The scanning mechanism of eukaryotic translation initiation

Annual Review of Biochemistry

Volumn 83, Issue , 2014, Pages 779-812

  Hinnebusch, Alan G ^a  

^a EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (United States)

Author keywords

eIFs; initiation; ribosome; scanning; translation; tRNA

Indexed keywords

DEAD BOX PROTEIN; INITIATION FACTOR 1; INITIATION FACTOR 1A; INITIATION FACTOR 4A; INITIATION FACTOR 4G; INITIATION FACTOR 5; MESSENGER RNA; RNA HELICASE; TERNARY COMPLEX FACTOR; TRANSFER RNA; GUANOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; INITIATION FACTOR 3; METHIONINE; METHIONINE TRANSFER RNA; PROTEIN BINDING; START CODON;

CODON; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY; ENZYME ACTIVATION; EUKARYOTE; HYDROLYSIS; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN HYDROLYSIS; PROTEIN RNA BINDING; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; REVIEW; RIBOSOME SUBUNIT; RNA BINDING; TRANSLATION INITIATION; ANIMAL; BASE PAIRING; BINDING SITE; CHEMISTRY; GENETICS; HUMAN; METABOLISM; RIBOSOME; SMALL RIBOSOMAL SUBUNIT; START CODON; TETRAHYMENA;

ANIMALS; BASE PAIRING; BINDING SITES; CODON, INITIATOR; EUKARYOTIC INITIATION FACTOR-1; EUKARYOTIC INITIATION FACTOR-3; EUKARYOTIC INITIATION FACTOR-5; GUANOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; HUMANS; HYDROLYSIS; METHIONINE; PROTEIN BINDING; RIBOSOME SUBUNITS, SMALL, EUKARYOTIC; RIBOSOMES; RNA HELICASES; RNA, TRANSFER, MET; TETRAHYMENA;

EID: 84902193122     PISSN: 00664154     EISSN: 15454509     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060713-035802     Document Type: Review

References (248)

1. Hinnebusch AG, Dever TE, Asano K. 2007. Mechanism of translation initiation in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In Translational Control in Biology and Medicine, ed. MB Mathews,NSonenberg, JWBHershey, pp. 225-68. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.: Cold Spring Harb. Lab.
2. Kozak M. 1978. How do eucaryotic ribosomes select initiation regions in messenger RNA? Cell 15:1109-23
3. Kozak M. 1979. Inability of circular mRNA to attach to eukaryotic ribosomes. Nature 280:82-85
4. Sherman F, Stewart JW. 1982. Mutations altering initiation of translation of yeast iso-1-cytochrome c: contrasts between the eukaryotic and prokaryotic initiation process. In The Molecular Biology of the Yeast Saccharomyces Metabolism and Gene Expression, ed. JN Strathern, EW Jones, JR Broach, pp. 301-34. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.: Cold Spring Harb. Lab.
5. Sherman F, Stewart JW, Schweingruber AM. 1980. Mutants of yeast initiating translation of iso-1-cytochrome c within a region spanning 37 nucleotides. Cell 20:215-22
6. Kozak M. 1984. Selection of initiation sites by eucaryotic ribosomes: effect of inserting AUG triplets upstream from the coding sequence for preproinsulin. Nucleic Acids Res. 12:3873-93
7. Kozak M. 1986. Point mutations define a sequence flanking the AUG initiator codon that modulates translation by eukaryotic ribosomes. Cell 44:283-92
8. Hinnebusch AG. 2011. Molecular mechanism of scanning and start codon selection in eukaryotes. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 75:434-67
9. Pelletier J, Sonenberg N. 1985. Insertion mutagenesis to increase secondary structure within the 5' noncoding region of a eukaryotic mRNA reduces translational efficiency. Cell 40:515-26
10. Kozak M. 1986. Influences of mRNA secondary structure on initiation by eukaryotic ribosomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:2850-54
11. Pestova TV, Lorsch JR, Hellen CUT. 2007. The mechanism of translation initiation in eukaryotes. In Translational Control in Biology and Medicine, ed. MB Mathews,NSonenberg, JWBHershey, pp. 87-128. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.: Cold Spring Harb. Lab.
12. Lorsch JR, Dever TE. 2010. Molecular view of 43S complex formation and start site selection in eukaryotic translation initiation. J. Biol. Chem. 285:21203-7
13. Sonenberg N, Hinnebusch AG. 2009. Regulation of translation initiation in eukaryotes: mechanisms and biological targets. Cell 136:731-45
14. Rajyaguru P, Parker R. 2012. RGG motif proteins: modulators of mRNA functional states. Cell Cycle 11:2594-99
15. Jackson RJ, Kaminski A, Poyry TAA. 2007. Coupled termination-reinitiation events in mRNA translation. In Translational Control in Biology and Medicine, ed. MB Mathews, N Sonenberg, JWB Hershey, pp. 197-224. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.: Cold Spring Harb. Lab.
16. Kozak M. 1987. Effects of intercistronic length on the efficiency of reinitiation by eucaryotic ribosomes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 7:3438-45
17. Hinnebusch AG. 2005. Translational regulation of GCN4 and the general amino acid control of yeast. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 59:407-50
18. Hinnebusch AG. 2006. eIF3: a versatile scaffold for translation initiation complexes. Trends Biochem. Sci. 31:553-62
19. Lawless C, Pearson RD, Selley JN, Smirnova JB, Grant CM, et al. 2009. Upstream sequence elements direct post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression under stress conditions in yeast. BMC Genomics 10:7-26
20. Kertesz M, Wan Y, Mazor E, Rinn JL, Nutter RC, et al. 2010. Genome-wide measurement of RNA secondary structure in yeast. Nature 467:103-7
21. Doudna JA, Sarnow P. 2007. Translation initiation by viral internal ribosome entry sites. In Translational Control in Biology and Medicine, ed. MB Mathews, N Sonenberg, JWB Hershey, pp. 129-54. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.: Cold Spring Harb. Lab.
22. Jackson RJ. 2013. The current status of vertebrate cellular mRNA IRESs. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 5:a011569
23. Erickson FL, Hannig EM. 1996. Ligand interactions with eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2: role of the γ-subunit. EMBO J. 15:6311-20
24. Kapp LD, Lorsch JR. 2004. GTP-dependent recognition of the methionine moiety on initiator tRNA by translation factor eIF2. J. Mol. Biol. 335:923-36
25. Wagner T, Gross M, Sigler PB. 1984. Isoleucyl initiator tRNA does not initiate eucaryotic protein synthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 259:4706-9
26. Farruggio D, Chaudhuri J, Maitra U, RajBhandary UL. 1996. The A1 ×U72 base pair conserved in eukaryotic initiator tRNAs is important specifically for binding to the eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF2. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:4248-56
27. Kapp LD, Kolitz SE, Lorsch JR. 2006. Yeast initiator tRNA identity elements cooperate to influence multiple steps of translation initiation. RNA 12:751-64
28. Astrom SU, von Pawel-Rammingen U, Bystrom AS. 1993. The yeast initiator tRNAMet can act as an elongator tRNAMet in vivo. J. Mol. Biol. 233:43-58
29. RajBhandary UL, Chow CM. 1995. Initiator tRNAs and initiation of protein synthesis. In tRNA Structure, Biosynthesis, and Function, ed. D Soll, UL RajBhandary, pp. 511-28. Washington, DC: Am. Soc. Microbiol.
