New trends in using technology in the language curriculum

Annual Review of Applied Linguistics

Volumn 27, Issue , 2007, Pages 76-97

  Blake, Robert J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 41849094090     PISSN: 02671905     EISSN: 14716356     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1017/S0267190508070049     Document Type: Review

References (102)

1. Arnold, N., & Ducate, L. (Eds.). (2006). Calling on CALL: From theory and research to new directions in foreign language teaching (CALICO Monograph Series, Vol. 5). San Marcos, TX: CALICO.
2. Bauer, B., deBenedette, L., Furstenberg, G., Levet, S., & Waryn, S. (2006). The Cultura Project, (pp. 31-62). In J. A. Beiz & S. L. Thorne (Eds.), Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education. Boston: Heinle.
3. Belz, J. A., & Thorne, S. L. (Eds.). (2006). Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education. Boston: Heinle.
4. Chun, D. (2006). CALL technologies for L2 reading. In L. Ducate & N. Arnold (Eds.), Calling on CALL: From theory and research to new directions in foreign language teaching (CALICO Monograph Series, Vol. 5, pp. 69-98). San Marcos, TX: CALICO.
5. Heift, T., & Schulze, M. (2007). Parsers and pedagogues: Errors and intelligence in computer assisted language learning. London: Routledge.
6. Hubbard P., & Levy M. (Eds.) (2006a). Teacher education in CALL. Philadelphia: Benjamins.
7. Stickler, U., & Hauck, M. (Eds.). (2006). Special Issue: What does it take to teach online? Towards a pedagogy for online language teaching and learning. CALICO Journal, 23(3), 463-642.
8. Abrams, Z. I. (2006). From theory to practice: Intracultural CMC the L2 classroom. In L. Ducate & N. Arnold (Eds.) Calling on CALL: From theory and research to new directions in foreign language teaching (CALICO Monograph Series, Vol. 5, pp. 181-209). San Marcos, TX: CALICO.
9. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2006). Making the grade: Online education in the United States, 2006. Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium. Retrieved January 11, 2007, from http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/survey/ index.asp
10. Arnold, N., & Ducate, L. (2006). CALL: Where are we and where do we go from here? In N. Arnold & L. Ducate (Eds.) Calling on CALL: From theory and research to new directions in foreign language teaching (CALICO Monograph Series, Vol. 5, pp. 1-20). San Marcos, TX: CALICO.
11. Belz, J. A. (2002). Social dimensions of telecollaborative foreign language study. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 60-81. Retrieved on December 10, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol6numl/belz/
12. Belz, J. A. (2003). Linguistic perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 68-117. Retrieved on July 18, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/belz
13. Belz, J. A., & Thorne, S. L. (Eds.). (2006). Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education. Boston: Heinle.
14. Bañados, E. (2006). A blended-learning pedagogical model for teaching and learning EFL successfully through an online interactive multimedia environment. CALICO Journal, 23(3), 533-550.
15. Beatty, K. (2003). Teaching and researching computer-assisted language learning. London: Longman.
16. Bialystok, E., & Hakuta, K. (1994). In other words. New York: Basic Books.
17. Blake, R. (forthcoming). Brave new digital classroom: Technology in service of the foreign language curriculum. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
18. Blake, R. (in press). From Web pages to distance Learning: Technology in the foreign-language curriculum. In I. Lancashire (Ed.), Teaching literature and language online(Options in Teaching Series). New York: MLA Press.
19. Blake, R. (2005). Bimodal chatting: The glue of a distance language learning course. The CALICO Journal, 22(3), 497-511.
20. Blake, R. (2006). Two Heads as Better Than One: C[omputer] M[ediated] C[communication] for the L2 Curriculum. In R. P. Donaldson & M. A. Haggstrom, Changing language education through CALL (pp. 229-248). Abingdon, Oxon, and New York: Routledge.
21. Blake, R., & Delforge, A. (2007). Online language learning: The case of Spanish Without Walls. In B. Lafford & R. Salaberry (Eds.), The art of teaching Spanish: Second language acquisition from research to praxis (pp. 127-147). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
22. Blake, R, & Zyzik, E. (2003). Who's helping whom?: Learner/heritage speakers' networked discussions in Spanish. Applied Linguistics, 24(4), 519-44.
23. Burston, J. (1998). Antidote 98. CALICO Journal, 16(2), 197-212.
24. Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
25. Byram, M., Gribkova, B., & Starkey, H. (2002). Developing the intercultural dimension in language teaching: A practical introduction for teachers. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe.
