RGG motif proteins: Modulators of mRNA functional states

Cell Cycle

Volumn 11, Issue 14, 2012, Pages 2594-2599

  Rajyaguru, Purusharth ^a   Parker, Roy ^a  

^a HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Arginine methylation; Decapping; eIF4E; eIF4G; mRNA decay; npl3; Re entry to translation; RGG motif; Sbp1; Translation initiation

Indexed keywords

ARGININE; EIF4G PROTEIN; GLYCINE; MESSENGER RNA; PROTEIN; RGG MOTIF PROTEIN; SCD6 PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARGININE METHYLATION; HUMAN; METHYLATION; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REVIEW; RNA SPLICING; RNA TRANSCRIPTION; RNA TRANSLATION; RNA TRANSPORT; TRANSLATION REGULATION;

EID: 84864379832     PISSN: 15384101     EISSN: 15514005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cc.20716     Document Type: Review

References (57)

1. Rajyaguru P, She M, Parker R. Scd6 targets eIF4G to repress translation: RGG motif proteins as a class of eIF4G-binding proteins. Mol Cell 2012; 45:244-54; PMID:22284680; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2011.11.026.
2. Sonenberg N, Hinnebusch AG. New modes of translational control in development, behavior and disease. Mol Cell 2007; 28:721-9; PMID:18082597; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2007.11.018.
3. Topisirovic I, Sonenberg N. mRNA Translation and Energy Metabolism in Cancer: The Role of the MAPK and mTORC1 Pathways. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 2011.
4. Ruggero D, Sonenberg N. The Akt of translational control. Oncogene 2005; 24:7426-34; PMID:16288289; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1209098.
5. Liu-Yesucevitz L, Bassell GJ, Gitler AD, Hart AC, Klann E, Richter JD, et al. Local RNA translation at the synapse and in disease. J Neurosci 2011; 31:16086-93; PMID:22072660; http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4105-11.2011.
6. Bhuvanagiri M, Schlitter AM, Hentze MW, Kulozik AE. NMD: RNA biology meets human genetic medicine. Biochem J 2010; 430:365-77; PMID:20795950; http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BJ20100699.
7. Decker CJ, Parker R. A turnover pathway for both stable and unstable mRNAs in yeast: evidence for a requirement for deadenylation. Genes Dev 1993; 7:1632-43; PMID:8393418; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.7.8.1632.
8. Muhlrad D, Decker CJ, Parker R. Deadenylation of the unstable mRNA encoded by the yeast MFA2 gene leads to decapping followed by 5′→3′ digestion of the transcript. Genes Dev 1994; 8:855-66; PMID:7926773; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.8.7.855.
9. Tharun S, Parker R. Targeting an mRNA for decapping: displacement of translation factors and association of the Lsm1p-7p complex on deadenylated yeast mRNAs. Mol Cell 2001; 8:1075-83; PMID:11741542; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S1097-2765(01)00395-1.
10. Brengues M, Teixeira D, Parker R. Movement of eukaryotic mRNAs between polysomes and cytoplasmic processing bodies. Science 2005; 310:486-9; PMID:16141371; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1115791.
11. Bhattacharyya SN, Habermacher R, Martine U, Closs EI, Filipowicz W. Relief of microRNA-mediated translational repression in human cells subjected to stress. Cell 2006; 125:1111-24; PMID:16777601; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. cell.2006.04.031.
12. Parker R, Sheth U. P bodies and the control of mRNA translation and degradation. Mol Cell 2007; 25:635-46; PMID:17349952; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.molcel.2007.02.011.
13. Eulalio A, Behm-Ansmant I, Izaurralde E. P bodies: at the crossroads of post-transcriptional pathways. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007; 8:9-22; PMID:17183357; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2080.
14. Hilgers V, Teixeira D, Parker R. Translationin-dependent inhibition of mRNA deadenylation during stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. RNA 2006; 12:1835-45; PMID:16940550; http://dx.doi.org/10.1261/rna.241006.
15. Gowrishankar G, Winzen R, Dittrich-Breiholz O, Redich N, Kracht M, Holtmann H. Inhibition of mRNA deadenylation and degradation by different types of cell stress. Biol Chem 2006; 387:323-7; PMID:16542155; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1515/BC.2006.043.
16. Igreja C, Izaurralde E. CUP promotes deadenylation and inhibits decapping of mRNA targets. Genes Dev 2011; 25:1955-67; PMID:21937713; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.17136311.
17. Marnef A, Sommerville J, Ladomery MR. RAP55: insights into an evolutionarily conserved protein family. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2009; 41:977-81; PMID:18723115; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2008.06.015.
18. Hilliker A, Gao Z, Jankowsky E, Parker R. The DEAD-box protein Ded1 modulates translation by the formation and resolution of an eIF4F-mRNA complex. Mol Cell 2011; 43:962-72; PMID:21925384; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel. 2011.08.008.