30. Benelli D, Londei P. 2011. Translation initiation in Archaea: conserved and domain-specific features. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 39:89-93
31. Schmitt E, Blanquet S,Mechulam Y. 2002. The large subunit of initiation factor aIF2 is a close structural homologue of elongation factors. EMBO J. 21:1821-32
32. Roll-Mecak A, Alone P, Cao C, Dever TE, Burley SK. 2004. X-ray structure of translation initiation factor eIF2γ: implications for tRNA and eIF2?binding. J. Biol. Chem. 279:10634-42
33. Pedullá N, Palermo R, Hasenöhrl D, Bläsi U, Cammarano P, Londei P. 2005. The archaeal eIF2 homologue: functional properties of an ancient translation initiation factor. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:1804-12
34. Yatime L, Schmitt E, Blanquet S, Mechulam Y. 2004. Functional molecular mapping of archaeal translation initiation factor 2. J. Biol. Chem. 279:15984-93
35. Yatime L, Mechulam Y, Blanquet S, Schmitt E. 2006. Structural switch of the γsubunit in an archaeal aIF2?γheterodimer. Structure 14:119-28
36. Nissen P, Kjeldgaard M, Thirup S, Polekhina G, Reshetnikova L, et al. 1995. Crystal structure of the ternary complex of Phe-tRNAPhe, EF-Tu, and a GTP analog. Science 270:1464-72
37. SchmittE, PanvertM,Lazennec-SchurdevinC,Coureux PD, Perez J, et al. 2012. Structure of the ternary initiation complex aIF2-GDPNP-methionylated initiator tRNA. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19:450-54
38. Sokabe M, Yao M, Sakai N, Toya S, Tanaka I. 2006. Structure of archaeal translational initiation factor 2?γ-GDP reveals significant conformational change of the ?-subunit and switch 1 region. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:13016-21
39. Yatime L, Mechulam Y, Blanquet S, Schmitt E. 2007. Structure of an archaeal heterotrimeric initiation factor 2 reveals a nucleotide state between the GTP and the GDP states. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104:18445-50
40. Stolboushkina E,Nikonov S, Nikulin A, Bläsi U,Manstein DJ, et al. 2008. Crystal structure of the intact archaeal translation initiation factor 2 demonstrates very high conformational flexibility in the ?-and ?-subunits. J. Mol. Biol. 382:680-91
41. Schmitt E, Naveau M, Mechulam Y. 2010. Eukaryotic and archaeal translation initiation factor 2: a heterotrimeric tRNA carrier. FEBS Lett. 584:405-12
42. Nika J, Rippel S, Hannig EM. 2001. Biochemical analysis of the eIF2?γ complex reveals a structural function for eIF2?in catalyzed nucleotide exchange. J. Biol. Chem. 276:1051-56
43. Shin BS, Kim JR, Walker SE,Dong J, Lorsch JR, Dever TE. 2011. Initiation factor eIF2 promotes eIF2-GTP-Met-tRNAi Met ternary complex binding to the 40S ribosome. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18:1227-34
44. NaveauM, Lazennec-Schurdevin C, PanvertM,Dubiez E, Mechulam Y, Schmitt E. 2013. Roles of yeast eIF2?and eIF2?subunits in the binding of the initiator methionyl-tRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 41:1047-57
45. NaveauM,Lazennec-SchurdevinC, PanvertM,Mechulam Y, SchmittE. 2010.tRNAbinding properties of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 from Encephalitozoon cuniculi. Biochemistry 49:8680-88
46. Hashem Y, des Georges A, Dhote V, Langlois R, Liao HY, et al. 2013. Structure of the mammalian ribosomal 43S preinitiation complex bound to the scanning factor DHX29. Cell 153:1108-19
47. Ben-Shem A, Garreau de Loubresse N, Melnikov S, Jenner L, Yusupova G, Yusupov M. 2011. The structure of the eukaryotic ribosome at 3.0A° resolution. Science 334:1524-29
48. +4 positions flanking the initiation codon with components of the mammalian 48S translation initiation complex. Genes Dev. 20:624-36
49. Erickson FL, Nika J, Rippel S,Hannig EM. 2001. Minimum requirements for the function of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2. Genetics 158:123-32
50. Trachsel H, Erni B, Schreier MH, Staehelin T. 1977. Initiation of mammalian protein synthesis: the assembly of the initiation complex with purified initiation factors. J. Mol. Biol. 116:755-67
51. Benne R, Hershey JWB. 1978. The mechanism of action of protein synthesis initiation factors from rabbit reticulocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 253:3078-87
52. Peterson DT, Merrick WC, Safer B. 1979. Binding and release of radiolabeled eukaroytic initiation factors 2 and 3 during 80 S initiation complex formation. J. Biol. Chem. 254:2509-19
53. Thomas A, Spaan W, van Steeg H, Voorma HO, Benne R. 1980. Mode of action of protein synthesis initiation factor eIF-1 from rabbit reticulocytes. FEBS Lett. 116:67-71
54. Chaudhuri J, Si K, Maitra U. 1997. Function of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1A (eIF1A) (formerly called eIF-4C) in initiation of protein synthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 272:7883-91
55. Chaudhuri J, Chowdhury D, Maitra U. 1999. Distinct functions of eukaryotic translation initiation factors eIF1A and eIF3 in the formation of the 40S ribosomal preinitiation complex. J. Biol. Chem. 274:17975-80
56. Algire MA, Maag D, Savio P, Acker MG, Tarun SZ Jr, et al. 2002. Development and characterization of a reconstituted yeast translation initiation system. RNA 8:382-97
57. Majumdar R, Bandyopadhyay A,Maitra U. 2003. Mammalian translation initiation factor eIF1 functions with eIF1A and eIF3 in the formation of a stable 40S preinitiation complex. J. Biol. Chem. 278:6580-87
58. Kolupaeva VG, Unbehaun A, Lomakin IB, Hellen CU, Pestova TV. 2005. Binding of eukaryotic initiation factor 3 to ribosomal 40S subunits and its role in ribosomal dissociation and anti-Association. RNA 11:470-86
59. Maag D, Fekete CA, Gryczynski Z, Lorsch JR. 2005. A conformational change in the eukaryotic translation preinitiation complex and release of eIF1 signal recognition of the start codon. Mol. Cell 17:265-75
60. Benne R, Hershey JWB. 1976. Purification and characterization of initiation factor IF-E3 from rabbit reticulocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 73:3005-9
61. Fraser CS, Lee JY, Mayeur GL, Bushell M, Doudna JA, Hershey JWB. 2004. The j-subunit of human translation initiation factor eIF3 is required for the stable binding of eIF3 and its subcomplexes to 40 S ribosomal subunits in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 279:8946-56