26. Byrnes, H. (2006). Perspectives. Modern Language Journal, 90(2), 244-246.
27. Chapelle, C. (2005). CALICO at center stage: Our emerging rights and responsibilities. CALICO Journal, 23(1), 5-15.
28. Chenoweth, N. A., Jones, C. M., & G. Richard Tucker, G. R. (2006). Language online: Principles of design and methods of assessment. In R. P. Donaldson & M. A. Haggstrom, Changing language education through CALL (pp. 146-167). Abingdon, Oxon, and New York: Routledge.
29. Chenoweth, N. A., & Murday, K. (2003). Measuring student learning in an online French course. CALICO Journal, 20(2), 285-314.
30. Chenoweth, N. A., Ushida, E., & Murday, K. (2006). Student learning in hybrid French and Spanish courses: An overview of language online. CALICO Journal, 24(1), 115-145.
31. Chun, D. (2007). Come ride the wave: But where is it taking us? CALICO Journal, 24(2), 239-252.
32. Cohen, A., & Sykes, J. (2006). Dancing with words: Strategies for learning pragmatics in Spanish. Retrieved May 11, 2006, from http://www.carla.umn.edu/speechacts/sp_pragmatics/home.html
33. Colpaert, J. (2006). Pedagogy-driven design for online language teaching and learning. CALICO Journal, 23(3), 411-491.
34. Commission on the Abraham Lincoln Study Abroad Fellowship Program. (2005). Global Competance & National Needs. Retrieved December 17, 2007, from http://www.lincolncommission.org/
35. Cummins, J., & Sayers, D. (1995). Brave new schools: Challenging cultural literacy through global learning networks. New York: St. Martin's Press.
36. Davidson, D. (2007). Study abroad and outcomes measurements: The case of Russian. Modem Language Journal, 91(2), 276-280.
37. Darhower, M. (2007). A tale of two communities: Group dynamics and community building in a Spanish-English telecollaboration. CALICO Journal, 24(3), 561-589.
38. Davies, G. (Ed.). (2006). Information and communication technologies for language teachers (ICT4LT). Slough: Thames Valley University. Retrieved June 27, 2007, from http://www.ict4lt.org
39. Donaldson, R. P., & Haggstrom, M. A. (2005). Changing language education through CALL. Abingdon, Oxon, and New York: Routledge.
40. Doughty, C. J., & Long, M. H. (2003). Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 7(3), 50-80. Retrieved March 4, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/ vol7num3/doughty
41. Dubreil, S. (2006). Getting perspective on culture through CALL. In L. Ducate & N. Arnold (Eds.), Calling on CALL: From theory and research to new directions in foreign language teaching (CALICO Monograph Series, Vol. 5, pp. 237-268). San Marcos, TX: CALICO.
42. Echávez-Solano, N. (2003). A comparison of student outcomes and attitudes in technology-enhanced vs. traditional second-semester Spanish language courses. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
43. Egbert, J. (2005). CALL essentials: Principles and practice in CALL classrooms. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
44. Egbert, J., Paulus, T., & Nakamichi, Y. (2002). The impact of CALL instruction on classroom computer use: A foundation for rethinking technology in teacher education. Language Learning & Technology, 6(3), 106-126. Retrieved June 25, 2007 from http://llt.msu.edu/vol6num3/egbert/default.html
45. Ehsani, F., & Knodt, E. (1998). Speech technology in computer-aided language learning: Strengths and limitations of a new CALL paradigm. Language Learning & Technology, 2(1), 54-73. Retrieved January 1, 2007, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol6num3/egbert/default.html
46. Epps, M. (2004). CALL: How does it make you feel? Unpublished master's thesis, Federal Language Training Laboratory, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
47. Eskenazi, M. (1999). Using automatic speech processing for foreign language pronunciation tutoring: Some issues and a prototype. Language Learning & Technology, 2(2), 62-76. Retrieved January 2, 2007, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol2num2/article3/
48. Felix, U. (Ed.). (2003). Language learning online: Towards best practice. Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
49. Fleming, S., & Hiple, D. (2004). Distance education to distributed learning: Multiple formats and technologies in language instruction. CALICO Journal, 22(1), 63-82.