19. Kapasi P, Chaudhuri S, Vyas K, Baus D, Komar AA, Fox PL, et al. L13a blocks 48S assembly: role of a general initiation factor in mRNA-specific translational control. Mol Cell 2007; 25:113-26; PMID:17218275; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2006.11.028.
20. Paquin N, Ménade M, Poirier G, Donato D, Drouet E, Chartrand P. Local activation of yeast ASH1 mRNA translation through phosphorylation of Khd1p by the casein kinase Yck1p. Mol Cell 2007; 26:795-809; PMID:17588515; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2007.05.016.
21. Chen C, Nott TJ, Jin J, Pawson T. Deciphering arginine methylation: Tudor tells the tale. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2011; 12:629-42; PMID:21915143; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm3185.
22. Pawlak MR, Scherer CA, Chen J, Roshon MJ, Ruley HE. Arginine N-methyltransferase 1 is required for early postimplantation mouse development, but cells deficient in the enzyme are viable. Mol Cell Biol 2000; 20:4859-69; PMID:10848611; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.20.13.4859-69.2000.
23. Wong CM, Tang HM, Kong KY, Wong GW, Qiu H, Jin DY, et al. Yeast arginine methyltransferase Hmt1p regulates transcription elongation and termination by methylating Npl3p. Nucleic Acids Res 2010; 38:2217-28; PMID:20053728; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp1133.
24. McBride AE, Cook JT, Stemmler EA, Rutledge KL, McGrath KA, Rubens JA. Arginine methylation of yeast mRNA-binding protein Npl3 directly affects its function, nuclear export and intranuclear protein interactions. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:30888-98; PMID:15998636; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M505831200.
25. Calvanese V, Lara E, Suárez-Alvarez B, Abu Dawud R, Vázquez-Chantada M, Martínez-Chantar ML, et al. Sirtuin 1 regulation of developmental genes during differentiation of stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107:13736-41; PMID:20631301; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.1001399107.
26. Hubers L, Valderrama-Carvajal H, Laframboise J, Timbers J, Sanchez G, Côté J. HuD interacts with survival motor neuron protein and can rescue spinal muscular atrophy-like neuronal defects. Hum Mol Genet 2011; 20:553-79; PMID:21088113; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddq500.
27. Ostareck-Lederer A, Ostareck DH, Rucknagel KP, Schierhorn A, Moritz B, Huttelmaier S, et al. Asymmetric arginine dimethylation of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K by protein-arginine methyltransferase 1 inhibits its interaction with c-Src. J Biol Chem 2006; 281:11115-25; PMID:16492668; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M513053200.
28. Côté J, Richard S. Tudor domains bind symmetrical dimethylated arginines. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:28476-83; PMID:15955813; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M414328200.
29. Pahlich S, Zakaryan RP, Gehring H. Protein arginine methylation: Cellular functions and methods of analysis. Biochim Biophys Acta 2006; 1764:1890-903; PMID:17010682.
30. Yu MC. The Role of Protein Arginine Methylation in mRNP Dynamics. Mol Biol Int 2011; 2011:163827; PMID:22091396; http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/ 163827.
31. Brahms H, Meheus L, de Brabandere V, Fischer U, Lührmann R. Symmetrical dimethylation of arginine residues in spliceosomal Sm protein B/B′and the Sm-like protein LSm4, and their interaction with the SMN protein. RNA 2001; 7:1531-42; PMID:11720283; http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ S135583820101442X.
32. Friesen WJ, Paushkin S, Wyce A, Massenet S, Pesiridis GS, Van Duyne G, et al. The methylosome, a 20S complex containing JBP1 and pICln, produces dimethylarginine-modified Sm proteins. Mol Cell Biol 2001; 21:8289-300; PMID:11713266; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.21.24.8289-300.2001.
33. Selenko P, Sprangers R, Stier G, Bühler D, Fischer U, Sattler M. SMN tudor domain structure and its interaction with the Sm proteins. Nat Struct Biol 2001; 8:27-31; PMID:11135666; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/83014.
34. Nichols RC, Wang XW, Tang J, Hamilton BJ, High FA, Herschman HR, et al. The RGG domain in hnRNP A2 affects subcellular localization. Exp Cell Res 2000; 256:522-32; PMID:10772824; http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/excr.2000.4827.
35. Blackwell E, Zhang X, Ceman S. Arginines of the RGG box regulate FMRP association with polyribosomes and mRNA. Hum Mol Genet 2010; 19:1314-23; PMID:20064924; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddq007.
36. Boisvert FM, Hendzel MJ, Masson JY, Richard S. Methylation of MRE11 regulates its nuclear compartmentalization. Cell Cycle 2005; 4:981-9; PMID:15970667; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.4.7.1830.
37. Gonsalvez GB, Rajendra TK, Tian L, Matera AG. The Sm-protein methyltransferase, dart5, is essential for germ-cell specification and maintenance. Curr Biol 2006; 16:1077-89; PMID:16753561; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.cub.2006.04.037.
38. Klattenhoff C, Theurkauf W. Biogenesis and germline functions of piRNAs. Development 2008; 135:3-9; PMID:18032451; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.006486.