62. Maag D, Lorsch JR. 2003. Communication between eukaryotic translation initiation factors 1 and 1A on the yeast small ribosomal subunit. J. Mol. Biol. 330:917-24
63. Sokabe M, Fraser CS, Hershey JWB. 2012. The human translation initiation multi-factor complex promotes methionyl-tRNAi binding to the 40S ribosomal subunit. Nucleic Acids Res. 40:905-13
64. Nanda JS, Saini AK, Munoz AM, Hinnebusch AG, Lorsch JR. 2013. Coordinatedmovements of eukaryotic translation initiation factors eIF1, eIF1A, and eIF5 trigger phosphate release from eIF2 in response to start codon recognition by the ribosomal preinitiation complex. J. Biol. Chem. 288:5316-29
65. Fletcher CM, Pestova TV, Hellen CUT,Wagner G. 1999. Structure and interactions of the translation initiation factor eIF1. EMBO J. 18:2631-39
66. Battiste JB, Pestova TV, Hellen CUT, Wagner G. 2000. The eIF1A solution structure reveals a large RNA-binding surface important for scanning function. Mol. Cell 5:109-19
67. Reibarkh M, Yamamoto Y, Singh CR, del Rio F, Fahmy A, et al. 2008. Eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 1 carries two distinct eIF5-binding faces important for multifactor assembly and AUG selection. J. Biol. Chem. 283:1094-103
68. Rabl J, Leibundgut M, Ataide SF, Haag A, BanN. 2011. Crystal structure of the eukaryotic 40S ribosomal subunit in complex with initiation factor 1. Science 331:730-36
69. Yu Y, Marintchev A, Kolupaeva VG, Unbehaun A, Veryasova T, et al. 2009. Position of eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF1A on the 40S ribosomal subunit mapped by directed hydroxyl radical probing. Nucleic Acids Res. 37:5167-82
70. Lomakin IB, Steitz TA. 2013. The initiation of mammalian protein synthesis and mRNA scanning mechanism. Nature 500:307-11
71. Weisser M, Voigts-Hoffmann F, Rabl J, Leibundgut M, Ban N. 2013. The crystal structure of the eukaryotic 40S ribosomal subunit in complex with eIF1 and eIF1A. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20:1015-17
72. Lomakin IB, Kolupaeva VG, Marintchev A, Wagner G, Pestova TV. 2003. Position of eukaryotic initiation factor eIF1 on the 40S ribosomal subunit determined by directed hydroxyl radical probing. Genes Dev. 17:2786-97
73. Cheung YN, Maag D, Mitchell SF, Fekete CA, Algire MA, et al. 2007. Dissociation of eIF1 from the 40S ribosomal subunit is a key step in start codon selection in vivo. Genes Dev. 21:1217-30
74. Fekete CA,Applefield DJ, Blakely SA, Shirokikh N, PestovaT, et al. 2005. The eIF1A C-terminal domain promotes initiation complex assembly, scanning and AUG selection in vivo. EMBO J. 24:3588-601
75. Fekete CA, Mitchell SF, Cherkasova VA, Applefield D, Algire MA, et al. 2007. N-and C-terminal residues of eIF1A have opposing effects on the fidelity of start codon selection. EMBO J. 26:1602-14
76. Saini AK, Nanda JS, Lorsch JR, Hinnebusch AG. 2010. Regulatory elements in eIF1A control the fidelity of start codon selection by modulating tRNAi Met binding to the ribosome. Genes Dev. 24:97-110
77. SinghCR,HeH, IiM,Yamamoto Y, Asano K. 2004. Efficient incorporation of eukaryotic initiation factor 1 into the multifactor complex is critical for formation of functional ribosomal preinitiation complexes in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 279:31910-20
78. Unbehaun A, Borukhov SI, Hellen CU, Pestova TV. 2004. Release of initiation factors from 48S complexes during ribosomal subunit joining and the link between establishment of codon-Anticodon basepairing and hydrolysis of eIF2-bound GTP. Genes Dev. 18:3078-93
79. Phan L, Zhang X, Asano K, Anderson J, Vornlocher HP, et al. 1998. Identification of a translation initiation factor 3 (eIF3) core complex, conserved in yeast and mammals, that interacts with eIF5. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:4935-46
80. Valáŝek L, Phan L, Schoenfeld LW, Valaskova V, Hinnebusch AG. 2001. Related eIF3 subunits TIF32 and HCR1 interact with an RNA recognition motif in PRT1 required for eIF3 integrity and ribosome binding. EMBO J. 20:891-904
81. Zhou M, Sandercock AM, Fraser CS, Ridlova G, Stephens E, et al. 2008. Mass spectrometry reveals modularity and a complete subunit interaction map of the eukaryotic translation factor eIF3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105:18139-44
82. Phan L, Schoenfeld LW, Valáŝek L, Nielsen KH, Hinnebusch AG. 2001. A subcomplex of three eIF3 subunits binds eIF1 and eIF5 and stimulates ribosome binding of mRNA and tRNAi Met. EMBO J. 20:2954-65
83. Sun C, Todorovic A, Querol-Audi J, Bai Y, Villa N, et al. 2011. Functional reconstitution of human eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 (eIF3). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108:20473-78
84. Masutani M, Sonenberg N, Yokoyama S, Imataka H. 2007. Reconstitution reveals the functional core of mammalian eIF3. EMBO J. 26:3373-83
85. Querol-Audi J, Sun C, Vogan JM, Smith MD, Gu Y, et al. 2013. Architecture of human translation initiation factor 3. Structure 6:920-28
86. Siridechadilok B, FraserCS, Hall RJ,Doudna JA, NogalesE. 2005. Structural roles for human translation factor eIF3 in initiation of protein synthesis. Science 310:1513-15
87. Cuchalová L, Kouba T, Herrmannová A, Dányi I, Chiu WL, Valáŝek L. 2010. The RNA recognition motif of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3g (eIF3g) is required for resumption of scanning of posttermination ribosomes for reinitiation onGCN4 and together with eIF3i stimulates linear scanning. Mol. Cell. Biol. 30:4671-86
88. ElantakL,Wagner S,HerrmannováA,KaráskováM,RutkaiE, et al. 2010. The indispensable N-terminal half of eIF3j/HCR1 cooperates with its structurally conserved binding partner eIF3b/PRT1-RRM and with eIF1A in stringent AUG selection. J. Mol. Biol. 396:1097-116
89. Herrmannová A, Daujotyte D, Yang JC, Cuchalová L, Gorrec F, et al. 2012. Structural analysis of an eIF3 subcomplex reveals conserved interactions required for a stable and proper translation pre-initiation complex assembly. Nucleic Acids Res. 40:2294-311
90. Wei Z, Zhang P, Zhou Z, Cheng Z,Wan M, Gong W. 2004. Crystal structure of human eIF3k, the first structure of eIF3 subunits. J. Biol. Chem. 279:34983-90
91. Nielsen KH, Valáŝek L, Sykes C, Jivotovskaya A, Hinnebusch AG. 2006. Interaction of the RNP1 motif in PRT1 with HCR1 promotes 40S binding of eukaryotic initiation factor 3 in yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26:2984-98
