Warschauer, M., & Kern, R. (2000). Network-based language teaching. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
149. Webb, N. M. (1991). Task-related verbal interaction and mathematics learning in small groups. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(5), 366-389.
150. Wesche, M. (1981). Language aptitude measures in streaming, matching students with methods, and diagnosis of learning problems. In K. C. Diller (Ed.), Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude (pp. 119-154). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
151. White, L. (1989). Universal grammar and second language acquisition. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
152. White, L. (1991). Adverb placement in second language acquisition: Some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research, 7, 133-161.
153. Wilkins, D. (1976). Notional syllabuses. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
154. Wray, A. (2000). Formulaic sequences in second language teaching: Principle and practice. Applied Linguistics, 21(4), 463-489.
155. Yano, Y., Long, M. H., & Ross, S. (1994). The effects of simplified and elaborated texts on foreign language reading comprehension. Language Learning, 44(2), 189-219.