50. Freinet, C. (1994). Les oeuvres pédagogiques [The pedagogical works]. Paris: Edition Seuil.
51. Fryer, L, & Carpenter, R. (2006). Emerging Technologies: Bots as language learning tools. Language Learning & Technology, 10(3), 8-14.
52. Fukkink, R. G., Hulstijn, J., & Simis, A. (2005). Does training of second-language word recognition skills affect reading comprehension? An experimental study. The Modem Language Journal, 89(1), 54-75.
53. Grabe, W. (2004). Research on teaching reading. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 44-69.
54. Grgurovic, M., & Chapelle, C. A. (2007). Database of comparison studies: Computer-assisted vs. classroom second/foreign language instruction. Retrieved June 11, 2007, from http://tesl.engl.iastate.edu:591/comparison/main. htm
55. Hegelheimer, V. (2006). Helping ESL writers through a multimodal, corpus-based online grammar resource. CALICO Journal, 24(1), 5-32.
56. Hegelheimer, V., & Fisher, D. (2006). Grammar, writing, and technology: A sample technology-supported approach to teaching grammar and improving writing for ESL learners. CALICO Journal, 23(2), 257-279
57. Heift, T. (2001). Intelligent language tutoring systems for grammar practice. Zeitschrift für Interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht [Online], 6(2), 15 pp. Retrieved December 28, 2006. from http://www.spz.tu-darmstadt.de/projekt_ejournal/jg-06-2/beitrag/heift2.htm
58. Heift, T. (2002). Learner control and error correction in ICALL: Browsers, peekers and adamants. CALICO Journal, 19(3), 295-313.
59. Heift, T. (2004). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in CALL. ReCALL, 16(2), 416-431.
60. Holmberg, B., Shelley, M., & White, C. (2005). Distance education and languages: Evolution and change. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
61. Hubbard, P., & Bradin Siskin, C. (2004). Another look at tutorial CALL. ReCALL, 16(2), 448-461.
62. Hubbard, P., & Levy, M. (2006b). The scope of CALL education. In P. Hubbard & M. Levy, Teacher education in CALL (pp. 3-20). Philadelphia: Benjamins.
63. Kassen, M. A., Lavine, R. Z., Murphy-Judy, K., & Peters, M. (2007). Preparing and developing technology-proficient L2 teachers (CALICO Monograph Series, Vol. 6). San Marcos, TX: CALICO.
64. Kern, R., Ware, P., & Warschauer, M. (2004). Crossing frontiers: New directions in online pedagogy and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 243-260.
65. Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
66. Kramsch, C. (2000). Social discursive construction of self in L2 learning. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 133-154). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
67. Kramsch, C., A'Ness, F., & Lam, W. S. E. (2000). Authenticity and authorship in the computer-mediated acquisition of L2 literacy. Language Learning & Technology, 4(2), 78-104. Retrieved June 7, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num2/kramsch/default.html
68. Lafford, B. (2004). Review of Tell Me More. Language Learning & Technology, 18(3), 21-34. Retrieved January 1, 2007, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol8num3/review1
69. Lafford, B., Lafford, P., & Sykes, J. (2007). Entre dicho y hecho ...: An assessment of the application of research from second language acquisition and related fields to the creation of Spanish CALL materials for lexical acquisition. CALICO Journal 24(3), 497-529.
70. Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking University Teaching. London: Routledge.
71. Lai, C., & Zhao, Y. (2005). Introduction: The essence of second language education and technology integration. In Y. Zhao (ed.) Research in technology and second language learning: Developments and directions (pp. 401-409). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
72. Lee, L. (2004). Learners' perspectives on networked collaborative interaction with native speakers of Spanish in the U.S. Language, Learning, & Technology, 8(1), 83-100. Retrieved July 20, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol8num1/lee
73. LeLoup, J. W., & Ponterio, R. (2005). On the net: Vocabulary support for Independent online reading. Language Learning & Technology, 9(2), 3-7. Retrieved August 30, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol9num2/net/default. html
74. Levy, M., & Stockwell, G. (2006). CALL dimensions: Options and issues in computer-assisted language learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
75. Lomicka, L. (2006). Understanding the other: Intercultural exchange and CMC. In L. Ducate & N. Arnold (Eds.), Calling on CALL: From theory and research to new directions in foreign language teaching (CALICO Monograph Series, Vol. 5, pp. 211-236). San Marcos, TX: CALICO.