92. Elantak L, Tzakos AG, Locker N, Lukavsky PJ. 2007. Structure of eIF3b-RRM and its interaction with eIF3j: structural insights into the recruitment of eIF3b to the 40S ribosomal subunit. J. Biol. Chem. 282:8165-74
93. Fraser CS, Berry KE, Hershey JWB, Doudna JA. 2007. eIF3j is located in the decoding center of the human 40S ribosomal subunit. Mol. Cell 26:811-19
94. Pisarev AV, Kolupaeva VG, Yusupov MM, Hellen CU, Pestova TV. 2008. Ribosomal position and contacts of mRNA in eukaryotic translation initiation complexes. EMBO J. 27:1609-21
95. Ben-Shem A, Jenner L, Yusupova G, Yusupov M. 2010. Crystal structure of the eukaryotic ribosome. Science 330:1203-9
96. Valáŝek L,Mathew A, Shin BS, Nielsen KH, Szamecz B,Hinnebusch AG. 2003. The yeast eIF3 subunits TIF32/a and NIP1/c and eIF5 make critical connections with the 40S ribosome in vivo. Genes Dev. 17:786-99
97. Kouba T,Dányi I, Gunisova S, MunzarovaV, VlckovaV, et al. 2012. Small ribosomal proteinRPS0 stimulates translation initiation bymediating 40S-binding of eIF3 via its direct contact with the eIF3a/TIF32 subunit. PLoS ONE 7:e40464
98. Chiu WL, Wagner S, Herrmannová A, Burela L, Zhang F, et al. 2010. The C-terminal region of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3a (eIF3a) promotes mRNA recruitment, scanning, and, together with eIF3j and the eIF3bRNArecognitionmotif, selection ofAUGstart codons. Mol. Cell. Biol. 30:4415-34
99. Kouba T, Rutkai E, Karásková M, Valáŝek L. 2012. The eIF3c/NIP1 PCI domain interacts with RNA and RACK1/ASC1 and promotes assembly of translation preinitiation complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 40:2683-99
100. Luna RE, Arthanari H, Hiraishi H, Nanda J, Martin-Marcos P, et al. 2012. The C-terminal domain of eukaryotic initiation factor 5 promotes start codon recognition by its dynamic interplay with eIF1 and eIF2?. Cell Rep. 1:689-702
101. Valáŝek L, Nielsen KH, Hinnebusch AG. 2002. Direct eIF2-eIF3 contact in the multifactor complex is important for translation initiation in vivo. EMBO J. 21:5886-98
102. Valáŝek L, Nielsen KH, Zhang F, Fekete CA, Hinnebusch AG. 2004. Interactions of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 (eIF3) subunit NIP1/c with eIF1 and eIF5 promote preinitiation complex assembly and regulate start codon selection. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:9437-55
103. Asano K, Krishnamoorthy T, Phan L, Pavitt GD, Hinnebusch AG. 1999. Conserved bipartite motifs in yeast eIF5 and eIF2Bε, GTPase-Activating and GDP-GTP exchange factors in translation initiation, mediate binding to their common substrate eIF2. EMBO J. 18:1673-88
104. Asano K, Clayton J, Shalev A, Hinnebusch AG. 2000. A multifactor complex of eukaryotic initiation factors eIF1, eIF2, eIF3, eIF5, and initiator tRNAMet is an important translation initiation intermediate in vivo. Genes Dev. 14:2534-46
105. Singh CR, Yamamoto Y, Asano K. 2004. Physical association of eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 5 carboxyl-terminal domain with the lysine-rich eIF2? segment strongly enhances its binding to eIF3. J. Biol. Chem. 279:49644-55
106. Yamamoto Y, Singh CR, Marintchev A, Hall NS, Hannig EM, et al. 2005. The eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 5 HEAT domain mediates multifactor assembly and scanning with distinct interfaces to eIF1, eIF2, eIF3, and eIF4G. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:16164-69
107. Karásková M, Gunisova S, Herrmannová A, Wagner S, Munzarova V, Valáŝek L. 2012. Functional characterization of the role of the N-terminal domain of the c/Nip1 subunit of eukaryotic initiation factor 3 (eIF3) in AUG recognition. J. Biol. Chem. 287:28420-34
108. Das S, Maiti T, Das K, Maitra U. 1997. Specific interaction of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5 (eIF5) with the ?-subunit of eIF2. J. Biol. Chem. 272:31712-18
109. Singh CR, Curtis C, Yamamoto Y, Hall NS, Kruse DS, et al. 2005. Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5 is critical for integrity of the scanning preinitiation complex and accurate control of GCN4 translation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:5480-91
110. Jivotovskaya AV, Valáŝek L,Hinnebusch AG, Nielsen KH. 2006. Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 (eIF3) and eIF2 can promote mRNA binding to 40S subunits independently of eIF4G in yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26:1355-72
111. Das S, Maitra U. 2000. Mutational analysis of mammalian translation initiation factor 5 (eIF5): role of interaction between the ?subunit of eIF2 and eIF5 in eIF5 function in vitro and in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:3942-50
112. Bieniossek C, Schütz P, Bumann M, Limacher A, Uson I, Baumann U. 2006. The crystal structure of the carboxy-terminal domain of human translation initiation factor eIF5. J. Mol. Biol. 360:457-65
113. Dominguez D, Altmann M, Benz J, Baumann U, Trachsel H. 1999. Interaction of translation initiation factor eIF4G with eIF4A in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 274:26720-26
114. DominguezD,Kislig E, AltmannM,TrachselH. 2001. Structural and functional similarities between the central eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF)4A-binding domain of mammalian eIF4G and the eIF4A-binding domain of yeast eIF4G. Biochem. J. 355:223-30
115. Imataka H, Sonenberg N. 1997. Human eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4G (eIF4G) possesses two separate and independent binding sites for eIF4A. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:6940-47
116. Neff CL, Sachs AB. 1999. Eukaryotic translation initiation factors eIF4G and eIF4A from Saccharomyces cerevisiae physically and functionally interact. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:5557-64
117. Pause A, Méthot N, Svitkin Y, Merrick WC, Sonenberg N. 1994. Dominant negative mutants of mammalian translation initiation factor eIF-4A define a critical role for eIF-4F in cap-dependent and capindependent initiation of translation. EMBO J. 13:1205-15
118. Rogers GW Jr, Komar AA, Merrick WC. 2002. eIF4A: the godfather of the DEAD box helicases. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol. 72:307-31
119. Schütz P, Bumann M, Oberholzer AE, Bieniossek C, Trachsel H, et al. 2008. Crystal structure of the yeast eIF4A-eIF4G complex: an RNA-helicase controlled by protein-protein interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105:9564-69
