Social dimensions of telecollaborative foreign language study

Language Learning and Technology

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 60-81

  Belz, Julie A ^a,b  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041063942     PISSN: 10943501     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Agar, M. (1994). Language shock: Understanding the culture of conversation. New York: William Morrow.
2. Appel, M. C. (1999). Tandem language learning by e-mail: Some basic principles and a case study. Centre for Language and Communication Studies, Occasional Paper 54. Dublin: Trinity College. [Accessed on-line via ERIC ED 430396.]
3. Archer, M. S. (1988). Culture and agency: The place of culture in social theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
4. Archer, M. S. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5. Ash, M. G. (Ed.). (1997). German universities past and future. Crisis or renewal. Providence, RI: Berghahn Books.
6. Ashwill, M. A., Foraker, W., Nerison-Low, R., Milotich, M., & Milotich, U. (1999). The educational system in Germany. case study findings. National Institute on Student Achievement, Curriculum, and Assessment Office of Educational Research and Improvement U.S. Department of Education Report. Retrieved July 15, 2001, from http://www.ed.gov/pubs/GermanCaseStudy/title.html.
7. Belz, J. (2001). Institutional and individual dimensions of transatlantic group work in network-based language teaching. ReCALL, 13(2). 129-147.
8. Belz, J., & Müller-Hartmann, A. (2001). Deutsch-amerikanische Telekollaboration im Fremdsprachenunterricht - Lernende im Kreuzfeuer der institutionellen Zwänge [German-American telecollaboration: Learners in the cross-fire of institutional constraints]. Unpublished manuscript.
9. Brammerts, H. (1996). Language learning in tandem using the Internet. In M. Warschauer (Ed.), Telecollaboration in foreign language learning. Proceedings of the Hawai'i Sumposium (pp. 121-130). Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.
10. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, UK: Cambrdge University Press.
11. Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
12. Cameron, D., Frazer, E., Harvey, P., Rampton, M. B. H., & Richardson, K. (1992). Researching Language: Issues of Power and Method. New York: Routledge.
13. Candlin, C. (2000). Introduction. In B. Norton (Ed.), Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity and educational change (pp. xiii-xxi). New York: Longman.
14. Carter, B., & Sealey, A. (2000). Language, structure, and agency: What can realist social theory offer to sociolinguistics? Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4(1), 3-20.
15. Chapelle, C. (2000). Is network-based learning CALL? In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Networkbased language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 204-228). New York: Cambridge University Press.
16. Chun, D. (1994). Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. System, 22, 17-31.
17. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.
18. FirstClass. (2001). [computer software]. Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada: Centrinity.
19. Fischer, G. (1998). E-mail in foreign language teaching. Toward the creation of virtual classrooms. Tübingen, Germany: Stauffenburg.
20. Freeman, D., & Johnson, K. E. (1998). Reconceptualizing the knowledge-base of language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 32(3), 397-417.
21. Furstenberg, G., Levet, S., English, K., & Maillet, K. (2001). Giving a voice to the silent language of culture: The Cultura Project. Language Learning & Technology, 5(1), 55-102. Retrieved July 15, 2001, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol5num1/furstenberg/.
22. Gillespie, J. (2000). Toward a computer-based learning environment: A pilot study in the use of FirstClass. ReCALL, 12(1), pp. 19-26.
23. Hall, J. K. (1999, March 8). The discursive construction of learning in one high school classroom. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics, Stamford, CT.
24. nd ed.). [Ben Loves Anna]. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz Verlag.
25. Hatch, E. (1992). Discourse and language education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26. Hilgendorf, S. (1996). The impact of English in Germany. English Today, 12(3), 3-14.
27. Kern, R. G. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. The Modern Language Journal, 79(4), 457-476.
28. Kern, R. G. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Using e-mail exchanges to explore personal histories in two cultures. In M. Warschauer (Ed.), Telecollaboration in foreign language learning (pp. 105-119). Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
29. Kinginger, C., Gourves-Hayward, A., & Simpson, V. (1999). A tele-collaborative course on French-American intercultural communication. The French Review, 72(5), 853-866.
30. Kramsch, C. (1985). Literary texts in the classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 69(4), 356-366.
31. Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. Kramsch, C. (2000). Second language acquisition, applied linguistics, and the teaching of foreign languages. The Modern Language Journal, 84(3), 311-326.
33. Kramsch, C., & Thorne, S. (in press). Foreign language learning as global communicative practice. In D. Block & D. Cameron (Eds.), Language learning and teaching in the age of globalization. London: Routledge.
34. Lantolf, J. P. (1996). SLA theory building: "Letting all the flowers bloom!" Language Learning, 46(4), 713-749.