76. Lomicka, L., & Cooke-Plagwitz, J. (Eds.). (2004). The Heinle professional series in language instruction: Volume 1: Teaching with technology. Boston: Heinle.
77. Magnan, S. (2007). Reconsidering communicative language teaching for national goals. Modern Language Journal, 91(2).
78. Meskill, C. (2005). Triadic scaffolds: Tools for teaching English language learners with computers. Language Learning & Technology, 9(1), 46-59. Retrieved June 12, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol9numl/ meskill/default.html
79. Meskill, C. (2006). Notes from the special issue editor: special issue on electronic literacy. CALICO Journal, 10(2), 2-3.
80. Nagata, N. (1996). Computer vs. workbook instruction in second language acquisition. CALICO Journal, 14(1), 53-75.
81. Nagata, N. (2002). An Application of natural language processing to Web-based language learning. CALICO Journal, 19(3), 583-599.
82. O'Dowd, R. (2003). Understanding "the other side": Intercultural learning in a Spanish-English e-mail exchange. Language Learning and Technology, 7(2), 118-144.
83. O'Dowd, R. (2005). Negotiating sociocultural and institutional contexts: The case of Spanish-American Telecollaboration. Language and Intercultural Communication, 5(1), 40-56.
84. O'Dowd, R. (2006). Telecollaboration and the development of intercultural communicative competence. Munich, Germany: Langenscheidt ELT GmbH.
85. O'Dowd, R., & Ritter, M. (2006). Understanding and working with "failed communication" in telecollaborative exchanges. CALICO Journal, 23(3), 623-642.
86. O'Rourke, B. (2005). Form-focused interaction in online tandem learning. CALICO Journal, 22(3), 433-466.
87. O'Rourke, B., & Schwienhorst, K. (2003). Talking text: Reflections on reflection in computer-mediated communication. In D. Little, J. Ridley, & E. Ushida (Eds.), Learner autonomy in foreign language teaching: Teacher, learner, curriculum, assessment (pp. 47-60). Dublin: Authentik.
88. Payne, S. (2007). The BodoBot project. Retrieved June 11, 2007, from http://spayne.ats.amherst.edu/index.php?section=home
89. Schulze, M. (2001). Human language technologies in computer-assisted language learning. In A. Chambers & G. Davies (Eds.), ICT and Language Learning: A European Perspective (pp. 111-132). Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
90. Scida, E., & Saury, R. E. (2006). Hybrid courses and their impact on student and classroom performance: A case study at the University of Virginia. CALICO Journal, 23(3), 511-531.
91. Smith, Bryan. (2003). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. The Modern Language Journal, 87(1), 38-54.
92. Sykes, J. (2005). Synchronous CMC and pragmatic development: Effects of oral and written chat. CALICO Journal, 22(3), 399-431.
93. Thorne, S. L. (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 38-67. Retrieved July 18, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/thorne/
94. Thorne, S. L., & Payne, J. S. (2005). Evolutionary trajectories, Internet-mediated expression, and language education. CALICO Journal, 22(3), 371-397.
95. Underwood, J. (1989). On the edge: Intelligent CALL in the 1990s. Computers and the Humanities, 23(1), 71-84.
96. Ushida, E. (2007). Robo-Sensei personal Japanese tutor, version 1.0. CALICO Journal, 24(2), 408-420.
97. Walczynski, S. (2002). Applying the job characteristics model to Mallard Web-based classes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Illinois State University, Normal.
98. Ware, P. D., & Kramsch, C. (2005). Toward an intercultural stance: Teaching German and English through telecollaboration. The Modern Language Journal, 89(2), 190-205.
99. Warschauer, M., & De Florio-Hansen, I. (2003). Multilingualism, identity, and the Internet. In A. Hu and I. De Florio-Hansen (Eds.), Multiple identity and multilingualism (pp. 155-179). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
100. Wildner-Bassett, M. E. (2005). CMC as written conversation: A critical social-constructivist view of multiple identities and cultural positioning in the L2/C2 classroom. CALICO Journal, 22(3), 635-656.
101. Zhao, Y. (2003). Recent developments in technology and language learning: a literature review and meta-analysis. CALICO Journal, 21(1), 7-27.
102. Zhao, Y., Alvarez-Torres, M.J., Smith, B., & Tan, H. S. (2005). The non-neutrality of technology: A theoretical analysis and empirical study of computer mediated communication technologies. In Y Zhao (Ed.), Research in technology and second language learning: Developments and directions (pp. 281-316). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.