120. Caruthers JM, Johnson ER,McKay DB. 2000. Crystal structure of yeast initiation factor 4A, a DEAD-box RNA helicase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:13080-85
121. Oberer M, Marintchev A, Wagner G. 2005. Structural basis for the enhancement of eIF4A helicase activity by eIF4G. Genes Dev. 19:2212-23
122. HilbertM, Kebbel F, Gubaev A, Klostermeier D. 2011. eIF4G stimulates the activity of the DEAD box protein eIF4A by a conformational guidance mechanism. Nucleic Acids Res. 39:2260-70
123. Feoktistova K, Tuvshintogs E, Do A, Fraser CS. 2013. Human eIF4E promotes mRNA restructuring by stimulating eIF4A helicase activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110:13339-44
124. Blum S, Schmid SR, Pause A, Buser P, Linder P, et al. 1992. ATP hydrolysis by initiation factor 4A is required for translation initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:7664-68
125. Svitkin Y, Pause A, Haghighat A, Pyronnet S,WitherellGW,et al. 2001. The requirement for eukaryotic initiation factor 4A (eIF4A) in translation is in direct proportion to the degree of mRNA 5' secondary structure. RNA 7:382-94
126. Pestova TV, Kolupaeva VG. 2002. The roles of individual eukaryotic translation initiation factors in ribosomal scanning and initiation codon selection. Genes Dev. 16:2906-22
127. Mitchell SF, Walker SE, Algire MA, Park EH, Hinnebusch AG, Lorsch JR. 2010. the 5'-7-methylguanosine cap on eukaryotic mRNAs serves both to stimulate canonical translation initiation and block an alternative pathway. Mol. Cell 39:950-62
128. Blum S, Schmid SR, Pause A, Buser P, Linder P, et al. 1992. ATP hydrolysis by initiation factor 4A is required for translation initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:7664-68
129. Park EH, Zhang F, Warringer J, Sunnerhagen P, Hinnebusch AG. 2011. Depletion of eIF4G from yeast cells narrows the range of translational efficiencies genome-wide. BMC Genomics 12:1-18
130. Sengoku T,Nureki O,Nakamura A, Kobayashi S, Yokoyama S. 2006. Structural basis for RNA unwinding by the DEAD-box protein Drosophila Vasa. Cell 125:287-300
131. Liu F, Putnam A, Jankowsky E. 2008. ATP hydrolysis is required for DEAD-box protein recycling but not for duplex unwinding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105:20209-14
132. Parsyan A, Svitkin Y, Shahbazian D, Gkogkas C, Lasko P, et al. 2011. mRNA helicases: the tacticians of translational control. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12:235-45
133. Korneeva NL, Lamphear BJ, Hennigan FL, Rhoads RE. 2000. Mutually cooperative binding of eukaryotic translation initiation factor (eIF) 3 and eIF4A to human eIF4G-1. J. Biol. Chem. 275:41369-76
134. LeFebvre AK, Korneeva NL, TrutschlM, Cvek U, Duzan RD, et al. 2006. Translation initiation factor eIF4G-1 binds to eIF3 through the eIF3e subunit. J. Biol. Chem. 281:22917-32
135. Marintchev A, Edmonds K, Marintcheva B, Hendrickson E, Oberer M, et al. 2009. Topology and regulation of the human eIF4A/4G/4H helicase complex in translation initiation. Cell 136:447-60
136. Asano K, Shalev A, Phan L, Nielsen K, Clayton J, et al. 2001. Multiple roles for the carboxyl terminal domain of eIF5 in translation initiation complex assembly and GTPase activation. EMBO J. 20:2326-37
137. Tarun SZ, Wells SE, Deardorff JA, Sachs AB. 1997. Translation initiation factor eIF4G mediates in vitro poly(A) tail-dependent translation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:9046-51
138. Park E, Walker S, Lee J, Rothenburg S, Lorsch J,Hinnebusch A. 2011. Multiple elements in the eIF4G1 N-terminus promote assembly of eIF4G1 PABP mRNPs in vivo. EMBO J. 30:302-16
139. Hinton TM, Coldwell MJ, Carpenter GA, Morley SJ, Pain VM. 2007. Functional analysis of individual binding activities of the scaffold protein eIF4G. J. Biol. Chem. 282:1695-708
140. Kahvejian A, Svitkin YV, Sukarieh R, M'Boutchou MN, Sonenberg N. 2005. Mammalian poly(A)-binding protein is a eukaryotic translation initiation factor, which acts via multiple mechanisms. Genes Dev. 19:104-13
141. Svitkin YV, Evdokimova VM, Brasey A, Pestova TV, Fantus D, et al. 2009. General RNA-binding proteins have a function in poly(A)-binding protein-dependent translation. EMBO J. 28:58-68
142. Yanagiya A, Svitkin YV, Shibata S, Mikami S, Imataka H, Sonenberg N. 2009. Requirement of RNA binding of mammalian eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4GI (eIF4GI) for efficient interaction of eIF4E with the mRNA cap. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29:1661-69
143. Arava Y,Wang Y, Storey JD, Liu CL, Brown PO, Herschlag D. 2003. Genome-wide analysis of mRNA translation profiles in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:3889-94
144. Kaye NM, Emmett KJ, Merrick WC, Jankowsky E. 2009. Intrinsic RNA binding by the eukaryotic initiation factor 4F depends on a minimal RNAlength but not on them7Gcap. J. Biol. Chem. 284:17742-50
145. Berset C, Zurbriggen A, Djafarzadeh S, Altmann M, Trachsel H. 2003. RNA-binding activity of translation initiation factor eIF4G1 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. RNA 9:871-80
146. Singh CR, Watanabe R, Chowdhury W, Hiraishi H, Murai MJ, et al. 2012. Sequential eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5 (eIF5) binding to the charged disordered segments of eIF4G and eIF2? stabilizes the 48S preinitiation complex and promotes its shift to the initiation mode. Mol. Cell. Biol. 32:3978-89
147. Rajagopal V, Park EH, Hinnebusch AG, Lorsch JR. 2012. Specific domains in yeast eIF4G strongly bias the RNA unwinding activity of the eIF4F complex towards duplexes with 5'-overhangs. J. Biol. Chem. 287:20301-12
148. Hilliker A, Gao Z, Jankowsky E, Parker R. 2011. The DEAD-box protein Ded1 modulates translation by the formation and resolution of an eIF4F-mRNA complex. Mol. Cell 43:962-72
149. Berthelot K, Muldoon M, Rajkowitsch L, Hughes J, McCarthy JE. 2004. Dynamics and processivity of 40S ribosome scanning on mRNA in yeast. Mol. Microbiol. 51:987-1001
150. Abaeva IS, Marintchev A, Pisareva VP, Hellen CU, Pestova TV. 2011. Bypassing of stems versus linear base-by-base inspection of mammalian mRNAs during ribosomal scanning. EMBO J. 30:115-29
151. Rozovsky N, Butterworth AC, Moore MJ. 2008. Interactions between eIF4AI and its accessory factors eIF4B and eIF4H. RNA 14:2136-48
