The scope of CALL education

Language Learning and Language Teaching

Volumn 14, Issue , 2006, Pages 3-20

  Hubbard, Philip ^a   Levy, Mike ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85127302427     PISSN: 15699471     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (35)

1. Bax, S. (2003). CALL - Past, present, and future. System, 31, 13-28.
2. Beatty, K. (2003). Teaching and Researching Computer Assisted Language Learning. London: Pearson Education.
3. Biddle, B. J. (1986). Recent developments in role theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 12, 67-92.
4. Chapelle, C. (2001). Computer Applications in Second Language Acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing, and research. Cambridge: CUP.
5. Clancey, W. J. (1995). A tutorial on situated learning. In J. Self (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers and Education (Taiwan) (pp. 49-70). Charlottesville, VA: AACE.
6. Cooke-Plagwitz, J. (2004). Using the Internet to train language teachers to use the Internet: A special topics course for teachers of German. In L. Lomicka & J. Cooke-Plagwitz (Eds.), Teaching with Technology (pp. 65-71). Boston, MA: Heinle.
7. Davies, G. (2003). Perspectives on offline and online training initiatives. In U. Felix (Ed.), Language Learning Online: Towards best practice (pp. 193-214). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
8. Davies, G. (Ed.). (2006). Information and Communication Technologies for Language Teachers (ICT4LT). Slough: Thames Valley University. Available at http://www.ict4lt.org.
9. Doughty, C. & Long, M. (2003). Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 7 (3), 50-80.
10. Egbert, J. (2005). CALL Essentials: Principles and practice in CALL classrooms. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
11. Egbert, J. & Hanson-Smith, E. (Eds.). (1999). CALL Environments: Research, practice, and critical issues. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
12. Egbert, J., Paulus, T., & Nakamichi, Y. (2002). The impact of CALL instruction on classroom computer use: A foundation for rethinking technology in teacher education. Language Learning & Technology, 6 (3), 108-126.
13. Freeman, D. (1998). Doing Teacher Research: From inquiry to understanding. Pacific Grove, CA: Heinle.
14. Goodwin, J. (2001). Teaching pronunciation. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (third edition) (pp. 117-138). Boston, MA: Heinle.
15. Hubbard, P. (1988). An integrated framework for CALL courseware evaluation. CALICO Journal, 6 (2), 51-72.
16. Hubbard, P. (1992). A methodological framework for CALL courseware development. In M. Pennington & V. Stevens (Eds.), Computers in Applied Linguistics (pp. 39-65). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
17. Hubbard, P. (1996). Elements of CALL methodology: Development, evaluation, and implementation. In M. Pennington (Ed.), The Power of CALL (pp. 15-32). Houston, TX: Athelstan.
18. Hubbard, P. (2004). Guest editorial (untitled). Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17 (1), 1-6.
19. ISTE (1998). National Educational Technology Standards for Students Booklet. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
20. ISTE (2000). National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers Booklet. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
21. Levy, M. (1995). Integrating CALL: The tutor and the tool. In A. Gimeno (Ed.), Technology Enhanced Language Learning: Focus on integration, proceedings of EuroCALL'95 (pp. 239-248). Valencia: Universidad Politécnica de Valencia.
22. Levy, M. (1997). CALL: Context and conceptualization. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
23. Levy, M. & Hubbard, P. (2005). Why call CALL 'CALL'? (Guest editorial). Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18 (3), 1-6.
24. Levy, M. & Stockwell, G. (2006). CALL Dimensions: Options and issues in computer assisted language learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25. Lomicka, L & Cooke-Plagwitz, J. (Eds.). (2004). Teaching with Technology. Boston MA: Heinle.
26. Newman, M. & Hanauer, D. (2005). The NCATE/TESOL teacher education standards: A critical review. TESOL Quarterly, 39 (4), 753-764.
27. Nunan, D. (1999). A foot in the world of ideas: Graduate study through the Internet. Language Learning & Technology, 3 (1), 52-74.
28. Richards, J. & Rodgers, T. (1982). Method: Approach, design, and procedure. TESOL Quarterly, 16 (2), 153-168.
29. Schmidt, M. (2000). Role theory, emotions, and identity in the department headship of secondary schooling. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 827-842.
30. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4-14.
31. Sokolik, M. (2001). Computers in language teaching. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (third edition) (pp. 477-488). Boston, MA: Heinle.
32. Tripp, D. (1993). Critical Incidents in Teaching: Developing professional judgement. London: Routledge.
33. Underwood, J. (1984). Linguistics, Computers, and the Language Teacher: A communicative approach. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
34. Warschauer, M., Shetzer, H., & Meloni, C. (2000). Internet for English Teaching. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
35. Weasonforth, D., Biesenbach-Lucas, S., & Meloni, C. (2002). Realizing constructivist objectives through collaborative technologies: Threaded discussions. Language Learning & Technology, 6 (3), 58-86.