35. Lantolf, J. P. (Ed.). (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
36. Lantolf, J. P., & Pavlenko, A. (2001). (S)econd (L)anguage (A)ctivity theory: Understanding second language learners as people. In M. Breen (Ed.), Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research (pp. 141-158). New York: Longman.
37. Layder, D. (1993). New strategies in social research. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
38. Leont'ev, A. A. (1981). Psychology and the language learning process [Ed. by C. V. James]. New York: Pergamon Press.
39. Little, D., & Brammerts, H. (Eds.). (1996). A guide to language learning in tandem via the Internet. Centre for Language and Communication Studies, Occasional Paper 46. Dublin: Trinity College. [Accessed on-line via ERIC ED399789.]
40. McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (1994). Language as discourse: Perspectives for language teaching. London: Longman.
41. McGroarty, M. (1998). Constructive and constructivist challenges for applied linguistics. Language Learning, 48(4), 591-622.
42. Mendes, S. (Director). (1999). American Beauty [Motion picture]. USA: DreamWorks.
43. Meskill, C., & Ranglova, K. (2000). Sociocollaborative language le arning in Bulgaria. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 20-40). New York: Cambridge University Press.
44. Müller-Hartmann, A. (2000). The role of tasks in promoting intercultural learning in electrnic learning networks. Language Learning & Technology, 4(2), 129-147. Retrieved July 15, 2001, from: http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num2/muller/.
45. Noack, E. (1999). Comparing U.S. and German education. Like apples and sauerkraut. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(10), 773-776.
46. Norton, B. (2000). Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity, and educational change. New York: Longman.
47. Omaggio Hadley, A. (1993). Teaching language in context [2nd ed.]. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
48. Perkins, J. A., & Burn, B. (1978). Access to higher education: Two perspectives. A comparative study of the Federal Republic of Germany and the United States. New York: International Council for Education Development.
49. Rampton, B. (1995). Crossing. Language and ethnicity among adolescents. London: Longman.
50. Salaberry, R. (1999). CALL in the year 2000: Still developing the research agenda. A commentary on Carol Chapelle's CALL in the year 2000: Still in search of research paradigms. Language Learning & Technology, 3(1), 104-107. Retrieved July 15, 2001, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol3num1/comment/.
51. Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. N. (1998). Individual and social aspects of learning. Review of Research in Education, 23, 1-24.
52. Schmid, H.-C. (Director). (1995). Nach fünf im Urwald [It's a Jungle Out There; Motion picture]. Germany: Senator Film.
53. Schneider, P. (1991). Amerikanische Biographie [American biography]. In R. Walker, E. Tschirner, B. Nikolai, & G. Strasser (Eds.), Assoziationen. Deutsch für die Mittelstufe (p. 232-236). New York: McGraw-Hill.
54. Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. (2001). Intercultural communication: A discourse approach [2nd ed.]. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
55. Snyder, T. (2001). Digest of education statistics 2000. National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved July 31, 2001, from http://nces.ed.gov.pubs2001/2001034.pdf.
56. Sotillo, S. M. (2000). Discourse functions and syntactic complexity in synchronous and asynchronous communication. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 82-119. Retrieved July 15, 2001, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num1/sotillo/.
57. Tella, S. (1996). Foreign languages and modern technology: Harmony or hell? In M. Warschauer (Ed.), Telecollaboration in foreign language learning (pp. 3-18). Honolulu: University of Hawai'i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
58. VanPatten, B. (1999). What is SLA and what is it doing in this department? ADFL Bulletin, 30(3), 49-53.
59. Wallace, P. (2001). The psychology of the internet [2nd ed.]. New York: Cambridge University Press.
60. Warschauer, M. (Ed.). (1995). Virtual connections. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
61. Warschauer, M. (Ed.). (1996). Telecollaboration in foreign language learning. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
62. Warschauer, M. (1997). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. The Modern Language Journal, 81, 470-481.
63. Warschauer, M. (1998a). Researching technology in TESOL: Determinist, instrumental, and critical approaches. TESOL Quarterly, 32(4), 757-761.
64. Warschauer, M. (1998b). Online learning in sociocultural context. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 29(3), 68-88.
65. Warschauer, M. (1999). Electronic literacies. Language, culture, and power in online education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
66. Warschauer, M., & Kern, R. (Eds.). (2000). Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
67. Wegerif, R. (1998). The social dimension of asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 2(1). Retrieved July 15, 2001 from http://www.aln.org/alnweb/journal/vol2_issue1/wegerif.htm.
68. Widdowson, H, (1992). Practical stylistics: An approach to poetry. New York: Oxford University Press.
69. Woodson, J. (1998). If you come softly. New York: Penguin.