152. Dmitriev SE, Terenin IM, Dunaevsky YE,Merrick WC, Shatsky IN. 2003. Assembly of 48S translation initiation complexes from purified components with mRNAs that have some base pairing within their 5' untranslated regions. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:8925-33
153. Shahbazian D, Parsyan A, Petroulakis E, Topisirovic I,Martineau Y, et al. 2010. Control of cell survival and proliferation by mammalian eukaryotic initiation factor 4B. Mol. Cell. Biol. 30:1478-85
154. Bi X, Ren J, Goss DJ. 2000. Wheat germ translation initiation factor eIF4B affects eIF4A and eIFiso4F helicase activity by increasing the ATP binding affinity of eIF4A. Biochemistry 39:5758-65
155. Nielsen KH, BehrensMA, He Y, Oliveira CL, Jensen LS, et al. 2011. Synergistic activation of eIF4A by eIF4B and eIF4G. Nucleic Acids Res. 39:2678-89
156. Ozes AR, Feoktistova K, Avanzino BC, Fraser CS. 2011. Duplex unwinding and ATPase activities of the DEAD-box helicase eIF4A are coupled by eIF4G and eIF4B. J. Mol. Biol. 412:674-87
157. AltmannM,Wittmer B,Méthot N, Sonenberg N, Trachsel H. 1995. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae translation initiation factor Tif3 and its mammalian homologue, eIF-4B, have RNA annealing activity. EMBO J. 14:3820-27
158. Altmann M, Müller PP, Wittmer B, Ruchti F, Lanker S, Trachsel H. 1993. A Saccharomyces cerevisiae homologue of mammalian translation initiation factor 4B contributes to RNA helicase activity. EMBO J. 12:3997-4003
159. Coppolecchia R, Buser P, Stotz A, Linder P. 1993. A new yeast translation initiation factor suppresses a mutation in the eIF-4A RNA helicase. EMBO J. 12:4005-11
160. Walker SE, Zhou F, Mitchell SF, Larson VS, Valáŝek L, et al. 2013. Yeast eIF4B binds to the head of the 40S ribosomal subunit and promotes mRNA recruitment through itsN-terminal and internal repeat domains. RNA 19:191-207
161. Andreou AZ, Klostermeier D. 2014. eIF4B and eIF4G jointly stimulate eIF4A ATPase and unwinding activities by modulation of the eIF4A conformational cycle. J. Mol. Biol. 4261:51-61
162. Park EH,Walker SE, Zhou F, Lee JM, Rajagopal V, et al. 2012. Yeast eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 4B enhances complex assembly between eIF4A and eIF4G in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 288:2340-54
163. Méthot N, Song MS, Sonenberg N. 1996. A region rich in aspartic acid, arginine, tyrosine, and glycine (DRYFG) mediates eukaryotic initiation factor 4B (eIF4B) self-Association and interaction with eIF3. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:5328-34
164. Méthot N, Pickett G, Keene JD, Sonenberg N. 1996. In vitro RNA selection identifies RNA ligands that specifically bind to eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4B: the role of the RNA remotif. RNA 2:38-50
165. Vassilenko KS, Alekhina OM, Dmitriev SE, Shatsky IN, Spirin AS. 2011. Unidirectional constant rate motion of the ribosomal scanning particle during eukaryotic translation initiation. Nucleic Acids Res. 39:5555-67
166. Matsuda D, Dreher TW. 2006. Close spacing of AUG initiation codons confers dicistronic character on a eukaryotic mRNA. RNA 12:1338-49
167. Prévôt D, Décimo D, Herbreteau CH, Roux F, Garin J, et al. 2003. Characterization of a novel RNAbinding region of eIF4GI critical for ribosomal scanning. EMBO J. 22:1909-21
168. Watanabe R, Murai MJ, Singh CR, Fox S, Ii M, Asano K. 2010. The eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 4G HEAT domain promotes translation re-initiation in yeast both dependent on and independent of eIF4A mRNA helicase. J. Biol. Chem. 285:21922-33
169. Kozak M. 1977. Nucleotide sequences of 5'-terminal ribosome-protected initiation regions from two reovirus messages. Nature 269:391-94
170. Lazarowitz SG, Robertson HD. 1977. Initiator regions from the small size class of reovirus messenger RNA protected by rabbit reticulocyte ribosomes. J. Biol. Chem. 252:7842-49
171. Spirin AS. 2009. How does a scanning ribosomal particle move along the 5'-untranslated region of eukaryotic mRNA? Brownian ratchet model. Biochemistry 48:10688-92
172. Niederberger N, Trachsel H, Altmann M. 1998. The RNA recognition motif of yeast translation initiation factor Tif3/eIF4B is required but not sufficient for RNA strand-exchange and translational activity. RNA 4:1259-67
173. Pisareva VP,Pisarev AV,Komar AA, HellenCU, PestovaTV. 2008. Translation initiation onmammalian mRNAs with structured 5'UTRs requires DExH-box protein DHX29. Cell 135:1237-50
174. Dhote V, Sweeney TR, Kim N, Hellen CU, Pestova TV. 2012. Roles of individual domains in the function of DHX29, an essential factor required for translation of structured mammalian mRNAs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109:E3150-59
175. Parsyan A, Shahbazian D, Martineau Y, Petroulakis E, Alain T, et al. 2009. The helicase protein DHX29 promotes translation initiation, cell proliferation, and tumorigenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106:22217-22
176. Chuang RY, Weaver PL, Liu Z, Chang TH. 1997. Requirement of the DEAD-box protein ded1p for messenger RNA translation. Science 275:1468-71
177. de la Cruz J, Iost I, Kressler D, Linder P. 1997. The p20 and Ded1 proteins have antagonistic roles in eIF4E-dependent translation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:5201-6
178. Jamieson DJ, Beggs JD. 1991. A suppressor of yeast spp81/ded1 mutations encodes a very similar putative ATP-dependent RNA helicase. Mol. Microbiol. 5:805-12
179. Marsden S,Nardelli M, Linder P, McCarthy JE. 2006. Unwinding single RNA molecules using helicases involved in eukaryotic translation initiation. J. Mol. Biol. 361:327-35
180. Lai MC, Lee YH, Tarn WY. 2008. The DEAD-box RNA helicase DDX3 associates with export messenger ribonucleoproteins as well as tip-Associated protein and participates in translational control. Mol. Biol. Cell 19:3847-58
181. Soto-Rifo R, Rubilar PS, Limousin T, de Breyne S, Décimo D, Ohlmann T. 2012. DEAD-box protein DDX3 associates with eIF4F to promote translation of selected mRNAs. EMBO J. 31:3745-56
182. Lee CS, Dias AP, Jedrychowski M, Patel AH, Hsu JL, Reed R. 2008. Human DDX3 functions in translation and interacts with the translation initiation factor eIF3. Nucleic Acids Res. 36:4708-18
183. Geissler R, Golbik RP, Behrens SE. 2012. The DEAD-box helicase DDX3 supports the assembly of functional 80S ribosomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 40:4998-5011
