Effective use of CALL technologies: Finding the right balance

Changing Language Education Through CALL

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1-18

  Levy, Mike ^a  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953320324     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203008423     Document Type: Chapter

References (45)

1. Ashcraft, M.H. (1993). Human memory and cognition . New York: Harper Collins.
2. Blake, R. (2000). Computer mediated communication: Awindow on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning and Technology, 4 (1), 120-136.
3. Chapelle, C. (2000). Is network-based learning CALL? In M. Warschauer, & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 204-228). Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
4. Clark, R.E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42 (2), 21-29.
5. Crystal, D. (2001). Language and the Internet . Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
6. Darhower, M. (2002). Interactional features of synchronous CMC in the intermediate L2 class: A socio-cultural case study. CALICO Journal, 19 (2), 249-277.
7. Fernandez-Garcia, M., & Martinez-Arbelaiz, A. (2002). Negotiation of meaning in nonnative speaker-nonnative speaker synchronous discussions. CALICO Journal, 19 (2), 279-294.
8. Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning on performance in task-based learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18 , 299-324.
9. Ganderton, R. (1999). Interactivity in L2 web-based reading. In R. Debski, & M. Levy (Eds.), WORLD-CALL: Global perspectives on computer-assisted language learning (pp. 49-66). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
10. Gibson, J.J. (1979). The ecological approach to perception . London: Houghton- Mifflin.
11. Gonzalez-Bueno, M., & Perez, L. (2000). Electronic mail in foreign language writing: A study of grammatical accuracy, and quality of language. Foreign Language Annals, 33 (2), 189-197.
12. Herring, S.C. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
13. Hewer, S., Kötter, M., Rodine, C., & Shield, L. (1999). The right tools for the job: Criteria for the choice of tools in the design of a virtual, interactive environment for distance language learners and their tutors. Presented at CAL '99: Virtuality in Education. London.
14. Hubbard, K. (1992). A methodological framework for CALL courseware development. In M. Pennington, & V. Stevens (Eds.), Computers in applied linguistics: An international perspective . Avon: Multilingual Matters.
15. Hutchby, I. (2001). Conversation and technology: From the telephone to the Internet . Oxford: Blackwell.
16. Kasper, G. (2001). Four perspectives on L2 pragmatic development. Applied Linguistics, 22 (4), 502-530.
17. Kötter, M. (2001). MOOrituri te salutant? Language learning through MOO-based synchronous exchanges between learner tandems. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 14 (3-4), 289-304.
18. Kötter, M., Shield, L., & Stevens, A. (1999). Real-time audio and email for fluency: Promoting distance language learners' aural and oral skills via the Internet. Re-CALL, 11 (2), 55-60.
19. Kozma, R.B. (1994). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42 (2), 7-19.
20. Levy, M. (2002). CALL by design: Discourse, products and processes. ReCALL, 14 (1), 58-84.
21. Levy, M. . (2001). Coherence and direction in CALL research. In K. Cameron (Ed.), CALL-The challenge of change: Research and practice (pp. 5-14). Exeter: Elm Bank Publications.
22. Levy, M. . (2000). Scope, goals and methods in CALL research: Questions of coherence and autonomy. ReCALL, 12 (2), 170-195.
23. Levy, M. . (1997). Computer-assisted language learning: Context and conceptualisation . Oxford: Oxford UP.
24. Mehnert, U. (1998). The effects of different lengths of time for planning on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20 , 83-108.
25. Murray, D.E. (2000). Protean communication: The language of computer-mediated communication. T ESOL Quarterly, 34 (3), 397-421.
26. Negretti, R. (1999). Web-based activities and SLA: A conversation analysis research approach. Language Learning and Technology, 3 (1), 75-87.
27. Paramskas, D.M. (1999). The shape of computer-mediated communication. In C. Cameron (Ed.), CALL: Media, design and applications (pp. 13-34). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
28. Pawley, A., & Syder, F. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In J.C. Richards, & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 191-227). London: Longman.
29. Pederson, M. (1988). Research in CALL. In W.F. Smith (Ed.), Modern media in foreign language education: Theory and implementation (pp. 99-132). Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company.
30. Richards, J.C., & Rodgers, T.S. (1986). Approaches and methods in language teaching . Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
31. Robinson, P. (Ed.) (2001). Cognition and second language instruction . Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
32. Salaberry, M. (2000). Pedagogical design of computer-mediated communication tasks: Learning objectives and technological capabilities. The Modern Language Journal, 84 (1), 28-37.
33. Schwienhorst, K. (2002). Evaluating tandem language learning in the MOO: Discourse repair strategies in a bilingual internet project. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15 (2), 135-145.
34. Sinclair, J. McH. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation . Oxford: Oxford UP.
35. Skehan, P. (1998). The cognitive approach to language learning . Oxford: Oxford UP.
36. Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (2001). Cognition and tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 183-205). Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
37. Slaouti, D. (1998). Motivating learners to write. CALL Review , January, 9-13.
38. Sotillo, S.M. (2000). Discourse functions and syntactic complexity in synchronous and asynchronous communication. Language Learning and Technology, 4 (1), 82-119.
39. Toyoda, E., & Harrison, R. (2002). Categorization of text chat communication between learners and native speakers of Japanese. Language Learning and Technology, 6 (1), 82-99.
40. von der Emde, S., Schneider, J., & Kötter, M. (2001). Technically speaking: Transforming language learning through virtual learning environments (MOOs). The Modern Language Journal, 85 (2), 210-225.
41. Warschauer, M., & Kern, R. (2000). Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice . Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
42. Weininger, M., & Shield, L. (2001). Orality in MOO: Rehearsing speech in text: A preliminary study. In K. Cameron (Ed.), CALL-The challenge of change (pp. 89-96). Exeter: Elm Bank Publications.
43. Widdowson, H.G. (1998). Context, community and authentic language. TESOL Quarterly, 32 (4), 705-716.
44. Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning . Harlow: Longman.
45. Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986). Understanding computers and cognition . Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.