39. Mowen KA, Schurter BT, Fathman JW, David M, Glimcher LH. Arginine methylation of NIP45 modulates cytokine gene expression in effector T lymphocytes. Mol Cell 2004; 15:559-71; PMID:15327772; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.molcel.2004.06.042.
40. Koyuncu OO, Dobner T. Arginine methylation of human adenovirus type 5 L4 100-kilodalton protein is required for efficient virus production. J Virol 2009; 83:4778-90; PMID:19264777; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.02493-08.
41. Bikkavilli RK, Malbon CC. Wnt3a-stimulated LRP6 phosphorylation is dependent upon arginine methylation of G3BP2. J Cell Sci 2012; PMID:22357953; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.100933.
42. Mauchi N, Ohtake Y, Irie K. Stability control of MTL1 mRNA by the RNA-binding protein Khd1p in yeast. Cell Struct Funct 2010; 35:95-105; PMID:20953064; http://dx.doi.org/10.1247/csf.10011.
43. Kshirsagar M, Parker R. Identification of Edc3p as an enhancer of mRNA decapping in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2004; 166:729-39; PMID:15020463; http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.166.2.729.
44. Decourty L, Saveanu C, Zemam K, Hantraye F, Frachon E, Rousselle JC, et al. Linking functionally related genes by sensitive and quantitative characterization of genetic interaction profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105:5821-6; PMID:18408161; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0710533105.
45. Nissan T, Rajyaguru P, She M, Song H, Parker R. Decapping activators in Saccharomyces cerevisiae act by multiple mechanisms. Mol Cell 2010; 39:773-83; PMID:20832728; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.08.025.
46. Xu J, Chua NH. Arabidopsis decapping 5 is required for mRNA decapping, P-body formation and translational repression during postembryonic development. Plant Cell 2009; 21:3270-9; PMID:19855049; http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.109. 070078.
47. Fromm SA, Truffault V, Kamenz J, Braun JE, Hoffmann NA, Izaurralde E, et al. The structural basis of Edc3- and Scd6-mediated activation of the Dcp1:Dcp2 mRNA decapping complex. EMBO J 2012; 31:279-90; PMID:22085934; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2011.408.
48. Segal SP, Dunckley T, Parker R. Sbp1p affects translational repression and decapping in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 2006; 26:5120-30; PMID:16782896; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01913-05.
49. Frankel A, Clarke S. RNase treatment of yeast and mammalian cell extracts affects in vitro substrate methylation by type I protein arginine N-methyltransferases. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1999; 259:391-400; PMID:10362520; http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.1999.0779.
50. Gilbert W, Siebel CW, Guthrie C. Phosphorylation by Sky1p promotes Npl3p shuttling and mRNA dissociation. RNA 2001; 7:302-13; PMID:11233987; http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1355838201002369.
51. Raught B, Gingras AC, Gygi SP, Imataka H, Morino S, Gradi A, et al. Serum-stimulated, rapamycin-sensitive phosphorylation sites in the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4GI. EMBO J 2000; 19:434-44; PMID:10654941; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/19.3.434.
52. Chuang C, Lin SH, Huang F, Pan J, Josic D, Yu-Lee LY. Acetylation of RNA processing proteins and cell cycle proteins in mitosis. J Proteome Res 2010; 9:4554-64; PMID:20812760; http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/pr100281 h.
53. Kafasla P, Barrass JD, Thompson E, Fromont-Racine M, Jacquier A, Beggs JD, et al. Interaction of yeast eIF4G with spliceosome components: implications in pre-mRNA processing events. RNA Biol 2009; 6:563-74; PMID:19838078; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/rna.6.5.9861.
54. Topisirovic I, Siddiqui N, Lapointe VL, Trost M, Thibault P, Bangeranye C, et al. Molecular dissection of the eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) export-competent RNP. EMBO J 2009; 28:1087-98; PMID:19262567; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2009.53.
55. Park EH, Zhang F, Warringer J, Sunnerhagen P, Hinnebusch AG. Depletion of eIF4G from yeast cells narrows the range of translational efficiencies genome-wide. BMC Genomics 2011; 12:68; PMID:21269496; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ 1471-2164-12-68.
56. Fromont-Racine M, Mayes AE, Brunet-Simon A, Rain JC, Colley A, Dix I, et al. Genome-wide protein interaction screens reveal functional networks involving Sm-like proteins. Yeast 2000; 17:95-110; PMID:10900456; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1002/1097-0061(20000630)17:2〈95::AIDYEA16〉3.0.CO;2-H.
57. Collins SR, Kemmeren P, Zhao XC, Greenblatt JF, Spencer F, Holstege FC, et al. Toward a comprehensive atlas of the physical interactome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Proteomics 2007; 6:439-50; PMID:17200106; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M600381-MCP200.