184. Cigan AM, Feng L, Donahue TF. 1988. tRNAi Met functions in directing the scanning ribosome to the start site of translation. Science 242:93-97
185. Kolitz SE, Takacs JE, Lorsch JR. 2009. Kinetic and thermodynamic analysis of the role of start codon/anticodon base pairing during eukaryotic translation initiation. RNA 15:138-52
186. Passmore LA, Schmeing TM, Maag D, Applefield DJ, AckerMG, et al. 2007. The eukaryotic translation initiation factors eIF1 and eIF1A induce an open conformation of the 40S ribosome. Mol. Cell 26:41-50
187. Lin CA, Ellis SR, True HL. 2009. The Sua5 protein is essential for normal translational regulation in yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 30:354-63
188. El Yacoubi B, Lyons B, Cruz Y, Reddy R, Nordin B, et al. 2009. The universal YrdC/Sua5 family is required for the formation of threonylcarbamoyladenosine in tRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 37:2894-909
189. DaugeronMC, Lenstra TL, Frizzarin M, El Yacoubi B, Liu X, et al. 2011. Gcn4 misregulation reveals a direct role for the evolutionary conserved EKC/KEOPS in the t6A modification of tRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 39:6148-60
190. Srinivasan M, Mehta P, Yu Y, Prugar E, Koonin EV, et al. 2011. The highly conserved KEOPS/EKC complex is essential for a universal tRNA modification, t6A. EMBO J. 30:873-81
191. El Yacoubi B, Hatin I, Deutsch C, Kahveci T, Rousset JP, et al. 2011. A role for the universal Kae1/Qri7/YgjD (COG0533) family in tRNA modification. EMBO J. 30:882-93
192. Korostelev A, Trakhanov S, Laurberg M, Noller HF. 2006. Crystal structure of a 70S ribosome-tRNA complex reveals functional interactions and rearrangements. Cell 126:1065-77
193. Selmer M, Dunham CM, Murphy FV IV, Weixlbaumer A, Petry S, et al. 2006. Structure of the 70S ribosome complexed with mRNA and tRNA. Science 313:1935-42
194. Simonetti A, Marzi S,Myasnikov AG, Fabbretti A, YusupovM,et al. 2008. Structure of the 30S translation initiation complex. Nature 455:416-20
195. Dong J, Nanda JS, Rahman H, Pruitt MR, Shin BS, et al. 2008. Genetic identification of yeast 18S rRNA residues required for efficient recruitment of initiator tRNAMet and AUG selection. Genes Dev. 22:2242-55
196. Nemoto N, Singh CR, Udagawa T, Wang S, Thorson E, et al. 2010. Yeast 18 S rRNA is directly involved in the ribosomal response to stringent AUG selection during translation initiation. J. Biol. Chem. 285:32200-12
197. LancasterL,NollerHF. 2005. Involvement of 16SrRNAnucleotides G1338 andA1339 in discrimination of initiator tRNA. Mol. Cell 20:623-32
198. Abdi NM, Fredrick K. 2005. Contribution of 16S rRNA nucleotides forming the 30S subunit A and P sites to translation in Escherichia coli. RNA 11:1624-32
199. Qin D, Abdi NM, Fredrick K. 2007. Characterization of 16S rRNA mutations that decrease the fidelity of translation initiation. RNA 13:2348-55
200. Drabkin HJ, Helk B, RajBhandary UL. 1993. The role of nucleotides conserved in eukaryotic initiator methionine tRNAs in initiation of protein synthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 268:25221-28
201. Lomakin IB, Shirokikh NE, Yusupov MM, Hellen CU, Pestova TV. 2006. The fidelity of translation initiation: reciprocal activities of eIF1, IF3 and YciH. EMBO J. 25:196-210
202. von Pawel-Rammingen U, A° ström S, Byström AS. 1992. Mutational analysis of conserved positions potentially important for initiator tRNA function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12:1432-42
203. Battle DJ, Doudna JA. 2002. Specificity of RNA-RNA helix recognition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:11676-81
204. Basavappa R, Sigler PB. 1991. The 3A° crystal structure of yeast initiator tRNA: functional implications in initiator/elongator discrimination. EMBO J. 10:3105-11
205. Schmeing TM, Voorhees RM, Kelley AC, Ramakrishnan V. 2011. Howmutations in tRNA distant from the anticodon affect the fidelity of decoding. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18:432-36
206. Pestova TV, Borukhov SI, Hellen CUT. 1998. Eukaryotic ribosomes require initiation factors 1 and 1A to locate initiation codons. Nature 394:854-59
207. Yoon HJ, Donahue TF. 1992. The sui1 suppressor locus in Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes a translation factor that functions during tRNAi Met recognition of the start codon. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12:248-60
208. Algire MA, Maag D, Lorsch JR. 2005. Pi release from eIF2, not GTP hydrolysis, is the step controlled by start-site selection during eukaryotic translation initiation. Mol. Cell 20:251-62
209. Nanda JS, Cheung YN, Takacs JE,Martin-Marcos P, Saini AK, et al. 2009. eIF1 controls multiple steps in start codon recognition during eukaryotic translation initiation. J. Mol. Biol. 394:268-85
210. Alone PV, Cao C, Dever TE. 2008. Translation initiation factor 2γmutant alters start codon selection independent of Met-tRNA binding. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28:6877-88
211. Shin BS, Acker MG, Kim JR, Maher KN, Arefin SM, et al. 2011. Structural integrity of ?-helix H12 in translation initiation factor eIF5B is critical for 80S complex stability. RNA 17:687-96
212. Maag D, Algire MA, Lorsch JR. 2006. Communication between eukaryotic translation initiation factors 5 and 1A within the ribosomal pre-initiation complex plays a role in start site selection. J. Mol. Biol. 356:724-37
213. Ivanov IP, Loughran G, Sachs MS, Atkins JF. 2010. Initiation context modulates autoregulation of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1 (eIF1). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107:18056-60
214. Martin-Marcos P, Cheung YN, Hinnebusch AG. 2011. Functional elements in initiation factors 1, 1A and 2?discriminate against poor AUG context and non-AUG start codons. Mol. Cell. Biol. 31:4814-31
215. Loughran G, Sachs MS, Atkins JF, Ivanov IP. 2012. Stringency of start codon selection modulates autoregulation of translation initiation factor eIF5. Nucleic Acids Res. 40:2898-906
216. DonahueT. 2000. Genetic approaches to translation initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In Translational Control of Gene Expression, ed. N Sonenberg, JWB Hershey, MB Mathews, pp. 487-502. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.: Cold Spring Harb. Lab.
217. Dorris DR, Erickson FL, Hannig EM. 1995. Mutations in GCD11, the structural gene for eIF-2γ in yeast, alter translational regulation of GCN4 and the selection of the start site for protein synthesis. EMBO J. 14:2239-49
218. HuangH, Yoon H, Hannig EM, Donahue TF. 1997. GTP hydrolysis controls stringent selection of the AUG start codon during translation initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 11:2396-413
219. Donahue TF, Cigan AM, Pabich EK, Castilho-Valavicius B. 1988. Mutations at a Zn(II) finger motif in the yeast eIF-2?gene alter ribosomal start-site selection during the scanning process. Cell 54:621-32
220. Hashimoto NN, Carnevalli LS, Castilho BA. 2002. Translation initiation at non-AUG codonsmediated by weakened association of eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 2 subunits. Biochem. J. 367:359-68
221. Alone PV, Dever TE. 2006. Direct binding of translation initiation factor eIF2γ-G domain to its GTPase-Activating and GDP-GTP exchange factors eIF5 and eIF2Bε. J. Biol. Chem. 281:12636-44
222. Conte MR, Kelly G, Babon J, Sanfelice D, Youell J, et al. 2006. Structure of the eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 5 reveals a fold common to several translation factors. Biochemistry 45:4550-58
223. Das S, Ghosh R, Maitra U. 2001. Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5 functions as a GTPaseactivating protein. J. Biol. Chem. 276:6720-26
224. Paulin FE, Campbell LE, O'Brien K, Loughlin J, Proud CG. 2001. Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5 (eIF5) acts as a classical GTPase-Activator protein. Curr. Biol. 11:55-59
225. Majumdar R, Maitra U. 2005. Regulation of GTP hydrolysis prior to ribosomal AUG selection during eukaryotic translation initiation. EMBO J. 24:3737-46
226. He H, von der Haar T, Singh CR, Ii M, Li B, et al. 2003. The yeast eukaryotic initiation factor 4G (eIF4G) HEAT domain interacts with eIF1 and eIF5 and is involved in stringent AUG selection. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:5431-45
227. Evans DR, Rasmussen C, Hanic-Joyce PJ, Johnston GC, Singer RA, Barnes CA. 1995. Mutational analysis of the Prt1 protein subunit of yeast translation initiation factor 3. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:4525-35
228. Bolger TA, Wente SR. 2011. Gle1 is a multifunctional DEAD-box protein regulator that modulates Ded1 in translation initiation. J. Biol. Chem. 286:39750-59
229. SinghCR, Lee B,Udagawa T, Mohammad-Qureshi SS, Yamamoto Y, et al. 2006. An eIF5/eIF2 complex antagonizes guanine nucleotide exchange by eIF2B during translation initiation. EMBO J. 25:4537-46
230. Singh CR, Udagawa T, Lee B, Wassink S, He H, et al. 2007. Change in nutritional status modulates the abundance of critical pre-initiation intermediate complexes during translation initiation in vivo. J. Mol. Biol. 370:315-30
231. Jennings MD, Pavitt GD. 2010. eIF5 has GDI activity necessary for translational control by eIF2 phosphorylation. Nature 465:378-81
232. Acker MG, Shin BS, Dever TE, Lorsch JR. 2006. Interaction between eukaryotic initiation factors 1A and 5B is required for efficient ribosomal subunit joining. J. Biol. Chem. 281:8469-75
233. Acker MG, Shin BS, Nanda JS, Saini AK, Dever TE, Lorsch JR. 2009. Kinetic analysis of late steps of eukaryotic translation initiation. J. Mol. Biol. 385:491-506
234. Roll-Mecak A, CaoC,Dever TE, Burley SK. 2000. X-ray structures of the universal translation initiation factor IF2/eIF5B. Conformational changes on GDP and GTP binding. Cell 103:781-92
235. Choi SK,Olsen DS,Roll-Mecak A, Martung A,RemoKL, et al. 2000. Physical and functional interaction between the eukaryotic orthologs of prokaryotic translation initiation factors IF1 and IF2. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:7183-91
236. Olsen DS, Savner EM, Mathew A, Zhang F, Krishnamoorthy T, et al. 2003. Domains of eIF1A that mediate binding to eIF2, eIF3 and eIF5B and promote ternary complex recruitment in vivo. EMBO J. 22:193-204
237. Marintchev A, Kolupaeva VG, Pestova TV, Wagner G. 2003. Mapping the binding interface between human eukaryotic initiation factors 1A and 5B: a new interaction between old partners. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:1535-40
238. Fringer JM, AckerMG, Fekete CA, Lorsch JR, Dever TE. 2007. Coupled release of eukaryotic translation initiation factors 5B and 1A from 80S ribosomes following subunit joining. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27:2384-97
239. Kainuma M, Hershey JWB. 2001. Depletion and deletion analyses of eucaryotic translation initiation factor 1A Sacchaaromyces cerevisiae. Biochimie 83:505-14
240. Pestova TV, Lomakin IB, Lee JH, Choi SK, Dever TE, Hellen CUT. 2000. The joining of ribosomal subunits in eukaryotes requires eIF5B. Nature 403:332-35
241. Lee JH, PestovaTV, Shin BS, CaoC,Choi SK, Dever TE. 2002. Initiation factor eIF5B catalyzes second GTP-dependent step in eukaryotic translation initiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:16689-94
242. Shin BS, Maag D, Roll-Mecak A, Arefin MS, Burley SK, et al. 2002. Uncoupling of initiation factor eIF5B/IF2 GTPase and translational activities by mutations that lower ribosome affinity. Cell 111:1015-25
243. Shin BS, Kim JR, AckerMG, Maher KN, Lorsch JR, Dever TE. 2009. rRNA suppressor of a eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5B/initiation factor 2 mutant reveals a binding site for translational GTPases on the small ribosomal subunit. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29:808-21
244. Unbehaun A, Marintchev A, Lomakin IB, Didenko T, Wagner G, et al. 2007. Position of eukaryotic initiation factor eIF5B on the 80S ribosome mapped by directed hydroxyl radical probing. EMBO J. 26:3109-23
245. Allen GS, Zavialov A, Gursky R, Ehrenberg M, Frank J. 2005. The cryo-EM structure of a translation initiation complex from Escherichia coli. Cell 121:703-12
246. Guenneugues M, Caserta E, Brandi L, Spurio R, Meunier S, et al. 2000. Mapping the fMet-tRNAfMet binding site of initiation factor IF2. EMBO J. 19:5233-40
247. Guillon L, Schmitt E, Blanquet S, Mechulam Y. 2005. Initiator tRNA binding by e/aIF5B, the eukaryotic/ archaeal homologue of bacterial initiation factor IF2. Biochemistry 44:15594-601
248. Ingolia NT, Ghaemmaghami S, Newman JR, Weissman JS. 2009. Genome-wide analysis in vivo of translation with nucleotide resolution using ribosome profiling. Science 324:218-23